Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:External-beam radiation therapy (RT) is standard of care (SOC) for pain relief of symptomatic bone metastases. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiation to asymptomatic bone metastases in preventing skeletal-related events (SRE). METHODS:In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, adult patients with widely metastatic solid tumor malignancies were stratified by histology and planned SOC (systemic therapy or observation) and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive RT to asymptomatic high-risk bone metastases or SOC alone. The primary outcome of the trial was SRE. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations for SRE and overall survival (OS). RESULTS:= .01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Radiation delivered prophylactically to asymptomatic, high-risk bone metastases reduced SRE and hospitalizations. We also observed an improvement in OS with prophylactic radiation, although a confirmatory phase III trial is warranted.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Management of CNS involvement in leukemia may include craniospinal irradiation (CSI), though data on CSI efficacy are limited. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed leukemia patients who underwent CSI at our institution between 2009 and 2021 for CNS involvement. CNS local recurrence (CNS-LR), any recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), CNS PFS, and overall survival (OS) were estimated. RESULTS:Of thirty-nine eligible patients treated with CSI, most were male (59%) and treated as young adults (median 31 years). The median dose was 18 Gy to the brain and 12 Gy to the spine. Twenty-five (64%) patients received CSI immediately prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, of which 21 (84%) underwent total body irradiation conditioning (median 12 Gy). Among 15 patients with CSF-positive disease immediately prior to CSI, all 14 assessed patients had pathologic clearance of blasts (CNS-response rate 100%) at a median of 23 days from CSI start. With a median follow-up of 48 months among survivors, 2-year PFS and OS were 32% (95% CI 18-48%) and 43% (95% CI 27-58%), respectively. Only 5 CNS relapses were noted (2-year CNS-LR 14% (95% CI 5-28%)), which occurred either concurrently or after a systemic relapse. Only systemic relapse after CSI was associated with higher risk of CNS-LR on univariate analysis. No grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was seen during CSI. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:CSI is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for patients with CNS leukemia. Control of systemic disease after CSI may be important for CNS local control. CNS recurrence may reflect reseeding from the systemic space.

Leptomeningeal metastases/diseases (LMDs) are a late-stage complication of solid tumor or hematologic malignancies. LMD is spread of cancer cells to the layers of the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid maters) and subarachnoid space seen in 3 to 5% of cancer patients. It is a disseminated disease which carries with it significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. Our understanding of disease pathophysiology is currently lacking; however, advances are being made. As our knowledge of disease pathogenesis has improved, treatment strategies have evolved. Mainstays of treatment such as radiotherapy have changed from involved-field radiotherapy strategies to proton craniospinal irradiation which has demonstrated promising results in recent clinical trials. Systemic treatment strategies have also improved from more traditional chemotherapeutics with limited central nervous system (CNS) penetration to more targeted therapies with better CNS tumor response. Many challenges remain from earlier clinical detection of disease through improvement of active treatment options, but we are getting closer to meaningful treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:As novel systemic therapies allow patients to live longer with cancer, the risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases increases and providers will more frequently encounter emergent presentation of brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Management of these metastases requires appropriate work-up and well-coordinated multidisciplinary care. We set out to perform a review of emergent radiotherapy (RT) for CNS metastases, specifically focusing on BM and LM. METHODS:We review the appropriate pathways for workup and initial management of BM and LM, while reviewing the literature supporting emergent treatment of these entities with surgery, systemic anti-cancer therapy, and RT. To inform this narrative review, literature searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted, with preference given to articles employing modern RT techniques, when applicable. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence for management of BM and LM in the emergent setting, discussion was supplemented by the authors' expert commentary. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:This work highlights the importance of surgical evaluation, particularly for patients presenting with significant mass effect, hemorrhagic metastases, or increased intracranial pressure. We review the rare situations where emergent initiation of systemic anti-cancer therapy is indicated. When defining the role of RT, we review factors guiding selection of appropriate modality, treatment volume, and dose-fractionation. Generally, 2D- or 3D-conformal treatment techniques prescribed as 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions, should be employed in the emergent setting. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with BM and LM present from a diverse array of clinical situations, requiring well-coordinated multidisciplinary management, and there is a paucity of high-quality evidence guiding such management decisions. This narrative review aims to more thoroughly prepare providers for the challenging situation of emergent management of BM and LM.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), often presenting with back pain and motor/sensory deficits, is associated with poor survival, particularly when there is loss of ambulation. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature and discuss appropriate workup and management of MESCC, specifically in the emergent setting. METHODS:A PubMed search was conducted on "spinal cord compression" and "radiation therapy." Articles were analyzed for the purpose of this narrative review. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:If MESCC is suspected, neurologic examination and complete spine imaging are recommended. Emergent treatment is indicated if there is radiographic evidence of high-grade compression and/or clinically significant motor deficits. Treatment involves a combination of medical management, surgical decompression, radiation therapy (RT), and rehabilitation. For motor deficits, emergent initiation of high dose steroids is recommended. Circumferential surgical decompression ± stabilization followed by RT provides superior clinical outcomes than RT alone. For patients whom surgery is not reasonable, RT alone may provide significant treatment response which depends on radioresponsiveness of the pathology. Systemic therapy, if indicated, is typically reserved till after primary treatment of MESCC, but patients with chemoresponsive tumors may receive primary chemotherapy. The selected RT schedule should be personalized to each patient and commonly is 30 Gy in 10 fractions (fx), 20 Gy in 5 fx, or 8 Gy in 1 fx. MESCC recurrence may be treated with additional RT, if within the spinal cord tolerance, or surgery. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been used for high grade MESCC in patients with relatively intact neurologic function at a few centers with a very robust infrastructure to support rapid initiation of treatment within a short period of time, but is generally not feasible for most clinical practices. SBRT may be advantageous for low grade MESCC, recurrence, or in the post-operative setting. Detection of MESCC prior to development of high-grade compression or deterioration of neurologic function may allow patients to benefit more from advanced therapies and improve prognosis. CONCLUSIONS:MESCC is a devastating condition; optimal treatment should be personalized to each patient and approached collaboratively by a multidisciplinary team.

