Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Sagging of the neck aesthetic area is an important indicator of age. The development of complex and globally accepted tools for proper assessment of the change in neck volume is an essential contribution to aesthetic research and the routine clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To develop a grading scale for the objective assessment of the neck volume and to establish the reliability of this scale for clinical research and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-point rating scale was developed to assess neck volume objectively. Twelve experts rated frontal and lateral neck photographs of 50 subjects in two separate rating cycles using the neck volume scale. Responses of raters were analyzed to assess inter- and intrarater reliability. RESULTS: Interrater reliability for the neck volume scale was almost perfect, with intraclass correlation coefficients for the first and second rating cycles of 0.85 and 0.84, respectively. Intrarater reliability for the neck volume scale was high (0.90) and Pearson correlation coefficients ranged between 0.88 and 0.95 and were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The neck volume scale demonstrates optimal reliability for clinical research and practice.

BACKGROUND: Age-related upper face changes such as wrinkles, lines, volume loss, and anatomic alterations may affect quality of life and psychological well-being. The development of globally accepted tools to assess these changes objectively is an essential contribution to aesthetic research and routine clinical medicine. OBJECTIVE: To establish the reliability of several upper face scales for clinical research and practice: forehead lines, glabellar lines, crow's feet (at rest and dynamic expression), sex-specific brow positioning, and summary scores of forehead and crow's feet areas and of the entire upper face unit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four 5-point photonumerical rating scales were developed to assess glabellar lines and sex-specific brow positioning. Twelve experts rated identical upper face photographs of 50 subjects in two separate rating cycles using all eight scales. Responses of raters were analyzed to assess intra- and interrater reliability. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was substantial for all upper face scales, aesthetic areas, and the upper face score except for the brow positioning scales. Intrarater reliability was high for all scales and resulting scores. CONCLUSION: Except for brow positioning, the upper face rating scales are reliable tools for valid and reproducible assessment of the aging process.

Polymer hydrogels have been used for many years in European and Asian countries, and these products are often considered to be the same material in different packaging. This, however, is not the case. Performance and safety profiles depend on many factors including chemical and physical characteristics (including rheological properties), manufacturing process and control (cross linking, impurities, stability, etc.), injection technique, and interaction with surrounding tissues. Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAH) products, although often considered equal, have clear differences in composition, manufacturing, and injection technique as well as ability to interact with surrounding tissues, characteristics that determine the safety and effectiveness profiles of each of these gels.

Background: Injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is indicated in the United States for use in immune-competent patients for correction of shallow-to-deep nasolabial fold contour deficiencies and other facial wrinkles in which a deep dermal grid pattern injection technique is appropriate. It is also indicated for restoration and/or correction of signs of lipoatrophy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Objective: The authors examine the efficacy of injectable PLLA for correction of nasolabial fold wrinkles, based on Investigator Global Evaluations (IGE). Methods: A randomized, multicenter, subject-blinded, parallel-group study compared injectable PLLA versus human collagen for correction of nasolabial fold wrinkles for 13 months after up to four treatments (intent-to-treat population, 233). Injectable PLLA-treated subjects were followed up for an additional 12 months (total, 25 months) after the final treatment session. Efficacy was also assessed through secondary IGE for improvement, which is the subject of this report. Results: IGE reports of improvement were significantly greater in subjects who received injectable PLLA versus those who received human collagen (p < .001). Overall improvement with injectable PLLA was 100% three weeks after the final treatment, remaining above 85% through month 25. Overall IGE of improvement with human collagen declined from 94.0% at week three to 6.0% at month 13. Both treatment groups had similar safety profiles. Conclusions: IGE of improvement were significantly greater with injectable PLLA treatment than with human collagen treatment at all time points following the last treatment. Injectable PLLA treatment continued to show a beneficial effect for up to 25 months

