Faculty Bibliography

With a rising annual incidence, pancreatic cancer is now the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in American men and women [...].

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer is a challenging malignancy with an aggressive biology and limited treatment options, contributing to low survival rates. Supportive and palliative care play a key role in improving the quality of life and psychological distress for patients and their families. However, appropriate delivery and effectiveness of these interventions may be influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). These factors create significant barriers for patients, influencing their access to care and ability to make informed decisions. This review explores the role of SDOH in supportive and palliative care of pancreatic cancer patients and identifies areas for improvement to enhance this type of care for vulnerable populations. METHODS:A thorough narrative review was carried out to evaluate the influence of social determinants of health on supportive and palliative care in the management of pancreatic cancer, focusing on symptom management, psychosocial support, nutritional support, advance care planning, rehabilitation, functional support, and care coordination. RESULTS:This review demonstrates that disparities exist. Black and Asian patients receive less pain medications; those with lower level of education struggle to access psychological support; Hispanic and Black patients often do not receive needed nutritional care; and end-of-life planning is less common among non-White and less-educated patients. CONCLUSIONS:SDOH significantly affects the experience and delivery of supportive and palliative care in pancreatic cancer patients, exacerbating inequities across multiple domains of care. Addressing these disparities requires coordinated efforts at clinical, organizational, and policy levels to ensure equitable access to care for all patients in their final phase of life. Integrating attention to SODH into care delivery models can improve outcomes and enhance quality of life for these patients.

This manuscript describes the evolution in the operative management of pancreatic cancer. Early attempts at pancreatic resection were met with daunting peri‑operative outcomes but were fine-tuned to yield today's established pancreatic resections. Advances in medical therapy, including neo-adjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancers and refined adjuvant regimens, have improved oncologic outcomes and are allowing surgeons to move beyond current anatomic distinctions of resectability. Venous, hepatic artery and celiac axis resection during pancreatectomy are now common vascular operations at specialty centers which have been associated with favorable oncologic outcomes. Recent efforts are addressing locally advanced pancreatic cancer with superior mesenteric artery and/or multivessel involvement using either arterial divestment or arterial resection and reconstruction. An additional consideration in the treatment of pancreatic cancer is the benefit and risks of neoadjuvant radiation in locally advanced cases which has been avoided thus far given concerns regarding the effect of radiation on the vasculature. Therefore, with these improvements in peri‑operative therapy and robust preoperative planning often with the aid of vascular and microvascular surgeons, several centers have been exploring new frontiers in the operative management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND:Antithrombotic therapy (AT) aims to strike a balance between preventing thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. However, evidence for AT management after pancreatectomy with vascular reconstruction is lacking. We aimed to provide an overview of the current use of AT for pancreatic surgery with vascular reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:A web-based survey was distributed to 123 surgeons from high-volume pancreas centers (>50 pancreatic resections/year). AT management after different types of vascular reconstruction were investigated. An "aggressive" protocol was defined as the use of any AT protocol other than prophylactic heparin, aspirin, or their combination. RESULTS:The survey was completed by 80 surgeons (59% Europe, 30% USA, 11% Asia). In Europe/Asia, prophylactic heparin was the most commonly reported protocol after partial venous resection/end-to-end anastomosis/human graft (71%/65%/50%, respectively), and an "aggressive" protocol (86%) was the most frequently used after prosthetic graft reconstruction. Conversely, in the USA, prophylactic heparin + aspirin was the most commonly reported protocol after all types of venous reconstruction. Following arterial reconstruction, heparin + aspirin was the most commonly reported protocol, regardless of region. An "aggressive" protocol was more frequently used in Europe/Asia (odds ratio (OR) 1.28; p < 0.001) and following vein reconstruction with either human graft (OR 1.2; p = 0.007) or prosthetic graft (OR 1.56, p <0.001), while ultrasound (OR 1.65; p < 0.001) and arterial reconstruction (OR 1.64; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with antiplatelet use. CONCLUSIONS:In an international cohort of high-volume pancreas surgeons, significant variation in the use of AT following pancreatectomy with vascular reconstruction was observed. This variation was driven by geographical differences and the type of vascular reconstructions performed. In an international cohort of high-volume pancreas surgeons, this Worldwide Snapshot Survey analyzed the current use of antithrombotic therapy for pancreatic surgery with vascular reconstruction. A significant heterogeneity in antithrombotic practice was found and it was mainly driven by geographical differences and the type of vascular reconstructions performed.

