Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: There is no effective therapy for patients (pts) with IDH-mutant gliomas that progress after RT and chemotherapy. At time of progression, these tumors have often transformed to glioblastoma (GBM) and have increased numbers of somatic mutations, i.e. have a ?hypermutator phenotype?. We hypothesized that there is synergistic efficacy of Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) combined with HFRT in pts with secondarily trans- formed IDH-mutant GBMs. Safety-lead-in results will be presented.
METHOD(S): This is a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of Avelumab with HFRT in adults with transformed IDH-mutant GBM who previously received RT and TMZ and/or PCV. All pts received Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV followed at Day 8 by HFRT (25 Gy in 5 daily 5-Gy fractions) and then Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. A 3 + 3 design was used for a 6-patient safety-lead-in cohort. Adverse events were recorded according to CTCAE.
RESULT(S): Six pts (F=4, M=2) with a median age= 45.5 yrs (range 31.5-54.4 yrs) were enrolled in the safety-lead-in cohort. No DLT was observed. Grade >= 3 AEs included increased cerebral edema (3 pts), hyponatremia (1 pt) and worsening hemiparesis (3 pts). Grade <= 2 AEs included nausea, hypothyroidism, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, transaminase elevation, and fever/chills. Median follow-up time was 8.9 mo. Best treatment response was SD in 1 patient. At time of last follow-up all pts have discontinued treatment for PD. Median PFS was 4.2 mo (range 1.4-5.7). Median OS was 10.1 (range 6.8-21+) mo. 4 pts (67%) died, 2 pts remain alive in follow-up at 6.9 and 21.6 months after treatment initiation. The study was closed after the safety lead-in completed enrollment due to slow accrual.
CONCLUSION(S): Avelumab combined with HFRT was tolerable without dose-limiting toxicity in this safety-lead-in cohort of adult patients with transformed IDH-mutant GBM. Further studies are necessary to determine efficacy of this treatment regimen

BACKGROUND: TMZ offers minimal benefit in pts with De novo uMGMT GBM. V is synergistic with RT and TMZ in uMGMT preclinical GBM models, safe when combined with either RT or TMZ clinically, but the triplet (V+RT+TMZ) is poorly tolerated. VERTU tested V in pts with uMGMT GBM.
METHOD(S): VERTU is a randomized Phase 2 trial comparing Standard Arm (Arm A), RT (60Gy/30 fractions) + TMZ (75mg/ m2 daily) followed by TMZ (150-200mg/m2D 1-5) every 28 days for 6 cycles vs Experimental Arm (Arm B), RT (60Gy/30 fractions) + V (200mg PO BID) followed by TMZ (150-200mg/m2D 1-5) + V (40mg bid, D 1-7) every 28 days for 6 cycles in pts with De novo uMGMT GBM according to centralised testing.
RESULT(S): 125 pts were randomized 1:2 (41:84). The 2 groups were matched for age, sex, performance status and extent of resection. Median follow-up was 25.8 months and 91 pts had died. The 6-month Progression-Free Survival (6mPFS) for Arms A and B were 34% (95% CI 20-48) and 46% (95% CI 36-57) respectively. The median PFS for Arms A and B were 4.2m (95% CI 2.5-6.0) and 5.7m (95% CI 4.1-6.6) respectively (HR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55-1.18). 55% of pts in both arms experienced Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) with no significant differences in frequency or severity between the arms. Most common Grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia, seizures, hyperglycaemia and diarrhoea.
CONCLUSION(S): VERTU demonstrated that a novel treatment strategy for patients with De novo uMGMT GBM was feasible and tolerable. The observed 6mPFS and PFS were similar in both arms. Overall survival and other endpoints will be presented. Central MRI review, biomarker analyses, including DNA repair and methylation signature analyses are ongoing

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of nGBMs harbor EGFR-amp. Depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m) is an antibody drug conjugate: a monoclonal antibody that binds activated EGFR (wild-type and EGFRvIII mutant) linked to a microtubule-inhibitor toxin. Pre-clinical and earlier clinical trials suggested efficacy.
METHOD(S): RTOGF 3508/AbbVie M13-813 (INTELLANCE-1, NCT02573324) was a phase 3 academic-industry collaboration (RTOG-Foundation, AbbVie). Eligible adults (KPS >= 70, EGFR-amp nGBM, centrally confirmed histology and biomarkers) were randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide and either depatux-m (2.0 mg/kg during RT, 1.25 mg/kg thereafter, q 14 days) or placebo, stratified by region of world, RPA class, MGMT methylation, and EGFRvIII mutation. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with 640 patients planned for randomization; 441 events yielded 85% power to detect 25% reduction in hazard of death (HR 0.75), one-sided 2.5% level of significance by stratified weighted log-rank.
RESULT(S): 2229 patients were screened and 639 (median age 60, range 22-84; 394 men, 62%) randomized. Pre-specified interim analysis after 346 events (>= 75% required) found no OS improvement for depatux-m over placebo (median 18.9 vs. 18.7 months, HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.25, one-sided p= 0.63). Progression-free survival (PFS) trended toward depatux-m (median 8.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.02), particularly among the ~50% with EGFRvIII mutation (median 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93) but without an OS improvement (median 19.8 vs. 18.2, HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.27). Ocular side effects (grade >= 1) occurred in 95% of depatux-m treated patients, 61% grade 3-4, causing 12% to discontinue, and were the most common treatment related adverse events.
CONCLUSION(S): Interim analysis demonstrated no OS benefit for treating EGFR-amp nGBM with depatux-m. PFS trended toward favoring depatux-m, particularly in the EGFRvIII harboring subgroup. No new important safety risks were identified. The trial was stopped for futility. Active patients are permitted to continue treatment

