Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:yuanj01
Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: a comparison between conventional and endovascular stent graft techniques
Ohki, T; Marin, M L; Veith, F J; Yuan, J G; Ohki, M; Soundararajan, K; Sanchez, L A; Parsons, R E; Lyon, R T; Yamazaki, Y
Endovascular grafts (EVGs) have been proposed as a treatment for a variety of vascular diseases; however, the impact of EVGs on graft healing has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study is to compare anastomotic intimal hyperplasia (AIH) and endothelialization in EVGs and conventional bypass grafts (CGs). Seven mongrel dogs received an EVG in one iliac artery and a CG in the other iliac artery using a 5 mm x 4 cm polytetrafluoroethylene graft. The EVG was secured to the native vessel wall, with balloon expandable stents at either ends of the graft. CGs were anastomosed using running sutures. Intravascular ultrasound was performed at the time of sacrifice (8 weeks) to determine percentage of stenosis at the distal anastomosis. Specimens were divided longitudinally for light microscopic analysis (thickness of distal AIH) and scanning electron microscopic studies (percentage of endothelial coverage of the graft). Percentage of stenosis at the distal anastomosis was significantly higher in EVGs compared with CGs (28.2 +/- 18.2% versus 1.8 +/- 2.8%; P < 0.01) due to significantly greater mean intimal thickness in the EVGs (441.1 +/- 101.1 microns versus 82.4 +/- 41.9 microns; P < 0.01). The total percentage of area covered by endothelial cells was also significantly greater in EVGs compared with CGs (80.5 +/- 37.5% versus 30.3 +/- 37.1%; P < 0.05). Intraluminal location enhanced endothelialization of the polytetrafluoroethylene graft; however, it also resulted in greater AIH. Further device refinements including stent design may be required to maximize the potential of these endovascular procedures
PMID: 9224391
ISSN: 0022-4804
CID: 79973
Endovascular aortounifemoral grafts and femorofemoral bypass for bilateral limb-threatening ischemia
Ohki, T; Marin, M L; Veith, F J; Lyon, R T; Sanchez, L A; Suggs, W D; Yuan, J G; Wain, R A; Parsons, R E; Patel, A; Rivers, S P; Cynamon, J; Bakal, C W
PURPOSE: Although axillobifemoral bypass procedures have a lower mortality rate than aortobifemoral bypass procedures, they are limited by decreased patency, moderate hemodynamic improvement, and the need for general anesthesia. This report describes an alternative approach to bilateral aortoiliac occlusive disease using unilateral endovascular aortofemoral bypass procedures in combination with standard femorofemoral reconstructions. METHODS: Seven patients who had bilateral critical ischemia and tissue necrosis in association with severe comorbid medical illnesses underwent implantation of unilateral aortofemoral endovascular grafts, which were inserted into predilated, recanalized iliac arteries. The proximal end of the endovascular graft was fixed to the distal aorta or common iliac artery with a Palmaz stent. The distal end of the graft was suture-anastomosed to the ipsilateral patent outflow vessel, and a femorofemoral bypass procedure was then performed. RESULTS: All endovascular grafts were successfully inserted through five occluded and two diffusely stenotic iliac arteries under either local (1), epidural (5), or general anesthesia (1). The mean thigh pulse volume recording amplitudes increased from 9 +/- 3 mm to 30 +/- 7 mm and from 6 +/- 2 mm to 26 +/- 4 mm ipsilateral and contralateral to the aortofemoral graft insertion, respectively. In all cases the symptoms completely resolved. Procedural complications were limited to one local wound hematoma. No graft thromboses occurred during follow-up to 28 months (mean, 17 months). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular iliac grafts in combination with standard femorofemoral bypass grafts may be an effective alternative to axillobifemoral bypass in high-risk patients who have diffuse aortoiliac occlusive disease, particularly when bilateral axillary-subclavian disease is present
PMID: 8976352
ISSN: 0741-5214
CID: 79965
Effect of polytetrafluoroethylene covering of Palmaz stents on the development of intimal hyperplasia in human iliac arteries
Marin, M L; Veith, F J; Cynamon, J; Parsons, R E; Lyon, R T; Suggs, W D; Bakal, C W; Waahl, S; Sanchez, L A; Yuan, J G; Ohki, T
PURPOSE: The occurrence of neointimal hyperplasia within a stent may result in restenosis with recurrent symptoms of end-organ ischemia. This study evaluated the potential of a nonporous covering of a stent to function as a barrier to the formation of intrastent neointimal hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve endovascular stent grafts were used to treat 12 high-risk patients with limb-threatening ischemia secondary to long-segment iliac artery occlusion. A 6-mm, thin-walled polytetrafluoroethylene graft was inserted and anchored to the common iliac artery with use of Palmaz stents. Each stent was covered by graft material over one-half of its length. Control angiograms obtained immediately after graft insertion were compared with follow-up angiograms obtained between 4 and 6 months after the initial procedure. On each angiogram, the region of the stent was magnified by 20x to permit computerized luminal diameter measurements. RESULTS: The mean luminal diameter within the stent was significantly greater on the covered (7.7 mm +/- 0.33 standard deviation) compared with the uncovered (6.7 mm +/- 0.85 standard deviation) portions (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Partially covered stents are a unique model for assessing the effects of an extrinsic stent covering on arterial healing and myointimal hyperplasia. These data suggest that a relatively nonporous covering of polytetrafluoroethylene may inhibit stent-related restenosis in iliac arteries
PMID: 8897327
ISSN: 1051-0443
CID: 79962