Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) occurs due to a mismatch in myocardial oxygen supply and demand without unstable coronary artery disease. We sought to identify patterns, predictors and outcomes of invasive management of type 2 MI in the USA. METHODS:Adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized with type 2 MI were identified in a cross-sectional study from the 2018 National Inpatient Sample. Invasive management was defined as invasive coronary angiography or revascularization. Patient, hospital and geographic characteristics associated with invasive management were identified by multivariable logistic regression. Propensity-matched cohorts were generated to evaluate associations between invasive vs. conservative management and mortality. RESULTS:We identified 268 850 admissions with type 2 MI in 2018. Type 2 MI patients had a high burden of comorbidities and were commonly admitted with diagnoses of circulatory (39.7%), infectious (23.1%) or respiratory (10.8%) illness. Only 11.2% of type 2 MI were managed invasively, of which 17.9% underwent coronary revascularization. Odds of invasive management were higher with commercial insurance [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-1.52] and lower with Medicaid (aOR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.96) vs. Medicare. Significant heterogeneity in invasive management of type 2 MI was observed by geographic region (range 7.2-13.8%), independent of patient and hospital factors. Invasive management was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than conservative management overall (3.9 vs. 9.1%; P < 0.001) and in propensity-matched analyses (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Invasive management of type 2 MI varies by insurance status and geography, highlighting uncertainty regarding optimal management and potential disparities in clinical care.

BACKGROUND:Perioperative myocardial infarction is frequently attributed to type 2 myocardial infarction, a mismatch in myocardial oxygen supply-demand without unstable coronary artery disease. Our aim was to identify characteristics, management, and outcomes of perioperative type 1 versus type 2 myocardial infarction among surgical inpatients. METHODS:Adults age ≥45 years hospitalized for noncardiac surgery were identified in the United States. Perioperative myocardial infarction were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. Clinical characteristics, invasive myocardial infarction management, mortality, and readmissions were assessed by myocardial infarction subtype. RESULTS:Among 4,755,382 surgical hospitalizations, we identified 38,975 perioperative myocardial infarctions (0.82%), with type 2 infarction in 42%. Patients with type 2 myocardial infarction were older, more likely to be women, and less likely to have cardiovascular comorbidities compared with type 1 myocardial infarction. Fewer patients with type 2 myocardial infarction underwent invasive management than type 1 myocardial infarction (6.7% vs 28.8%, P < .001). Type 2 myocardial infarction mortality was lower than type 1 myocardial infarction mortality (12.1% vs 17.4%, P < .001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.59). Invasive management of perioperative myocardial infarction was associated with lower mortality in type 1 (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.74) but not type 2 (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.77-1.85) myocardial infarction. Among survivors, there was no difference in 90-day hospital readmission between type 2 and type 1 perioperative myocardial infarction (36.5% vs 36.1%, P = .72). CONCLUSIONS:Type 2 myocardial infarctions account for approximately 40% of perioperative myocardial infarctions. Patients with type 2 perioperative myocardial infarction are less likely to undergo invasive management and have lower mortality compared with those with type 1 perioperative myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes of lower extremity revascularization (LER) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is uncertain. We characterized associations between DM and post-procedural outcomes in PAD patients undergoing LER. METHODS:Adults undergoing surgical or endovascular LER were identified from the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database. DM was defined by ICD-9 diagnosis codes and sub-classified based on the presence or absence of complications (poor glycemic control or end-organ damage). Major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACLE) were defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or major limb amputation during the index hospitalization for LER. For survivors, all-cause 6-month hospital readmission was determined. RESULTS:Among 39,441 patients with PAD hospitalized for LER, 50.8% had DM. The composite of MACLE after LER was not different in patients with and without DM after covariate adjustment, but patients with DM were more likely to require major limb amputation (5.5% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44) and hospital readmission (59.2% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001; aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.55). Of 20,039 patients with DM hospitalized for LER, 55.7% had DM with complications. These patients were more likely to have MACLE after LER (11.1% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001; aOR 1.56 95% CI 1.28-1.89) and require hospital readmission (61.1% vs. 47.2%, p < 0.001; aOR 1.41 95% CI 1.27-1.57) than patients with uncomplicated DM. CONCLUSIONS:DM is present in ≈50% of patients undergoing LER for PAD and is an independent risk factor for major limb amputation and 6-month hospital readmission.

