Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Based on inhibition of viral replication and limited reports on clinical efficacy, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was initially considered as a prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Despite this optimism, more extensive reports have significantly dampened the promise of efficacy, however cardiac toxicity has surfaced raising attention to this complication. Although HCQ is generally considered safe during pregnancy based on studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematous and other rheumatic conditions, this initiative leveraged a unique opportunity to evaluate neonatal electrocardiograms (ECGs) in the context of HCQ levels to address any potential cardiotoxicity.
Method(s): Neonatal ECGs and HCQ blood levels were available in a recently completed study evaluating the efficacy of HCQ 400mg daily to prevent the recurrence of congenital heart block associated with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies. The ECGs of affected newborns who met the primary outcome of advanced block were not included in this safety study so that the results only reflect those infants with no clinical cardiac disease. Using the Bazett formula to correct for heart rate, corrected QT (QTc) intervals were calculated and compared to age-matched normal values. For reference, the median (2nd percentile - 98th percentile) values for QTc were 413 (378-448) msec in males, and 420 (379-462) msec in females. QTc intervals were recorded in the absence of knowledge of the HCQ levels. Values exceeding 448 msec for males and 462 msec for females were considered abnormal. Levels of HCQ were assessed during each trimester of pregnancy and in the cord blood, providing unambiguous assurance of drug exposure.
Result(s): There were 45 ECGs available for interpretation within the first 4 months of life in unaffected infants. Overall, there was no correlation between cord blood levels of HCQ and the QTc (R = 0.02, P = 0.86) or the average value of HCQ levels obtained during each individual pregnancy and cord blood and the QTc (R = 0.04, P = 0.80), as shown in Figure 1A and Figure 1B. Likewise there was no correlation between the average of the maternal HCQ levels obtained at each trimester and delivery plus cord levels and the QTc on the ECGs of the 31 infants evaluated on day of life 1-4 (R = 0.08, P = 0.63) or those of the 14 children older than 4 days (R = 0.01, P = 0.95). Maternal values of HCQ were sustained throughout pregnancy and delivery (Figure 2). Mean QTc values were nearly identical between those in the highest and lowest quartiles of cord blood HCQ levels (P = 0.57) and between the highest and lowest quartiles of average HCQ levels during pregnancy (P = 0.54) (Figure 3A and 3B). Among these 45 infants, only 5 had prolongation of the QTc (11%; 95% CI: 4% - 24%), 2 marked and 3 marginal. No arrhythmias occurred in any neonate that was not known to have heart block.
Conclusion(s): In aggregate, these data provide reassurances that the maternal use of HCQ is not associated with a high incidence of QTc prolongation in the neonate

Background/Purpose: Poor therapeutic response rates contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with lupus nephritis. Early identification of patients likely to respond is crucial as delays in treatment associate with worse outcomes. This study evaluated response using prospectively collected data obtained from the multi-ethnic/racial, multi-center Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) lupus nephritis cohort. This cohort represents a real-world clinical setting using provider chosen standard of care and uniform collection of data.
Method(s): This study included SLE patients based on ACR or SLICC classification enrolled in AMP who met the following criteria: urine protein-creatine ratio (UPCR) > 1 at entry, and histologic biopsy Class III, IV, V, or mixed. Patients were followed at 3, 12, 26 and 52 wks with demographics, history, laboratory results, disease activity, and medica-tions recorded at each visit. Follow up data were available for 136 patients at 26 wks and 118 at 52 wks. Complete response was defined as a reduction in UPCR to <.5, a normal serum creatinine or no greater than 125% of baseline, and < 10 mg prednisone at time of response assessment. Patients were partial responders if UPCR decreased > 50% but remained >.5 and nonresponders if < 50% reduction in UPCR and/or did not meet the other response criteria.
Result(s): Medications were reported at 12 wks (Table 1). The complete response rate was 26% at both 26 and 52 wks. For patients undergoing a first biopsy, the rates were 37% and 40% and for those with repeat biopsies, the rates were lower at 21% and 19% respectively (p=0.042 at 26 wks; p=0.015 at 52 wks). The complete response at 26 wks was generally sustained with only 4 of 27 patients experiencing a relapse at 52 wks. At 26 wks, patients with membranous histology were less likely to be complete responders than patients with proliferative histology. This trend was observed regardless of biopsy number and persisted for response status at 52 wks. Although baseline activity score did not predict responder status, complete responders had a significantly lower chronicity index than nonresponders (mean + SD, 2.26 + 2.22 vs 3.83 + 2.57, p=0.016) at 26 wks with similar results at 52 wks. Responder status at 26 and 52 wks whether first or repeat biopsy was independent of extrarenal disease at entry (Table 2). Complete responder status was associated with positive anti-dsDNA serology at baseline for repeat biopsy patients. Complete responders had a greater change in C3, hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, albumin, and UPCR at 12 wks compared to baseline values than nonresponders (Table 3). Similar trends were observed when considering response status at 52 wks.
Conclusion(s): The low complete response rates reported in the AMP cohort are consistent with findings in blinded controlled trials of standard-of-care therapies and support the critical need for new therapeutics particularly in patients undergoing repeat biopsies and those with increased chronicity

