Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Infection has been associated with stroke in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD); however, little data exist on the timing, type and mortality impact of infection-related stroke. METHODS:Prospectively collected data of HeartMate II (N = 332) and HeartWare (N = 70) LVAD patients from a single center were reviewed. Only strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic) that occurred within 6 weeks following a LVAD infection were considered in analyses. The association between LVAD infections (wound, pump pocket, driveline and/or bloodstream infection [BSI]), specific pathogens and ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The impact of infection-related stroke on cumulative survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS:Of 402 patients, LVAD infection occurred in 158 (39%) including BSI in 107 (27%), driveline infection in 67 (17%), wound infection in 31 (8%) and pump pocket infection in 24 (6%). LVAD infection-related stroke occurred in 20/158 (13%) patients in a median of 4 days (0-36 days) from documented infection. In multivariable analysis, ischemic stroke was associated with wound infection (aOR 9.0, 95% CI 2.4-34.0, P = 0.001) and BSI (aOR 7.7, 95% CI 0.9-66.0, P = 0.064), and hemorrhagic stroke was associated with BSI in 100% of cases (P = 0.01). There was no association with driveline or pump pocket infection. The cumulative survival rate among patients with infection-related stroke was significantly lower compared to those with LVAD infection but no stroke (log-rank P < 0.001). There was a trend toward shorter stroke-free survival among patients with LVAD infection. CONCLUSIONS:LVAD infections, particularly BSI, are significantly associated with stroke, and infection-related stroke conferred significantly lower cumulative survival.

Purpose: In October 2018, a new US adult heart allocation scheme was enacted in which the etiology of cardiomyopathy can play a significant role in the prioritization of patients listed for transplantation. Given this, we embarked on a review of the diagnoses of patients who underwent therapy for advanced heart failure at our center.
Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed the etiology of cardiomyopathy of patients receiving either durable ventricular assist device (VAD) or orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York, NY between January 2011 and October 2018. We evaluated for discrepancies between the primary HF diagnosis at time of operation with the ultimate diagnosis, combining both clinical follow-up data and cardiac pathology.
Result(s): During the study period, a total of 110 patients were treated with advanced therapies, of which the majority (74.5%) were male. 40.9% were African American, 35.4% Caucasian, 4.5% Asian, and 23.6% Hispanic. 86.3% underwent VAD and 22.0% underwent OHT. The average age of those undergoing OHT and VAD were 58 and 61 respectively. The most common reported etiology of HF was dilated cardiomyopathy (57.3%), followed by ischemic (36.3%), familial DCM (1.8%), amyloidosis (1.8%), restrictive cardiomyopathy (1.8%), and sarcoidosis (0.9%). On final review of the diagnoses in these patients, 14 (12.7%) had a final diagnosis that was inconsistent with the prior reported one. 5 were clerical errors, but 9 were significant deviations from the prior diagnosis. The most common diagnoses that were misidentified prior to VAD or OHT were cardiac sarcoidosis (2), cardiac amyloidosis (2), and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2). Among those 9 patients, 7 patients received VAD with 5 eventually requiring OHT (median days to OHT = 248); 2 patients directly received OHT. All of those are alive except one patient who was lost to follow-up (transferred care to another center). Patients in whom the diagnosis was misidentified prior to VAD or OHT had smaller LV dimensions on transthoracic echocardiography on average than other LVAD or OHT patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Conclusion(s): In this single-center review, we found that the majority of HF patients undergoing VAD and OHT had a correct diagnosis for their heart failure prior to treatment, although notably 8.1% had a missed diagnosis at time of intervention (VAD or OHT). Appropriately identifying the subtype of cardiomyopathy remains challenging especially in advanced HF patients but can significantly impact waiting list time in the current organ allocation scheme. A normal or minimally increased LV dimension on echocardiogram in a patient with advanced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy may warrant further workup for another diagnosis.
Copyright

BACKGROUND:Little data exists regarding reversal and resumption of antithrombotics following left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS:Prospectively collected data of LVAD patients with ICH was reviewed. Coagulopathy reversal agents, antithrombotic regimens and thrombotic (venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic (recurrent ICH, gastrointestinal bleed, anemia requiring transfusion) complications were recorded. RESULTS:Of 405 patients, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 39 (10%): 23 intracerebral hemorrhages, 10 subarachnoid hemorrhages, and 6 subdural hematomas. Of 27 patients who received antithrombotic reversal, 8 (30%) had inadequate coagulopathy reversal and 3 of these had hemorrhage expansion or died before repeat imaging. One (4%) had a thrombotic complication (deep vein thrombosis). Antithrombotic therapy was resumed in 17(100%) survivors in a median time 8 days for antiplatelet agents, and 14 days for warfarin. Recurrent intracranial hemorrhage occurred within a median of 7 days of antithrombotic resumption, while ischemic stroke occurred in a median of 428 days. Patients who resumed antiplatelets alone (N=4) had a trend toward more thrombotic events (1.37 vs. 0.14 events-per-patient-year [EPPY],P=0.08), including more fatal thrombotic events (0.34 EPPY vs. 0.08, P=0.89) compared to those resuming warfarin±antiplatelet (N=14). Non-fatal hemorrhage event rates were 0.34 EPPY in the warfarin±antiplatelet vs. 0 EPPY in the antiplatelet alone group (P=0.16). No fatal hemorrhagic events occurred. CONCLUSIONS:Reversal of anticoagulation appears safe following LVAD-associated intracranial hemorrhage, though inadequate reversal was common. Resumption of warfarin±antiplatelet was associated with fewer fatal and non-fatal thrombotic events compared to antiplatelets alone, though more non-fatal hemorrhage events occurred.

