Faculty Bibliography

Background/UNASSIGNED:The preoperative selection of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are likely to have an objective response to first transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains challenging. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To develop and validate a clinical-radiomic model (CR model) for preoperatively predicting treatment response to first TACE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A total of 595 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were included in this retrospective study. A tumoral and peritumoral (10 mm) radiomic signature (TPR-signature) was constructed based on 3,404 radiomic features from 4 regions of interest. A predictive CR model based on TPR-signature and clinical factors was developed using multivariate logistic regression. Calibration curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the model's performance. Results/UNASSIGNED:< 0.001). The predicted treatment response also allowed for significant discrimination between the Kaplan-Meier curves of each BCLC B subclassification. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:The CR model had an excellent performance in predicting the first TACE response in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and could provide a robust predictive tool to assist with the selection of patients for TACE.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 who undergo urgent and emergent surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Although COVID-19 infection is usually associated with mild disease, it can lead to severe respiratory complications. Little is known about the perioperative outcomes of patients with COVID-19. METHODS:We examined patients who underwent urgent and emergent surgery at 2 hospitals in New York City from March 17 to April 15, 2020. Elective surgical procedures were cancelled throughout and routine, laboratory based COVID-19 screening was instituted on April 1. Mortality, complications, and admission to the intensive care unit were compared between patients with COVID-19 detected perioperatively and controls. RESULTS:Among 468 subjects, 36 (7.7%) had confirmed COVID-19. Among those with COVID-19, 55.6% were detected preoperatively and 44.4% postoperatively. Before the routine preoperative COVID-19 laboratory screening, 7.7% of cases were diagnosed preoperatively compared to 65.2% after institution of screening (P = 0.0008). The perioperative mortality rate was 16.7% in those with COVID-19 compared to 1.4% in COVID-19 negative subjects [aRR = 9.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.68-15.21]. Serious complications were identified in 58.3% of COVID-19 subjects versus 6.0% of controls (aRR = 7.02; 95%CI, 4.96-9.92). Cardiac arrest, sepsis/shock, respiratory failure, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute kidney injury were more common in those with COVID-19. The intensive care unit admission rate was 36.1% in those with COVID-19 compared to 16.4% of controls (aRR = 1.34; 95%CI, 0.86-2.09). CONCLUSIONS:COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk for serious perioperative morbidity and mortality. A substantial number of patients with COVID-19 are not identified until after surgery.

BACKGROUND:Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly around the world to become a global pandemic. There is limited data on the impact of COVID-19 among patients with cancer. METHODS:A systematic review was performed to determine outcomes of adult patients with cancer affected by coronavirus infections, specifically SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers and assessed for quality and bias. Outcomes measured included study characteristics, cancer type, phase of care at the time of diagnosis, and clinical presentation. Morbidity and mortality outcomes were analyzed to assess the severity of infection as compared to the general population. RESULTS:A total of 19 studies with 110 patients were included. Of these, 66.4% had COVID-19 infections, 32.7% MERS and only one patient with SARS. The majority of COVID-19 studies were based on studies in China. There was a 56.6% rate of a severe event, including ICU admission or requiring mechanical ventilation, with an overall 44.5% fatality rate. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with cancer with coronavirus infections may be more susceptible to higher morbidity and mortality.

Background: There is limited literature on the occurrence and management of psoriasis involving the ear.
Objective(s): To better understand psoriasis of the ear and current approaches for management.
Method(s): The Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation was surveyed on the frequency and presentation of psoriasis of the ear, the types of examinations performed, and the rationale for choice of treatment.
Result(s): In this survey, the observed frequency of ear psoriasis was wide (10%-70%). The scalp was the most common concurrent site of extra-auricular psoriasis. Inspection of the ear was commonly reported; however, 75% of respondents report not inspecting the canal. Topical corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment. Systemic and biologic therapies are infrequently used.
Limitation(s): This study is limited by the sample size of respondents. Not every question of the survey was answered by all those surveyed.
Conclusion(s): Results from our survey suggest that the evaluation of psoriasis of the ear is often not complete. Inspection of the ear, including the canal, is recommended, especially if the scalp is involved. Routine inspection of the ear is recommended both to evaluate treatment response and for potential adverse side effects. In the setting of persistent ear disease, collaboration between dermatologists and otolaryngologists is encouraged.
Copyright