Background Supported by both the ACR and EULAR, the EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria for SLE employ positive ANA (ever) as an entry criterion and use a weighted scheme with values ranging from 2 to 10, for a classification cut-off of 10. Criteria items are attributed to SLE only if there is no more likely alternative diagnosis in the individual patients. Items are organized in domains, and only the highest ranking item within a domain is counted. These criteria have been validated in a cohort of 696 SLE patients and 574 non-SLE patients from a total of 21 centers, reaching an overall sensitivity of 96.1% and a specificity of 93.4%. To at least estimate the performance in groups underrepresented in the validation cohort of this transatlantic project, we analyzed this cohort for patient subsets with regard to sex, ethnicity, and disease duration. Methods The full EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria validation cohort was analyzed for female (n=1,098) and male (n=172) patients, Asian (n=118), Black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and White (n=941) patients, and patients with an SLE duration of less than 1 year (n=34), one to less than 3 years (n=196), 3 to less than 5 years (n=157), and 5 or more years (n=879). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria, the SLICC 2012 criteria and the ACR 1997 criteria each. Results As shown in table 1, most of the point estimates for sensitivity and specificity in subsets lay within the 95% confidence intervals of the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ ACR 2019 criteria validation. In particular, sensitivity and specificity for all ethnic groups were within the confidence intervals or even higher. Formally, the sensitivity was slightly lower for male patients, corresponding to a higher specificity, but the male 95% confidence intervals (0.86-0.98 for sensitivity, 0.90-0.99 for specificity) overlapped. While sensitivity appeared independent of disease duration from year 1 on, sensitivity was only 89% in the first year of disease, identical to the SLICC criteria (89%) and numerically higher than the ACR criteria (56%), but all confidence intervals overlapped. Conclusion While not all subgroups of SLE patients in the validation cohort are of adequate size to fully explore the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE classification criteria in the respective subsets, the point estimates of sensitivity and specificity suggest that the new criteria perform at least reasonably well in all ethnic groups, in men and in early disease. Nevertheless, sensitivity and specificity should be independently validated in larger groups of Asian, Black and Hispanic patients, male patients and in early disease