BACKGROUND: This is a report of the secondary endpoints, Subject Global Evaluation (overall improvement) and Subject Satisfaction scores, from a study designed to examine the efficacy of injectable poly-L-lactic acid for the correction of nasolabial fold wrinkles over 25 months. METHODS: A randomized, subject-blinded, parallel-group, multicenter clinical study was conducted to compare the effects of injectable poly-L-lactic acid with those of human collagen for the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles at 13 months following the last treatment. Injectable poly-L-lactic acid-treated subjects were followed for 25 months. RESULTS: From month 3 through month 13 following the last treatment, injectable poly-L-lactic acid-treated subjects (n = 116) reported significantly higher Subject Global Evaluation scores compared with human collagen-treated subjects (n = 117; p < 0.001). Overall Subject Global Evaluation scores for injectable poly-L-lactic acid-treated subjects were 99 percent at week 3, 91 percent at month 13, and 81 percent at month 25 (all times following the last treatment). In contrast, for human collagen-treated subjects, overall Subject Global Evaluation scores declined by 84 percent, from 96 percent at week 3 to 15 percent at month 13. Subject Satisfaction scores were significantly different (p < 0.01) between treatment groups beginning week 3 and continuing through month 13. Overall Subject Satisfaction scores were maintained for over 80 percent of injectable poly-l-lactic acid-treated subjects (n = 106) at month 25 after the last treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles with injectable poly-l-lactic acid resulted in statistically significantly higher Subject Global Evaluation and Subject Satisfaction scores compared with human collagen at 13 months. Injectable poly-l-lactic acid-treated subjects maintained improvements for up to 25 months after treatment

BACKGROUND:Repeat treatments of nonpermanent dermal fillers are used in the long-term treatment of wrinkles and folds and to volumize. OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and effectiveness of a nonanimal-sourced hyaluronic acid (HA) (which uses a cohesive polydensified matrix (CPM) technology [CPMHA]) for the treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs) during an 18-month open-label extension trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Ninety-five of 118 subjects continued with this optional open-label extension of a split-face, double-blind trial. All subjects received CPMHA in both NLFs at 24 weeks after treatment in this study and were assessed at weeks 32, 48, 72, and 96. Touch-ups were allowed for optimal correction. Safety was assessed according to reported adverse events (AEs) and serum antibody measurement. RESULTS:At all four post-week 24 time points, the severity of the NLFs showed a decrease from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale. The effects persisted in the majority (∼80%) of subjects without repeat treatment for at least one interval of 48 weeks. The study filler was well tolerated, with only one related AE (injection site bruising) reported. Little potential for immunogenic reactions was identified. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This CPMHA is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for at least 48 weeks in the majority of subjects for the correction of moderate to severe NLFs with repeat injections given over an 18-month period.

BACKGROUND: Injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a synthetic, biodegradable, biocompatible polymer device. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of injectable PLLA with human-derived collagen in treating nasolabial fold wrinkles. METHODS: In this randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group, multicenter study, subjects received injectable PLLA (n = 116) or collagen (n = 117) injections (1-4 visits, 3-week intervals). Wrinkle Assessment Scale scores were calculated at screening; posttreatment week 3; months 3, 6, 9, and 13 (injectable PLLA or collagen groups); and months 19 and 25 (injectable PLLA group). Safety data were obtained from subject interviews and case report forms. RESULTS: Injectable PLLA significantly improved mean Wrinkle Assessment Scale scores (all time points, P < .001). Improvements (up to 25 months after last treatment) were significantly greater (P < .001) than with collagen for posttreatment months 3 to 13. LIMITATIONS: Mostly white women and subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types II and III were included. CONCLUSION: Injectable PLLA provides well-tolerated, effective, and long-lasting (up to 25 months) nasolabial fold wrinkle correction

BACKGROUND This paper presents interim results of a 5-year Food and Drug Administration postapproval study to evaluate the long-term safety and patient satisfaction of an advanced polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based filler for the correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs). OBJECTIVE To report the incidence of adverse events, including granuloma formation, and subject satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Safety data were evaluated for 1,008 subjects treated. Treatment was administered at day 1 plus one or two additional touch-ups, as required, through day 60. Potential adverse events, subject satisfaction, and any additional cosmetic treatments received in the treatment area were evaluated over an 18-month follow-up period. RESULTS Approximately 6% (63/1,008) of patients reported 82 device-related adverse events. Overall, 19% (187/1,008) of subjects experienced adverse events, the majority of which were mild; none were unanticipated. There were 14 serious adverse events reported; none of which were device related. One granuloma was reported, which resolved completely with a single medical treatment. Subject satisfaction with treatment remained high (similar to 80% very satisfied or satisfied) throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Results confirm and further support the long-term safety and efficacy of this PMMA filler for the correction of NLFs. Suneva Medical, Inc. sponsored this Food and Drug Administration clinical trial and provided editorial support