Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:laufei02
Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery
Hussain, Ibrahim; Barzilai, Ori; Reiner, Anne S; DiStefano, Natalie; McLaughlin, Lily; Ogilvie, Shahiba; Bilsky, Mark; Laufer, Ilya
BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Neoplastic spinal instability is movement-related pain or neurologic compromise under physiologic loads with the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) developed to facilitate diagnosis. There is a paucity of evidence that mechanical instability correlates with patient-reported symptoms and that surgical stabilization significantly improves these patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PURPOSE:The objective of this study was to determine if SINS correlates with patient-reported preoperative pain and disability, and if surgical stabilization significantly improves PRO. STUDY DESIGN:A single-institution prospective cohort study was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE:A total of 131 patients who underwent stabilization for metastatic spinal tumor treatment between July 2014 and August 2016 were included. OUTCOMES MEASURES:Preoperative baseline and mean difference in perioperative PROs as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) were the outcome measures. METHODS:The SINS was analyzed as a continuous, ordinal, and categorical variable (Stable: 0-6, Indeterminate: 7-12, Unstable: 13-18). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman rank coefficient (rho), the Kruskal-Wallis test, and an extension of the Cochran-Armitage trend test. The SINS and association between the mean differences in post- and preoperative PRO scores was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS:There was a statistically significant positive correlation between increasing SINS and severity of preoperative pain with BPI average pain (rho=0.20; p=.03) and MDASI pain (rho=0.19; p=.03). Increasing SINS correlated with severity of preoperative disability with BPI walking (rho=0.19; p=.04), MDASI activity (rho=0.24; p=.006), and MDASI walking (rho=0.20; p=.03). Similar associations were noted when SINS was analyzed as an ordinal categorical variable. Stabilization significantly improved nearly all PRO measures for patients with indeterminate and unstable SINS. Significant correlations persisted when controlling for neurologic status and were not affected based on the technique of surgical stabilization used. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-related outcome-based validation of SINS confirms this scoring system for diagnosing neoplastic spinal instability and provides surgeons with a tool to determine which patients will benefit from stabilization. Surgical stabilization of cancer patients with SINS consistent with mechanical instability provides significant reduction in pain and improves patient mobility independent of neurologic status and stabilization technique.
PMID: 28713049
ISSN: 1878-1632
CID: 4715572
Metastases of spinal myxopapillary ependymoma: unique characteristics and clinical management
Kraetzig, Theresa; McLaughlin, Lily; Bilsky, Mark H; Laufer, Ilya
OBJECTIVE Myxopapillary ependymoma is a benign WHO Grade I tumor most commonly located in the conus-cauda equina region of the spine. Although this tumor is defined by an overall excellent survival, dissemination throughout the whole neuraxis occurs frequently. The current study evaluated the clinical characteristics and significance of myxopapillary ependymoma metastases. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery from 2005 to 2015 for treatment of spinal myxopapillary ependymoma were included in the study. Charts were reviewed for primary tumor symptoms and initial treatment, local recurrence, response to salvage therapy, and presence and behavior of distant metastases. RESULTS Nineteen patients with spinal myxopapillary ependymoma were included in the study (52.6% female). The median age at first diagnosis was 32 years old (range 9-58 years old), and 26.3% were ≤ 18 years old. The median follow-up of all included patients was 48 months (range 6-456 months). Of the primary tumors, 84.2% were located in the lower thoracic or upper lumbar spine, spanning 1-3 levels in 94.7%. All patients underwent surgery for initial treatment: in 78.9% a gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved, with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in 20%. Of the 21.2% who underwent a subtotal resection (STR), 75% underwent postoperative RT. Tumor progression was noted in 26.3% of patients after a median 36-month follow-up (range 12-240 months). In 57.9% of patients, distant metastases were found, of which 36.4% were present at initial diagnosis. Further metastases occurred within a median of 20 months (range 2-360 months). Following a diagnosis of metastatic tumor, 72.7% did not show progression and no symptoms were observed during a median follow-up of 36 months (range 6-216 months). Metastases occurred in all parts of the neuroaxis, but were principally localized in the thoracic and sacral spine in 38.9% and 33.3%, respectively; the brain was involved in 11.1%. In 54.5%, more than 1 level was affected. Overall survival was 100% with an excellent clinical and neurological outcome in 78.9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Metastatic dissemination within the CNS can be observed in many patients with myxopapillary ependymoma. GTR of the primary tumor should be the primary treatment goal, and additional RT is recommended after STR. For distant metastases of myxopapillary ependymoma without clinical manifestation, close clinical and MRI follow-up represents a sufficient strategy because most of the metastases remain asymptomatic and do not show progression over time. Additional resection or irradiation as salvage therapy would be recommended if metastases become symptomatic.
