Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:crb253

Total Results:

130


Use of contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheters for stepwise linear ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation does not improve outcomes [Meeting Abstract]

Knotts, R J; Bookstall, K E; Torbey, E; Bernstein, S A; Park, D S; Fowler, S J; Holmes, D; Aizer, A; Barbhaiya, C R; Chinitz, L A
Introduction: Large clinical trials have recently demonstrated stepwise linear ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) to be inferior to pulmonary vein isolation alone. It is unknown whether the unfavorable outcomes observed in these trials can be attributed to the pro-arrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. We hypothesized that improved lesion quality related to use of contact-force sensing (CFS) ablation catheters would improve procedural outcomes. Methods: We prospectively analyzed procedural outcomes of 74 consecutive patients with NPAF undergoing first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation with a CFS catheter (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster) using a step-wise approach (Group 1). The clinical outcomes of these patients were compared with 74 consecutive patients with NPAF who underwent catheter ablation between September 2013 and June 2014 with a non-contact force sense radiofrequency ablation catheter (Group 2) at a single tertiary care medical center. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals following index ablation. Results: Baseline characteristics of Group 1 and Group 2 were similar, although in Group 1 there was a greater prevalence of patients with persistent NPAF lasting for 6-months or longer prior to initial ablation (43% vs 21%, p=0.071). The recurrence rate at 1 year as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was not significantly different between Group 1 and Group 2 (25.7% vs 29.7%, p=0.582). The presenting recurrent arrhythmia was most frequently atrial tachycardia (AT) in both groups (Group 1: n=19, AT 68.4% and AF 31.6% vs Group 2: n=22, AT 59.1% and AF 40.9%). A similar proportion of patients in both groups underwent repeat ablation (Group 1: 17.6% vs Group 2: 13.5%, p=0.496). Conclusions: Utilization of a CFS ablation catheter was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for stepwise catheter ablation for NPAF. The optimal strategy for NPAF ablation using a contact-force sensing catheter remains undefined
EMBASE:72283716
ISSN: 1556-3871
CID: 2150972

Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for organization of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF): A randomized controlled trial [Meeting Abstract]

Aizer, A; Wu, P B; Holmes, D; Fowler, S J; Bernstein, S A; Park, D S; Barbhaiya, C R; Chinitz, L A
Introduction: LA ablation for persistent AF that achieves organization to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm (SR) predicts greater long term ablation success. However, extensive LA ablation increases the risks of recurrent AT, adverse atrial remodeling and procedural complications. Preclinical and observational studies suggest that right atrial ablation may reduce AF risk. We hypothesized that CTI ablation may reduce the extent of LA ablation required to achieve organization of persistent AF. Methods: Persistent AF patients (n=107) were randomized to two arms (CTI-first or CTI-last) in a single center, prospective, single blind study. Excluding the CTI ablation, stepwise linear LA ablation was performed in a prespecified order. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who organized to AT or SR. The secondary endpoint was number of steps to organization. Results: CTI ablation first versus last during AF ablation did not significantly alter the percentage of patients who organized (Table). Among those who organized, the number of steps to organization did not differ between the two arms. No significant differences were found when patients were stratified by LA size or AF duration. Conclusions: CTI ablation does not alter the extent of LA ablation needed to achieve organization of AF. The utility of right atrial ablation for persistent AF ablation remains unclear. (Table presented)
EMBASE:72283298
ISSN: 1556-3871
CID: 2150982

Resumption of AVN conduction in post-TAVR patients who receive PPM [Meeting Abstract]

Subnani, K; Love, C J; Holmes, D; Aizer, A; Fowler, S J; Bernstein, S A; Park, D S; Barbhaiya, C R; Chinitz, L A
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is becoming a widely accepted alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. A common complication of the procedure is the development of conduction defects requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. It has been noted that in some patients, the conduction block is not permanent. Determine the incidence and predictors of resuming intrinsic conduction in patients that receive PPM implantation after TAVR. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing TAVR at New York University Langone Medical Center was undertaken. Extracted data included patient demographics, pre-TAVR electrocardiogram, procedural, echocardiographic, catheterization, and device interrogation data. Evaluation of device interrogations done at one month follow-up or earlier to look for resumption of intrinsic conduction. Results: There were a total number of 451 patients who were status-post TAVR in our registry at NYU. Of the 451, 45 patients received a permanent pacemaker placement for complete heart block; 9.9% 45/451. The majority of patients were implanted within 48hrs post TAVR. Device follow-up information at 1 month or earlier was available for 33 of the 45 patients who received PPM. 5 patients who were recently implanted are still pending follow-up. 3 patients expired after implantation and 4 were lost to follow-up. Of the 33 patients, 14 (42%) patients had resumption of AV nodal conduction at 1 month follow-up. 19 patients (57%) remained dependent. Conclusions: 42% of patients who received a permanent pacemaker for complete heart block after TAVR had resumption of conduction. This suggests that many patients may not require long term PPM post TAVR. Patients that remained dependent had a higher incidence of preexisting RBBB and LAFB, however a lack thereof does not preclude an increased risk. These data suggest that waiting longer than 48 hours for resumption of AV nodal conduction would avoid unnecessary implantation in patients who develop complete heart block post TAVR
EMBASE:72283155
ISSN: 1556-3871
CID: 2150992