Background - Based on inhibition of viral replication and limited reports on clinical efficacy, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is being considered as prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Although HCQ is generally considered safe during pregnancy based on studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematous and other rheumatic conditions, there may still be reluctance to institute this antimalarial during pregnancy for the sole purpose of antiviral therapy. Methods - To provide data regarding any potential fetal/neonatal cardiotoxicity, we leveraged a unique opportunity in which neonatal electrocardiograms (ECGs) and HCQ blood levels were available in a recently completed study evaluating the efficacy of HCQ 400mg daily to prevent the recurrence of congenital heart block associated with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies. Results - Forty-five ECGs were available for QTc measurement, and levels of HCQ were assessed during each trimester of pregnancy and in the cord blood, providing unambiguous assurance of drug exposure. Overall, there was no correlation between cord blood levels of HCQ and the neonatal QTc (R = 0.02, P = 0.86) or the mean of HCQ values obtained throughout each individual pregnancy and the QTc (R = 0.04, P = 0.80). In total 5 (11%; 95% CI: 4% - 24%) neonates had prolongation of the QTc > 2SD above historical healthy controls (2 markedly and 3 marginally) but ECGs were otherwise normal. Conclusions - In aggregate, these data provide reassurances that the maternal use of HCQ is associated with a low incidence of infant QTc prolongation. However, if included in clinical COVID-19 studies, early postnatal ECGs should be considered.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the performance of the new criteria with regard to disease duration, sex and race/ethnicity, and compared its performance against the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria. METHODS:Twenty-one SLE centres from 16 countries submitted SLE cases and mimicking controls to form the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated. RESULTS:The cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and white (n=941) patients; with an SLE duration of 1 to <3 years (n=196) and ≥5 years (n=879). Among patients with 1 to <3 years disease duration, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% vs 81%). The EULAR/ACR criteria performed well in men (sensitivity 93%, specificity 96%) and women (sensitivity 97%, specificity 94%). Among women, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% vs 83%) and better specificity than the SLICC criteria (94% vs 82%). Among white patients, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (95% vs 83%) and better specificity than the SLICC criteria (94% vs 83%). The EULAR/ACR criteria performed well among black patients (sensitivity of 98%, specificity 100%), and had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria among Hispanic patients (100% vs 86%) and Asian patients (97% vs 77%). CONCLUSIONS:The EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria perform well among patients with early disease, men, women, white, black, Hispanic and Asian patients. These criteria have superior sensitivity than the ACR criteria and/or superior specificity than the SLICC criteria across many subgroups.

BACKGROUND:Although hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a mainstay of treatment for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), ocular toxicity can result from accumulated exposure. As the longevity of patients with SLE improves, data are needed to balance the risk of ocular toxicity and the risk of disease flare, especially in older patients with quiescent disease. Accordingly, this study was initiated to examine the safety of HCQ withdrawal in older SLE patients. METHODS:Data were obtained by retrospective chart review at three major lupus centers in New York City. Twenty-six patients who discontinued HCQ and thirty-two patients on HCQ matched for gender, race/ethnicity, and age were included in this study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a lupus flare classified by the revised version of the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) Flare composite index, within 1 year of HCQ withdrawal or matched time of continuation. RESULTS:Five patients (19.2%) in the HCQ withdrawal group compared to five (15.6%) in the HCQ continuation group experienced a flare of any severity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% CI 0.31, 5.30; p = 0.73). There were no severe flares in either group. The results were similar after adjusting for length of SLE, number of American College of Rheumatology criteria, low complement levels, and SELENA-SLEDAI score, and in a propensity score analysis (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.23, 6.16; p = 0.84). The analysis of time to any flare revealed a non-significant earlier time to flare in the HCQ withdrawal group (log-rank p = 0.67). Most flares were in the cutaneous and musculoskeletal systems, but one patient in the continuation group developed pericarditis. The most common reason for HCQ withdrawal was retinal toxicity (42.3%), followed by patient's preference (34.6%), other confirmed or suspected adverse effects (15.4%), ophthalmologist recommendation for macular degeneration (3.8%), and rheumatologist recommendation for quiescent SLE (3.8%). CONCLUSIONS:In this retrospective study of older stable patients with SLE on long-term HCQ, withdrawal did not significantly increase the risk of flares.

