Faculty Bibliography
Searched for:
in-biosketch:true
person:wolfgc01
Total Results:
641
ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Evolution-Transforming Pancreatic Surgery
PMID: 39994166
ISSN: 1534-4681
CID: 5800642
Recognizing IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer as a specific entity requiring prospective clinical studies: a call for international collaboration
PMID: 39945800
ISSN: 1460-2105
CID: 5793802
Implications of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Path Towards Personalized Prognostication
OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to investigate prognostic factors in context of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and develop tools that can allow for accurate and personalized patient prognostication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:NAT might impact the prognostic ability of well-established clinicopathological factors in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS:Patients after resection for PDAC were identified from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group Recurrence Database and institutional databases at NYU Langone Health and the Johns Hopkins Hospital (2014-2019). Patients were stratified into NAT and chemo-naïve groups. Overall survival (OS), calculated from the time of resection, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using log-rank tests. Prognostic factors associated with OS were assessed in both groups using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses and presented using hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Predictive models were developed and an interactive tool was created to predict survival independently in both groups. RESULTS:Of 2,760 patients with resected PDAC, 778 patients (28%) received NAT. Independent predictors for worse OS in chemo-naïve patients included age ≥65 years, markedly elevated CA19-9 (≥500 U/mL) at diagnosis, higher AJCC-T stage (T3/4 vs T1/2), worsening AJCC N-stage (N2 vs. N1 vs. N0), poor tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, and microscopically positive resection margin (R1 vs. R0). Contrastingly, predictors for worse OS in NAT patients included non-normalization of CA19-9 after NAT (<37 U/mL), presence of nodal disease (N1/2 vs. N0 given no statistical difference between N1 and N2 disease), and grade of treatment response (moderate/poor vs. complete/near complete). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Prognostic factors for OS in patients with resected PDAC differ between chemo-naïve and NAT patients. Personalized prediction tools for OS in resected PDAC based on these specific factors are available online (www.pancpals.com/tools).
PMID: 39928537
ISSN: 1528-1140
CID: 5793182
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection and SMA Divestment: A Step-by-Step Educational Video
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:En-bloc celiac axis resection (CAR) was first proposed by Lyon H. Appleby in 1952 for gastric cancer and later modified for pancreatic resections with gastric preservation by Nimura et al. in 1976. CAR remains uncommon, performed in fewer than 0.2 cases annually. Advancements in preoperative imaging and anatomy understanding, ischemic complication management, and centralization of care have improved outcomes. This report presents a robotic distal pancreatectomy (DP) with CAR and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) divestment. CASE REPORT/METHODS:A 65-year-old woman presented with back pain. Imaging revealed biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body, encasing the celiac, splenic, and common hepatic arteries with SMA abutment. Following four cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, follow-up imaging demonstrated stable disease without metastasis. The need for hepatic artery reconstruction was assessed intraoperatively, with alternative strategies detailed in the accompanying video. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE/METHODS:The patient underwent a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with class Ia CAR. Surgery was conducted in a caudal approach, lasted 420 minutes with minimal blood loss (100 ml). Laparoscopic ultrasound (lapUS) and indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion were used to assess resectability, vascular perfusion, and targeted blood vessels. The postoperative course was uneventful, except for a Grade B chyle leak managed conservatively. No liver or gastric ischemia occurred. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated two months postoperatively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Enhanced visualization, improved dexterity, and adjuncts including lapUS and ICG are potential benefits that are available to surgeons with the robotic platform when performing arterial divestment and CAR via a caudal approach.
PMID: 39918751
ISSN: 1534-4681
CID: 5784382
Tangential Versus Segmental Portomesenteric Venous Resection During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: An International Multicenter Cohort Study on Surgical and Oncological Outcome
OBJECTIVE:To investigate whether tangential versus segmental portomesenteric venous resection (PVR) impacts surgical and oncological outcome in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with portomesenteric vein (PMV) involvement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Current comparative studies on tangential versus segmental PVR as part of pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer include all degrees of PMV involvement, including cases where tangential PVR may not be a feasible approach, limiting the clinical applicability. METHODS:International retrospective study in 10 centers from 5 countries, including all consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR for pancreatic cancer with ≤180° PMV involvement on cross-sectional imaging at diagnosis (2014-2020). Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of tangential versus segmental PVR with overall survival (OS) from surgery, recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence, and in-hospital/30-day major morbidity, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS:Overall, 357 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR were included (42% tangential PVR, 58% segmental PVR). The adjusted risk for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 23% (95%CI, 17-32) after tangential and 23% (95%CI, 17-30) after segmental PVR (P=0.98). After adjusting for confounders, PVR type was not associated with OS (HR=0.94 [95%CI, 0.69-1.30]), RFS (HR=0.94 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.28), and locoregional recurrence (OR=0.76 [95%CI, 0.40-1.46]). CONCLUSIONS:In patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with ≤180° PMV involvement, the type of PVR (i.e., tangential vs. segmental) was not associated with differences in surgical and oncological outcome. This suggest that if both procedures are technically feasible, surgeons can choose the type of PVR based on their preference.
