Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Compared to recipients of ABO-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney transplants (LDKT), recipients of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) LDKT have a higher risk of graft loss, particularly in the first few weeks after transplantation. However, the decision to proceed with ABOi LDKT should be based on a comparison of the alternative: waiting for future ABOc LDKT (e.g, through kidney paired exchange) or for a deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT). We sought to evaluate the patient survival difference between ABOi LDKT and waiting for an ABOc LDKT or an ABOc DDKT. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study of adults in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 808 ABOi LDKT recipients and 2423 matched controls from among 245,158 adult, first-time kidney-only waitlist registrants who did not receive an ABOi LDKT and who remained on the waitlist or received either an ABOc LDKT or an ABOc DDKT, 2002-2017 EXPOSURE: Receipt of ABOi LDKT OUTCOME: Death ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We compared mortality among ABOi LDKT recipients versus a weighted matched comparison population using Cox proportional hazards regression as well as Cox models that accommodated for changing hazards ratios over time. RESULTS:Compared to matched controls, ABOi LDKT was associated with lower survival risk in the first 30 days post-transplant (99.0% vs 99.6%, respectively), but higher survival risk beyond 180 days post-transplant. Patients who received ABOi LDKT had higher survival at 5 and 10 years (90.0% and 75.4% respectively) than similar patients who remained on the waitlist or received ABOc LDKT or ABOc DDKT (81.9% and 68.4% respectively). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:No measurement of ABO antibody titers in recipients; eligibility of participants for kidney paired donation is unknown. CONCLUSIONS:Transplant candidates who receive an ABOi LDKT and survive more than 180 days post-transplant experience a long-term survival benefit compared to remaining on the waitlist to potentially receive an ABO compatible kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND:As obesity prevalence grows, more end-stage organ disease patients will be precluded from transplant. Numerous reports suggest bariatric surgery in end-stage organ disease may help patients achieve weight loss sufficient for transplant listing. METHODS:We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis of studies of bariatric surgery to achieve solid organ transplant listing. RESULTS:Among 82 heart failure patients, 40.2% lost sufficient weight for listing, 29.3% were transplanted, and 8.5% had sufficient improvement with weight loss they no longer required transplantation. Among 28 end-stage lung disease patients, 28.6% lost sufficient weight for listing, 7.1% were transplanted, and 14.3% had sufficient improvement following weight loss they no longer required transplant. Among 41 cirrhosis patients, 58.5% lost sufficient weight for listing, 41.5% were transplanted, and 21.9% had sufficient improvement following weight loss they no longer required transplant. Among 288 end-stage/chronic kidney disease patients, 50.3% lost sufficient weight for listing and 29.5% were transplanted. CONCLUSIONS:Small sample size and publication bias are limitations; however, bariatric surgery may benefit select end-stage organ disease patients with obesity that precludes transplant candidacy.

BACKGROUND:Kidneys from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are traditionally considered to be at risk for poorer survival outcomes, as reflected in the kidney donor profile index (KDPI). Modern direct-acting antivirals may modify this risk. METHODS:Using United Network for Organ Sharing data, HCV-infected adult first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2014 to 2017 were examined. Graft and patient survival were compared in a propensity-matched cohort of recipients of HCV antibody (Ab)(+) kidneys versus Ab(-) kidneys. Subsequent analysis was performed in a propensity-matched cohort of recipients of HCV-viremic (RNA positive) versus HCV-naïve kidneys. RESULTS:There were 379 recipients each in the matched cohort of recipients of HCV Ab(+) versus HCV Ab(-) kidneys. Despite a higher KDPI (58.2% for HCV Ab[+] versus 38.8% for HCV Ab[-]), 1-year patient and graft survival were similar in the HCV(+) and HCV(-) groups (95.4% and 94.9% versus 97.9% and 96.0%, P = 0.543 and P = 0.834, respectively). There were 200 recipients each in the cohort of recipients of HCV-viremic versus HCV-naïve kidneys, with the KDPI again higher in the HCV-viremic group (56.8% versus 35.2%). Baseline hazard ratios (HRs) for graft failure (HR, 4.69; P = 0.009) and death (HR, 7.60; P = 0.003) were significantly elevated in the viremic group, but crossed 1 at 21 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In the modern direct-acting antiviral era, calculated likely KDPI overestimates risk kidneys from HCV (+) donors. Donor viremia conveys an early risk which appears to subside over time. These results suggest that it may be time to revise the kidney donor risk index.