Faculty Bibliography

Sino-orbital cutaneous fistulas (SOCFs) are a rare and challenging complication from conditions including granulomatosis with polyangiitis. SOCFs are difficult to manage due to poor vascular supply, compromised tissue, and systemic immunocompromise, which lead to a high rate of recurrence. Given the overall rarity of SOCFs, optimal surgical repair remains controversial, with options ranging from conservative management, onlay grafts, and vascularized flaps. This case report describes a novel one-step approach to SOCF closure using a composite chondral mucosal nasoseptal flap in a patient with a large left medial canthal SOCF that had recurred despite 2 prior attempts at closure including a vascularized paramedian forehead flap. Nasoseptal flaps may provide vascularized mucosal tissue to allow for greater success in closure over traditional, external flaps, and skin grafts.

OBJECTIVE:Several pathologies either invade or arise within the orbit. These include meningiomas, schwannomas, and cavernous hemangiomas among others. Although several studies describing various approaches to the orbit are available, no study describes all cranio-orbital and orbitocranial approaches with clear, surgically oriented anatomical descriptions. As such, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive guide to the microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to and through the orbit. METHODS:Six formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric head specimens were dissected in the surgical anatomy laboratory at the authors' institution. In each specimen, the following approaches were modularly performed: endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs), including a lateral transorbital approach and a superior eyelid crease approach; endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs), including those to the medial orbit and optic canal; and transcranial approaches, including a supraorbital approach, a fronto-orbital approach, and a 3-piece orbito-zygomatic approach. Each pertinent step was 3D photograph-documented with macroscopic and endoscopic techniques as previously described. RESULTS:Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the orbit afforded excellent access to the medial orbit and medial optic canal. Regarding ETOAs, the lateral transorbital approach afforded excellent access to the floor of the middle fossa and, once the lateral orbital rim was removed, the cavernous sinus could be dissected and the petrous apex drilled. The superior eyelid approach provides excellent access to the anterior cranial fossa just superior to the orbit, as well as the dura of the lesser wing of the sphenoid. Craniotomy-based approaches provided excellent access to the anterior and middle cranial fossa and the cavernous sinus, except the supraorbital approach had limited access to the middle fossa. CONCLUSIONS:This study outlines the essential surgical steps for major cranio-orbital and orbitocranial approaches. Endoscopic endonasal approaches offer direct medial access, potentially providing bilateral exposure to optic canals. ETOAs serve as both orbital access and as a corridor to surrounding regions. Cranio-orbital approaches follow a lateral-to-medial, superior-to-inferior trajectory, progressively allowing removal of protective bony structures for proportional orbit access.

