Faculty Bibliography

Objectives To characterize treatment and hearing outcomes for cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas with inherent risks of hearing loss and identify predictors of hearing loss for surgically treated lesions. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Tertiary care medical center. Participants Adult patients with CPA meningiomas impinging upon cranial nerve VIII and/or pretreatment hearing loss managed with microsurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with Gamma Knife at our center between 2012 and 2023. Main Outcome Measures Hearing preservation rate was determined from analysis of patients with pretreatment serviceable hearing for whom hearing-preserving treatment was attempted. Surgical patients were further analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify factors predictive of postoperative hearing loss. Results We identified 80 patients with CPA meningiomas meeting inclusion criteria who were managed with either microsurgery (43, 54%) or radiosurgery (37, 46%). Following SRS, hearing was preserved in 88% of cases. Following microsurgery, hearing was preserved in 71% of patients-all patients who lost hearing had tumors involving the internal auditory canal (IAC). Among surgical patients only, multivariable analysis accounting for preoperative hearing, recurrence status, lesion size, and patient age, the preoperative imaging finding that the CPA meningioma surrounded the vestibulocochlear nerve was significantly associated with hearing loss (hazard ratio: 10.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-81.4, p = 0.02). Conclusion Most patients with meningiomas of the CPA can experience preservation of hearing, even when there is risk of hearing loss based on pretreatment evaluation. IAC invasion and surrounding of eighth nerve by tumor may portend poorer hearing outcomes in surgically managed patients.

OBJECTIVE:To better understand cochlear implant (CI) performance after reimplantation with a different device manufacturer. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Multisite retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients older than 4 years who received a CI and subsequently underwent CI reimplantation with a different manufacturer over a 20-year period. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Reimplantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:The primary outcome was difference in the best CNC score obtained with the primary CI, compared with the most recent CNC score obtained after reimplantation. RESULTS:Twenty-nine patients met the criteria at three centers. The best average CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation was 46.2% (n = 16), measured an average of 14 months (range: 3-36 mo) postoperatively. When looking at the most recent CNC score of adult patients before undergoing reimplantation, the average CNC score dropped to 19.2% (n = 17). After reimplantation, the average 3- to 6-month CNC score was 48.3% (n = 12), with most recent average CNC score being 44.4% (n = 17) measured an average of 19 months (range: 3-46 mo) postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.321; t11 = 0.48) identified in performance between the best CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation, and the most recent score achieved after reimplantation (n = 12). Analysis of prerevision and postrevision speech performance was not possible in pediatric patients (<18 yr old) because of differences in tests administered. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing reimplantation with a different manufacturer achieved CNC score performance comparable to their best performance with their original device.