OBJECTIVE:To characterize the hospitalization and death rates among patients with inflammatory arthritis affected by COVID-19 and to analyze the associations between comorbidities and immunomodulatory medications and infection outcomes. METHODS:Clinical, demographic, maintenance treatment, and disease course data and outcomes of individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA; rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthritis) with symptomatic COVID-19 infection were prospectively assessed via web-based questionnaire followed by individual phone calls and electronic medical record review. Baseline characteristics and medication use were summarized for hospitalized and ambulatory patients, and outcomes were compared for each medication class using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS:A total of 103 patients with IA were included in the study (n=80 confirmed and n=23 highly suspicious for COVID-19). Twenty-six percent of participants required hospitalization, and 4% died. Patients who warranted hospitalization were significantly more likely to be older (P<0.001) and have comorbid hypertension (P=0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P=0.022). IA patients taking oral glucocorticoids had a higher likelihood of being admitted for COVID-19 (P<0.001) while those on maintenance anti-cytokine biologic therapies did not. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In patients with underlying IA, COVID-19 outcomes were worse in those receiving glucocorticoids but not in patients on maintenance anti-cytokine therapy. Further work is needed to understand whether immunomodulatory therapies affect COVID-19 incidence.

OBJECTIVE:To characterize patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) affected by COVID-19 and to analyze associations of comorbidities and medications on infection outcomes. METHODS:Patients with SLE and RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were identified through an established New York University lupus cohort, query of two hospital systems, and referrals from rheumatologists. Data were prospectively collected via a web-based questionnaire and review of medical records. Baseline characteristics were obtained for all patients with COVID-19 to analyze risk factors for hospitalization. Data were also collected from asymptomatic patients and those with COVID-19-like symptoms who tested negative or were not tested. Statistical analyses were limited to confirmed COVID-19-positive patients. RESULTS:A total of 226 SLE patients were included: 41 patients with confirmed COVID-19; 19 patients who tested negative for COVID-19; 42 patients with COVID-19-like symptoms who did not get tested; and 124 patients who remained asymptomatic without testing. Of those SLE patients with COVID-19, 24 (59%) required hospitalization, four required intensive care unit-level of care, and four died. Hospitalized patients tended to be older, non-white, Hispanic, have higher BMI, history of nephritis, and at least one comorbidity. An exploratory (due to limited sample size) logistic regression analysis identified race, presence of at least one comorbidity, and BMI as independent predictors of hospitalization. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In general, the variables predictive of hospitalization in our SLE patients were similar to those identified in the general population. Further studies are needed to understand additional risk factors for poor COVID-19 outcomes in patients with SLE.

BACKGROUND:Experimental and clinical evidence support the role of macrophage Toll-like receptor signaling in maternal anti-SSA/Ro-mediated congenital heart block (CHB). OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an orally administered Toll-like receptor antagonist widely used in lupus including during pregnancy, was evaluated for efficacy in reducing the historical 18% recurrence rate of CHB. METHODS:This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 2-stage clinical trial was designed using Simon's optimal approach. Anti-SSA/Ro-positive mothers with a previous pregnancy complicated by CHB were recruited (n = 19 Stage 1; n = 35 Stage 2). Patients received 400 mg daily of HCQ prior to completion of gestational week 10, which was maintained through pregnancy. The primary outcome was 2° or 3° CHB any time during pregnancy, and secondary outcomes included isolated endocardial fibroelastosis, 1° CHB at birth and skin rash. RESULTS:By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 4 of 54 evaluable pregnancies resulted in a primary outcome (7.4%; 90% confidence interval: 3.4% to 15.9%). Because 9 mothers took potentially confounding medications (fluorinated glucocorticoids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin) after enrollment but prior to a primary outcome, to evaluate HCQ alone, 9 additional mothers were recruited and followed the identical protocol. In the per-protocol analysis restricted to pregnancies exposed to HCQ alone, 4 of 54 (7.4%) fetuses developed a primary outcome as in the ITT. Secondary outcomes included mild endocardial fibroelastosis (n = 1) and cutaneous neonatal lupus (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS:These prospective data support that HCQ significantly reduces the recurrence of CHB below the historical rate by >50%, suggesting that this drug should be prescribed for secondary prevention of fetal cardiac disease in anti-SSA/Ro-exposed pregnancies. (Preventive Approach to Congenital Heart Block With Hydroxychloroquine [PATCH]; NCT01379573).