Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:V600-mutant melanoma with asymptomatic brain metastases. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The safety lead-in (SLI) assessed tolerability for high-dose encorafenib 300 mg twice daily (BID) plus binimetinib 45 mg BID. If the high dose was tolerable in ph2, patients would be randomized to receive high or standard dose (encorafenib 450 mg once daily [QD] plus binimetinib 45 mg BID). Otherwise, standard dose was evaluated as the recommended ph2 dose (RP2D). Patients who tolerated standard dosing during Cycle 1 could be dose escalated to encorafenib 600 mg QD plus binimetinib 45 mg BID in Cycle 2. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were examined. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 10), 1 achieved complete response and 5 achieved partial responses (PR); the brain metastasis response rate (BMRR) was 60% (95% CI: 26.2, 87.8). In ph2, 2 of 3 patients achieved PR (BMRR, 67% [95% CI: 9.4, 99.2]). Repeated encorafenib 300 mg BID dosing did not increase steady-state exposure compared with historical 450 mg QD data. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Despite small patient numbers due to early trial termination, BMRR appeared similar between the SLI and ph2, and the ph2 safety profile appeared consistent with previous reports of standard-dose encorafenib in combination with binimetinib.

mRNA-4157 (V940) is an individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) targeting up to 34 patient-specific tumor neoantigens to induce T cell responses and potentiate anti-tumor activity. We report mechanistic insights into the immunogenicity of mRNA-4157 via characterization of T cell responses to neoantigens from the first-in-human phase 1, KEYNOTE-603 study (NCT03313778) in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (Part A: 1mg mRNA-4157, n = 4) or resected cutaneous melanoma (Part D: 1mg mRNA-4157 + 200mg pembrolizumab, n = 12). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were assessed. All patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE); there were no grade 4/5 AEs or dose-limiting toxicities. mRNA-4157 alone induced consistent de novo, and strengthened pre-existing, T cell responses to targeted neoantigens. Following combination therapy, sustained mRNA-4157-induced neoantigen-specific T cell responses and expansion of cytotoxic CD8 and CD4 T cells were observed. These findings show the potential of a novel mRNA INT approach in oncology.

The origins of cancer vaccines date back to the 1800s. Since then, there have been significant efforts to generate vaccines against solid and hematologic malignancies using a variety of platforms. To date, these efforts have generally been met with minimal success. However, in the era of improved methods and technological advancements, supported by compelling preclinical and clinical data, a wave of renewed interest in the field offers the promise of discovering field-changing paradigms in the management of established and resected disease using cancer vaccines. These include novel approaches to personalized neoantigen vaccine development, as well as innovative immune-modulatory vaccines (IMVs) that facilitate activation of antiregulatory T cells to limit immunosuppression caused by regulatory immune cells. This article will introduce some of the limitations that have affected cancer vaccine development over the past several decades, followed by an introduction to the latest advancements in neoantigen vaccine and IMV therapy, and then conclude with a discussion of some of the newest technologies and progress that are occurring across the cancer vaccine space. Cancer vaccines are among the most promising frontiers for breakthrough innovations and strategies poised to make a measurable impact in the ongoing fight against cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:>12 months [late] from initial therapy). RESULTS:73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Approximately 50 % of resected stage II-IV melanoma patients develop recurrent disease by 5 years despite adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. Data to define best management of recurrences is lacking. METHODS:This was a multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study. Patients with resected stage II-IV melanoma who commenced adjuvant anti-PD-1-based therapy before January 2022 and later recurred were identified. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, recurrence patterns, management and outcomes were collected. RESULTS:711 patients from 17 sites were included. Median age was 60 [range 16-92], 64 % were male, 2 % stage II, 91 % were stage III, 7 % stage IV. Median time to recurrence was 6.2 months (0-68.5) and median follow up time from recurrence was 19.8 months (range 0.2-73.1). 63 % recurred on anti-PD-1 therapy, 36 % off therapy [3 % < 6 months, 33 % > 6 months]. Initial recurrences were locoregional (LR) alone in 44 %, distant alone (DR) in 43 %, and 11 % in both sites. LR recurrences were managed with local therapy, alone (62 %) or with "second adjuvant" anti-PD-1 (14 %) or BRAF/MEK therapy (23 %); 12 m RFS2 was 25 %, 29 % and 69 % respectively (p = 0.0045). Definitive systemic therapy at first recurrence was given in 16 % LR and 86 % DR, with best outcomes for anti-CTLA4 + anti-PD-1 and trial combinations (24 m PFS 63 % and 69 %, respectively). The 24 m OS for the entire cohort was 65 %. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Most recurrences following adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy occur early and while still on drug. Outcomes are poor, regardless of site, timing of recurrence, and subsequent treatment.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) shows benefits in adjuvant (AT) and neoadjuvant melanoma treatments. However, ICI frequently induces severe immune-related adverse events (irAE). Unlike metastatic disease, in which irAEs are a clinical trade-off for treatment that improves survival, the toxicity burden from ICI in the AT setting is a substantial clinical problem urging for irAE-predictive biomarkers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:We assessed postsurgical, pre-ICI treatment peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from clinical trial patients (CheckMate 915) treated with AT nivolumab (n = 130) or ipilimumab/nivolumab (COMBO, n = 82). Performing RNA sequencing differential gene expression analysis, we tested baseline differences associated with severe (grades 3-5) irAEs and constructed an irAE-predictive model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized logistic regression. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The analysis of predicted protein-protein interactions among differentially expressed genes in peripheral CD4+ cells revealed significant enrichment of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathway, associated with severe irAEs in COMBO-treated patients. This gene expression signature predicted severe-irAE COMBO patients (χ2P value = 0.001) with 73% accuracy and was independent of disease recurrence (P = 0.79). The irAE-predictive model incorporating this gene expression signature demonstrated 82% accuracy (χ2P value = 8.91E-06). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:We identified baseline gene expression differences in key immune pathways of peripheral blood T cells from COMBO-treated patients with grades 3 to 5 irAEs and defined a SYK-related gene signature correctly identifying ∼60% of COMBO-treated patients with grades 3 to 5 irAEs. This finding aligns with our previous work linking anti-CTLA4 irAEs with a germline variant associated with high SYK expression. This gene signature may serve as a baseline biomarker of severe grade 3 to 5 irAE risk, which is especially important in AT treatment.