PMID: 29219779
ISSN: 1547-5646
CID: 4715632
Safety and utility of kyphoplasty prior to spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic tumors: a clinical and dosimetric analysis
Barzilai, Ori; DiStefano, Natalie; Lis, Eric; Yamada, Yoshiya; Lovelock, D Michael; Fontanella, Andrew N; Bilsky, Mark H; Laufer, Ilya
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of kyphoplasty treatment prior to spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with spine metastases. METHODS A retrospective review of charts, radiology reports, and images was performed for all patients who received SRS (single fraction; either standalone or post-kyphoplasty) at a large tertiary cancer center between January 2012 and July 2015. Patient and tumor variables were documented, as well as treatment planning data and dosimetry. To measure the photon scatter due to polymethyl methacrylate, megavolt photon beam attenuation was determined experimentally as it passed through a kyphoplasty cement phantom. Corrected electron density values were recalculated and compared with uncorrected values. RESULTS Of 192 treatment levels in 164 unique patients who underwent single-fraction SRS, 17 (8.8%) were treated with kyphoplasty prior to radiation delivery to the index level. The median time from kyphoplasty to SRS was 22 days. Four of 192 treatments (2%) demonstrated local tumor recurrence or progression at the time of analysis. Of the 4 local failures, 1 patient had kyphoplasty prior to SRS. This recurrence occurred 18 months after SRS in the setting of widespread systemic disease and spinal tumor progression. Dosimetric review demonstrated a lower than average treatment dose for this case compared with the rest of the cohort. There were no significant differences in dosimetry analysis between the group of patients who underwent kyphoplasty prior to SRS and the remaining patients in the cohort. A preliminary analysis of polymethyl methacrylate showed that dosimetric errors due to uncorrected electron density values were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS In cases without epidural spinal cord compression, stabilization with cement augmentation prior to SRS is safe and does not alter the efficacy of the radiation or preclude physicians from adhering to SRS planning and contouring guidelines.
PMID: 29087812
ISSN: 1547-5646
CID: 4715612
Photon Irradiation for Spinal Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas
Chapter by: Lockney, Dennis T.; Lockney, Natalie A.; Schmitt, Adam; Yamada, Josh; Bilsky, Mark; Laufer, Ilya
in: CHORDOMAS AND CHONDROSARCOMAS OF THE SKULL BASE AND SPINE by
pp. 355-362
ISBN:
CID: 4716192
Hybrid Therapy for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: Technique for Separation Surgery and Spine Radiosurgery (vol 15, pg 361, 2018) [Correction]
Barzilai, Ori; Laufer, Ilya; Robin, Adam; Xu, Ran; Yamada, Yoshiya; Bilsky, Mark H.