BACKGROUND:The parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system has shown tumor-suppressive effects in preclinical models of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by inhibiting cancer stem cells and suppressing inflammatory cytokine production. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that bethanechol, an FDA-approved parasympathomimetic agent targeting muscarinic receptors, could enhance treatment efficacy in PDAC. METHODS:We conducted a Phase 0/window of opportunity study evaluating short term parasympathetic activation with fixed dose bethanechol (100 mg twice daily) in subjects with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was change in cell proliferation by Ki-67 expression compared to stage matched controls. Secondary endpoints included tissue expression of stem cell markers (CD44), infiltrating immune cells (CD8a, Granzyme B, and CD68), and changes in circulating inflammatory cytokine concentrations. RESULTS:Seventeen patients were enrolled with 13 eligible for analysis of endpoints. Median age was 74 (59-86), 6 female (46%), all ECOG 0-1 and median duration of treatment was 8 days (7-13). R0 resections were achieved in 9 patients (69%). There was no difference in Ki67 and CD44 tissue biomarkers between bethanechol-treated and control samples. Decreased numbers of Granzyme B-expressing cells were seen in bethanechol-treated tissues. Bethanechol treatment was associated with suppression of circulating IL-18. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAE) were hot flashes (30.7%), urinary frequency (15.4%), increased salivation (15.4%), hyperhidrosis (7.7%), and nausea (7.7%). There were no Grade 3 or higher adverse effects. No surgical complications were attributed to bethanechol treatment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Bethanechol 100 mg twice daily is well tolerated in patients with PDAC in this small phase 0/window of opportunity study (NCT03572283). Bethanechol treatment was associated with decreased Granzyme B positive cells and decreased circulating IL-18 consistent with an anti-inflammatory role for parasympathetic muscarinic signaling in PDAC.

OBJECTIVE:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is commonly diagnosed at an advanced stage. Liquid biopsy approaches may facilitate detection of early stage PDAC when curative treatments can be employed. DESIGN:To assess circulating marker discrimination in training, testing and validation patient cohorts (total n=426 patients), plasma markers were measured among PDAC cases and patients with chronic pancreatitis, colorectal cancer (CRC), and healthy controls. Using CA19-9 as an anchor marker, measurements were made of two protein markers (TIMP1, LRG1) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) pancreas-specific methylation at 9 loci encompassing 61 CpG sites. RESULTS:Comparative methylome analysis identified nine loci that were differentially methylated in exocrine pancreas DNA. In the training set (n=124 patients), cfDNA methylation markers distinguished PDAC from healthy and CRC controls. In the testing set of 86 early stage PDAC and 86 matched healthy controls, CA19-9 had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.94), which was increased by adding TIMP1 (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.06), LRG1 (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.02) or exocrine pancreas-specific cfDNA methylation markers at nine loci (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96; p=0.02). In the validation set of 40 early stage PDAC and 40 matched healthy controls, a combined panel including CA19-9, TIMP1 and a 9-loci cfDNA methylation panel had greater discrimination (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) than CA19-9 alone (AUC 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92). CONCLUSION:A combined panel of circulating markers including proteins and methylated cfDNA increased discrimination compared with CA19-9 alone for early stage PDAC.

BACKGROUND:Invasive carcinomas arising from premalignant lesions are currently staged by the same criteria as conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS:Clinicopathologic information and survival data were extracted through a thorough search of histology codes from National Cancer Database (2006-2016). A total of 723 patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm were analyzed. RESULTS:The median age was 67 years, and 351 patients (48.5%) were male. There were 212 (29.3%), 232 (32.1%), 272 (37.6%), and 7 (1.0%) patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 classification. Extrapancreatic extension (EPE) was present in 284 (39.3%). Age (HR = 1.504, 95% CI 1.196-1.891), R1 or R2 resection (HR = 1.585, 95% CI 1.175-2.140), and EPE (HR = 1.598, 95% CI 1.209-2.113) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Size criteria did not significantly affect survival. The median survival was 115.9 months for patients without EPE, compared to 34.2 months for those with EPE. EPE discriminated survival better than tumor size. DISCUSSION:The T classification of the eighth edition AJCC staging system is not adequate for invasive carcinomas associated with premalignant lesions of the pancreas. They merit a separate, dedicated staging system that uses appropriate prognostic factors.