Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE: The APOE varepsilon4 allele, an established genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease, has been linked to an increased risk for dementia especially in older individuals with HIV-1 infection. This allele has also been associated with increased memory impairment following oral lorazepam challenge in healthy elderly. Lorazepam and other benzodiazepines are widely prescribed in individuals with HIV-1 infection who are at increased risk for cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine if the varepsilon4 allele influences lorazepam-induced memory deficits in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one non-demented, HIV-1 seropositive adults (15 varepsilon4 carriers, mean age = 43.47 +/- 8.25; 26 varepsilon4 non-carriers, mean age = 46.77 +/- 8.56) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design, receiving single acute oral doses of lorazepam 0.5, 1.0 mg, or placebo over three sessions, each 1 week apart. Standardized neuropsychological assessments, including measures of immediate and delayed verbal recall, were conducted at baseline and at 1, 2.5, and 5 h post-drug administration in each condition. RESULTS: Acute lorazepam administration produced dose- and time-dependent impairments in measures of verbal recall. However, the e4 allele did not modulate these adverse effects. An APOE varepsilon4 group by time interaction was also found such that the APOE-varepsilon4-positive subjects had significantly better immediate and delayed verbal recall than the negative subjects at baseline assessment, but the groups did not significantly differ at any subsequent time point. CONCLUSION: Future studies should clarify the role of varepsilon4 in the modulation of drug-induced cognitive toxicity and baseline performance and their relationship to progressive decline, especially in older individuals with HIV-1 infection, a group at increased risk for dementia

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine the relationship between APOE epsilon4 and subjective effects of trihexyphenidyl on measures reflecting sedation and confusion and to investigate the relationship between trihexyphenidyl-induced subjective effects and objective memory performance. Methods: This study comprised 24 cognitively intact, health elderly adults (12 APOE epsilon4 carriers) at an outpatient geriatric psychiatry research clinic. This was a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, three-way, crossover experimental design. All participants received 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg trihexyphenidyl or placebo administered in counterbalanced sequences over a period of three consecutive weeks. Bond and Lader's visual analog scales and alternate versions of the Buschke Selective Reminding Test were administered in a repeated measures design at baseline, 1, 2.5, and 5 hours postdrug administration. Results: A 2.0-mg oral dose of trihexyphenidyl resulted in increased subjective ratings of mental slowness in carriers of the APOE epsilon4 allele only. Drug effects as determined by difference scores between 2.0 mg trihexyphenidyl and placebo on ratings of mental slowness significantly correlated with total and delayed recall on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test in carriers of the APOE epsilon4 allele only. However, no significant effects were found with other visual analog scales reflecting subjective sedation and clear-headedness. Conclusion: The epsilon4 allele in healthy elderly was associated with increased subjective mental slowing after trihexyphenidyl anticholinergic challenge

Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer disease (AD) and has also been investigated in patients with mild to moderate AD. To characterize the specific cognitive benefits of memantine in patients with mild to moderate AD, a post hoc analysis was conducted of a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing memantine (10 mg twice daily) to placebo. Cognition was assessed using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) total score, individual items, and aggregated subscales, using a mixed model repeated measures analysis. As assessed by the ADAS-cog total score, participants in the placebo group demonstrated significantly more cognitive decline from baseline than participants treated with memantine at all visits beginning at week 8. Subjects treated with placebo also declined significantly more than individuals in the memantine group on 5 of 11 ADAS-cog individual items: orientation, language, comprehension, word finding, and recall of test instructions. Out of 3 ADAS-cog aggregated item subscales (language, memory, and praxis), outcomes in 2 (language and memory) favored memantine. Consistent with findings from trials conducted in moderate to severe AD patients, this post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial suggests that memantine benefits core aspects of language and some aspects of memory in patients with mild to moderate AD

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the moderate-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, memantine, versus placebo in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD). METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 42 U.S. sites. Participants were 403 outpatients with mild to moderate AD and Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 10-22 randomized to memantine (20 mg/day; N=201) or placebo (N=202) for 24 weeks. Primary outcomes were change from baseline at 24 weeks on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), a measure of cognition, and on the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus), a global measure. Secondary outcomes included change on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL(23)), measures of behavior and function, respectively. RESULTS: Most (82.4%) participants completed the trial. Memantine resulted in significantly better outcomes than placebo on measures of cognition, global status, and behavior when based on the protocol-specified primary last observation carried forward imputation as well as a mixed-models repeated-measures approach applied to the continuous outcomes. Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events for memantine versus placebo were 19 (9.5%) and 10 (5.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the safety and efficacy of memantine for the treatment of mild to moderate AD

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone (RU-486) has been reported to increase early morning plasma ACTH/cortisol in diverse non-demented populations. This pilot study examined the cortisol response to RU 486 in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), a condition associated with abnormalities in various aspects of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Nine AD subjects were randomized in a placebo-controlled parallel study: 4 in the placebo group and 5 in the RU 486 group. Subjects received oral doses of RU 486 (200 mg) or placebo daily for 6-weeks. Morning plasma cortisol was determined at baseline, at 12 h following the first study drug dose, and weekly thereafter. RU 486 resulted in a significant increase in cortisol levels [F(1,6)=65.32; P<0.001]. The magnitude of this increase grew over the course of the study [F(1,6)=63.17; P<0.001], was not related to cortisol suppression after dexamethasone and appeared greater than that reported in the literature in younger populations in response to the same drug regimen. However, further studies with age-matched controls should be done to determine possible AD related changes in this response

RATIONALE: Retrograde facilitation (RF) refers to a paradoxical phenomenon in which recall of information presented before acute administration of agents generally associated with anterograde amnestic and sedative effects, such as benzodiazepines, is enhanced relative to a placebo condition. However, it is unclear whether this effect occurs in elderly individuals and if it is influenced by plasma drug levels, baseline cognitive function, or genetic factors such as the APOE e-4 allele, that may modulate drug-induced cognitive toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To determine if acute oral doses of lorazepam (0.5 mg, 1 mg) produced RF in elderly individuals exposed to interference tasks, and the variables associated with RF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four cognitively intact and highly educated (>12 years) older adults (mean age, 66.09 years) participated in a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study. The Buschke Selective Reminding Test was used to assess RF and amnestic effects for verbal memory. Self-ratings of mood states were also obtained. RESULTS: Lorazepam administration resulted in significant dose-dependent RF, i.e., better recall of pre-drug word lists compared to placebo [F(1,63)= 15.358; p<0.001 and F(1,63)= 46.163; p<0.001 for 0.5 and 1 mg lorazepam, respectively]. Also, more of the pre-drug words were recalled in the 1.0-mg-lorazepam condition relative to the 0.5-mg-lorazepam condition [F(1,63)=29.498; p<0.001]. In both the 0.5 and 1 mg lorazepam conditions, participants who exhibited high RF experienced significantly greater lorazepam-induced memory impairments over time [F(3,61)=2.901; p<0.05; F(3,61)=2.698; p<0.05; 0.5 and 1 mg lorazepam, respectively]. Also, in the 1-mg-lorazepam condition, participants who exhibited high RF reported significantly greater drowsiness relative to participants who showed less RF [t(62)=-2.521; p<0.05]. RF was not significantly associated with age, the APOE epsilon4 allele, years of education, global cognitive status, vocabulary scores, or a memory index score. CONCLUSION: In healthy elderly, acute oral lorazepam administration resulted in dose-dependent RF, which was associated with greater anterograde amnestic and sedative effects