PMID: 39846439
ISSN: 1528-1140
CID: 5802422
The impact of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with left-sided resectable pancreatic cancer: an international multicenter study
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the association between neoadjuvant therapy and overall survival (OS) in patients with left-sided resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) compared to upfront surgery. BACKGROUND:Left-sided pancreatic cancer is associated with worse OS compared to right-sided pancreatic cancer. Although neoadjuvant therapy is currently seen as not effective in patients with RPC, current randomized trials included mostly patients with right-sided RPC. METHODS:International multicenter retrospective study including consecutive patients after left-sided pancreatic resection for pathology-proven RPC, either after neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery in 76 centers from 18 countries on 4 continents (2013-2019). Primary endpoint is OS from diagnosis. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of neoadjuvant therapy with OS, adjusting for confounders at time of diagnosis. Adjusted OS probabilities were calculated. RESULTS:=0.96) involvement. CONCLUSIONS:Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with left-sided RPC was associated with improved OS compared to upfront surgery. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy increased with larger tumor size and higher serum CA19-9 at diagnosis. Randomized controlled trials on neoadjuvant therapy specifically in patients with left-sided RPC are needed.
PMID: 39814200
ISSN: 1569-8041
CID: 5776932
Impact of resection margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer
BACKGROUND:To improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a complete resection is crucial. However, evidence regarding the impact of microscopically positive surgical margins (R1) on recurrence is conflicting due to varying definitions and limited populations of patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of the resection margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma stratified by local tumor stage. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreatectomy at a high-volume academic center (2012-2022). R1 was subclassified into microscopic invasion of the margin (R1 direct) or carcinoma present within 1 mm but not directly involving the margin (R1 <1 mm). Overall survival and time to recurrence were assessed by log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS:Of 472 included patients, 154 (33%) had an R1 resection. Of those 50 (32%) had R1 <1 mm and 104 (68%) R1 direct. The most commonly involved margin was the uncinate (41%) followed by the pancreatic neck (16%) and vascular margins (9%). Overall, a stepwise shortening of time to recurrence and overall survival was observed with an increasing degree of margin involvement (median time to recurrence: R0 39.3 months, R1 <1 mm 16.0 months, and R1 direct 13.4 months, all comparisons P < .05). Multivariable analyses confirmed the independent prognostic value of R1 direct across all surgical stages. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The resection margin status portends an independent prognostic value. Moreover, this association persists in patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Increasing the R0-resection rate is the most important potentially influenceable prognostic factor for improving surgery-related outcomes.
PMID: 39798179
ISSN: 1532-7361
CID: 5775802
Reply to: Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Resected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Cancer: Addressing Statistical and Methodological Concerns in Survival Analysis
PMID: 39787438
ISSN: 1527-7755
CID: 5805222
HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. 2025:27(1):94-101.DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.006
Identifying an optimal cancer risk threshold for resection of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
BACKGROUND:IPMN consensus guidelines make implicit judgments on what cancer risk level should prompt surgery. We used decision modeling to estimate this cancer risk threshold (CRT) for BD-IPMN patients. METHODS:We created a decision model to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) following surgery or surveillance for BD-IPMNs. We simulated treatment decisions for hypothetical patients, varying age, comorbidities and lesion location (pancreatic head/tail). The base case was a 60-year-old patient with mild comorbidities and pancreatic head IPMN. Probabilities, life expectancies, and utilities were incorporated from literature/public datasets. CRT was defined as the level of cancer risk at which the expected value of QALYs for surgery first exceeded that of surveillance. RESULTS:In the base case, surgery was preferred over surveillance, yielding 21.90 vs. 21.88 QALYs. The optimal CRT for a BD-IPMN patient depended on age, comorbidities, and location. CRT in the base case was 20 % and 3 % for an IPMN in the head and tail of the pancreas, respectively. Other drivers of preferred treatment were age and likelihood of postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:For BD-IPMNs, the optimal CRT varies depending on patient age and risk of surgical complications. Personalized risk threshold values could guide treatment decisions and inform future treatment consensus guidelines.
PMID: 39505679
ISSN: 1477-2574
CID: 5803672
Longitudinal assessment of disparities in pancreatic cancer care: A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database
BACKGROUND:The existence of sociodemographic disparities in pancreatic cancer has been well-studied but how these disparities have changed over time is unclear. The purpose of this study was to longitudinally assess patient management in the context of sociodemographic factors to identify persisting disparities in pancreatic cancer care. METHODS:Using the National Cancer Database, patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2017 were identified. The primary outcomes were surgical resection and/or receipt of chemotherapy. Outcome measures included changes in associations between sociodemographic factors (i.e., sex, age, race, comorbidity index, SES, and insurance type) and treatment-related factors (i.e., clinical stage at diagnosis, surgical resection, and receipt of chemotherapy). For each year, associations were assessed via univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS:Of 75,801 studied patients, the majority were female (51%), White (83%), and had government insurance (65%). Older age (range of OR 2010-2017 [range-OR]:0.19-0.29), Black race (range-OR: 0.61-0.78), lower SES (range-OR: 0.52-0.94), and uninsured status (range-OR: 0.46-0.71) were associated with lower odds of surgical resection (all p < 0.005), with minimal fluctuations over the study period. Older age (range-OR: 0.11-0.84), lower SES (range-OR: 0.41-0.63), and uninsured status (range-OR: 0.38-0.61) were associated with largely stable lower odds of receiving chemotherapy (all p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS:Throughout the study period, age, SES, and insurance type were associated with stable lower odds for both surgery and chemotherapy. Black patients exhibited stable lower odds of resection underscoring the continued importance of mitigating racial disparities in surgery. Investigation of mechanisms driving sociodemographic disparities are needed to promote equitable care.
PMID: 39653505
ISSN: 1432-2323
CID: 5762392
