Faculty Bibliography

Tumor-agnostic precision medicine (PM) strategies promise to support treatment decisions in relapsed/refractory blood cancer patients. Genomic-based PM (gPM) and drug screening-based functional PM (fPM) currently represent the most prominent PM methodologies. In this study, we report the feasibility analysis of the first 55 patients enrolled in the multicentric, randomized controlled EXALT-2 trial (NCT04470947) comparing treatment recommendations of gPM, fPM, and physicians' choice (PC) head to head. In 54 patients (98%), the diagnostic workflow was successfully implemented, resulting in treatment recommendations for 42 patients (76%), of whom 29 (69%) received the suggested individualized treatments. Actionable targets were identified in 65% by gPM and 80% by fPM (64% microscopy-based, 86% flow cytometry-based fPM). The median time to report was shorter for fPM than for gPM testing. The two strategies revealed overlapping drug targets in 60% of cases. Both, gPM and fPM can efficiently be integrated into the clinical routine to guide therapy decisions for the majority of patients.

Technological innovations in genomics and related fields have facilitated large sequencing efforts, supported new biological discoveries in cancer, and spawned an era of liquid biopsy biomarkers. Despite these advances, precision oncology has practical constraints, partly related to cancer's biological diversity and spatial and temporal complexity. Advanced imaging technologies are being developed to address some of the current limitations in early detection, treatment selection and planning, drug delivery, and therapeutic response, as well as difficulties posed by drug resistance, drug toxicity, disease monitoring, and metastatic evolution. We discuss key areas of advanced imaging for improving cancer outcomes and survival. Finally, we discuss practical challenges to the broader adoption of precision imaging in the clinic and the need for a robust translational infrastructure.

BRAF V600E mutations are frequently found in histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms such as Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), but few reports have also described BRAF mutations in Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD), and even these cases may predominantly represent mixed histiocytosis. BRAF mutations have been studied in histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms and described to be associated with increased risk of relapse and long-term consequences, but few studies have examined BRAF V600E mutation in RDD, which is recognized as a neoplasm given the high frequency of MAPK pathway alterations. Here, we report a case of BRAF V600E-mutated RDD in a patient who presented with generalized lymphadenopathy. During our evaluation of this patient, we also found expression of PD-L1 in neoplastic histiocytes. During our review period, only few cases of RDD reported to harbor BRAF mutation or were evaluated for the expression of PDL1 by neoplastic cells. Given the potential challenges in distinguishing RDD from other histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms, including mixed histiocytosis with similar clinicopathological manifestations, we will discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the frequency and clinical impact of BRAF V600E in RDD, as well as the role of BRAF mutations in RDD pathogenesis. Distinction of BRAF V600E mutated histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms requires consideration of distinctive histopathological and immunophenotypic findings in appropriate clinical and radiologic setting. Given the increasing use of BRAF inhibitors as well as checkpoint blockade inhibitors to treat a number of cancers, we will discuss the clinical implications of the presence of BRAF V600E mutation and PD-L1 expression in RDD.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to determine whether MRI radiomic features of key cerebral structures differ between women and men, and whether detection of such differences depends on the image resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Ultrahigh resolution (UHR) 3D MP2RAGE (magnetization-prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echo) T1-weighted MR images (voxel size, 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm3) of the brain of 30 subjects (18 women and 12 men; mean age, 39.0 ± 14.8 years) without abnormal findings on MRI were retrospectively included. MRI was performed on a whole-body 7 T MR system. A convolutional neural network was used to segment the following structures: frontal cortex, frontal white matter, thalamus, putamen, globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, and corpus callosum. Eighty-seven radiomic features were extracted respectively: gray-level histogram (n = 18), co-occurrence matrix (n = 24), run-length matrix (n = 16), size-zone matrix (n = 16), and dependence matrix (n = 13). Feature extraction was performed at UHR and, additionally, also after resampling to 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm3 voxel size (standard clinical resolution). Principal components (PCs) of radiomic features were calculated, and independent samples t tests with Cohen d as effect size measure were used to assess differences in PCs between women and men for the different cerebral structures. RESULTS:At UHR, at least a single PC differed significantly between women and men in 6/7 cerebral structures: frontal cortex (d = -0.79, P = 0.042 and d = -1.01, P = 0.010), frontal white matter (d = -0.81, P = 0.039), thalamus (d = 1.43, P < 0.001), globus pallidus (d = 0.92, P = 0.020), caudate nucleus (d = -0.83, P = 0.039), and corpus callosum (d = -0.97, P = 0.039). At standard clinical resolution, only a single PC extracted from the corpus callosum differed between sexes (d = 1.05, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS:Nonnegligible differences in radiomic features of several key structures of the brain exist between women and men, and need to be accounted for. Very high spatial resolution may be required to uncover and further investigate the sexual dimorphism of brain structures on MRI.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the associations between the hour of the day and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores assigned by radiologists in prostate MRI reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective single-center collection of prostate MRI reports over an 8-year period. Mean PI-RADS scores assigned between 0800 and 1800 h were examined with a regression model. RESULTS: = 0.005, p < 0.001), with malignant scores more frequently assigned later in the day. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings suggest chronobiological factors may contribute to variability in radiological assessments. Though the magnitude of the effect is small, this may potentially add variability and impact diagnostic accuracy.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess radiologists' current use of, and opinions on, structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging, and to provide recommendations for a structured report template. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:An online survey with 28 questions was sent to European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) members. The questionnaire had four main parts: (1) participant information, e.g., country, workplace, experience, and current SR use; (2) SR design, e.g., numbers of sections and fields, and template use; (3) clinical impact of SR, e.g., on report quality and length, workload, and communication with clinicians; and (4) preferences for an oncology-focused structured CT report. Data analysis comprised descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS:A total of 200 radiologists from 51 countries completed the survey: 57.0% currently utilized SR (57%), with a lower proportion within than outside of Europe (51.0 vs. 72.7%; p = 0.006). Among SR users, the majority observed markedly increased report quality (62.3%) and easier comparison to previous exams (53.5%), a slightly lower error rate (50.9%), and fewer calls/emails by clinicians (78.9%) due to SR. The perceived impact of SR on communication with clinicians (i.e., frequency of calls/emails) differed with radiologists' experience (p < 0.001), and experience also showed low but significant correlations with communication with clinicians (r = - 0.27, p = 0.003), report quality (r = 0.19, p = 0.043), and error rate (r = - 0.22, p = 0.016). Template use also affected the perceived impact of SR on report quality (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Radiologists regard SR in oncologic imaging favorably, with perceived positive effects on report quality, error rate, comparison of serial exams, and communication with clinicians. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT/CONCLUSIONS:Radiologists believe that structured reporting in oncologic imaging improves report quality, decreases the error rate, and enables better communication with clinicians. Implementation of structured reporting in Europe is currently below the international level and needs society endorsement. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:• The majority of oncologic imaging specialists (57% overall; 51% in Europe) use structured reporting in clinical practice. • The vast majority of oncologic imaging specialists use templates (92.1%), which are typically cancer-specific (76.2%). • Structured reporting is perceived to markedly improve report quality, communication with clinicians, and comparison to prior scans.