OBJECTIVE:To characterize transimpedance matrix (TIM) heatmap patterns in patients at risk of labyrinthine abnormality to better understand accuracy and possible TIM limitations. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review of TIM patterns, preoperative, and postoperative imaging. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients undergoing cochlear implantation with risk of labyrinthine abnormality. INTERVENTION/METHODS:None. RESULTS:Seventy-seven patients were evaluated. Twenty-five percent (n = 19) of patients had a TIM pattern variant identified. These variants were separated into 10 novel categories. Overall, 9% (n = 6) of electrodes were malpositioned on intraoperative x-ray, of which 50% (n = 3) were underinserted, 17% (n = 1) were overinserted, 17% (n = 1) had a tip foldover, and 17% (n = 1) had a coiled electrode. The number of patients with a variant TIM pattern and normal x-ray was 18% (n = 14), and the number of patients with normal TIM pattern and malposition noted on x-ray was 3% (n = 2; both were electrode underinsertions that were recognized due to open circuits and surgical visualization).A newly defined skip heat pattern was identified in patients with IP2/Mondini malformation and interscalar septum width <0.5 mm at the cochlear pars ascendens of the basal turn. CONCLUSIONS:This study defines novel patterns for TIM heatmap characterization to facilitate collaborative and comparative research moving forward. In doing so, it highlights a new pattern termed skip heat, which corresponds with a deficient interscalar septum of the cochlea pars ascendens of the basal turn in patients with IP2 malformation. Overall, the data assist the surgeon in better understanding the implications and limitations of TIM patterns within groups of patients with risk of labyrinthine abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the safety of cochlear implants (CIs) in children under 9 months of age to better understand expected postoperative complication rates, and to provide a preliminary look at efficacy. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Single-center retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Children 5 to 8 months of age who received a CI between 2011 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Therapeutic-CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:The primary outcome was 6-month postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, device explantation/reimplantation, rehabilitation supports, and hearing and language outcomes. Complications of children implanted under than 9 months of age was compared with a cohort of children implanted 9 to 18 months of age between the years 2011 and 2016 using a chi-squared test (p < 0.05). RESULTS:One hundred six children under 9 months of age were implanted (204 CIs) at a mean age of 6.6 months (range: 5-8). Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (26%) and were often minor. There were no mortalities. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, including reimplantation rates, between patients implanted under 9 months of age and those implanted 9 to 18 months of age. Speech discrimination outcomes were excellent, and mean spoken language outcomes were near normative for typically developing children. CONCLUSIONS:Cochlear implantation can be a safe and effective treatment option for children 5 to 8 months of age. Early hearing screening and referral for infants to receive appropriate intervention will continue to play a critical role in optimizing speech and language outcomes.

OBJECTIVES:Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being utilized with increasing frequency and may be linked to neurologic and audiovestibular toxicities. This report aimed to describe a case of ICI-induced sensorineural hearing loss ultimately requiring bilateral cochlear implantation. METHODS:A 42-year-old female with stage IV metastatic melanoma of the perianal skin was treated with ipilimumab (blocker of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) and nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1]). After 21 weeks of therapy, she developed sudden vertigo and bilateral hearing loss. A full workup including MRI and lumbar puncture ruled out intracranial parenchymal metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, stroke and intracranial infection. ICI-associated aseptic meningoencephalitis was therefore diagnosed. The patient received systemic steroids as well as intratympanic steroids, which temporarily improved hearing, but eventually developed permanent, bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS:The patient received bilateral cochlear implants and has demonstrated good performance one year after implantation. DISCUSSION:ICI are being increasingly used to treat a variety of advanced malignancies. This is the first report of bilateral cochlear implants in the context of profound hearing loss after an immunotherapy induced meningoencephalitis. CONCLUSION:ICI carries the risk of potential ototoxicity, including profound SNHL as depicted in our case. Cochlear implantation proved to be beneficial and may be considered in patients with ICI-related hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES:To determine rates of hearing preservation and performance in patients who met candidacy for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) and were implanted with a slim modiolar electrode (CI532 or CI632). DESIGN:Adult patients meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average [LFPTA] less than 60 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz and monosyllabic word scores between 10% and 60% in the ear to be implanted), who received a slim modiolar electrode were included. Main outcome measures included rates of hearing preservation, defined as a LFPTA ≤80 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz, as well as postoperative low-frequency pure-tone threshold shifts, consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and AzBio sentences in noise scores. RESULTS:Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria during a 4-year period. Mean (standard deviation) preoperative LFPTA was 34.5 (13.0) dB, and 71.7% had preserved hearing at initial activation. The mean LFPTA shift in patients who preserved hearing at initial activation was 19.7 (14.6) dB, compared with 62.6 (17.7) dB in patients who did not preserve hearing as per our definition. Perioperative steroid use was not different in patients with and without preserved hearing (X 2 (1, N = 46) = 0.19, p = .67, V = 0.06). One year after surgery, 57% of patients had a decline in LFPTA >80 dB and were no longer considered candidates for EAS, with 34.7% still retaining low-frequency thresholds ≤80 dB. CNC word scores at 1 year were 69.9% and 61.4% among individuals with and without preserved low-frequency hearing respectively, measured in their CI ear alone, in their regular listening condition of EAS or electric only ( t (32) = 1.13, p = 0.27, d = 0.39, 95% CI = -6.51, 22.86). Device use time did not differ between groups. Among adults with preserved residual hearing at 1 year (n = 16), 44% used EAS, although there was no significant difference in performance between EAS users and nonusers with preserved hearing. Loss of residual hearing over time did not result in a decline in speech perception performance. CONCLUSION:The present study demonstrated favorable early rates of hearing preservation with a slim modiolar array. Performance was not significantly different in individuals with and without preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing, independent of EAS use. Compared with reports of short electrode use, the loss of residual hearing in patients implanted with this array did not impact speech perception performance.