ISI:000449381000063
ISSN: 2332-4252
CID: 4716152
Stabilization of Tumor-Associated Craniovertebral Junction Instability: Indications, Operative Variables, and Outcomes
Zuckerman, Scott L; Kreines, Fabiana; Powers, Ann; Iorgulescu, J Bryan; Elder, James B; Bilsky, Mark H; Laufer, Ilya
BACKGROUND:Whether primary or metastatic, tumors of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are rare and challenging. OBJECTIVE:To examine the surgical indications, operative variables, and outcomes in patients with tumors of the CVJ undergoing occipitocervical (OC) stabilization. METHODS:A single-institution, retrospective case series was performed from a prospectively maintained spine database. Patients with primary or metastatic tumors of the CVJ who underwent OC stabilization were identified. Out of 46 patients who underwent OC fusion, 39 were for tumor. Paired t -tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to assess for postoperative changes. RESULTS:Ten patients (26%) harbored primary tumors, and the remaining 29 (74%) had metastatic disease. Of the metastatic patients, 14 had a neurological deficit, 10 had severe neck pain, and 5 were deemed mechanically unstable. Postoperative visual analog pain scores were significantly reduced at all 3 follow-up times ( P < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI; 3.2, 6.0]; P = .001, 95% CI [2.6, 7.7]; P = .020, 95% CI [0.6, 5.5]). The percentage of patients who were ambulatory and neurologically improved or intact remained stable postoperatively with no significant declines. There were 2 perioperative mortalities (5%), and 13 patients (33%) experienced a major complication. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with primary or metastatic tumor of the CVJ, OC stabilization using a cervical screw-rod system affixed to a midline-keel buttress plate, with or without posterior decompression, is a reliable method for CVJ stabilization in the oncologic setting. Improvement in pain and preservation of neurological function was seen.
PMID: 28368478
ISSN: 1524-4040
CID: 4715492
Incidence and risk factors for preoperative deep venous thrombosis in 314 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis
Zacharia, Brad E; Kahn, Sweena; Bander, Evan D; Cederquist, Gustav Y; Cope, William P; McLaughlin, Lily; Hijazi, Alexa; Reiner, Anne S; Laufer, Ilya; Bilsky, Mark
OBJECTIVE The authors of this study aimed to identify the incidence of and risk factors for preoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases. METHODS Univariate analysis of patient age, sex, ethnicity, laboratory values, comorbidities, preoperative ambulatory status, histopathological classification, spinal level, and surgical details was performed. Factors significantly associated with DVT univariately were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS The authors identified 314 patients, of whom 232 (73.9%) were screened preoperatively for a DVT. Of those screened, 22 (9.48%) were diagnosed with a DVT. The screened patients were older (median 62 vs 55 years, p = 0.0008), but otherwise similar in baseline characteristics. Nonambulatory status, previous history of DVT, lower partial thromboplastin time, and lower hemoglobin level were statistically significant and independent factors associated with positive results of screening for a DVT. Results of screening were positive in only 6.4% of ambulatory patients in contrast to 24.4% of nonambulatory patients, yielding an odds ratio of 4.73 (95% CI 1.88-11.90). All of the patients who had positive screening results underwent preoperative placement of an inferior vena cava filter. CONCLUSIONS Patients requiring surgery for spinal metastases represent a population with unique risks for venous thromboembolism. This study showed a 9.48% incidence of DVT in patients screened preoperatively. The highest rates of preoperative DVT were identified in nonambulatory patients, who were found to have a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of harboring a DVT. Understanding the preoperative thrombotic status may provide an opportunity for early intervention and risk stratification in this critically ill population.