Electrophysiologic assessment of conduction abnormalities and atrial arrhythmias associated with amyloid cardiomyopathy

Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Kumar, Saurabh; Baldinger, Samuel H; Michaud, Gregory F; Stevenson, William G; Falk, Rodney; John, Roy M
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmias in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) result in significant comorbidity and mortality but have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define intracardiac conduction, atrial arrhythmia substrate, and ablation outcomes in a group of advanced CA patients referred for electrophysiologic study. METHODS: Electrophysiologic study with or without catheter ablation was performed in 18 CA patients. Findings and catheter ablation outcomes were compared to age- and gender-matched non-CA patients undergoing catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). RESULTS: Supraventricular tachycardias were seen in all 18 CA patients (1 AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, 17 persistent atrial tachycardia [AT]/AF). The HV interval was prolonged (>55 ms) in all CA patients, including 6 with normal QRS duration (
PMID: 26400855
ISSN: 1556-3871
CID: 1927202

Better Lesion Creation And Assessment During Catheter Ablation

Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Balindger, Samuel; John, Roy M; Epstein, Laurence M; Koplan, Bruce A; Tedrow, Usha B; Stevenson, William G; Michaud, Gregory F
Permanent destruction of abnormal cardiac tissue responsible for cardiac arrhythmogenesis whilst avoiding collateral tissue injury forms the cornerstone of catheter ablation therapy. As the acceptance and performance of catheter ablation increases worldwide, limitations in current technology are becoming increasingly apparent in the treatment of complex arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. This review will discuss the role of new technologies aimed to improve lesion formation with the ultimate goal of improving arrhythmia-free survival of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias.
PMCID:4955884
PMID: 27957200
ISSN: 1941-6911
CID: 3095292

Epicardial Radiofrequency Ablation Failure During Ablation Procedures for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Reasons and Implications for Outcomes

Baldinger, Samuel H; Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Mahida, Saagar; Epstein, Laurence M; Michaud, Gregory F; John, Roy; Tedrow, Usha B; Stevenson, William G
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) from the epicardial space for ventricular arrhythmias is limited or impossible in some cases. Reasons for epicardial ablation failure and the effect on outcome have not been systematically analyzed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed reasons for epicardial RFA failure relative to the anatomic target area and the type of heart disease and assessed the effect of failed epicardial RFA on outcome after ablation procedures for ventricular arrhythmias in a large single-center cohort. Epicardial access was attempted during 309 ablation procedures in 277 patients and was achieved in 291 procedures (94%). Unlimited ablation in an identified target region could be performed in 181 cases (59%), limited ablation was possible in 22 cases (7%), and epicardial ablation was deemed not feasible in 88 cases (28%). Reasons for failed or limited ablation were unsuccessful epicardial access (6%), failure to identify an epicardial target (15%), proximity to a coronary artery (13%), proximity to the phrenic nerve (6%), and complications (<1%). Epicardial RFA was impeded in the majority of cases targeting the left ventricular summit region. Acute complications occurred in 9%. The risk for acute ablation failure was 8.3x higher (4.5-15.0; P<0.001) after no or limited epicardial RFA compared with unlimited RFA, and patients with unlimited epicardial RFA had better recurrence-free survival rates (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial RFA for ventricular arrhythmias is often limited even when pericardial access is successful. Variability of success is dependent on the target area, and the presence of factors limiting ablation is associated with worse outcomes.
PMID: 26527625
ISSN: 1941-3084
CID: 2039692

Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Electrogram Analysis and Pacing Are Complimentary for Recognition of Abnormal Conduction and Far-Field Potentials During Substrate Mapping of Infarct-Related Ventricular Tachycardia" [Letter]

Baldinger, Samuel H; Nagashima, Koichi; Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Choi, Eue-Keun; Epstein, Laurence M; Michaud, Gregory F; John, Roy; Tedrow, Usha B; Stevenson, William G
PMID: 26671941
ISSN: 1941-3084
CID: 2041622

Electrogram Analysis and Pacing Are Complimentary for Recognition of Abnormal Conduction and Far - Field Potentials during Substrate Mapping of Infarct - Related Ventricular Tachycardia

