Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Surgeons with high volume (HV) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) have seen better outcomes than low volume (LV) surgeons. However, literature regarding surgeon volume and outcomes in morbidly obese THA patients is scarce. This study examines the association between surgeon volume with THA in morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40) and their clinical outcomes. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We retrospectively reviewed all morbidly obese patients who underwent primary THA at our institution between March 2012 and July 2020 with 2 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared between the HV (HVa, top quartile of surgeons with the highest overall yearly THA volume) and LV (LVa) surgeons. Similar analysis was run comparing HV of morbidly obese THA (HVo, top quartile of surgeons with the highest yearly morbidly obese THA volume) and LV of morbidly obese THA (LVo) surgeons. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Six hundred and forty-three patients and 33 surgeons were included. HVa surgeons had significantly shorter length of stay and increased home discharge. HVa and HVo surgeons had significantly shorter operative times. There were no significant differences in overall 90-day major and minor complications or clinical differences in patient-reported outcomes. Revision rates and freedom from revisions did not differ between groups at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:HVa surgeons had significantly lower length of stay and operative times and increased discharge to home. There was no significant decrease in complications or revisions in either comparison model. Complications, revision rates, and patient satisfaction in morbidly obese patients who undergo THA may be independent of surgeon volume.

BACKGROUND:The impact of morbid obesity (MO) on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when performed by high-volume (HV) surgeons has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess complication rates and implant survivorship in MO patients operated on by HV surgeons. METHODS:Patients undergoing primary, elective TKA between June 2011 and May 2022 with a HV surgeon (top 25% surgeons by the number of primary TKAs per year) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) into 3 groups: BMI ≥40 (MO), 30≤ BMI <40 (non-morbidly obese), and BMI <30 (nonobese) and 1:1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. Of the 12,132 patients evaluated, 1,158 were included in final matched analyses (386 per group). The HV surgeons performed a median of 104 TKAs annually (range, 90-173). RESULTS:The MO patients had significantly longer surgery duration (P = .006) and hospital lengths of stay (P < .001). The 90-day postoperative complications (P = .38) and readmission rates (P = .39) were comparable between groups. Rates of all-cause, septic and aseptic revision were similar between groups at two-year (P = .30, P = .15, and P = .26, respectively) and the latest follow-up (P = .36, P = .52, and P = .38, respectively). Improvement in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) scores at 6 months (P = .049) and one year (P = .015) was significantly higher in MO patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinical outcomes and complication rates following TKA by HV surgeons are comparable regardless of obesity status. The MO patients may benefit from referral to experienced surgeons to minimize procedural risks and improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

The process of giving and receiving feedback in orthopaedic surgery training programs is distinctly unique from any other job. Trainees are required to meet certain milestones, and faculty are responsible for the caliber of surgical skills of their graduating trainees, yet there are rarely standardized practices and guidance for providing real-time feedback. Furthermore, institutional educational programs for faculty on giving meaningful feedback are lacking. The purpose of this article was to understand how feedback is defined, how to appropriately involve the learner in the process to foster active engagement rather than destructive thinking, and to characterize important principles that can elevate one's learning and self-reflection to the fullest potential.