Background: Preoperative chemoRT is a standardof- care as shown in the CROSS trial (N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-2084), Surgery is sometimes deferred in pts with clinical CR (cCR) based on lack of overall survival benefit (J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2310-2317, J Clin Oncol2007;25:1160-1168). Nivolumab has activity in advanced ESCC (Lancet Oncol 2017;18:631-639), and adding it to chemoRT may improve outcomes.
Method(s): This phase I/II study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability and efficacy of nivolumab added to chemoRT (6 weekly carboplatin AUC 2, paclitaxel 50mg/m2, RT 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions 5/7 days) for pts with TanyN1-3 or T3-4N0M0 ESCC. The phase I primary endpoint is 'unacceptable toxicity' at 28 days after the last dose of chemotherapy. The phase II primary endpoints are cCR (endoscopy + PET/CT) and pCR rates for pts undergoing surgery. Nivolumab is given q2W x2, then concurrent chemoRT with nivolumab q2W x3. If no cCR, pt proceeds to esophagectomy, then adjuvant nivolumab q2W x3; if cCR, pt has an option of no surgery but receives nivolumab q2W x3.
Result(s):From 7/20/17 to 12/27/18, 6 pts were enrolled. No unacceptable or grade 5 toxicities were observed. The most common grade 1/2 AEs in >1 pt were anorexia, myelosuppression, elevated AST and nausea. Grade 3/4 AEs in >1 pt were lymphopenia and leukocytopenia. 2 pts required hospitalizations (dyspnea 1, colitis 1). All pts completed therapy; 1 pt had dose delay due to grade 2 esophagitis; 2 pts progressed, 4 achieved cCR. Of 4 pts with cCR, 2 pts chose surgery and both achieved pCR. None of the 4 pts recurred.
Conclusion(s): ChemoRT with nivolumab is tolerable with manageable toxicities in locally advanced ESCC. Enrollment to the phase II portion ended because of slow accrual. Adverse Events. Grade 1 &2 in > 1 pt: 4/6: Anorexia & Anemia 3/6: Leukocytopenia Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Nausea & Elevated AST 2/6: Hypomagnesemia Hypokalemia Grade 3 & 4 in > 1 pt: 5/6: Lymphopenia, 2/6: Leukocytopenia

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can prolong survival in advanced HCC patients, but response rates have been minimal. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab (nivo) demonstrated objective response rates (ORR) of 15% (escalation phase) and 20% (expansion phase) in the Checkmate 040 study. Pre-clinical and translational studies have demonstrated that IL-8 and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) contribute to HCC progression and recurrence following treatment. Therefore, rationale exists to evaluate combinatorial approaches to target TAM function combined with checkpoint inhibitory therapy. This phase II, randomized study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined anti-CSF1R (Cabiralizumab) or anti-IL-8 (BMS-986253) in combination with Nivo in advanced HCC. Method(s): Advanced HCC patients without prior systemic treatment and disease measurable by RECISTv1.1 with Childs A liver function are eligible. Patients will be enrolled (n=25 per arm) to Nivo 240 mg IV Q2 weeks monotherapy, Nivo 240 mg IV + BMS-986253 1200 mg IV Q2 weeks, or Nivo 240 mg IV + Cabiralizumab 4 mg/kg IV Q2 weeks. Primary endpoints include safety and ORR determined by RECISTv1.1. Secondary endpoints include time to response, duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include analysis of tumor microenvironment immune and tumor cell profiling of pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue

BACKGROUND:Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) is a gene that regulates tumor survival, neovascularization and invasion. Overexpression of HIF-1α correlates with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RO7070179 is a HIF-1α inhibitor that decreases HIF-1α mRNA and its downstream targets, it could be a potential treatment in HCC. AIM/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate safety and preliminary activity of RO7070179 in patients with previously treated HCC, with focus on a patient with prolonged response to RO7070179. METHODS:In the preclinical study of RO7070179 in a HCC xenograft model, the mice were separated into 4 groups with each group received doses of 0, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg for total 10 doses. HCC patients who failed at least one line of systemic treatment, received RO7070179 as a weekly infusion, each cycle is 6 wk. We evaluated the safety and HIF-1α mRNA levels of RO7070179. RESULTS:Preclinical evaluation of RO7070179 in orthotopic HCC xenograft model showed no significant differences in HCC tumor weight between the 3 and 10 mg/kg groups. However, dose of 10 mg/kg of RO7070179, has shown 76% reduction of the amount of HIF-1α mRNA in HCC tissue. In the phase 1b study of RO7070179 in previously treated HCC patients, 8 out of 9 were evaluable: 1 achieved PR and 1 SD. The patient with PR responded after 2 cycles treatments, which has been maintained for 12 cycles. This patient also showed reduction in perfusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) after 1 cycle of treatment. After 1 cycle of treatment, both patients with PR and SD showed decrease in HIF-1α mRNA at the root of biopsies (each biopsy was divided into 2 specimens, the tip and the root). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:RO7070179 can reduce HIF-1α mRNA level in HCC patients with SD or PR. It is well tolerated at 10 mg/kg, with transaminitis as the dose of increased toxicity. This study indicates that RO7070179 might benefit HCC patients, and an early signal for clinical benefit can potentially be predicted through changes in either mRNA level or DCE-MRI within 1 cycle of therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. In 2007, sorafenib became the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved first line systemic treatment for HCC, however, it confers only modest benefit in median overall survival (mOS) and comes with significant side effects. This review article will explore systemic treatments for incurable HCC beyond sorafenib. It will pay particular emphasis to various kinase inhibitors, immunotherapies, and new data on combination therapies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Sorafenib is the only food and drug administration (FDA) approved as first line systemic treatment in HCC. Regorafenib and nivolumab are the only FDA approved second line treatment after progression on sorafenib. We will discuss all potential first and second line options in HCC. In addition, we also will explore sequencing treatment options in HCC, and examine biomarkers that can potentially predict benefits from treatments such as immune checkpoint inhibitor. This minireview summarizes potential treatments in HCC based on clinical trials that have been published in manuscript or abstract format from 1994-2018.

Background: ESCC comprises 80% of esophageal cancers worldwide. Preoperative chemoRT is a standard-of-care based on the CROSS trial (N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-2084), which reported encouraging pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Surgery is often deferred in patients with clinical CR (cCR) based on lack of overall survival (OS) benefit (J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2310-2317, J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1160-1168). Nivolumab has activity in advanced ESCC (Lancet Oncol 2017;18:631-639), and adding it to chemoRT may improve outcomes. ESCC has a high somatic mutation rate and treatment with chemoRT may augment the abscopal effect.
Method(s): Our trial aims to establish the safety and tolerability (phase I), as well as the efficacy (phase II) of nivolumab added to a standard chemoRT backbone for patients with Tany N1-3 or T3-4N0 M0 ESCC. Phase I will enroll up to 12 patients and phase II, up to 44, per an optimal two-stage design. The phase I primary endpoint is unacceptable toxicity at 28 days after the last dose of chemotherapy. Phase II primary endpoints are cCR (endoscopy + PET/CT), pCR for patients undergoing surgery, and median progression-free survival and OS, which will be estimated via Kaplan Meier curves. Extensive tumor and blood immune correlative studies are planned. (Table Presented)