Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:moyl02

Total Results:

252


Retrospective BReast Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Multisite (BRIMM) multisoftware study

Basukala, Dibash; Mikheev, Artem; Li, Xiaochun; Goldberg, Judith D; Gilani, Nima; Moy, Linda; Pinker, Katja; Partridge, Savannah C; Biswas, Debosmita; Kataoka, Masako; Honda, Maya; Iima, Mami; Thakur, Sunitha B; Sigmund, Eric E
INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) provides imaging biomarkers for breast tumor characterization. It has been extensively applied for both diagnostic and prognostic goals in breast cancer, with increasing evidence supporting its clinical relevance. However, variable performance exists in literature owing to the heterogeneity in datasets and quantification methods. METHODS/UNASSIGNED: RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:
PMCID:11891049
PMID: 40066090
ISSN: 2234-943x
CID: 5808282

Distant-Stage Breast Cancer Incidence Is Increasing in U.S. Women across Age Groups and Race and Ethnicity Groups [Editorial]

Kim, Eric; Moy, Linda
PMID: 39656128
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 5762542

2024 Top Images in Radiology: Radiology In Training Editors' Choices [Editorial]

Tordjman, Mickael; Guarnera, Alessia; Horst, Carolyn; O'Shea, Aileen; Yuan, Frank; Zhang, Kuan; Deng, Francis; Chernyak, Victoria; Moy, Linda; Lennartz, Simon
PMID: 39625376
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 5780112

RIDGE: Reproducibility, Integrity, Dependability, Generalizability, and Efficiency Assessment of Medical Image Segmentation Models

Maleki, Farhad; Moy, Linda; Forghani, Reza; Ghosh, Tapotosh; Ovens, Katie; Langer, Steve; Rouzrokh, Pouria; Khosravi, Bardia; Ganjizadeh, Ali; Warren, Daniel; Daneshjou, Roxana; Moassefi, Mana; Avval, Atlas Haddadi; Sotardi, Susan; Tenenholtz, Neil; Kitamura, Felipe; Kline, Timothy
Deep learning techniques hold immense promise for advancing medical image analysis, particularly in tasks like image segmentation, where precise annotation of regions or volumes of interest within medical images is crucial but manually laborious and prone to interobserver and intraobserver biases. As such, deep learning approaches could provide automated solutions for such applications. However, the potential of these techniques is often undermined by challenges in reproducibility and generalizability, which are key barriers to their clinical adoption. This paper introduces the RIDGE checklist, a comprehensive framework designed to assess the Reproducibility, Integrity, Dependability, Generalizability, and Efficiency of deep learning-based medical image segmentation models. The RIDGE checklist is not just a tool for evaluation but also a guideline for researchers striving to improve the quality and transparency of their work. By adhering to the principles outlined in the RIDGE checklist, researchers can ensure that their developed segmentation models are robust, scientifically valid, and applicable in a clinical setting.
PMID: 39557736
ISSN: 2948-2933
CID: 5758252

Minimum Reporting Items for Clear Evaluation of Accuracy Reports of Large Language Models in Healthcare (MI-CLEAR-LLM) [Editorial]

Park, Seong Ho; Suh, Chong Hyun; Lee, Jeong Hyun; Kahn, Charles E; Moy, Linda
PMCID:11444851
PMID: 39344542
ISSN: 2005-8330
CID: 5714162

Digital reference object toolkit of breast DCE MRI for quantitative evaluation of image reconstruction and analysis methods

Bae, Jonghyun; Tan, Zhengguo; Solomon, Eddy; Huang, Zhengnan; Heacock, Laura; Moy, Linda; Knoll, Florian; Kim, Sungheon Gene
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To develop a digital reference object (DRO) toolkit to generate realistic breast DCE-MRI data for quantitative assessment of image reconstruction and data analysis methods. METHODS: RESULTS: CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We have developed a DRO toolkit that includes realistic morphology of tumor lesions along with the expected pharmacokinetic parameter ranges. This simulation framework can generate many images for quantitative assessment of DCE-MRI reconstruction and analysis methods.
PMID: 38775077
ISSN: 1522-2594
CID: 5654602

Pearls and Pitfalls for LLMs 2.0 [Editorial]

Huisman, Merel; Kitamura, Felipe; Cook, Tessa S; Hentel, Keith D; Elias, Jonathan; Shih, George; Moy, Linda
PMCID:11535876
PMID: 39470427
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 5746872

Checklist for Reproducibility of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging

Moassefi, Mana; Singh, Yashbir; Conte, Gian Marco; Khosravi, Bardia; Rouzrokh, Pouria; Vahdati, Sanaz; Safdar, Nabile; Moy, Linda; Kitamura, Felipe; Gentili, Amilcare; Lakhani, Paras; Kottler, Nina; Halabi, Safwan S; Yacoub, Joseph H; Hou, Yuankai; Younis, Khaled; Erickson, Bradley J; Krupinski, Elizabeth; Faghani, Shahriar
The application of deep learning (DL) in medicine introduces transformative tools with the potential to enhance prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment planning. However, ensuring transparent documentation is essential for researchers to enhance reproducibility and refine techniques. Our study addresses the unique challenges presented by DL in medical imaging by developing a comprehensive checklist using the Delphi method to enhance reproducibility and reliability in this dynamic field. We compiled a preliminary checklist based on a comprehensive review of existing checklists and relevant literature. A panel of 11 experts in medical imaging and DL assessed these items using Likert scales, with two survey rounds to refine responses and gauge consensus. We also employed the content validity ratio with a cutoff of 0.59 to determine item face and content validity. Round 1 included a 27-item questionnaire, with 12 items demonstrating high consensus for face and content validity that were then left out of round 2. Round 2 involved refining the checklist, resulting in an additional 17 items. In the last round, 3 items were deemed non-essential or infeasible, while 2 newly suggested items received unanimous agreement for inclusion, resulting in a final 26-item DL model reporting checklist derived from the Delphi process. The 26-item checklist facilitates the reproducible reporting of DL tools and enables scientists to replicate the study's results.
PMID: 38483694
ISSN: 2948-2933
CID: 5711272

Chatbots for Literature Review and Research-Insights from a Panel Discussion at the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) 2023

McIlvain, Grace; Oechtering, Thekla H; Shammi, Ummul Afia; Bhayana, Rajesh; Hutter, Jana; Moy, Linda; Schweitzer, Mark
PMID: 37795851
ISSN: 1522-2586
CID: 5664512

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update

Niell, Bethany L.; Jochelson, Maxine S.; Amir, Tali; Brown, Ann; Adamson, Megan; Baron, Paul; Bennett, Debbie L.; Chetlen, Alison; Dayaratna, Sandra; Freer, Phoebe E.; Ivansco, Lillian K.; Klein, Katherine A.; Malak, Sharp F.; Mehta, Tejas S.; Moy, Linda; Neal, Colleen H.; Newell, Mary S.; Richman, Ilana B.; Schonberg, Mara; Small, William; Ulaner, Gary A.; Slanetz, Priscilla J.
Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
SCOPUS:85192881241
ISSN: 1546-1440
CID: 5659472