Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare the diagnostic performance of iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL)-spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) with that of standard magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography sequences for detecting and grading cartilage lesions within the hip joint during MR arthrography. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Following institutional review board approval, 67 consecutive hip MR arthrograms were retrospectively reviewed independently by three musculoskeletal radiologists and one musculoskeletal fellow. IDEAL-SPGR images and the two-dimensional images, the latter from the routine MR arthrography protocol, were evaluated at separate sittings to grade each articular surface of the hip joint. By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the two techniques for detecting and grading cartilage lesions were determined. The McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic performance. Interreader agreement was calculated using Fleiss κ values. RESULTS:For all readers and surfaces combined, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting cartilage lesions was 74% and 77%, respectively, for IDEAL-SPGR and 70% and 84%, respectively, for the routine MR arthrography protocol. IDEAL-SPGR had similar sensitivity (P = .12) to and significantly lower specificity (P < .001) than the routine MR arthrography protocol for depicting cartilage lesions. When analyzing the differences in sensitivity and specificity by reader, the two readers who had experience with IDEAL-SPGR had no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity for detecting cartilage lesions between the two sequences. For all readers and surfaces combined, IDEAL-SPGR had a higher accuracy in correctly grading cartilage lesion (P = .012-.013). Interobserver agreement for detecting cartilage lesions did not differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:IDEAL-SPGR had similar sensitivity and significantly lower specificity for detecting cartilage lesions and higher accuracy for grading cartilage lesions than did a routine MR arthrography protocol; the lower specificity of IDEAL-SPGR for detecting cartilage lesions was not seen in experienced readers.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays an integral role in the assessment of articular cartilage. This article discusses the role of MR imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage, the appearance of cartilage lesions on MR imaging, and the currently available MR imaging techniques for evaluating cartilage morphology. A limitation of currently available sequences is their inability to consistently detect superficial degenerative and posttraumatic cartilage lesions that may progress to more advanced osteoarthritis. In the future, improved image quality may allow for better evaluation of articular cartilage and earlier detection of cartilage lesions.

Due to its high spatial resolution and excellent tissue contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the most commonly used imaging method to evaluate joints. Most musculoskeletal MRI is performed using 2D fast spin-echo sequences. However, 3D sequences have also been used for joint imaging and have the advantage of acquiring thin continuous slices through joints, which reduces the effects of partial volume averaging. With recent advances in MR technology, 3D sequences with isotropic resolution have been developed. These sequences allow high-quality multiplanar reformat images to be obtained following a single acquisition, thereby eliminating the need to repeat sequences with identical tissue contrast in different planes. Preliminary results on the diagnostic performance of 3D isotropic resolution sequences are encouraging. However, additional studies are needed to determine whether these sequences can replace currently used 2D fast spin-echo sequences for providing comprehensive joint assessment in clinical practice.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine whether preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging could help identify factors associated with poor clinical outcome after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in middle-aged and elderly patients with meniscal tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:The prospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study was performed with informed consent in 53 men and 47 women (average ages, 54.5 and 56.6 years, respectively). Patients underwent knee MR imaging before APM; clinical symptoms were evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. Overall severity of knee joint degeneration and severity of each feature of joint degeneration were assessed with Boston Leads Osteoarthritis Knee (BLOK) scoring system. Tear length was measured, and type of meniscal tear was classified. Spearman correlation coefficients and relative risks showed the relationship between clinical outcome after APM (difference between preoperative and postoperative IKDC scores) and severity of joint degeneration. RESULTS:Seventy-four patients with isolated medial APM had a significant (P < .05) inverse correlation between clinical outcome and severity of cartilage loss and bone marrow edema in the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau. Fifteen patients with isolated lateral APM had a significant (P < .05) inverse correlation between clinical outcome and severity of cartilage loss in the lateral femoral condyle and lateral tibial plateau and bone marrow edema in the lateral femoral condyle. One hundred patients with APM had a significant (P < .05) inverse correlation between clinical outcome and severity of meniscal extrusion, total BLOK score, and meniscal tear length. A significantly (P < .05) increased relative risk that a patient would not definitely improve after APM was observed if a meniscal root tear was present. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Poorer clinical outcome after APM was associated with greater severity of cartilage loss and bone marrow edema in the same compartment as the meniscal tear, greater severity of meniscal extrusion, greater overall severity of joint degeneration, a meniscal root tear, and a longer meniscal tear at preoperative MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of our study was to determine whether 3D sequences can improve the diagnostic performance of a routine MR protocol for detecting cartilage lesions within the knee joint at 3 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS/METHODS:An iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) sequence (n = 75 patients) or an IDEAL gradient-recalled acquisition in a steady state (GRASS) sequence (n = 75 patients) was added to routine 3-T knee MR protocol to examine 150 patients who subsequently underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. Each articular surface of the knee joint was graded at arthroscopy. All MR examinations were independently reviewed twice by two musculoskeletal radiologists. During the first review, the routine MR protocol was used alone to grade each articular surface of the knee joint; during the second review, the routine MR protocol was used with IDEAL-SPGR or IDEAL-GRASS. Using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting cartilage lesions and the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions were determined for the routine MR protocol alone and for the routine MR protocol with IDEAL-SPGR or IDEAL-GRASS. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values and proportions of correctly graded cartilage lesions. RESULTS:There was a statistically significant improvement in the specificity (p < 0.05) but not the sensitivity (p = 0.08-0.32) for detecting cartilage lesions when using the routine MR protocol with IDEAL-SPGR or IDEAL-GRASS. There was also a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions when using the routine MR protocol with IDEAL-SPGR or with IDEAL-GRASS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Adding 3D sequences to a routine MR protocol improves the diagnostic performance for detecting cartilage lesions within the knee joint at 3 T.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is one of the most commonly used imaging modality for evaluating patients with joint pain. Musculoskeletal MR protocols at most institutions consist of 2-dimensional fast spin echo (FSE) sequences repeated in multiple planes. Three-dimensional sequences have also been used to evaluate the musculoskeletal system and have many potential advantages over 2-dimensional FSE sequences. Three-dimensional sequences acquire thin continuous slices through joints with high in-plane spatial resolution, which minimize the effects of partial volume averaging. Newly developed 3-dimensional isotropic resolution sequences can also be used to create high-quality multiplanar reformat images that allow joints to be evaluated in any orientation after a single acquisition. Preliminary results on the use of 3-dimensional isotropic resolution sequences for evaluating the musculoskeletal system are encouraging. However, additional studies are needed to document the advantages of 3-dimensional sequences before they can replace currently used 2-dimensional FSE sequences for evaluating the musculoskeletal system in clinical practice.

Throwing injuries of the elbow in the pediatric population are common. These can occur as lateral compression osteochondral injuries such as osteochondritis dissecans or medial tension overload such as so-called Little League elbow. Extension overload injuries may present in teens as stress injuries of the olecranon process. We review the imaging findings of each of these common injuries, with an emphasis on their magnetic resonance imaging appearance.

OBJECTIVE:MRI is commonly used to evaluate the articular cartilage of the knee and hip joints in clinical practice. This article will discuss the advantages and limitations of currently available MRI techniques for evaluating articular cartilage. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Because of its high spatial resolution, multiplanar capability, and excellent tissue contrast, MRI is the imaging technique of choice for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee and hip joints.