The 3D stereoscopic technique consists in providing the illusional perception of depth of a given object using two different images mimicking how the right and left eyes capture the object. Both images are slightly different and when overlapped gives a three-dimensional (3D) experience. Considering the limitations for establishing surgical laboratories and dissections courses in some educational institutions, techniques such as stereoscopy and photogrammetry seem to play an important role in neuroanatomy and neurosurgical education. The aim of this study was to describe how to combine and set up realistic models acquired with photogrammetry scans in 3D stereoscopic projections. Three donors, one dry skull, embalmed brain and head, were scanned using photogrammetry. The software used for displaying the final realistic 3D models (Blender, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) is a free software and allows stereoscopic projection without compromising the interactivity of each model. By default, the model was exported and immediately displayed as a red cyan 3D mode. The 3D projector used in the manuscript required a side-by-side 3D mode which was set up with simple commands on the software. The final stereoscopy projection offered depth perception and a visualization in 360° of each donor; this perception was noted especially when visualizing donors with different cavities and fossae. The combination of 3D techniques is of paramount importance for neuroanatomy education. Stereoscopic projections could provide a valuable tool for neuroanatomy instruction directed at clinical trainees and could be especially useful when access to laboratory-based learning is limited.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Our institution uses two approaches for nasal mucosal preparation during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) to improve surgical field visualization: topical epinephrine (TE) versus topical cocaine with injection of lidocaine containing epinephrine (TCLE). We aimed to compare anesthetic outcomes after ESS using these techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:We retrospectively identified adult patients at our institution who underwent ESS from May 2018 through January 2023 under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil infusions. Postoperative anesthetic outcomes, including pain and recovery time, were compared between patients who had mucosal preparation with TE versus TCLE using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS:Among 1449 patients who underwent ESS, 585 had TE, and 864 had TCLE. Compared with TE, during anesthetic recovery, the TCLE group had fewer episodes of severe pain (numeric pain score ≥ 7) (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.49-0.85; P = .002), less opioid analgesic administration (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95 % CI, 0.44-0.69; P < .001), and shorter recovery room stay (IPTW-adjusted ratio of the geometric mean, 0.90; 95 % CI, 0.85-0.96; P = .002). Postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative sedation were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who received preparation of the nasal mucosa with TCLE, compared with TE, were less likely to report severe pain or receive an opioid analgesic in the postanesthesia recovery room and had faster anesthetic recovery. This observation from our large clinical practice indicates that use topical and local anesthetic during endoscopic sinus surgery may have benefit for ambulatory ESS patients.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Surgical techniques for sellar reconstruction include no reconstruction, use of synthetic materials, autologous grafts, and/or vascularized flaps. The aim of this study was to conduct a multi-center study comparing the efficacy and postoperative morbidity associated with different sellar reconstruction techniques. METHODS:A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors from five participating sites between January 2021 and March 2023 was performed. The variables included demographics, tumor characteristics, reconstruction technique, postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF) leak, and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores. Comparisons of postoperative complications, SNOT-22 scores, and duration of surgery by type of onlay reconstruction were evaluated using Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal‒Wallis test. RESULTS:Five hundred and one patients were identified. The median tumor size was 2.1 cm, and 64% were non-functioning. Intraoperative CSF leak was identified in 38% of patients. A total of 89% of patients underwent onlay reconstruction: 49% were reconstructed with mucosal grafts, 35% with nasoseptal flaps, and 5% with other onlay techniques. Nasoseptal flaps were utilized more frequently in the setting of giant pituitary adenomas (>3 cm), medial cavernous sinus wall resection, and high-flow intraoperative CSF leaks. Cases who utilized mucosal grafts had an overall shorter operating time (median: 183 min vs. 240 min; p < 0.001). Five postoperative CSF leaks were identified, and therefore, statistical analysis could not be performed for this complication. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The effectiveness and morbidity of different sellar reconstruction techniques are comparable. Vascularized flaps were utilized more frequently in the setting of larger tumors and high-flow intraoperative CSF leaks.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) adversely impact patients' quality of life (QOL) and are frequently identified at an advanced stage. Because these tumors are rare, there are few studies that examine the specific QOL areas that are impacted. This knowledge would help improve the care of these patients. METHODS:In this prospective, multi-institutional study, 273 patients with SNMs who underwent definitive treatment with curative intent were evaluated. We used the University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL) instrument over 5 years from diagnosis to identify demographic, treatment, and disease-related factors that influence each of the 12 UWQOL subdomains from baseline to 5 -years post-treatment. RESULTS:Multivariate models found endoscopic resection predicted improved pain (vs. nonsurgical treatment CI 2.4, 19.4, p = 0.01) and appearance versus open (CI 27.0, 35.0, p < 0.001) or combined (CI 10.4, 17.1, p < 0.001). Pterygopalatine fossa involvement predicted worse swallow (CI -10.8, -2.4, p = 0.01) and pain (CI -17.0, -4.0, p < 0.001). Neck dissection predicted worse swallow (CI -14.8, -2.8, p < 0.001), taste (CI -31.7, -1.5, p = 0.02), and salivary symptoms (CI -28.4, -8.6, p < 0.001). Maxillary involvement predicted worse chewing (CI 9.8, 33.2; p < 0.001) and speech (CI -21.8, -5.4, p < 0.001) relative to other sites. Advanced T stage predicted worse anxiety (CI -13.0, -2.0, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:Surgical approach, management of cervical disease, tumor extent, and site of involvement impacted variable UWQOL symptom areas. Endoscopic resection predicted better pain, appearance, and chewing compared with open. These results may aid in counseling patients regarding potential QOL expectations in their SNM treatment and recovery course.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Eagle syndrome (ES) was first described in 1937, to characterize elongation of the styloid process. It is rarely encountered by neurosurgeons but does present the potential for vascular sequelae and neurological complications. DEMONSTRATIVE CASES/UNASSIGNED:We discuss three patients with uncommon presentations of neurovascular compromise with uncommon symptomatology, secondary to ES. Their management ranged from retrospective diagnoses following self-limited events, antiplatelet therapy, and endovascular and surgical interventions. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:While traumatic fractures, chiropractic manipulation, and history of prior neck surgery have been implicated as the etiologies for ES, congenital cases are common. The styloid process intimately interplays with adjacent neurovascular and nervous structures; its elongation can cause symptoms in 10% of patients. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Awareness of this potentially dangerous but rare disease - more commonly seen by our otolaryngology colleagues - may help reduce diagnostic delays when an elongated styloid process is the cause, as surgery may be required.