BACKGROUND:Removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient only list has led to a greater focus on outpatient (OP) procedures. However, the impact of OP-centered models in at-risk patients is unclear. Therefore, the current analysis investigated the effect of conversion from OP to inpatient (IP) status on postoperative outcomes and determined which factors put patients at risk for status change postoperatively. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a primary TKA at our institution between January 2, 2018, and April 26, 2022. All patients included were originally scheduled for OP surgery and were separated based on conversion to IP status postoperatively. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine the significance of all perioperative variables. Modeling via binary logistic regressions was used to determine factors predictive of status conversion. RESULTS:Of the 2,313 patients originally designated for OP TKA, 627 (27.1%) required a stay of 2 midnights or longer. Patients in the IP group had significantly higher facility discharge rates (P < .001) compared to the OP group. Factors predictive of conversion included age of 65 years and older (P < .001), women (P < .001), arriving at the postanesthesia care unit after 12 pm (P < .001), body mass index greater than 30 (P = .004), and Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 and higher (P = .004). Being the first case of the day (P < .001) and being married (P < .001) were both protective against conversion. CONCLUSION:Certain intrinsic patient factors may predispose a patient to an IP stay, and an understanding of predisposing factors which could lead to IP conversion may improve perioperative planning moving forward.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures are expected to grow exponentially in the upcoming years, highlighting the importance of identifying preoperative risk factors that predispose patients to poor outcomes. The present study sought to determine if preoperative healthcare events (PHEs) influenced outcomes following TKA. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent TKA at a single institution from June 2011 to April 2022. Patients who had a PHE within 90 days of surgery, defined as an emergency department visit or hospital admission, were compared to patients with no history of PHE. Patients who underwent revision, nonelective, and/or bilateral TKA were excluded. Chi-squared analysis and independent sample t-tests were used to determine significant differences between demographic variables. All significant covariates were included in binary logistic regressions used to predict discharge disposition, 90-day readmission, and 1-year revision. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .004) compared to patients without a PHE. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our results demonstrate that PHEs put patients at significantly greater risk of facility discharge, 90-day readmission, and 1-year revision. Moving forward, consideration of elective surgery scheduling in the context of a recent PHE may lead to improved postoperative outcomes. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND:The lower morbidity and mortality rate associated with increased surgeon and hospital volume may also correlate with improved patient-reported outcome measures. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using American Joint Replacement Registry data. METHODS:Using American Joint Replacement Registry data from 2012 to 2020, 8,193 primary, elective TKAs with both preoperative and 1-year postoperative The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scores were analyzed. This study was powered to detect the minimally clinical important difference (MCID). The main exposure variables were median annual surgeon and hospital volume. Tertiles were formed based on the median annual number of TKAs performed: low-volume surgeons (1 to 52), medium-volume (53 to 114), and high-volume (≥115); low-volume hospitals (1 to 283), medium-volume (284 to 602), and high-volume (≥603). The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of surgeon and hospital volume and demographics on achieving the MCID for KOOS-JR. RESULTS:The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR score for low-volume surgeons was 47.78 ± 13.50 and 77.75 ± 16.65, respectively, and 47.32 ± 13.73 and 76.86 ± 16.38 for low-volume hospitals. The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR score for medium-volume surgeons was 47.20 ± 13.46 and 76.70 ± 16.98, and 48.93 ± 12.50 and 77.15 ± 16.36 for medium-volume hospitals. The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR scores for high-volume surgeons were 49.08 ± 13.04 and 78.23 ± 16.72, and 48.11 ± 13.47 and 78.23 ± 17.22 for high-volume hospitals. No notable difference was observed in reaching MCID for KOOS-JR after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:An increased number of TKA cases performed by a given surgeon or at a given hospital did not have an effect on achieving MCID for KOOS-JR outcomes.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:To improve revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) prognosis and postoperative management, a better understanding of how non-elective and elective indications influence clinical outcomes is needed. We sought to compare ambulatory status, complication rates, and implant survival rates in patients who underwent aseptic rTHA for periprosthetic fracture or elective indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This retrospective study examined all aseptic rTHA patients with a minimum follow-up of two years at a single tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into two groups: fracture rTHA (F-rTHA) if the patient had a periprosthetic femoral or acetabular fracture, and elective rTHA (E-rTHA) if the patient underwent rTHA for other aseptic indications. Multivariate regression was performed for clinical outcomes to adjust for baseline characteristics, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess implant survival. RESULTS:A total of 324 patients (F-rTHA: 67, E-rTHA: 257) were included. In the F-rTHA cohort, 57 (85.0%) and 10 (15.0%) had femoral and acetabular periprosthetic fractures, respectively. F-rTHA patients were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing (40.3% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.049) and acute rehabilitation facilities (19.4% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.004). F-rTHA patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (26.9% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.033). Ambulatory status at three months postoperatively significantly differed (p = 0.004); F-rTHA patients were more likely to use a walker (44.6% vs. 18.8%) and less likely to ambulate independently (19.6% vs. 28.6%) or with a cane (28.6% vs. 41.1%). These differences did not persist at one and two years postoperatively. Freedom from all-cause re-revision (77.6% vs. 74.7%, p = 0.912) and re-revision due to PJI (88.1% vs. 91.9%, p = 0.206) were similar at five-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:Compared to rTHA performed for elective aseptic indications, fracture rTHA patients had poorer early functional outcomes, with greater need for ambulatory aids and non-home discharge. However, these differences did not persist long term and did not portend increased infection or re-revision rates.