CONTEXT:Individual goals and values should drive medical decision making for patients with serious illness. Unfortunately, clinicians' existing strategies to encourage reflection and communication regarding patients' personal values are generally time-consuming and limited in scope. OBJECTIVES:Herein, we develop a novel intervention to facilitate at-home reflection and discussion about goals and values. We then conduct a pilot study of our intervention in a small population of patients with metastatic cancer. METHODS:We first engaged former cancer patients and their families to adapt an existing serious illness communication guide to a worksheet format. We then distributed this adapted "Values Worksheet" to 28 patients with metastatic cancer. We surveyed participants about their perceptions of the Worksheet to assess its feasibility. RESULTS:Of 30 patients approached, 28 agreed to participate. Seventeen participants completed the Values Worksheet, and of those 11 (65%) responded to the follow-up survey. Seven of eleven reported that the Values Worksheet was a good use of time, and nine of eleven would be likely to recommend it to other patients with cancer. Eight of ten reported mild distress, two of ten reported moderate to severe distress. CONCLUSION:The Values Worksheet was a feasible way to facilitate at-home discussions of goals and values for select patients with metastatic cancer. Further research should focus on identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from the Values Worksheet, and should employ the Worksheet as one tool to facilitate reflection on the questions that arise around serious illness, as an adjunct to serious illness conversations with a physician.

PURPOSE:Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a promising treatment for patients with solid tumor leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). We hypothesize that genetic characteristics before and changes resulting after pCSI will reflect clinical response to pCSI. We analyzed the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients receiving pCSI for LM and explored genetic variations associated with response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:We subjected CSF from 14 patients with LM before and after pCSI to cell-free DNA sequencing using a targeted-sequencing panel. In parallel, plasma ctDNA and primary tumors were subjected to targeted sequencing. Variant allele frequency (VAF) and cancer cell fraction (CCF) were calculated; clonality of observed mutations was determined. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to associate genomic changes with survival. RESULTS:The median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 9 months [interquartile range (IQR), 5-21 months]. We showed clonal evolution between tumor and ctDNA of the CSF and plasma with unique mutations identified by compartment. Higher CSF ctDNA mean VAF before pCSI (VAFpre) had worse OS (6 months for VAFpre ≥ 0.32 vs. 9 months for VAFpre < 0.32; P = 0.05). Similarly, increased VAF after pCSI portended worse survival (6 vs. 18 months; P = 0.008). Higher mean CCF of subclonal mutations appearing after pCSI was associated with worse OS (8 vs. 17 months; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:In patients with solid tumor LM undergoing pCSI, we found unique genomic profiles associated with pCSI through CSF ctDNA analyses. Patients with reduced genomic diversity within the leptomeningeal compartment demonstrated improved OS after pCSI suggesting that CSF ctDNA analysis may have use in predicting pCSI response.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:The management of patients with advanced solid malignancies increasingly uses stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Advanced cancer patients are at risk for developing leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely collected during computed tomography (CT) myelography for spinal SBRT planning, offering an opportunity for early LM detection by CSF cytology in the absence of radiographic LM or LM symptoms (subclinical LM). This study tested the hypothesis that early detection of tumor cells in CSF in patients undergoing spine SBRT portends a similarly poor prognosis compared with clinically overt LM. METHODS AND MATERIALS/UNASSIGNED:We retrospectively analyzed clinical records for 495 patients with metastatic solid tumors who underwent CT myelography for spinal SBRT planning at a single institution from 2014 to 2019. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .02). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:LM remains a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Subclinical LM detected by CSF cytology in spine SBRT patients has a similarly poor prognosis compared with standardly detected LM and warrants consideration of central nervous system-directed therapies. As aggressive local therapies are increasingly used for metastatic patients, more sensitive CSF evaluation may further identify patients with subclinical LM and should be evaluated prospectively.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Pseudoprogression mimicking recurrent glioblastoma remains a diagnostic challenge that may adversely confound or delay appropriate treatment or clinical trial enrollment. We sought to build a radiomic classifier to predict pseudoprogression in patients with primary isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS/UNASSIGNED:-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status to predict pseudoprogression. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status into the classifier. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our results suggest that radiomic analysis of contrast T1-weighted images and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion images can assist the prompt diagnosis of pseudoprogression. Validation on external and independent data sets is necessary to verify these advanced analyses, which can be performed on routinely acquired clinical images and may help inform clinical treatment decisions.

PURPOSE:Photon involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the standard-of-care radiotherapy for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumors. We tested whether proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) encompassing the entire CNS would result in superior CNS progression-free survival (PFS) compared with IFRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We conducted a randomized, phase II trial of pCSI versus IFRT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancers with LM. We enrolled patients with other solid tumors to an exploratory pCSI group. For the randomized groups, patients were assigned (2:1), stratified by histology and systemic disease status, to pCSI or IFRT. The primary end point was CNS PFS. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TAEs). RESULTS:= .19). In the exploratory pCSI group, 35 patients enrolled, the median CNS PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 9.1 months) and OS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 11 months). CONCLUSION:Compared with photon IFRT, we found pCSI improved CNS PFS and OS for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancer with LM with no increase in serious TAEs.