Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To examine the longitudinal postoperative outcomes of open versus closed conjunctiva implantation of the XEN45 gel stent. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective multicenter study. SUBJECTS/METHODS:One hundred ninety-three patients with glaucoma underwent XEN45 implantation via an open or closed conjunctiva approach. METHODS:Data on patient demographics; diagnoses; preoperative and postoperative clinical data; outcome measures, including intraocular pressure (IOP); use of glaucoma medications; visual acuity; and complications were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Failure was defined as < 20% reduction in IOP from the medicated baseline or a IOP of > 21 mmHg at 2 consecutive visits at postoperative month 1 and beyond, the need for subsequent operative intervention or additional glaucoma surgery, or a catastrophic event, such as loss of light perception. Eyes that had not failed by these criteria and were not on glaucoma medications were considered complete successes. Overall success was defined as those who achieved success either with or without topical medications. RESULTS:Patients were followed for an average of 17 months. Complete success was achieved in 42.5% and 24.7% of the open and closed groups, respectively (P = 0.01). Overall success was achieved in 64.2% and 37.0% of the open and closed groups, respectively (P < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Bleb needling was performed in 12.4% of eyes in the open group compared with 40% of eyes in the closed group. An IOP spike of ≥ 10 mmHg was twice as likely to occur in the closed group compared with the open group during the postoperative period (40% vs. 18%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Implantation of XEN45 with opening of the conjunctiva resulted in a lower IOP with greater success and lower needling rate compared with those achieved with the closed conjunctiva technique. Similar rates of postoperative complications and vision loss were noted in each group. Although both procedures provide substantial IOP reduction, the open technique appears to result in higher success rates and fewer postoperative interventions. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)/BACKGROUND:Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the feasibility of remotely training glaucoma patients to take a 10-session clustered virtual reality (VR) visual field (VF) test (Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10]) at home, analyze results for test-retest variability, and assess correspondence with conventional perimetry. DESIGN/METHODS:Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS/METHODS:Twenty-one subjects with glaucoma were enrolled and included in the feasibility assessment of remote training. Thirty-six eyes were used for test-retest analysis and determination of concordance with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). METHODS:Subjects were provided with a mobile VR headset containing the VVP-10 test software and trained remotely via video conferencing. Subjects were instructed to complete 10 sessions over a 14-day period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Feasibility was determined by the number of subjects who were able to independently complete VVP-10 over the 14-day period after 1 remote training session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for average fraction seen across 10 sessions and the standard error (SE) of the mean were primary outcome measures for assessing test-retest variability. Correlation with HFA mean sensitivity (MS) across eyes, was a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS:Twenty subjects (95%) successfully completed the VVP-10 test series after 1 training session. The ICC for VVP-10 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97). The mean SE in units of fraction seen was 0.012. The Spearman correlations between VVP-10 average fraction seen and HFA MS were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-0.98) for moderate-to-advanced glaucoma eyes, and decreased to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.28-0.94) when all eyes were included. CONCLUSIONS:Remote training of patients at home is feasible, and subsequent remote clustered VF testing using VVP-10 by patients on their own, without any further interactions with caregivers or study staff, was possible. At-home VVP-10 results demonstrated low test-retest variability. Future studies must be conducted to determine if VVP-10, taken at home as convenient for the patient, may be a viable supplement to provide equivalent or complementary results to that of standard in-clinic assessment of visual function in glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)/BACKGROUND:Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.