Faculty Bibliography

Introduction: The utility of The Paris System (TPS) in diagnosing low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN) on urine cytology is controversial due to the strict requirement for fibrovascular cores, and low sensitivity/specificity. Many LGUNs are classified as atypical urothelial cells (AUC) on cytology, which compromises the performance and utility of TPS. Here, we studied cytomorphologic features of LGUN in urine samples to determine which features were commonly observed.
Material(s) and Method(s): Twenty-two urine cytology cases with corresponding (within 2 months) LGUN histologic diagnosis were retrieved for this pilot study and were evaluated by one cytopathologist for the presence of clusters, cercariform cells, hyperchromasia, irregular nuclear rim, papillary architecture +/-fibrovascular core, and nucleus:cytoplasm (N:C) ratio (Figure 1). Hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's Method) was used to classify the features.
Result(s): Of the 22 urines, one was voided (4.5%) and 21 were instrumented (95.5%). Majority (77.3%) were diagnosed as AUC, 1 was suspicious for urothelial carcinoma (4.5%), 4 cases were graded as LGUN (18.2%, Table 1). Clustering analysis demonstrated that the morphologic features abundantly present in the urine specimen of LGUN included: clusters (77.3%), N:C ratio >50% (85.4%), and papillary architecture without a core (72.7%). The features that were mostly absent in LGUN specimens included: irregular nuclear rim (0%), papillary formation with a core (0%), hyperchromasia (9.1%), coarse chromatin (22.7%), and cercariform cells (36.3%). (Table 2).
Conclusion(s): Papillary formation with a fibrovascular core, the most convincing feature of LGUN, was not present in our pilot cohort of LGUN urines. However, our study describes additional cytomorphologic features that may be useful in identifying LGUN in urine cytology. Our research will continue with the evaluation of a larger cohort of LGUN cases with corresponding urine cytology in order to further investigate these findings

Introduction: Biliary duct brushing (B

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The present study aimed to examine the molecular profiles of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules stratified by American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) categories and to determine whether certain ultrasonographic features display particular molecular alterations. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of cases from January 1, 2016 to April 1, 2018. Cases with in-house ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) diagnoses, molecular testing, and surgery were included. All cases were diagnosed as TBSRTC indeterminate categories. The ultrasound studies were retrospectively reviewed and assigned TI-RADS scores (TR1-TR5) by board-certified radiologists. The final diagnoses were determined based on the surgical resection pathology. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to study whether demographic characteristics, TI-RADS levels, and TBSRTC diagnoses were associated with ThyroSeq molecular results. RESULTS:Eighty-one cases met the inclusion criteria. RAS mutations were the most common alteration across all TI-RADS categories (TR2 2/2; TR3 10/19, TR4 13/44, and TR5 8/16), and did not stratify with any particular TI-RADS category. Only TR4 and TR5 categories displayed more aggressive mutations such as BRAFV600E and TERT. ThyroSeq results were positively correlated with thyroid malignancy when non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) was categorized in the malignant category (odds ratio [OR], 6.859; P<0.01), but not when NIFTP was removed from the malignancy category. Echogenicity scores were found to be negatively correlated with ThyroSeq results in thyroid nodules (OR, 0.162; P<0.01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Higher-risk molecular alterations tended to stratify with the higher TI-RADS categories.

BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor found among men in the United States. Incidence rates of PCa have recently grown in Asian countries, partially due to the comprehensive implementation of early detection systems. Interestingly, a prospective cohort study showed that adopting a westernized dietary pattern was associated with a higher risk of being diagnosed with PCa among Korean and Japanese men. However, a comparison of current clinicopathological features of PCa between American and Chinese men is lacking. In this study, we report the current clinicopathological features of PCa in Chinese men and compare them to those of patients in the USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Case cohorts included, in total, 871 PCa cases with prostatectomy sequentially treated since 2017, including 299 cases from USA and 572 cases from two different academic hospitals in China. The parameters, including patient's age, preoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, Grade Group, stage and tumor focality, were collected, analyzed and compared using two sample t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS:Significant differences were demonstrated in the mean age of patients, preoperative PSA levels, extra-prostatic extension, Gleason scores, and Grade Groups (p < 0.05). PCa patients in the Chinese group were older than patients in the USA group (67.81 vs. 63.53, p < 0.01). The preoperative PSA levels in the Chinese group were higher than those in the USA group (11.69 v.s 6.30, p < 0.01). A higher percentage of high Grade Groups (Groups 4 and 5) was observed in the Chinese group (25.7%) compared to the USA cohort (17.11%), while Grade Group 2 was more common in the USA group than in the Chinese group (51.68% vs. 32.52%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:All these data suggest that the clinicopathologic features of PCa are different between the USA and Chinese populations, which may be influenced by treatment strategies (including surgical case selection criteria).

Risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is based on experience with tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum, which are far more common than GISTs of other sites. In this study from 47 institutions, we analyzed GISTs of the esophagus (n = 102), colon (n = 136), and appendix (n = 27) for their size, mitotic rate, morphology, and outcome to determine which criteria predict their behavior. Esophageal GISTs were small (median: 2.5 cm) with spindle cell morphology and a low mitotic rate (mean: 3.6/5 mm2). Twelve (12%) tumors progressed, including 11 with a mitotic rate >5/5 mm2 and one large (6.8 cm) GIST with a mitotic rate of 2/5 mm2. Colonic GISTs were smaller (median: 1.4 cm) and presented with abdominal pain or bleeding in 29% of cases. Most (92%) were composed of spindle cells with a mean mitotic rate of 4.6/5 mm2. Sixteen (12%) tumors progressed: 14 had mitotic rates >5/5 mm2, and two were >5.0 cm with a mitotic rate <5/5 mm2. All but one appendiceal GIST measured <2.0 cm. These tumors were composed of spindle cells with low mitotic rates (<5/5 mm2), and none progressed. Our results suggest that progression risk among esophageal and colonic GISTs is associated with increased mitotic activity (>5/5 mm2) and size >5.0 cm. These findings support the use of size and mitotic rate for prognostication of GISTs in these locations, similar to tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum.

BACKGROUND:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is known to cause severe respiratory infections with occasional accompanying pleural effusion (PE), pericardial effusion (PCE), or peritoneal effusion (PTE). The effect of COVID-19 on effusion cytology is not yet known. This study aimed to examine the cytomorphologic features and workup of effusion fluids in patients with active COVID-19 infection versus those in recovery. METHODS:PE (n = 15), PCE (n = 1), and PTE samples (n = 20) from hospitalized patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection (from June 1, 2020, to December 30, 2020) were reviewed. Effusion fluids with metastatic carcinoma were excluded. Differential cell counts, cytomorphology, and relevant immunostains for effusion fluids were retrospectively evaluated and compared between patients with active infection (positive on a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT] within 2 months; n = 23) and those in the recovery phase from COVID-19 (negative on a SARS-CoV-2 NAAT for >2 months; n = 13). RESULTS:The cytology diagnoses were negative for malignancy (n = 31), atypical (n = 4), and suspicious for malignancy (n = 1). Active infection cases showed more atypical mesothelial cells than recovery cases (P < .05); some had enlarged nuclei, prominent nucleoli, occasional multinucleation, and bizarre nuclei. Immunostains were performed more often in active infection cases than recovery cases (47.8% vs 7.7%; P < .05). Differential cell counts (available for 28 cases) showed no significant differences between the active infection and recovery groups. CONCLUSIONS:This study found atypical and bizarre mesothelial cells more often in effusions of cases with active COVID-19 infection in comparison with patients in recovery. It is important for cytopathologists to become familiar with the cytomorphologic effects of SARS-CoV-2 on effusion cytology so that these cases can be properly triaged.

Follicular dendritic cell sarcomas (FDCS) are rare tumours of lymph nodes and extranodal tissues which are grouped with the histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms. The diagnosis is usually made after thorough clinical and pathological examination with immunohistochemical analysis. Difficulties persist in diagnosing FDCS on cytological preparations. We report herein a case of a 57-year-old female who presented with a right neck mass of 5 months duration. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging of the neck reported a necrotic right level IIb lymph node and asymmetric fullness of the right palatine tonsil. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy revealed numerous spindle, oval and stellate neoplastic cells, arranged singly and in syncytia with moderate nuclear pleomorphism, vesicular chromatin pattern, and prominent nucleoli, sprinkled with small lymphocytes. The tumour cells were strongly diffusely positive for CD21, CD23, and D2-40 immunostaining on cell bock sections, but were negative for CD1a and CD34, supporting the diagnosis of FDCS. Follow-up surgical pathology on the resection showed histopathological features and an immunohistochemical profile consistent with FDCS.