PMID: 28574332
ISSN: 1547-5646
CID: 4715542
Systematic Review of the Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Prostate Metastases to the Spine
Clarke, Michelle J; Molina, Camilo A; Fourney, Daryl R; Fisher, Charles G; Gokaslan, Ziya L; Schmidt, Meic H; Rhines, Laurence D; Fehlings, Michael G; Laufer, Ilya; Patel, Shreyaskumar R; Rampersaud, Y Raja; Reynolds, Jeremy; Chou, Dean; Bettegowda, Chetan; Mendel, Ehud; Weber, Michael H; Sciubba, Daniel M
STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Systematic review. OBJECTIVE:Surgical decompression and reconstruction of symptomatic spinal metastases has improved the quality of life in cancer patients. However, most data has been collected on cohorts of patients with mixed tumor histopathology. We systematically reviewed the literature for prognostic factors specific to the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine. METHODS:A systemic review of the literature was conducted to answer the following questions: Question 1. Describe the survival and functional outcomes of surgery or vertebral augmentation for prostate metastases to the spine. Question 2. Determine whether overall tumor burden, Gleason score, preoperative functional markers, and hormonal naivety favor operative intervention. Question 3. Establish whether clinical outcomes vary with the evolution of operative techniques. RESULTS:A total of 16 studies met the preset inclusion criteria. All included studies were retrospective series with a level of evidence of IV. Included studies consistently showed a large effect of hormone-naivety on overall survival. Additionally, studies consistently demonstrated an improvement in motor function and the ability to maintain/regain ambulation following surgery resulting in moderate strength of recommendation. All other parameters were of insufficient or low strength. CONCLUSIONS:There is a dearth of literature regarding the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine, which represents an opportunity for future research. Based on existing evidence, it appears that the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine has consistently favorable results. While no consistent preoperative indicators favor nonoperative treatment, hormone-naivety and high Karnofsky performance scores have positive effects on survival and clinical outcomes.
PMCID:5544163
PMID: 28811991
ISSN: 2192-5682
CID: 4715602
Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine for Treatment of Spinal Metastases Into a Decision Framework: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanicals Stability, and Systemic Disease
Barzilai, Ori; Laufer, Ilya; Yamada, Yoshiya; Higginson, Daniel S; Schmitt, Adam M; Lis, Eric; Bilsky, Mark H
Patients with cancer are frequently affected by spinal metastases. Treatment is palliative, with the principle goals of pain relief, preservation of neurologic function, and improvement in quality of life. In the past decade, we have witnessed a dramatic change in the treatment paradigms due to the development of improved surgical strategies and systemic and radiation therapy. The most important change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS), allowing delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk. High-dose SSRS provides durable tumor control when used either as definitive therapy or as a postoperative adjuvant therapy. Integration of SSRS has fundamentally changed the indications for and type of surgery performed for metastatic spine tumors. Although the role for surgical intervention is well established, a clear trend toward less-aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques has been observed. Targeted therapies are also rapidly changing the way cancer is being treated and have demonstrated improved survival for a number of malignancies. As these treatment decisions become more complex, a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, interventionalists, and pain specialists is required. In this article, the current evidence affecting the treatment of spinal metastases is integrated into a decision framework that considers four principal assessments of a patient's spine disease: NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical instability, and systemic disease).
PMID: 28640703
ISSN: 1527-7755
CID: 4715562
Predictors of complications and readmission following spinal stereotactic radiosurgery
Lubelski, Daniel; Tanenbaum, Joseph E; Purvis, Taylor E; Bomberger, Thomas T; Goodwin, Courtney Rory; Laufer, Ilya; Sciubba, Daniel M
AIM/OBJECTIVE:to identify preoperative factors associated with morbidity/mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission and operation rates following spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for spinal tumors. METHODS:The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program was queried from 2012 to 2014 to identify patients undergoing SRS for spinal tumors. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors. RESULTS:2714 patients were identified; 6.8% had major morbidity or mortality, 6.9% were readmitted within 30 days and 4.3% had a subsequent operation within 30 days. Age, BMI and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class were predictive of LOS. Major morbidity was predicted by age >80, BMI >35, high ASA, pretreatment functional dependence and baseline comorbidities. Predictors of operation within 30 days included preoperative steroid use, renal failure, BMI >35 and if the treatment was nonelective. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:4-7% of patients undergoing SRS for spinal tumors have morbidity following the procedure. Factors predictive of morbidity, LOS, and subsequent operation included age, BMI, baseline comorbidities and functional status. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Identification of preoperative patient-specific factors that are predictive of post-treatment outcome will aid in patient selection and patient counseling leading to greater patient satisfaction and hospital efficiency.
PMCID:6009216
PMID: 28718316
ISSN: 2045-0915
CID: 4715582