Faculty Bibliography

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection has not been reported for traumatic injuries to the pancreas. We present the case of a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy performed on a 10-year-old boy after he sustained a distal transection of the pancreas due to blunt abdominal trauma. The spleen and its vessels were preserved. The patient was sent home on postoperative day 3 without any postoperative complications. Performing an advanced laparoscopic pancreatic procedure is feasible, in the trauma setting, particularly in children.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, autopsy consent rates have fallen nationwide. In our institution they have declined from 15% to 7% in 10 years. We perceived that family reluctance to grant permission for autopsy was related to the invasiveness of the open procedure, so we began to do autopsies by needle biopsy, with an increase in consents to 25% during the first year. However, the procedure is inherently inaccurate, so we recently have introduced minimally invasive laparoscopic autopsy. METHODS: From July through October 1999, needle biopsy was performed on 25 patients who died at our institution, which was followed by laparoscopic evaluation. Consent for full conventional autopsy had been granted in nine cases, and these then were performed. Data from these autopsies were compared with those from the laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS: Of the patients for whom consent was obtained for open autopsy, there was complete agreement as to cause of death between the laparoscopic and conventional procedures. In one case, a liver hemangioma was missed by laparoscopy, and in two other cases, colon polyps were not discovered. Biopsies of internal organs were accurately performed on the pancreas, kidneys, and adrenals, all of which had been troublesome for needle biopsy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic autopsy is much more acceptable to the families of patients than the conventional form, resulting in a higher consent rate. On the basis of our study group, this procedure provides accurate data concerning the cause of death. In addition, performing these autopsies gives surgical residents invaluable training in laparoscopic skills.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively review 5 years' experience of transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in infants and children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 14 upper-pole partial nephrectomies (seven right and seven left) were undertaken in 13 children (mean age 3.8 years, range 0.4-14). One patient underwent bilateral upper-pole LPN. No children required a lower-pole partial nephrectomy during the study period. Evaluation included renal ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, renal scintigraphy and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in some cases. Three ports (10, 5 and 5 mm) were used in all except two patients, who required an additional 2 mm port for liver retraction. The diseased parenchyma was transected with electrocautery or harmonic scalpel. The distal ureter was simply transected in the absence of reflux, but tied adjacent to the bladder if reflux was present. RESULTS: The mean operative duration for LPN was 100 min, with an estimated blood loss of < 30 mL. A liquid diet was tolerated on the first morning after surgery and age-appropriate regular diet that evening in all except one patient. The mean hospital stay was 2.6 days. One patient had a significant decrease in haematocrit, which was managed conservatively, not requiring transfusion. Follow-up telephone interviews with the patients' parents showed that all were satisfied with the medical and cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSION: Transperitoneal LPN is preferable to open partial nephrectomy because: (i) The magnification provided by laparoscopy provides excellent vision for the precise dissection of the parenchyma and distal ureter, avoiding injury to the healthy tissue; (ii) There is minimal blood loss, fast recovery and less surgical scarring, and when upper-pole partial nephrectomy is required, LPN is less damaging to the lower-pole. Unlike total nephrectomy, where debate remains about open vs laparoscopic methods, the specific advantages of LPN make it clearly preferable.

BACKGROUND: In addition to its well-known benefits of decreased postoperative pain and shorter recovery time, laparoscopic hernia repair has the major advantage of allowing the surgeon to explore the side contralateral to the clinically diagnosed hernia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of incipient unsuspected contralateral hernia during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and to analyze the risks and benefits of identifying these hernias at the time of the initial surgery. METHODS: We did a retrospective review of the charts of all of the 724 male patients who underwent laparoscopic TEP repair of 958 groin hernias between September 1991 and September 1999. The initial clinical impression of the existence of unilateral or bilateral hernias was noted and compared to our operative findings. The same surgeon performed all the repairs. Exploration of the contralateral side was performed in a systematic fashion. A second mesh prosthesis was placed if a contralateral hernia was found. RESULTS: Bilateral hernia repair was performed on 234 patients (32. 3%). In 62 of them (11.2%), the contralateral hernia was diagnosed only at the time of the procedure. Operative time ranged from 14 to 185 min (median, 38.6). The operative time for the contralateral exploration ranged from 2 to 5 min (median, 2.8). The rate of complications was 4.1%, but no complications were directly related to the exploration of the asymptomatic side. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a large number of inguinal hernias are undiagnosed by physical examination (11.2%). Systematic contralateral exploration using the TEP approach is safe and does not greatly increase the operative time. Early identification and repair of a contralateral hernia obviates the need for reoperation, reduces overall costs to the health care system, and eliminates any further work loss for the patient.

OBJECTIVE: The extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach (EXTRA) has been shown to be an effective and safe repair for primary (PIH), recurrent (RIH) and bilateral hernia (BIH). There is very little data examining the merits of laparoscopic repair for hernias under local anesthesia. In this' paper, we compare EXTRA performed under both general and local anesthesia. METHODS: This nonrandomized prospective study was performed selectively on a male population only. Patients with associated pulmonary disease and high risk for general surgery were selected. Patients with recurrence and previous abdominal operations were excluded to decrease confounding variables in the study. A Prolene mesh was used in all patients. RESULTS: Between May 1997 and September 1998, 92 male patients underwent the repair of 107 groin hernias using the EXTRA technique. The procedure was explained to them, and different anesthesia options were given. Fourteen of these repairs were performed under local anesthesia and 93 under general anesthesia. Of the 10 patients who underwent a repair under local anesthesia, there were 8 indirect, 5 direct and 1 pantaloon. The mean age was 53 years. In the group of general anesthesia, the types of hernias repaired were 45 indirect, 30 direct and 11 pantaloon. The mean age was 45 years. The mean follow-up was 15 months. Each patient was sent home the same day. Two peritoneal tears were recorded in the first group. The operative time was longer in the local group (47 +/- 11 vs 18 +/- 3). None of the patients required conversion to an open technique or change of anesthesia. No recurrences were found in either group. The average time of return to work and regular activity was 3.5 +/- 1 and 3 +/- 1 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no significant difference in recurrence and complication rates when the EXTRA is performed under local anesthesia as compared to general. Blunt dissection of the preperitoneal space does not trigger pain and does not require lidocaine injection. The most painful area is the peritoneal reflection over the cord structure. The laparoscopic repair under local anesthesia represents an advantage in the repair of the inguinal hernia, particularly in the population where general anesthesia is contraindicated.

Early after the introduction of the laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, surgeons have realized the many potential applications of this approach. Since then, the access of the preperitoneal space has been used for many other laparoscopic procedures, which include the pelvic lymph node dissection, the bladder neck suspension, the varicoselectomy, and the radical prostatectomy. We discuss the different techniques used to create the preperitoneal space and then we describe our experience in the dissection of this space. The extraperitoneal endoscopic access provides a safe and minimally invasive approach to a variety of procedures and we believe that it is essential to introduce it as an integral part of the surgical training program.

Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy has traditionally been performed using one 5-mm and two 11-mm trocars. In this report, we evaluate the feasibility of the preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias using the needlescopic method (2-mm ports) and describe the technique used in this repair. A total of 11 inguinal hernias were treated with needlescopic extraperitoneal repair. There were five direct and six indirect hernias. One patient had a bilateral hernia. The average operative time was 54 min. One patient was converted to the standard laparoscopic extraperitoneal method. All patients were discharged a few hours after the procedure. They were able to resume activity within a few days and required only minimal analgesic intake. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 months. All patients were followed up by one of the surgeons at 1, 3, and 6 weeks, and then at 6 months. No complications were encountered. There have been no recurrences to date. Overall, needlescopic extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias is a feasible procedure in male patients seeking better cosmetic results than can be achieved with standard laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair. This procedure is technically more demanding. The operative time is longer. The cosmetic aspect is the only advantage of this technique.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy has the advantage of being a minimally invasive procedure with a recurrence rate comparable to open preperitoneal repair. However, surgeons have been reluctant to adopt this procedure because it requires general anesthesia. METHODS: In this report, we describe the technique used in the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias under local anesthesia using the preperitoneal approach. We also report our results with 10 inguinal hernias repaired using the same technique. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent their primary inguinal hernia repairs under local anesthesia. None were converted to general anesthesia. Four patients received a small amount of intravenous sedation. Three patients had bilateral hernias. There were five direct and eight indirect hernias. The average operative time was 47 min. The average lidocaine usage was 28 cc. All patients were discharged within a few hours of the surgery. There were no complications. Follow-up has ranged from 1 to 6 months. There has been no recurrences to date. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia is feasible under local anesthesia. This technique adds a new treatment option in the management of bilateral inguinal hernias, particularly in the population where general anesthesia is contraindicated or even for patients who are reluctant to receive general or epidural anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In 1975, researchers introduced the use of a large unsutured polyester mesh prosthesis placed in the preperitoneal space for inguinal hernia repair. Different stapling devices have been used to secure this mesh, and the most common complication of the procedure is nerve damage secondary to the staples. The necessity of stapling has never been demonstrated. We designed a prospective randomized study of the need for stapling in laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias with 1-year and 3-year followup. STUDY DESIGN: Inclusion criteria of the study were men older than 18 years and first-time inguinal hernia repair. Patients with recurrence and previous abdominal operations were excluded to avoid confounding variables. Each patient's hernia was assigned a consecutive random number chosen by computer, with each number corresponding to an assigned group. The first group had stapled mesh and the second had unstapled mesh. RESULTS: Data were collected over a 15-month period, with each procedure having a mean followup time of 8 months. A total of 100 procedures was performed in 92 patients. The two groups of patients were well matched for age and the type of hernia repaired. There were no recurrences in either group and no complications or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The initial 12-month followup showed no significant differences in recurrence or complication rates between the stapled and unstapled groups. Both groups returned to work within an average of 4 days. A net savings of $120 was realized for each hernia repair performed without stapled mesh. In addition, stapling presents an inherent risk of nerve damage.