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in males and its development and progression remains an important area of study. Recently, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been evidenced as key players in cancer pathogenesis. Specifically, dysregulation of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression has shown to affect tumor proliferation and metastasis, acting as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes. However, its specific mechanisms and functions in prostate cancer remain unclear. This review provides an overview of currently available information on prostate cancer-related lncRNAs, including GAS5, GAS-007, MEG3, PCA3, PCAT14, PCAT1, PVT1, UCA1, SChLAP1, MALAT1, HOTAIR, and NEAT1. Notable tumor growth inhibitors include GAS5 and MEG3. GAS5 is evidenced to interfere with the AKT/MTOR signaling pathway through targeting microRNA mir-103. MEG3, however, is proposed to inhibit the cycle, sponge miR-9-5p, and induce gene silencing. PCAT1, PVT1, and UCA1 are important tumor growth promoters. PCAT1 is indicated to be a transcriptional repressor, a mir-145-5P sponge, and a P13K/AKT pathway activator. Studies suggest that PVT1 acts via microRNA targeting and regulating proliferating cell nuclear antigen. UCA1 may sponge miR-204 and miR-331-3p as well as regulate myosin VI. Thorough understanding of these lncRNAs may elucidate new aspects of prostate cancer pathology and serve a pivotal role in developing novel diagnostic and prognostic techniques.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal tumors that co-express smooth muscle and melanocytic markers. They have a predilection for gynecologic organs where they present a unique diagnostic challenge due to morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with more common smooth muscle and stromal tumors. Limited information regarding natural history owing to rarity of this tumor makes accurate risk stratification difficult. Five different prognostic classification systems (2 for PEComa of all sites and 3 specific for gynecologic PEComa) have been proposed. We have described clinicopathologic features of 13 new cases of gynecologic PEComa, and tested all 5 prognostic algorithms in a total of 67 cases of gynecologic PEComa (54 cases from previously published studies). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were built and area under curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate predictive accuracy. The 'modified gynecologic-specific criteria' showed high sensitivity and specificity and yielded the highest AUC (0.864). The earlier version of it, 'gynecology-specific criteria' suffered from lower specificity (AUC = 0.843). Post hoc McNemar test confirmed significant difference between the performances of 'modified gynecology-specific criteria' and 'gynecology-specific criteria' (p = .008). The 'original' Folpe criteria for PEComas of all sites showed low specificity, had lower AUC (0.591) and was inapplicable in 18% of cases. Its two later versions ('revised' Folpe criteria and 'modified' Folpe criteria) also yielded lower AUC (0.690 and 0.591respectively). We have shown that 'modified gynecologic-specific' algorithm predicts clinical outcome of gynecologic PEComa with high accuracy and have validated its use for prognostic stratification of gynecologic PEComa.

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is known to cause severe respiratory infections with occasional accompanying pleural (PE), pericardial (PCE) or peritoneal effusion (PTE). The effect of COVID-19 disease on effusion cytology is not yet known. Therefore, our study aims to examine the cytomorphologic features and work-up of effusion fluid in patients in recovery from COVID-19 infection versus those with active disease.
Material(s) and Method(s): PE (n=15), PCE (n=1), PTE (n=19) samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection (6/1/2020-12/30/2020) were reviewed. EFs with metastatic carcinoma were excluded. Differential cell count (DCC), cytomorphology, and immunostains of EFs were retrospectively evaluated by a board-certified cytopathologist and compared between patients with active infection (AI, n=22, positive COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) within 2 months) and recovery phase from COVID-19 (RC, n=13, negative COVID-19 NAAT for >2 months).
Result(s): Cytology diagnoses were: negative for malignancy (n=30), atypical (n=4), suspicious for malignancy (n=1). AI cases showed more atypical mesothelial cells than RC cases (Table 1, p<0.05), some with enlarged nuclei with prominent nucleoli and occasional multi-nucleation (Figure 1), and some with bizarre nuclei (Table 1, p<0.01). Immunostains were performed more often in AI than RC cases (50.0% vs 7.7%, p<0.05). DCC (available in 28 cases) showed no significant difference amongst AI and RC cases (Figure 1, p>0.05).
Conclusion(s): Our study found atypical and bizarre mesothelial cells to be present more often in effusions of cases with active COVID-19 infection than in samples from patients in recovery, though DCCs did not show significant difference. Diagnosis of malignancy may be considered in cases with such nuclear atypia, which explains increased immunostain work-up in AI cases. It is important for cytopathologists to consider the patients' COVID-19 infection status when evaluating effusion cytology cases. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]
Copyright