Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer with early onset is increasing but comparisons with average onset cases have yielded mixed results (EOPC versus AOPC; age <50 versus ≥50). We compared clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and molecular traits of resected EOPC versus AOPC. METHODS:We retrospectively included patients with PDAC resected between 2010 and 2017 from The National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinicopathologic data were compared across EOPC versus AOPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox-regression were used to perform survival analysis. Molecular features were compared using data from the cBioPortal. RESULTS:24,078 patients with resected PDAC were included, of whom 1698 (7.1 %) had EOPC. Poor prognostic factors, including high grade, advanced T-stage, and lymphovascular invasion, were less prevalent in EOPC (All p < 0.05). Patients with EOPC more frequently received neoadjuvant (28 % vs. 22 %; p < 0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (68 % vs. 58 %; p < 0.001) and experienced improved OS (median OS 29.5 vs 25.9 months, p = 0.023; 5-year OS: 26.9 % vs 20.8 %). No differences in the presence of key driver mutations were observed between the two groups but some distinct oncogenic mutations were observed in EOPC. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:EOPC and AOPC are clinically similar but some cases of EOPC may harbor divergent molecular changes. These patients may have only marginally improved survival.

OBJECTIVE:The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) aimed to uniform the definition and classification of mortality following pancreatic resections, to guide strategies for reducing preventable deaths and standardize reporting. BACKGROUND:Reported rates of mortality after pancreatic surgery vary widely depending on patient comorbidities, case mix, and institutional expertise and resources. Conventional reporting lacks granularity and fails to capture the mechanisms leading to death. A standardized classification rooted in causal analysis may provide a more meaningful framework to appraise outcomes and design targeted interventions. METHODS:A systematic review of the literature, focusing on mortality rates, causes of death, and existing classification systems after pancreatectomy was conducted. A consensus definition and tripartite classification were developed through iterative discussions, revisions, and final approval by the ISGPS board members. RESULTS:Postpancreatectomy mortality (PPM) was defined as death occurring within 90 days of any pancreatic resection, directly or indirectly attributable to a surgical complication and retrospectively linked to it through root-cause analysis. Three categories were established: PPM 1, vascular/technical complexity-related mortality (15-30%); PPM 2, pancreatectomy-specific complication-related deaths, mainly due to postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and secondary systemic deterioration (45-65%); and PPM 3, cardiopulmonary and cerebrovascular deaths (10-25%). Each category reflects distinct mechanisms, timing of onset, intervention windows, and opportunities for rescue. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The proposed ISGPS classification of mortality enables the development of targeted strategies to reduce potentially preventable deaths and provides a more robust framework for the appraisal and benchmarking of surgical outcomes. Prospective validation is warranted to standardize this newly defined quality metric, ensuring its consistent use in future reporting and ultimately enhancing surgical quality and patient safety on a global scale.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with extensive peripancreatic vessel involvement is classified as locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). For this group of patients, the current standard of care does not include considering a potentially curative oncologic resection. However, recent advances in multiagent chemotherapy and surgical techniques are challenging this paradigm. Moreover, the current determination of anatomic resectability is vague and unreliable. Here we propose a definition of local resectability, based on pre- and intra-operative assessment. This anatomic definition of resectability assumes careful patient selection based on tumor biology and patient condition. The pre-operative evaluation of vascular anatomy and tumor involvement is conducted using 3D-rendering of pancreas-protocol computed tomography. Identifying a disease-free arterial or venous segment above and below the tumor involvement ("suitable target") is the single critical factor that determines anatomic resectability. Intraoperative isolation of these target vessels confirms the feasibility of vascular reconstruction before resection. This approach, which focuses on identifying target vessels rather than circumferential involvement, offers a more straightforward and clinically relevant method for assessing surgical eligibility in LAPC patients at centers of excellence. In summary, reconstructability-based on surgical expertise and guided by tumor biology-now defines the modern paradigm of resectability in LAPC.

BACKGROUND:The 2024 Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) build on previous guidelines that consider worrisome features (WF) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) to recommend surveillance or resection. These new guidelines have not yet been validated. METHODS:Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for an IPMN at an academic medical center between 2012 and 2023 were included. IPMNs were categorized as low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or invasive carcinoma (IC). Preoperative imaging was used to determine HRS and WF in accordance with the 2024 Kyoto guidelines. We compared IPMNs with LGD to those with HGD or IC using univariate analyses and evaluated logistic regression models with c-statistics. RESULTS:Of 211 patients, 84 (40%) had LGD, 49 (23%) had HGD, and 78 (37%) had IC. Among HRS, obstructive jaundice (p = 0.004), pancreatic duct ≥ 10 mm (p < 0.001), and suspicious or positive cytology (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with HGD/IC. An increasing number of HRS were associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. Among WFs, an abrupt change in the caliber of pancreatic duct with distal pancreatic atrophy (p = 0.001) and cystic growth ≥ 2.5 mm/year (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. Increasing numbers of WFs were also associated with higher rates of HGD/IC. The 2024 Kyoto model showed improved discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.849) compared with the 2017 Fukuoka model (AUC=0.780, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The risk of HGD/IC in IPMNs increased in a stepwise fashion as the number of WFs increased. The 2024 guidelines represent an advancement over the 2017 guidelines, notably with the inclusion of suspicious cytology as an HRS.