Combination checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown promising efficacy in melanoma. However, the underlying mechanism in humans remains unclear. Here, we perform paired single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing across time in 36 patients with stage IV melanoma treated with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, or combination therapy. We develop the algorithm Cyclone to track temporal clonal dynamics and underlying cell states. Checkpoint blockade induces waves of clonal T cell responses that peak at distinct time points. Combination therapy results in greater magnitude of clonal responses at 6 and 9 weeks compared to single-agent therapies, including melanoma-specific CD8⁺ T cells and exhausted CD8⁺ T cell (T_EX) clones. Focused analyses of T_EX identify that anti-CTLA-4 induces robust expansion and proliferation of progenitor T_EX, which synergizes with anti-PD-1 to reinvigorate T_EX during combination therapy. These next generation immune profiling approaches can guide the selection of drugs, schedule, and dosing for novel combination strategies.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for resected stage III/IV melanoma based on the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial. This analysis compared outcomes from CheckMate 238 with those from the real-world Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database in patients with resected stage III melanoma (per AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab. MATERIALS/METHODS:Outcomes included baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS) in the CheckMate 238 cohort (randomization until death or last known alive), and real-world overall survival (rwOS) in the Flatiron Health cohort (nivolumab initiation until death or data cutoff). rwOS was compared with OS using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was combined with the adjusted model to reduce baseline discrepancies. RESULTS:The CheckMate 238 and real-world cohorts included 369 and 452 patients, respectively (median age, 56.0 and 63.0 years; median follow-up, 61.4 vs. 25.5 months). rwOS was not different from OS in the unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% CI 0.92-1.74), adjusted (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.67-1.54), and adjusted IPTW (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.70-1.63) analyses. In the adjusted analysis, 2-year OS and rwOS rates were 84%. Median OS and rwOS were not reached. After IPTW, OS and rwOS were not different (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.70-1.64). CONCLUSIONS:In this comparative analysis, OS in the CheckMate 238 trial was similar to rwOS in the Flatiron Health database after adjustments in patients with resected stage III melanoma (per AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab, validating the trial results.

Traditional chemotherapy has been ineffective in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Until the use of checkpoint inhibitors, patients had very limited survival. Since the original US Food and Drug Administration approval of ipilimumab over a decade ago, the armamentarium of immunotherapeutic agents has expanded to include programmed cell death protein 1 and lymphocyte activation gene 3 antibodies, requiring a nuanced approach to the selection of frontline treatments, managing patients through recurrence and progression, and determining length of therapy. Herein, we review the existing evidence supporting current standard immunotherapy regimens and discuss the clinical decision-making involved in treating patients with metastatic melanoma with checkpoint inhibitors.