OBJECTIVE:To assess a series of patients receiving teprotumumab therapy and objectively quantify the rates of otologic adverse events. STUDY DESIGN:A prospective cohort study of adult patients receiving teprotumumab between May 2020 and January 2022. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. METHODS:Prior to treatment initiation, an ototoxicity-specific audiometric battery was completed, which included conventional audiometry (frequencies 250-8000 Hz), ultrahigh-frequency audiometry (9000-20,000 Hz), tympanometry, speech discrimination scores, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Testing was then repeated after treatment completion. RESULTS:In total, 35 patients were recruited, with a median (range) age of 48.5 years (21-74), and 8 (22.8%) were male. The most common subjective symptom reported was a hearing decline (25.7%), followed by aural fullness (17.1%) and tinnitus (14.3%). Fourteen patients had both pre- and posttreatment audiometric data. Among them, 3 patients (21.4%) were found to have changes in standard frequency audiometry, and 10 (71.4%) had changes in high-frequency audiometry, with 2 patients having changes in both. Less than half (n = 5) of the 11 patients with changes in standard or high-frequency pure tone hearing noted subjective hearing decline. Changes in DPOAE were noted in 4 patients out of 13 (30.7%). Two patients discontinued treatment due to hearing decline. Finally, 3 patients (8.6%) were diagnosed with patulous eustachian tube (PET) by an otolaryngologist, and another 3 patients are suspected to have PET based on symptom description during ophthalmologic follow-up. CONCLUSION:In our cohort, a high incidence of otologic symptoms was found to be associated with teprotumumab usage. Subjective hearing decline, changes in ultrahigh-frequency hearing as well as eustachian tube dysfunction may be encountered and suggest the potential ototoxicity of teprotumumab.

Soon after the World Health Organization declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 a global health emergency on January 30, 2020, New York City was plagued by the virus and its health system and economy pushed to their limits. The majority of the limited neurosurgical data in relation to COVID-19 is anecdotal and the higher theoretical risk of transmission of the virus among skull base aerosol generating (SBAG) cases has not been investigated or discussed in a neurosurgical population. We discuss a series of 13 patients who underwent 15 SBAG surgical procedures during the peak of COVID-19 in our hospital system and the protocols use perioperatively for their procedures. Our data support that with proper preoperative testing, a well-delineated surgical algorithm, and appropriate personal protective equipment, emergent/urgent cases can be done safely in hospitals that are currently experiencing high volumes of COVID-19 cases as we did in March to May of 2020.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Evaluate rates of Advanced Bionics Ultra 3D/Ultra cochlear implant failure in the setting of a worldwide device recall and report surgical and auditory outcomes after revision. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective chart review was performed for adult and pediatric patients implanted with at risk devices at our center from 2016 to 2020. Device failure rates, surgical, and auditory outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.95). DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients with device failure due to this field action performed well after revision implantation. Patients with bilateral at-risk devices but evidence of unilateral failure may elect to undergo simultaneous empiric revision of the contralateral device. Three patients who elected to change device manufacturers on revision have variable results that require further investigation. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Patients requiring revision for a device field action overall perform well. At-risk devices continue to require monitoring as a growing number are likely to fail over time.