Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:This study explores the implementation and outcomes of catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) within a safety-net hospital (SNH), addressing a critical gap in the literature concerning CBT in underserved and vulnerable populations. METHODS:This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing CBT between October 2020 and January 2024 at a SNH. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS:A total of 107 patients (47.6 % female, mean age 58.4 years) underwent CBT for acute PE, with 23 (21.5 %) high-risk and 84 (78.5 %) intermediate-risk PE. Demographically, 64 % identified as Black, 10 % White, 19 % Hispanic or Latino, and 5 % Asian. In terms of insurance coverage, 50 % had private insurance or Medicare, 36 % had Medicaid, and 14 % were uninsured. Notably, 67 % of the patients resided in high poverty rate zip codes and 11 % were non-citizen non-residents. Over a median follow up period of 30 days, 6 (5.6 %) patients expired (all high-risk PE), 3 of whom presented with cardiac arrest. No patients who presented with intermediate-risk PE died at 30 days. There was no difference in 30-day mortality based on race, insurance type, poverty level or citizenship status. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our study findings reveal no disparities in access or outcomes to CBT at our SNH, emphasizing the feasibility and success of implementing PERT and CBT at a SNH, offering a potential model to address healthcare disparities in acute PE on a broader scale.

Therapeutic anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy in acute pulmonary embolism (PE), however, select patients benefit from emergent reperfusion to prevent or rescue acute right ventricular failure and haemodynamic collapse. Compared to other leading causes of cardiovascular mortality such as myocardial infarction and stroke, there is a substantial paucity of literature informing on advanced therapies in PE. Recent years have seen significant evolution in the armamentarium available for PE care with the uptake of several endovascular treatment modalities and increased use of mechanical circulatory support. While several ongoing randomised controlled trials may alter the therapeutic landscape and approach to PE management, at present, we are left with multiple selections with limited guidance. In this review, we discuss the latest therapeutic options available for acute PE and offer an approach to their implementation.

Intravenous (IV) digoxin loading dose recommendations for rate control of atrial arrhythmias in critically ill patients are not well studied. When using digoxin in the setting of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), a loading dose (LD) in either a fixed-dose regimen, weight-based dose, or pharmacokinetic-based calculation to target a serum digoxin concentration (SDC) of 0.8-1.5 ng/mL is recommended. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of digoxin LD used in critically ill patients for rate control of AF/AFL and to assess the SDC achieved. This single center retrospective cohort study included patients who received IV digoxin and had a SDC drawn. The primary endpoint was the median SDC achieved after a digoxin LD. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of SDCs ≥1.5 ng/mL and heart rate (HR) control. A total of 92 patients were included. The median total LD of digoxin for the entire cohort was 11mcg/kg (750 mcg). For 61% of the cohort, the LD was distributed over six-hour intervals. The median SDC after completion of the IV digoxin LD was 1.3 ng/mL (0.9, 1.7). The incidence of supratherapeutic SDC was 36% for the total cohort. A target HR < 110 beats per minute within 24 hours from digoxin LD was achieved in 60% of the cohort. In conclusion, a median total digoxin LD of 750 mcg in critically ill patients with AF/AFL, targeting a SDC < 1.5ng/mL may be considered for acute rate control, taking into account drug-drug interactions in the cardiac intensive care unit. Future studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

The unprimed right ventricle is exquisitely sensitive to acute elevations in afterload. High pulmonary vascular tone incurred with acute pulmonary embolism has the potential to induce obstructive shock and circulatory collapse. While emergent pulmonary reperfusion is essential in severe circumstances, an important subset of pulmonary embolism patients may exhibit a less extreme presentation posing a management dilemma. As intensive care therapies have the potential to both salvage and harm the failing right ventricle, a keen understanding of the pathophysiology is requisite in the care of the contemporary patient with hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Here, we review right ventricular pathophysiology, an approach to risk stratification, and offer guidance on the medical and mechanical supportive and therapeutic strategies for the critically ill patient with acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The aim of this study was to examine the impact of early versus delayed catheter-based therapies (CBTs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2 academic centers involving patients with intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were divided into early (<12 hours) and delayed CBT (≥12 hours) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hemodynamic instability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:=0.046). When patients were stratified by timing of CBT (early/late) and the composite PE shock score (high ≥3; low <3), all 16 patients who experienced the primary composite outcome had a high composite PE shock score, with 14/16 (87.5%) having a high composite PE shock score and delayed intervention. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Early CBT was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The composite PE shock score may help identify patients who will benefit from early CBT. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

The provision of positive pressure ventilation has the potential to provoke hemodynamic deterioration. The subject of heart-lung interactions is both complex and critical yet often obscure and fraught with misconception among trainees and seasoned clinicians alike. In this article, we focus on the impact of positive pressure ventilation on the right heart, providing a teaching approach composed of didactic sessions and simulated cases. We split our didactics and cases into two 30-minute sessions: "How the right heart fills" and "How the right heart empties." Within each session, our framework highlights key concepts with respect to circulatory physiology, respiratory system mechanics, and an amalgam of the two subjects as it pertains to managing clinical scenarios encountered during a trainee's intensive care unit rotation.

BACKGROUND:Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and normotensive shock may have worse outcomes. However, diagnosis of normotensive shock requires invasive hemodynamics. Our objective was to assess the predictive value of McConnell's sign in identifying normotensive shock in patients with intermediate-risk PE. METHODS:and clinical evidence of hypoperfusion (i.e. elevated lactate, oliguria). The primary outcome was the association between McConnell's sign and normotensive shock. RESULTS:, p = 0.003), and higher rates of normotensive shock (76 % vs 27 %, p = 0.005). McConnell's sign had a sensitivity of 88 % and specificity of 53 % for identifying intermediate-risk PE patients with normotensive shock. Patients with McConnell's sign had an increased odds (odds ratio 8.38, confidence interval: 1.73-40.53, p = 0.008; area under the curve 0.70, 95 % confidence interval: 0.56-0.85) of normotensive shock. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study to suggest that McConnell's sign may identify those in the intermediate-risk group who are at risk for normotensive shock. Larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings.