Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Surgical access to metastases in the retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLN) could be difficult. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) can be utilized to access RPLNs. The purpose of this study was to describe a TORS approach to RPLN dissection. METHODS: Case series of patients undergoing RPLN dissection by TORS, compared to matched controls (1:2). RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent robotic RPLN dissection. Median age was 63 (43-73). Pathology was oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in 9 and papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in 3. The feeding tube dependence length was 12 days (1-46) on average. Complications occurred in 8 (66%); most commonly, aspiration pneumonitis (6). In comparison to the matched controls (24), there was no difference in length of stay or feeding tube dependence. Complications were higher in OPSCC patients. CONCLUSION: TORS is feasible for accessing RPLN. The procedure is well tolerated in PTC patients; OPSCC patients are at increased risk of complications

BACKGROUND: Whether elective lymph neck dissection (ELND) is associated with improved survival in oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the maxillary alveolus/hard palate is not known. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine patients presenting de novo and receiving treatment for clinically node negative SCC of the maxillary alveolus/hard palate at 2 cancer centers between 1985 and 2011 were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (21%) received ELND. Occult nodal metastases were present in 29% of the dissected necks. The ELND group had more T3 to T4 status tumors (62% vs 34%; p < .001) and positive-margin resections (59% vs 38%; p = .019). Patients undergoing ELND experienced lower rates of neck recurrence (6% vs 21%; p = .031), superior 5-year recurrence-free survival (68% vs 45%; p = .026), and overall survival (86% vs 62%; p = .043). ELND was associated with a 2-fold decrease in risk of recurrence in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: ELND was associated with lower rates of recurrence and improved survival in SCC of the maxillary alveolus/hard palate. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2015.

In this first paper of the 'Do You Know Your Guidelines' series, we review National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations and underlying evidence for the follow-up and surveillance of head and neck cancer survivors. The goals of follow-up and surveillance care are to 1) Maximize long-term oncologic outcomes of therapy with appropriate evaluation for recurrence; 2) Maximize functional and quality of life outcomes, while 3) Minimizing unnecessary and harmful low-value care. Finding the right balance of testing and surveillance is a challenge for providers and patients. Herein we review all NCCN recommendations for head and neck cancer survivors. We pay particular attention to an area of controversy: the use of ongoing surveillance imaging, in particular PET/CT scans

Importance: Limited data exist on performing major oral cavity resections and reconstructions without elective tracheotomy. Objectives: To describe a group of patients who successfully underwent major microvascular mandibular reconstruction without an elective tracheotomy and to perform a literature review to identify commonalities between our group and the available literature to identify potential common factors that might contribute to the success of this approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: Case series with retrospective medical chart review of 15 patients who underwent fibula microvascular free flap reconstruction of mandibular defects without tracheotomy between 2000 and 2014 (the most common indication was osteoradionecrosis) conducted at a tertiary referral hospital center. Exposures: Mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap without elective tracheotomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perioperative morbidity and mortality with a focus on airway management and perioperative complications. Results: The median age of 15 patients (11 males and 4 females) at the time of reconstruction was 42 years (range, 10-64 years). The indication for surgery was nonmalignant pathologic abnormalities in 8 patients (53%), osteosarcoma in 4 patients (27%), and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in 3 patients (20%). All patients were intubated endonasally and, excepting 1 pediatric case, were extubated the day following surgery. The fibula spanned the parasymphysis and/or symphysis in 2 patients, and was limited to the mandibular body in others (mean length, 7.6 cm [range, 4.0-15.0 cm]). The flap design was osteocutaneous in 3 patients and osseous in the rest. No patient required reintubation or tracheotomy. No complications due to endonasal intubation occurred. The average hospital length of stay was 11 days. Conclusions and Relevance: Major oral cavity resection and reconstruction with microvascular free flaps can be performed safely without elective tracheotomy in a select group of patients. Limited data exist on patient selection criteria. Further studies are needed to identify favorable factors and develop protocols for safe patient selection.

Importance: Historically, patients with cervical metastases from melanoma of the head and neck were treated with a radical neck dissection. This study evaluates the efficacy of limiting the extent of lymphadenectomy in this high-risk population. Objectives: To determine whether limiting the extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with biopsy-proven melanoma has a negative effect on regional control. Our hypothesis was that performing a more limited lymphadenectomy does not have a negative impact on regional control. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, single-cohort study was performed using a prospectively collected database of patients with head and neck melanoma with histopathologically positive lymph nodes after modified radical (MRND) or selective neck dissection (SNDs) performed at a high-volume, academic, tertiary care center. Interventions: Lymphadenectomy was performed as clinically indicated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were regional recurrence and regional recurrence free survival. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted using multiple patient characteristics. Results: Forty-one patients underwent SND or MRND from 2001 through 2010. The median number of positive nodes was 1 (range, 1-16). Twenty-six patients (63%) received adjuvant radiation and 23 patients (56%) received adjuvant immunotherapy or chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 17 months (range, 1-116 months). Regional control was achieved in 29 patients (71%). Median regional recurrence-free survival was 21 months (range, 1-116 months). Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26), total number of nodes examined (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10), and number of sentinel lymph nodes examined (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.09) were all significantly associated with increased recurrence-free survival. Tumor depth, extracapsular spread, number of nodes positive, prior SLNB, extent of lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy were not significant. Conclusions and Relevance: Limiting the extent of lymphadenectomy with frequent use of adjuvant radiation therapy is effective in achieving regional control of head and neck melanoma with cervical metastases.

BACKGROUND: A variety of tumors arise in or extend to the infratemporal fossa. We investigated the outcome of surgical management of these tumors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a craniofacial approach to resection of infratemporal fossa tumors from 1992 to 2008 in a cancer center. RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent resection of a infratemporal fossa tumors (68% men). Median age was 46 years (range, 1-81 years). The most common pathology was sarcoma (13; 30%). Twenty-two tumors (51%) were recurrent. Twenty patients (46%) underwent resection of tumors from the infratemporal fossa, 5 (12%) required resection of the anterior skull base, and 18 (42%) required orbital exenteration, additionally. Thirty-one patients (72%) required reconstruction with free tissue transfer. Twenty-seven patients (62.8%) required further treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Complications occurred in 9 patients (21%). Six patients (14%) underwent salvage operations. Median follow-up was 24 months. Median overall survival and 3-year survival were 40 months and 59.6%. CONCLUSION: Tumors involving the infratemporal fossa can be resected with acceptable morbidity and long-term survival.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Hard palate and maxillary alveolus are two commonly grouped oral cavity subsites due to their anatomic contiguity and oncologic disease behavior. Few studies have been conducted investigating clinical presentation, staging, prevalence of cervical metastases, and outcomes in this population. The primary objective of this study was to analyze predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in surgically treated patients, particularly as it relates to the role of neck dissection. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study with planned data collection. METHODS: This cohort study used planned data collection over 15 years (1994-2008) at a large tertiary care cancer center to study all patients presenting with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary alveolus and hard palate treated surgically. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of DFS. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (54 male, 56%). The majority of patients (54, 56%) presented with locally advanced disease (cT3, cT4). Occult nodal metastases were noted in 26% (17 of 65) of patients clinically staged as N0. The 3-year DFS was 70% (95% confidence interval = 59%-78%) with a median time to failure of 1.1 years (range = 0.3-9.7 years). Cox regression multivariate model demonstrated that advanced pathologic T stage, hard palate tumor site, and poorly differentiated tumor grade were each independent predictors of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of the patients with hard palate and maxillary alveolus tumors harbor occult cervical metastases. Elective neck dissection in the high-risk patients may potentially be beneficial in providing more accurate staging and improving DFS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

Objective. The optimal type of neck dissection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with clinical cervical metastases has not been determined. The following study was performed to determine the rate of regional control with selective neck dissection (SND) in these patients.Study Design. Case series with planned data collection.Settings. Single institution, cancer center.Methods and Subjects. Patients with cervical lymph node metastases from mucosal cancers of the head and neck who were treated with SND from 2000 to 2010 were selected. Demographics, tumor characteristics, extent of neck dissection, adjuvant treatments, locoregional control, and survival were recorded. Recurrence in the neck and disease-specific survival (DSS) were primary and secondary end points.Results. One hundred eight patients underwent SND. Sixty-nine (64%) were male. Median age was 62 (20-89) years. The most common primary site was the oral cavity (71.3%). Ninety-five (88%) received adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up was 21 months. Six patients (5.5%) had isolated recurrence in the dissected neck. Patients with N2C disease had poorer neck recurrence-free survival. At the end of study, 64 (59.3%) patients had no evidence of disease, and 23 (21.3%) had died of disease. Two-year DSS was 76.9%. Number of positive nodes (P = .026) and positive surgical margins (P = .001), among others, were predictors of poorer DSS.Conclusion. In a highly selected group of patients with cervical lymph node metastases from head and neck SCC, selective neck dissection is effective in controlling the disease in the neck when performed in the setting of a multimodality treatment, including adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Assessment of donor site morbidity and recipient site complications following free radial forearm osteocutaneous flap (FRFOCF) harvest and evaluation of patient perceived upper limb disability for free radial forearm osteocutaneous versus fasciocutaneous flaps (FRFF). METHODS: First a case series was undertaken of 218 patients who underwent an FRFOCF at two tertiary referral centers between February 1998 and November 2010. Outcomes included forearm donor site morbidity and recipient site complications. Second, the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire assessing patient perceived arm disability was administered by phone to 60 consecutive patients who underwent an FRFOCF or FRFF. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63 years with male predominance (62.8%). Median bone length harvested was 8 cm (range, 3-12 cm) with prophylactic plating of the radius following harvest. Donor site morbidity included fracture (1 patient, 0.5%) and sensory neuropathy (5 patients, 2.3%). Mean DASH scores were comparative between groups and to established normative values. Mandibular malunion rate was 3.2% and hardware extrusion at the recipient site occurred in 15.6%. CONCLUSION: Reluctance to perform FRFOCF by surgeons usually centers on concerns regarding potential donor site morbidity and adequacy of available bone stock; however, we identified minimal objective or patient perceived donor site morbidity or recipient site complications following harvest of FRFOCFs. Mild wrist weakness and stiffness are common but do not impede ability to perform activities of daily living. Data from this and other reports suggest this flap is particularly useful for midfacial and short segment mandibular reconstruction.