Relapse and toxicity limit the effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), yet biomarkers that predict outcomes and toxicity are lacking. We examined radiomic features extracted from pre-CAR-T ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT) scans (n = 341) of 180 patients (121 male; median age, 66 years). Three conventional (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax], metabolic tumor volume [MTV], total lesion glycolysis [TLG]) and 116 novel radiomic features were assessed, along with inflammatory markers, toxicities, and outcomes. At both pre-apheresis and pre-infusion time points, conventional PET features of disease correlated with elevated inflammatory markers. At pre-infusion, MTV was associated with grade ≥ 2 cytokine release syndrome (odds ratio [OR] for 100 mL increase: 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.20], P = 0.031), and SUVmax was associated with failure to achieve complete response (CR) (OR 1.72 [95% CI, 1.24-2.43], P < 0.001). Higher pre-apheresis and pre-infusion MTV values were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR for 10-unit increase: 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17], P < 0.001; 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07], P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (HR for 100-unit increase: 1.14 [95% CI, 1.07-1.21], P < 0.001; 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.06], P < 0.001). A combined MTV and LDH measure stratified patients into high and low PFS risk groups. Multiple pre-infusion novel radiomic features were associated with CR. These quantitative conventional [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT features obtained before CAR-T cell infusion, which were correlated with inflammation markers, may provide prognostic biomarkers for CAR-T therapy efficacy and toxicity. The use of conventional and novel radiomic features may thus help identify high-risk patients for earlier interventions.

BACKGROUND:F]FDG-PET-CT scans of patients with lymphoma with or without hypermetabolic tumour sites. METHODS:F]FDG-PET-CTs were obtained from a second centre (Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria). Seven model variants were evaluated, including MIP-based LARS-avg (optimised for accuracy) and LARS-max (optimised for sensitivity), and 3D PET-CT-based LARS-ptct. Following expert curation, areas under the curve (AUCs), accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities were calculated. FINDINGS/RESULTS:In the internal test cohort (3325 PET-CTs, 1012 patients), LARS-avg achieved an AUC of 0·949 (95% CI 0·942-0·956), accuracy of 0·890 (0·879-0·901), sensitivity of 0·868 (0·851-0·885), and specificity of 0·913 (0·899-0·925); LARS-max achieved an AUC of 0·949 (0·942-0·956), accuracy of 0·868 (0·858-0·879), sensitivity of 0·909 (0·896-0·924), and specificity of 0·826 (0·808-0·843); and LARS-ptct achieved an AUC of 0·939 (0·930-0·948), accuracy of 0·875 (0·864-0·887), sensitivity of 0·836 (0·817-0·855), and specificity of 0·915 (0·901-0·927). In the external test cohort (1000 PET-CTs, 503 patients), LARS-avg achieved an AUC of 0·953 (0·938-0·966), accuracy of 0·907 (0·888-0·925), sensitivity of 0·874 (0·843-0·904), and specificity of 0·949 (0·921-0·960); LARS-max achieved an AUC of 0·952 (0·937-0·965), accuracy of 0·898 (0·878-0·916), sensitivity of 0·899 (0·871-0·926), and specificity of 0·897 (0·871-0·922); and LARS-ptct achieved an AUC of 0·932 (0·915-0·948), accuracy of 0·870 (0·850-0·891), sensitivity of 0·827 (0·793-0·863), and specificity of 0·913 (0·889-0·937). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:F]FDG-PET-CT scans of lymphoma patients with and without hypermetabolic tumour sites. Deep learning might therefore be potentially useful to rule out the presence of metabolically active disease in such patients, or serve as a second reader or decision support tool. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant.