Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:African American, Hispanic, Asian, and Pacific Islanders are groups who are underrepresented in medicine (URM groups). Similarly, although women comprise more than 50% of medical students in the United States, women comprise a smaller percentage of all orthopaedic surgery trainees. Therefore, underrepresented in orthopaedics (URiO) represents the URM groups and women. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of specific steps to recruit a qualified, diverse trainee complement within a single academic orthopaedic surgery residency program between 2000 and 2023. We aim to explore changes in the representation of URiO during this period as well as explore the strategies and programs implemented by the department that may have impacted recruitment of a diverse complement of trainees. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Match lists from a large, academic, orthopaedic surgery residency between 2000 and 2023 were collected and reviewed for racial and gender data. Match lists were then divided into 6-year quantiles to identify any trends in the recruitment of URiO students. Self-reported racial and gender data from Electronic Residency Application Service applicant reports and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) data books between 2018 and 2022 were collected and reviewed. In addition, the department's strategies implemented during the study period with the goal of enhancing URiO exposure to orthopaedic surgery were also explored. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The department implemented proactive strategies to increase exposure to orthopaedic surgery for URiO students. An increase in URiO representation was noted between 2000 and 2023 with Hispanic, Black/African American, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander resident representation increasing by 5%, 11%, and 1%, respectively. In addition, women representation increased by 27% between 2000 and 2023. The overall attrition rate among URiO residents was 1% with only one resident not completing the program. Self-reported racial and gender data from ACGME data books demonstrated that Black/African American, Hispanic, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander residents comprised 5%, 4%, and 0.04%, respectively, of orthopaedic surgery residents between 2018 and 2022. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:These results provide insight for other programs to use similar strategies to potentially improve recruitment, retain, and provide support to URiO residents.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To compare 3 different cancellous screw configurations used for Garden 1 femoral neck fractures (FNFs). DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:A large urban academic medical center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:All patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B1.1 FNF who underwent in situ fixation with cancellous screws between 2012 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 2 screws placed in a parallel fashion, 3 screws placed in an inverted triangle configuration, and 3-screw fixation with placement of 1 "out-of-plane" screw perpendicular to the long axis of the femur. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:Postoperative femoral neck shortening (mm) was the primary outcome, which was compared among the 3 groups of different screw configurations. RESULTS:Sixty-one patients with a median follow-up of 1 year (interquartile range 0.6-1.8 years) and an average age of 72 years (interquartile range 65.0-83.0 years) were included. All fractures demonstrated bony healing. Overall, 68.9% of the cohort had ≤2 mm of femoral neck shortening. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who experienced greater than 2 mm of shortening (P = 0.839) or in the amount (mm) of femoral neck shortening (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 0.517, P = 0.772). CONCLUSIONS:Although most patients with valgus-impacted FNF treated with screw fixation do not experience further femoral neck shortening, some patients demonstrated continued radiographic shortening during the healing process. The development of further femoral neck shortening and the amount of shortening that occurs do not differ based on implant configuration. Multiple different screw configurations seem to be acceptable for achieving healing and minimizing further femoral neck impaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Osteonecrosis (ON) of the humeral head is defined as "avascular" when the death of bone is due to a disrupted blood supply. It is a known complication following proximal humeral fractures and can lead to poor long-term outcomes and even additional revision surgeries. CASE REPORT/UNASSIGNED:Patient AP developed symptomatic ON, 3 years following repair of a 4-part valgus impacted proximal humerus fracture. The point of interest in this case is the length of time from injury at which she developed symptomatic ON. Following surgical repair, she was seen at standard intervals, 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12- month follow-ups and demonstrated an excellent recovery. By the 1 year follow-up appointment, she had obtained a range of motion in her left shoulder of 170° forward elevation and 60° in external rotation. At this point, she was able to discontinue physical therapy and was radiographically and clinically healed. However, 2 years after, she began experiencing sudden onset of pain with shoulder ROM and progressive limitation. She was diagnosed with an ON of her proximal humerus. The patient was prescribed a 3-month course of corticosteroid, 3 months following her operation for a gynecological-related issue. However, with strong progress being made 9 months after this prescription, and problems occurring over 2 years after taking the medication, it is unclear whether the ON was related to her fracture pattern or developed as a result of the corticosteroid usage or a combination of the 2 due to a "double hit." CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This case review points out the potential need for continued monitoring even after radiographic and clinical healing is achieved in these injuries.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:To determine differences in functional outcomes, return to work, and complications, in operatively vs. nonoperatively treated diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:150 patients who presented to our center with a diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture (Orthopedic Trauma Association type 12) treated by open reduction internal fixation or closed reduction with bracing were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, injury information, surgical details, and employment data. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported functional outcomes were recorded at routine standard-of-care follow-ups. Complications were recorded. Outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical methods and compared. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .031). Three (4.5%) patients in the operative group developed iatrogenic, postoperative nerve palsy. Two patients in the operative group (4%) had a superficial surgical site infection. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:More patients treated surgically had functional range of motion by 6 weeks. Functional gains should be weighed by the patient and surgeon against risk of surgery, nonunion, nerve injury, and infection when considering various treatment options to better accommodate patients' needs.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Galeazzi fractures are fractures of the radial shaft accompanied by distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. They usually occur due to a mechanical fall or direct trauma to the wrist or forearm. Management of this serious injury varies from non-operative treatment with closed reduction and splinting to operative fixation using an external fixator (ex-fix) or open reduction internal fixation with plate and screws. CASE REPORT/UNASSIGNED:We present a 76-year-old female who presented with a right distal radius fracture after a ground-level fall. Due to fracture displacement after initial conservative management, she was placed in an external fixator for stabilization. After removal of the ex-fix, she sustained a midshaft radius fracture with DRUJ malalignment, consistent with a "Galeazzi-like" fracture. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:"Galeazzi-like" fractures with associated DRUJ malalignment can occur from previous external fixator pin sites and are adequately treated with standard operative fixation.