BACKGROUND:Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) can be performed with isolated tibial, isolated femoral, and combined tibial and femoral component exchange for different indications. Replacement of only 1 fixed component in rTKA leads to shorter operative times and decreased complexity. We sought to compare functional outcomes and rates of rerevision in patients undergoing partial and full rTKA. METHODS:This retrospective study examined all aseptic rTKA patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years in a single center between September 2011 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: full rTKA (F-rTKA) if both components (femoral and tibial) were revised and partial rTKA (P-rTKA) if only 1 component was revised. A total of 293 patients (P-rTKA = 76, F-rTKA = 217) were included. RESULTS:P-rTKA patients had significantly shorter surgical time (109 ± 37 Versus. 141 ± 44 minutes, P < .001). At mean follow-up of 4.2 (range 2.2-6.2) years, rerevision rates did not significantly differ between groups (11.8 Versus. 16.1%, P = .358). Improvements in postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Scale (KOOS), Joint Replacement scores were similar as well (P = .100 and P = .140, respectively). For patients undergoing rTKA due to aseptic loosening, freedom from rerevision due to aseptic loosening was similar between groups (100 Versus. 97.8%, P = .321). For patients undergoing rTKA due to instability, freedom from rerevision due to instability did not significantly differ as well (100 Versus. 98.1%, P = .683). In the P-rTKA cohort, freedom from all-cause and aseptic revision of preserved components was 96.1% and 98.7% at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION:Compared to F-rTKA, P-rTKA yielded similar functional outcomes and implant survivorship with shorter surgical time. When indications and component compatibility allow for such a procedure, surgeons can expect good outcomes when performing P-rTKA.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with positive preoperative urine toxicology (utox) screens prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have higher readmission rates, greater complication rates, and longer hospital stays compared to patients with negative screens. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of postponing surgery for patients with positive preoperative utox in the Medicaid population. METHODS:This retrospective, observational study reviewed the Medicaid ambulatory database at a large, academic orthopedic specialty hospital for patients with a utox screen prior to TJA from 2012 to 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) controls with negative preoperative utox or a utox consistent with prescription medications (Utox-) with TJA completed as scheduled; (2) positive preoperative utox with TJA rescheduled and surgery completed on a later date (R-utox+); (3) positive preoperative utox inconsistent with prescription medications with TJA completed as scheduled (S-utox+). Primary outcomes included mortality, 90-day readmission rate, complication rate, and length of stay. RESULTS:Of the 300 records reviewed, 185 did not meet inclusion criteria. The remaining 115 patients included 80 (69.6%) Utox-, 5 (6.3%) R-utox+, and 30 (37.5%) S-utox+. Mean follow-up time was 49.6 months. Hospital stays trended longer in the Utox- group (3.7 ± 2.0 days vs. 3.1 ± 1.6 S-utox+ vs.2.5 ± 0.4 R-utox+, p = 0.20). Compared to the R-utox+group, the S-utox+ group trended toward lower home discharge rates (p = 0.20), higher in-hospital complication rates (p = 0.85), and more all-cause 90-day emergency department visits (p = 0.57). There were no differences in postoperative opioid utilization between groups (p = 0.319). Duration of postoperative narcotic use trended toward being longer in the Utox- patients (820.7 ± 1073.8 days vs. 684.6 ± 1491.8 S-utox+ vs. 585.1 ± 948.3 R-utox+, p = 0.585). Surgical time (p = 0.045) and revision rates (p = 0.72) trended toward being higher in the S-utox+ group. CONCLUSIONS:Medicaid patients with positive preoperative utox who had surgeries postponed trended towards shorter hospital stays and greater home discharge rates. Larger studies should be conducted to analyze the implications of a positive preoperative utox on risk profiles and outcomes following TJA in the Medicaid population. Study design Retrospective cohort study.