BACKGROUND:Anticoagulation with warfarin is common prior to heart transplantation and complicates perioperative management. METHODS:This single-center, non-interventional, retrospective cohort study evaluated heart transplants before and after institution of a PCC-based preoperative warfarin reversal protocol for heart transplantation. Patients with international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 received who PCC prior to heart transplant surgery were compared to a control group prior to implementation of a PCC protocol. Co-primary endpoints were utilization of individual blood products. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, reoperation for bleeding, delayed sternal closure, thromboembolic events, duration of chest tube use, time to extubation, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS:The study included 106 consecutive heart transplant patients (PCC cohort = 57, historical control cohort = 49). There was a significant reduction in FFP utilization in the PCC cohort (6 units vs 8 units, p=0.002). Rates of PRBC and platelet transfusion were similar between groups. There was a significant increase in the incidence of cryoprecipitate utilization in the PCC cohort, which can likely be attributed to decreased antifibrinolytic utilization. There were no differences in secondary endpoints between groups, including thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS:This study found that a PCC-based warfarin reversal protocol significantly reduced FFP utilization compared to historical controls without impacting other clinically important surgical outcomes. These data suggest that PCC is a valuable tool for INR normalization that could safely reduce FFP administration and offer a practical alternative to traditional approaches for INR reversal prior to heart transplantation.

Purpose: The opioid epidemic has expanded the cardiac donor pool, but the concern for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a barrier to wider utilization of these hearts. We analyzed donor characteristics in transplanted and discarded cardiac allografts from overdosed donors (ODD) to determine if viable ODD hearts are being unnecessarily discarded due to inappropriate bias. Method(s): Data on adult cardiac transplantation from 2010-2017 were provided by the SRTR. Eight donor characteristics associated with PGD were analyzed: age, gender, hypertension, high creatinine, cocaine abuse, inotropic support, LVEF, and cardiac arrest. Donor characteristics of transplanted and discarded hearts were compared between ODD and non-ODD. Result(s): ODD comprised 11% (1710/15904) of transplanted hearts and 7% (2600/32678) of discarded hearts. Among transplanted hearts, ODD more frequently were younger than 50 (98% vs 90%), did not have hypertension (86% vs 83%), and did not require inotropic support (62% vs 55%) compared to non-ODD; ODD less frequently were male (63% vs 70%), had no history of cocaine abuse (57% vs 84%), or had creatinine <=1.5 (62% vs 81%). Among discarded hearts, ODD more frequently were younger than 50 (87% vs 46%), had no history of hypertension (78% vs 49%), and did not require inotropic support (51% vs 41%); ODD less often had no history of cocaine abuse (50% vs 86%) or creatinine <=1.5 (61% vs 69%) (Table). Donors known to have at least 6 of 8 favorable qualities comprised 36% (942/2600) of discarded ODD hearts, compared to 28% (9152/32678) of discarded non-ODD hearts (p<0.001). The most common reasons given for discard of ODD hearts with favorable qualities were poor organ function (18%), refusal by all programs (16%), and lack of recipient (11%). Conclusion(s): ODD hearts with favorable qualities are being discarded at disproportionally higher rates than non-ODD hearts. Further studies and better documentation are needed to understand current discard practices and if further expansion into this donor pool is appropriate.

Purpose: Heart transplantation (HTx) from hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors to HCV negative recipients may reduce waitlist time and increase access to viable organs. Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) are highly successful at curing HCV infection, but the effect of DAAs on the pharmacokinetics of calcineurin inhibitors is largely unknown. We describe the effect on tacrolimus dosage requirements in recipients of HCV viremic donors. Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed HCV negative HTx patients who received a HCV positive organ. All patients received an 8 week course of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (GP) for HCV treatment and were on standard triple immunosuppression therapy. Patients receiving concomitant medications that affect tacrolimus metabolism were excluded. All tacrolimus dosages and trough levels were collected from the time of initiation post-HTx until 1 month after completion of GP treatment. Tacrolimus dose normalized concentrations using the concentration:dose ration (ng/mL:mg/kg) were compared before, during, and after GP treatment. Result(s): Seven HTx recipients were included in the analysis. Tacrolimus dose normalized concentrations were 124.8, 163.4, and 196.7 (ng/mL)/(mg/kg/d) before, during and after GP treatment, respectively (Figure 1). Tacrolimus dosage requirements did not differ during GP treatment as compared to before or after GP treatment. The percentage of tacrolimus trough levels within goal range and the incidence of supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels, was 51% vs. 41% and 4% vs. 0% during GP treatment as compared to after GP treatment. Conclusion(s): We did not find a difference in tacrolimus dosage requirements while receiving GP treatment as compared to before or after GP treatment; however, this study was limited by a small sample size. No empiric dosage adjustments can be recommended when initiating or discontinuing GP treatment at this time. Further data will be needed to strengthen these findings.