Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Cognitive impairment has implications in counseling, treatment, and survivorship for women with gynecologic malignancies. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with cognition in women with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS:After Institutional Review Board approval, 165 women at an urban ambulatory gynecologic oncology facility were queried using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Wong-Baker pain scale, neuropathy scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) Depression Scale, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD 7). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to evaluate the association of cognitive deficit with age, education, race/ethnicity, disease site, stage, treatment, pain, neuropathy, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS:The mean MoCA score for the entire cohort was 24.1 (range 13-30.) 24% of patients had MoCA scores less than 22. Low scores (<22) were associated with older age, non-white race/ethnicity, lower education level, uterine and vulvar cancers, and pain ≥5 (p<0.05). There was a trend toward lower cognition scores for women treated with both chemotherapy and radiation (p=0.10). While clinically significant pain was associated with low cognition, there was no association with use of opioid pain medication and low cognition scores. CONCLUSIONS:There was a high prevalence of cognitive deficit in women with gynecologic malignancies. The association of low cognition with report of clinically significant pain, but not with use of opioid pain medications, should be further explored. Research is needed to evaluate the impact of cognitive deficits on treatment adherence and outcomes for women with gynecologic malignancies.

RATIONALE/BACKGROUND:Although expert communication between intensive care unit clinicians with patients or surrogates improves patient- and family-centered outcomes, fellows in critical care medicine do not feel adequately trained to conduct family meetings. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a communication skills program that could be easily integrated into a U.S. critical care fellowship. METHODS:We developed four simulation cases that provided communication challenges that critical care fellows commonly face. For each case, we developed a list of directly observable tasks that could be used by faculty to evaluate fellows during each simulation. We developed a didactic curriculum of lectures/case discussions on topics related to palliative care, end-of-life care, communication skills, and bioethics; this month-long curriculum began and ended with the fellows leading family meetings in up to two simulated cases with direct observation by faculty who were not blinded to the timing of the simulation. Our primary measures of effectiveness were the fellows' self-reported change in comfort with leading family meetings after the program was completed and the quality of the communication as measured by the faculty evaluators during the family meeting simulations at the end of the month. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS/RESULTS:Over 3 years, 31 critical care fellows participated in the program, 28 of whom participated in 101 family meeting simulations with direct feedback by faculty facilitators. Our trainees showed high rates of information disclosure during the simulated family meetings. During the simulations done at the end of the month compared with those done at the beginning, our fellows showed significantly improved rates in: (1) verbalizing an agenda for the meeting (64 vs. 41%; Chi-square, 5.27; P = 0.02), (2) summarizing what will be done for the patient (64 vs. 39%; Chi-square, 6.21; P = 0.01), and (3) providing a follow-up plan (60 vs. 37%; Chi-square, 5.2; P = 0.02). More than 95% of our participants (n = 27) reported feeling "slightly" or "much" more comfortable with discussing foregoing life-sustaining treatment and leading family discussions after the month-long curriculum. CONCLUSIONS:A communication skills program can be feasibly integrated into a critical care training program and is associated with improvements in fellows' skills and comfort with leading family meetings.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To examine how often hospitalized older adults with a diagnosis of heel ulcers are evaluated with noninvasive vascular tests and to determine the impact of invasive vascular or surgical procedures on 1-year mortality. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review using an electronic database and chart review of all patients discharged with a diagnosis of heel ulcer between 2006 and 2009. SETTING/METHODS:Urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A total of 506 participants aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Data collected included resident characteristics (demographics, medical history, and severity of illness using the Charlson comorbidity index), staging of heel ulcers, rates of noninvasive vascular assessments, vascular and surgical procedures, length of stay, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS:Thirty-one percent (155/506) of patients with a heel ulcer underwent noninvasive vascular testing and of these 83% (129/155) were found to have underlying ischemia. Twenty-six percent (130/506) of patients underwent at least 1 vascular or surgical procedure. The 1-year mortality rate for patients with stage 1 or 2 disease was 55%; this rose to 70% for patients with stage 3 or 4 ulcers (P = .01), and could not be explained by differences in the Charlson comorbidity index. Patients who underwent a vascular or surgical procedure had a significantly lower mortality compared with those who did not (59% vs 68% P = .04). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Older adults with a heel ulcer in the acute care setting are frequently not assessed for underlying ischemia of the lower extremities. The diagnosis carries high 1-year mortality rates. Evidence-based protocols need to be developed to determine which older adults should have a vascular assessment and then undergo an invasive procedure.