INTRODUCTION:Current evidence indicates that rivaroxaban may be a safe and effective alternative to warfarin among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and obesity. However, evidence regarding the impact of polypharmacy is limited in this population. The present study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among NVAF patients with obesity and polypharmacy in the US. METHODS:) and polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances between groups. Study outcomes were evaluated up to 36 months post-treatment initiation and included the composite of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) and major bleeding. Subgroup analyses were conducted stratified by polypharmacy category (5-9 or ≥ 10 medications). Outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS:A total of 7000 and 3920 NVAF patients with obesity and polypharmacy were initiated on rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. At 36 months of follow-up, rivaroxaban was associated with a 29% lower risk of stroke/SE relative to warfarin (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57, 0.90). Major bleeding risk was not significantly different among rivaroxaban- compared to warfarin-treated patients (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70, 1.03). Subgroup analyses yielded results that were largely consistent with the overall polypharmacy analysis. CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that rivaroxaban is an effective and safe treatment option among NVAF patients with obesity and polypharmacy in a commercially-insured US population.

BACKGROUND:Among patients with diabetes and chronic coronary disease, it is unclear if invasive management improves outcomes when added to medical therapy. METHODS:The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trials (ie, ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-Chronic Kidney Disease) randomized chronic coronary disease patients to an invasive (medical therapy + angiography and revascularization if feasible) or a conservative approach (medical therapy alone with revascularization if medical therapy failed). Cohorts were combined after no trial-specific effects were observed. Diabetes was defined by history, hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5%, or use of glucose-lowering medication. The primary outcome was all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI). Heterogeneity of effect of invasive management on death or MI was evaluated using a Bayesian approach to protect against random high or low estimates of treatment effect for patients with versus without diabetes and for diabetes subgroups of clinical (female sex and insulin use) and anatomic features (coronary artery disease severity or left ventricular function). RESULTS:<0.001). At median 3.1-year follow-up the adjusted event-free survival was 0.54 (95% bootstrapped CI, 0.48-0.60) and 0.66 (95% bootstrapped CI, 0.61-0.71) for patients with diabetes versus without diabetes, respectively, with a 12% (95% bootstrapped CI, 4%-20%) absolute decrease in event-free survival among participants with diabetes. Female and male patients with insulin-treated diabetes had an adjusted event-free survival of 0.52 (95% bootstrapped CI, 0.42-0.56) and 0.49 (95% bootstrapped CI, 0.42-0.56), respectively. There was no difference in death or MI between strategies for patients with diabetes versus without diabetes, or for clinical (female sex or insulin use) or anatomic features (coronary artery disease severity or left ventricular function) of patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS:Despite higher risk for death or MI, chronic coronary disease patients with diabetes did not derive incremental benefit from routine invasive management compared with initial medical therapy alone. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery is defined by elevated postoperative cardiac troponin concentrations that exceed the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit of the assay and are attributable to a presumed ischemic mechanism, with or without concomitant symptoms or signs. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery occurs in ≈20% of patients who have major inpatient surgery, and most are asymptomatic. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery is independently and strongly associated with both short-term and long-term mortality, even in the absence of clinical symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, or imaging evidence of myocardial ischemia consistent with myocardial infarction. Consequently, surveillance of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery is warranted in patients at high risk for perioperative cardiovascular complications. This scientific statement provides diagnostic criteria and reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and prognosis of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. This scientific statement also presents surveillance strategies and treatment approaches.

Background : In addition to their role in thrombosis and hemostasis, platelets are key mediators of inflammation and altered immunity. Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPA) represent the crossroads between thrombosis and inflammation and may represent a therapeutic target. While antiplatelet therapy (APT) reduces platelet activity and thrombosis, its effect on MPA is uncertain. Aims : To analyze the effect of APT on MPA in vitro. Methods : The effect of different platelet-activating agonists (thromboxane analog U-46619, ADP, PAR4, collagen, and epinephrine) on MPA formation in whole blood (WB) was measured via flow cytometry. Agonist-stimulated WB was incubated in the presence of inhibitors against P-selectin, PSGL-1, PAR1 (ML161), P2Y12 (AZD1283), GPIIb/IIIa (eptifibatide), acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), and dipyridamole and assessed for MPA formation. RNA-Seq data sets of monocytes incubated with healthy platelet releasates (PR) were used to identify platelet-induced upregulation of monocyte transcripts and were validated by RT-qPCR in monocyte-PR co-incubation assays in the presence of APT. Results : Circulating MPA are increased in prothrombotic and inflammatory diseases including the most recent COVID-19. Monocytes aggregated to platelets have more CD40 and tissue factor expression than monocytes not aggregated to platelets ( P < 0.05 for each comparison). As expected, targeting P-selectin (85.4% reduction) and PSGL-1 (88.2% reduction) had the greatest attenuation of MPA. Among platelet inhibitors, P2Y12 inhibition was most effective in lowering MPA formation (30.7% reduction) (figure 1). Flow cytometry analysis of MPA. Incubation of monocytes with platelet releasate induced upregulation of inflammatory mRNA transcripts suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 ( SOCS3 ) and o ncostatin m ( OSM ). Following pretreatment of platelets with APT, both GPIIb/IIIa and P2Y12 inhibition was associated with lower expression of SOCS3 and OSM (figure 2) . SOCS3 and OSM in monocytes incubated with APT-treated PR. Conclusions : Circulating MPA represent a crossroad of platelet and monocyte activation. We show that APT is associated with both reduced MPA formation and platelet-induced monocyte activation

Background : Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) exhibit an activated platelet phenotype and an increased risk of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Aims : We conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of aspirin and clopidogrel (two anti-platelet medications commonly used to prevent CVD) to reduce platelet activation and platelet effector cell properties in HIV patients. Methods : Fifty five HIV positive patients (mean age 53.5 +/- 7.8 years, 42.6% female, mean CD4+ T-cell count 665.6 cells/m 3 ), were enrolled to receive clopidogrel ( n = 22, 75 mg/d), aspirin ( n = 22, 81 mg/d), or no-treatment ( n = 11) for 14-days. Platelet aggregation and platelet receptor expression of p-selectin and pac-1 was assessed at baseline and day 14. To assess the impact of platelet inhibition on the endothelium ( in vitro ), platelets isolated from 6 patients (2/ group) at baseline and follow-up were incubated in HUVECs and proinflammatory HUVEC gene expression was assessed (Nanostring, 594 transcripts). Results : Aspirin treatment significantly reduced platelet aggregation to arachidonic acid (AA) (84% to 31%, P < 0.01) while clopidogrel reduced platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (85% to 41%, P < 0.001), confirming study drug compliance. Clopidogrel treatment decreased platelet p-selectin (-5.9%, P = 0.04), p-selectin plus thrombin (-40.8%, P = 0.03), pac-1 expression (-8%, P = 0.02), and pac-1 plus ADP (-24.0%, P = 0.03) and AA (-24.0%, P < 0.01). In contrast, aspirin did not affect p-selectin or pac-1 expression. When compared to no-treatment, HIV patients on clopidogrel exhibited a reduction in the composite pro-inflammatory transcript expression of platelet treated HUVECS (Log2 Fold DELTA -0.07 +/- 0.58 vs. -0.12 +/- 0.53, P < 0.001) while aspirin treated platelets upregulated HUVEC transcript expression (Log2 Fold DELTA-0.07 +/- 0.58 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.59, P < 0.001). Conclusions : Clopidogrel, but not aspirin, reduced platelet activation and HUVEC pro-inflammatory gene expression. Our results suggest that clopidogrel as opposed to aspirin may be preferential to reduce CV risk in HIV; however, larger clinical trials are needed to expand upon these findings