Baldinger, Samuel H; Nagashima, Koichi; Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Choi, Eue-Keun; Epstein, Laurence M; Michaud, Gregory F; John, Roy; Tedrow, Usha B; Stevenson, William G
BACKGROUND: -Mapping to identify scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) reentry circuits during sinus rhythm focuses on sites with abnormal electrograms, or pace-mapping findings of QRS morphology and long stimulus to QRS (S-QRS) intervals. We hypothesized that 1. these methods do not necessarily identify the same sites and 2. some electrograms are "far-field" potentials that can be recognized by pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: -From 12 patients with coronary disease and recurrent VT undergoing catheter ablation we retrospectively analyzed electrograms and pacing at 546 separate low bipolar voltage (<1.5mV) sites. Electrograms were characterized as showing evidence of slow conduction if late potentials (56%) or fractionated potentials (76%) were present. Neither was present at (13%) sites. Pacing from the ablation catheter captured 70% of all electrograms. Higher bipolar voltage and fractionation were independent predictors for pace capture. There was a linear correlation between the S-QRS duration during pacing and the lateness of a capturing electrogram (p<0.001), but electrogram and pacing markers of slow conduction were discordant at 40% of sites. Sites with far-field potentials, defined as those that remained visible and not captured by pacing stimuli, were identified at 48% of all pacing sites, especially in areas of low bipolar voltage and late potentials. Initial RF energy application rendered 74% of targeted sites electrically unexcitable. CONCLUSIONS: -Far-field potentials are common in scar areas. Combining analysis of electrogram characteristics and assessment of pace capture may refine identification of substrate targets for RF ablation.
PMID: 26033939
ISSN: 1941-3084
CID: 1615342

Epicardial Phrenic Nerve Displacement during Catheter Ablation of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias: Procedural Experience and Outcomes

Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Baldinger, Samuel H; Koplan, Bruce A; Maytin, Melanie; Epstein, Laurence M; John, Roy M; Michaud, Gregory F; Tedrow, Usha B; Stevenson, William G
BACKGROUND: -Arrhythmia origin in close proximity to the phrenic nerve (PN) can hinder successful catheter ablation. We describe our approach with epicardial PN displacement in such instances. METHODS AND RESULTS: -PN displacement via percutaneous pericardial access was attempted in 13 patients (age 49+/-16y, 9 females) with either atrial tachycardia (AT; 6 patients) or atrial fibrillation triggered from a superior vena cava focus (1 patient) adjacent to the right PN or epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) origin adjacent to the left PN (6 patients). An epicardially placed steerable sheath/4mm-catheter combination (5 patients) or a vascular or an esophageal balloon (8 patients) was ultimately successful. Balloon placement was often difficult requiring manipulation via a steerable sheath. In 2 VT cases, absence of PN capture was achieved only once the balloon was directly over the ablation catheter. In 3 AT patients, PN displacement was not possible with a balloon, however a steerable sheath/catheter combination was ultimately successful. PN displacement allowed acute abolishment of all targeted arrhythmias. No PN injury occurred acutely or in follow up. Two patients developed acute complications (pleuro-pericardial fistula 1, pericardial bleeding 1). Survival free of target arrhythmia was achieved in all AT patients, however a non-targeted VT recurred in 1 patient at a median of 13 months' follow up. CONCLUSIONS: -Arrhythmias originating in close proximity to the PN can be targeted successfully with PN displacement with an epicardially placed steerable sheath/catheter combination, or balloon, but this strategy can be difficult to implement. Better tools for phrenic nerve protection are desirable.
PMID: 25963395
ISSN: 1941-3084
CID: 1570532

The Role of Alternative Interventional Procedures When Endo- and Epicardial Catheter Ablation Attempts for Ventricular Arrhythmias Fail

Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag; Sobieszczyk, Piotr; Eisenhauer, Andrew C; Couper, Gregory S; Nagashima, Koichi; Mahida, Saagar; Baldinger, Samuel; Choi, Eue-Keun; Epstein, Laurence M; Koplan, Bruce A; John, Roy M; Michaud, Gregory F; Stevenson, William G; Tedrow, Usha B
BACKGROUND: -Ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) and standard percutaneous catheter ablation techniques portends a poor prognosis. We characterized the reasons for ablation failure and describe alternative interventional procedures in this high-risk group. METHODS AND RESULTS: -67 patients with VT refractory to 4+/-2 AADs and 2+/-1 prior endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation attempts underwent transcoronary ethanol ablation (TCEA), surgical epicardial window (Epi-window) or surgical cryoablation (OR-Cryo; age 62+/-11 years, VT storm in 52%). Failure of endo/epicardial ablation attempts was due to VT of intramural origin (35 patients), non-endocardial origin with prohibitive epicardial access due to pericardial adhesions (16), and anatomic barriers to ablation (8). In 8 patients, VT was of non-endocardial origin with a co-existing condition also requiring cardiac surgery. TCEA alone was attempted in 37 patients, OR-Cryo alone in 21 patients; and a combination of TCEA and OR-Cryo (5 patients), or TCEA and Epi-window (4 patients) in the remainder. Overall, alternative interventional procedures abolished >/=1 inducible VT and terminated storm in 69% and 74% of patients, respectively although 25% of patients had at least one complication. By 6 months post procedures, there was a significant reduction in defibrillator shocks (from a median of 8 per month to 1, P<0.001) and AAD requirement, although 55% of patients had at least one VT recurrence, and mortality was 17%. CONCLUSIONS: -A collaborative strategy of alternative interventional procedures offers the possibility of achieving arrhythmia control in high-risk patients with VT that is otherwise uncontrollable with AADs and standard percutaneous catheter ablation techniques.
PMID: 25925229
ISSN: 1941-3084
CID: 1570542