BACKGROUND:Staging laparoscopy (SL) is performed to detect occult metastases in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. However, current guideline recommendations vary widely on routinely performing SL. This global survey investigated use and indications of SL. METHODS:An online survey was sent to members of nine international societies and working groups. Information was obtained about SL use, indications SL and adjunct diagnostic modalities across four clinical scenarios. RESULTS:Among 617 responding surgeons (76 countries, six continents), 82% used SL which varied between regions (Americas 90%, Asia 85%, Oceania 81%, Europe 76%, Africa 59%; P < 0.050). Most perform SL during the same session as the scheduled laparotomy (63-79%). A SL was mainly performed at the time of upfront surgery (71%), after (60%) or before (37%) neoadjuvant/induction therapy, and before radiotherapy (31%). SL was mainly performed in selected patients, either based on indeterminate/suspicious lesions on cross-sectional imaging (78-87%), resectability status (54-64%), and/or elevated CA19-9 level (60-69%). Most common used adjuncts were cytological lavage (37-55%) and intra-abdominal liver ultrasonography (36-50%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite considerable global variability, SL is widely used to detect occult metastases in pancreatic cancer, mainly in high-risk patients and often during the scheduled laparotomy. The observed variability highlights the need for more evidence leading to stronger guideline recommendations.

BACKGROUND:Poor outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are associated with delayed diagnosis and early systemic spread of disease. Development of liquid biopsies for screening could help detect low-stage disease in asymptomatic patients. We aimed to evaluate the association between incidental diagnosis on outcomes and assess the potential role of liquid biopsies. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:An institutional registry was used to identify patients undergoing resection for PDAC at between 2010 and 2015. Patients were stratified based on presenting symptoms, and outcomes were analyzed. Preoperatively collected plasma that was available on these patients was analyzed using a multianalyte screening test based on ctDNA and proteins. RESULTS:Seventy-nine (9.6%) of 823 patients were diagnosed incidentally (asymptomatic at diagnosis). Incidental diagnosis was associated with type of surgery, and absence of nodal disease and lymphovascular invasion (all P<0.05). On multivariable analysis incidental diagnosis (HR, 0.561; 95%CI, 0.406-0.775; P<0.001) was independently associated with improved overall survival (OS), while tumor size ≥4cm (HR, 1.617; 95%CI, 1.201-2.176; P=0.002), nodal disease (HR, 1.259; 95%CI, 1.018-1.558; P=0.034), perineural invasion (HR,1.338; 95%CI, 1.030-1.739; P=0.029), and positive margins (HR,1.302; 95%CI, 1.058-1.602; P=0.013) were associated with poorer OS. Asymptomatic patients had a significantly longer OS (median-OS: 38 vs. 19 months (P<0.001). The rate of multianalyte test positivity was 75% (6/8) in asymptomatic patients compared to 73% (59/81) in symptomatic patients (P=0.895). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Approximately 10% of patients with PDAC are diagnosed incidentally. In resected PDAC, incidental diagnosis is independently associated with improved OS. Multianalyte screening tests perform equally well in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. These findings further reinforce the need for development of screening tools that can increase the rate of diagnosis at an asymptomatic stage and improve survival.

BACKGROUND:Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer with highly variable malignant potential. Current understanding of their biology remains incomplete, limiting accurate risk stratification and targeted interventions. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to characterise the molecular and immune features of IPMN across different dysplasia grades and histological subtypes, with a focus on IPMN-associated invasive carcinoma (IPMN-IC). DESIGN/METHODS:Spatial whole-transcriptome profiling using Digital Spatial Profiling was conducted on 12 patients, capturing the full histological and dysplastic spectrum of IPMN and conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A total of 117 epithelial, immune and stromal areas of interest were analysed. An expanded cohort of 43 patients with IPMN was used to validate selected key markers. RESULTS:Transcriptomic analysis unveiled stage-specific molecular alterations and identified two distinct subsets of high-grade (HG) IPMN lesions: one resembling indolent lesions (HG) and the other IC (HG+). Key markers associated with divergent biological behaviours were identified, including MUC5AC and TFF1 in indolent lesions, and Claudin-1 in lesions with invasive potential. Immune profiling revealed a trajectory from activation to suppression during IPMN progression. Several characteristic immune checkpoint molecules, including CEACAM1 and CD44, were identified in IPMN-IC. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study provides a spatially resolved molecular map of IPMN progression, delineating key transcriptomic and immune signatures. These findings advance the understanding of IPMN biology and highlight potential biomarkers for risk stratification and therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) progress from low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma (IC). High diagnostic accuracy is critical for surgical decision-making. METHODS:We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 2015, to January 27, 2025. Eligible studies reported on resected IPMNs, assessing diagnostic features for HGD/IC. Two reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Descriptive statistics summarized outcomes. The performance of worrisome features (WFs) and high-risk stigmata (HRS) based on International Association of Pancreatology guidelines were evaluated. RESULTS:In the 53 studies, 12 953 patients were included. HRS including obstructive jaundice and enhancing mural nodules ≥5mm showed robust specificity for HGD/IC, while main pancreatic duct size ≥10mm showed variable diagnostic accuracy. WFs such as cyst size ≥3 cm performed poorly, while cyst growth rate >3.5 mm/year demonstrated higher sensitivity (88%) and specificity (91%). Although rare, abrupt caliber change with distal atrophy was a robust predictor of malignancy (median odds ratio: 3.01). Acute pancreatitis and lymphadenopathy displayed variable value. Incremental improvement in diagnostic accuracy was observed with additional HRS or WFs. CONCLUSIONS:Current diagnostic markers are valuable but provide limited guidance for surgical decision-making in IPMNs, highlighting the need for further refinement of diagnostic tools.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the prognostic impact of margin status in patients with resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to inform future intraoperative decision-making on handling differing degrees of dysplasia on frozen section. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:The ideal oncologic surgical outcome is a negative transection margin with normal pancreatic epithelium left behind. However, the prognostic significance of reresecting certain degrees of dysplasia or invasive cancer at the pancreatic neck margin during pancreatectomy for IPMN-derived PDAC is debatable. METHODS:Consecutive patients with resected and histologically confirmed IPMN-derived PDAC (2002-2022) from six international high-volume centers were included. The prognostic relevance of a positive resection margin (R1) and degrees of dysplasia at the pancreatic neck margin were assessed by log-rank test and multivariable Cox-regression for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS:Overall, 832 patients with IPMN-derived PDAC were included with 322 patients (39%) having an R1-resection on final pathology. Median OS (mOS) was significantly longer in patients with an R0 status compared to those with an R1 status (65.8 vs. 26.3 mo P<0.001). Patients without dysplasia at the pancreatic neck margin had similar OS compared to those with low-grade dysplasia (mOS: 78.8 vs. 66.8 months, P=0.344). However, high-grade dysplasia (mOS: 26.1 mo, P=0.001) and invasive cancer (mOS: 25.0 mo, P<0.001) were associated with significantly worse OS compared to no or low-grade dysplasia. Patients who underwent conversion of high-risk margins (high-grade or invasive cancer) to a low-risk margin (low-grade or no dysplasia) after intraoperative frozen section had significantly superior OS compared to those with a high-risk neck margin on final pathology (mOS: 76.9 vs. 26.1 mo P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:In IPMN-derived PDAC, normal epithelium or low-grade dysplasia at the neck have similar outcomes while pancreatic neck margins with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer are associated with poorer outcomes. Conversion of a high-risk to low-risk margin after intraoperative frozen section is associated with survival benefit and should be performed when feasible.

BACKGROUND:Little is known about the prognostic significance of pancreatic duct (PD) dilation following pancreatoduodenectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). Although PD dilation is typically the hallmark radiographic feature of IPMN, other causes of PD dilation exist, including anastomotic stricture, pancreatitis, senescence, and postsurgical passive dilation. Therefore, PD dilation after pancreatoduodenectomy for IPMN represents a diagnostic and management dilemma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance of PD dilation after pancreatoduodenectomy for noninvasive IPMN. METHODS:All patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for noninvasive IPMN at nine pancreatic academic centers between 2013 and 2018 were included. Variables were entered prospectively into institutional databases and retrospectively reviewed for the purpose of this study. Dilation of the PD remnant was defined as a duct diameter of ≥5 mm, according to international guidelines. RESULTS:Four-hundred and eighty-one patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 30-90). Patients were surveilled for a median of 4.5 (+/-2.3; max 10.6) years. During follow-up, 132 patients (27.4%) developed PD dilation in the remnant tissue after a median of 3.3 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that older age at the time of pancreatoduodenectomy (P=0.01) and longer surveillance duration (P=0.002) were predictors of PD dilation. Interestingly, neither the pathological IPMN subtype (branch-duct vs. main duct/mixed, P=0.96) nor the preoperative PD diameter (P=0.14) was associated with an increased risk of PD dilation in the remnant. During follow-up, IPMN recurrence was suspected in the remaining 72 patients (18.4%), solely because of ductal dilation on cross-sectional imaging in 97% (70/72). Completion pancreatectomy was performed in only 16 patients (3.3%), of whom only four (0.8%) had invasive carcinoma. Three of these four patients had high-grade dysplasia in the original pancreatoduodenectomy specimen, whereas only one had a low-grade dysplastic lesion initially. On multivariable analysis, no variable was predictive of IPMN recurrence in the remnant. CONCLUSIONS:New main duct dilation in the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy for IPMN is common, occurring in 27% of the patients. The duration of surveillance is the main factor associated with remnant PD dilation, suggesting that this is likely a physiologic phenomenon. Although recurrence of IPMN in the remnant is often suspected, only 0.8% of patients develop an invasive carcinoma in the pancreatic remnant requiring completion pancreatectomy.