We sought to determine what effect the size of a displaced coronoid fracture fragment in Monteggia injuries has on clinical outcome. Sixty-seven patients presented to an academic medical center for operative fixation of a Monteggia fracture. Radiographs were assessed for length and height of the displaced coronoid fragment using measuring tools in our center's imaging archive system. Data were analyzed using binary logistic or linear regression, as appropriate, controlling for sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Outcome measurements included radiographic healing, range of motion, postoperative complications, and reoperation. The cohort had a mean follow-up of 16.7 months. Mean coronoid fragment area was 362.4±155.9 mm². Elbow range of motion decreased by 3.8° of elbow flexion (P<.001), 3.3° of elbow extension (P<.001), and 3.8° of forearm supination (P=.007) for every 1-cm² increase in coronoid fragment area. Complications (P=.012) and reoperation (P=.036) were associated with increasing coronoid fragment area. Nonunion rate, nerve injury, and pronation range of motion were not correlated to increasing coronoid fracture fragment area (P=.777, P=.123, and P=.351, respectively). As displaced coronoid fragment size increases in Monteggia fracture patterns, elbow range of motion decreases linearly. Coronoid displacement was also associated with increased rates of postoperative complication and need for reoperation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):15-21.].

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in adults and historically have frequently led to significant disability. Originally described over 5,000 years ago, until recently these fractures were almost exclusively treated by closed methods. Since the introduction of osteosynthesis in 1907, followed by the founding of the AO in 1958, and more recently the development of the volar locked plate in the early 2000s, over the past century the surgical treatment of these fractures has evolved greatly. While technological advancements have changed management for specific fracture patterns, closed treatment still has an important role and is definitive for many patients. The following review provides a historical perspective for current treatment strategies as well as an overview of the important factors that must be considered when treating patients with these injuries.

Orthopedic surgery in the United States has gone through many changes over the past few centuries. Starting with a small sect of subspecialized surgeons, advances in technology and surgical skills have paralleled the growth of the specialty. To keep up with demand, the training of orthopedic surgeons has undergone many iterations. From apprenticeships to the current residency model, the field has always adapted to ensure the constant production of well-trained surgeons to take care of the growing orthopedic needs in the population. In order to guarantee this, many regulatory committees have been formed over the years to help guide the regulation and certification of orthopedic training programs. With current day residents facing new challenges, the specialty continues to adapt the way it trains its future.