PURPOSE: To compare tumor progression based on clinical radiological assessment and on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria between GBM patients treated with proton radiotherapy (PT) vs. photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
METHOD(S): Eligible patients were enrolled on the described prospective phase II trial and had MR imaging at baseline and follow-up beyond 12 weeks from treatment completion. 'Clinical' progression was based on a radiology report of progression in combination with changes in treatment due to suspected disease progression. A single blinded observer applied RANO criteria to determine the RANO-based tumor progression.
RESULT(S): Of 90 enrolled patients, 66 were evaluable, with median follow-up of 19.8 (Range: 3.2-65.1) months; median of 22.6 months for PT (n=25) vs. 18.9 months for IMRT (n=41). Median time to progression (TTP) was 7.9 months based on clinical progression criteria (8.1 months IMRT, 6.3 months PT) and 7.2 months (7.3 months IMRT, 5.7 months PT) by RANO criteria (p=ns for all). Median 'clinical' progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 (Range: 6.4-11.1) months; 8.9 months IMRT vs. 8.7 months PT (p=0.065). Median RANO PFS was 8.3 (range, 5.8-11.6) months: 8.3 months IMRT vs. 6.9 months PT (p=0.226). There were 14 discrepant cases: 3 had progression based on 'clinical' but not RANO criteria, and 11 had progression based on RANO but not 'clinical' criteria.
CONCLUSION(S): Based on this secondary analysis of a randomized trial of PT vs. IMRT for GBM, there was no difference in tumor progression relative to treatment technique used. There was no statistical difference in PFS noted between clinical and RANO-based assessments, but RANO criteria identified progression more often than clinical assessment, and TTP was shortened with the use of RANO criteria alone. Further development of tumor assessment tools that improve consistency and accuracy of determining tumor progression are needed to guide therapeutic trials in GBM

H3 K27M-mutant gliomas often manifest as midline gliomas, have a dismal prognosis, and have no established or effective treatments at recurrence. ONC201 is the first clinical bitopic DRD2 antagonist/ClpP agonist and is under evaluation in Phase II trials for gliomas and other cancers. We previously reported in vitro studies suggesting dysregulated dopamine receptor expression and enhanced ONC201 sensitivity among H3 K27Mmutant gliomas. Following these observations, adults with midline H3 K27M-mutant glioma patients were enrolled to a dedicated Phase II clinical trial (NCT03295396), a multi-arm Phase II trial (NCT0252569), and expanded access protocols under the Sponsor's IND. An integrated radiographic analysis with an objective response rate primary endpoint in patients who received ONC201 monotherapy with confirmed H3 K27M-mutant glioma (not primarily in the pons or spinal cord and without leptomeningeal spread) that was progressive and measurable disease by RANO criteria, >90 days from completion of prior radiation, and had KPS >60. As of December 15, 2018, 15 patients have received single agent ONC201 who meet these criteria (n=9 NCT03295396; n=5 NCT0252569; n=1 expanded access). ONC201 was orally administered at 625 mg weekly, except for one patient dosed once every 3 weeks. As midline gliomas can exhibit a mixture of contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing disease, objective response was assessed by blinded independent central review using RANO-HGG and RANO-LGG criteria for each patient. Best response to date by RANO-HGG criteria is at least 27%: 1 CR, 3 PR, 7 SD, and 4 PD; by RANO-LGG is at least 36%: 1 CR, 1 PR, 3 minor response (MR), 4 SD, 5 PD, 1 unevaluable. By RANO-HGG, median onset of response is 2.6 months (range 1.3-3.4); median duration of response has not been reached with a median follow-up of 7.7 months (range 1.8-29.8). Updated radiographic response, pharmacodynamics, safety, and other clinical outcomes will be reported

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Dose constraints for re-irradiation of recurrent primary brain tumors are not well-established, especially for treatment volumes too large for stereotactic radiotherapy. This prospective trial was performed to test dose constraints for conventionally-fractionated re-irradiation of recurrent primary brain tumors MATERIALS/METHODS: A singleinstitution, prospective trial of 21 adults with recurrent brain tumors was performed. Electronic dosimetry records from the first course of radiation (RT1) were obtained and deformed onto the simulation CT for the second course of radiation (RT2). Treatment plans for RT2 were developed that met protocol-assigned dose constraints for RT2 alone and the composite dose of RT1+RT2. Dose constraints were also based on histology and interval since RT1. The primary endpoint was the rate of symptomatic brain necrosis after RT2.
RESULT(S): Twenty one adults enrolled from March 2017 to May 2018. Twelve had glioblastoma, four had oligodendroglioma, two had anaplastic astrocytoma, and one each had choroid plexus papilloma, hemangiopericytoma, and pleomorphic xanthroastrocytoma (PXA). Twenty patients were treated with VMAT and one was treated with proton CSI. Median RT1-RT2 interval was 45 months (range, 9-141 months). Median RT2 dose was 42.8 Gy (range, 17.5-60 Gy). Median PTV volume was 208 cc (range, 7-1537 cc). Median imaging followup was 9 months (range, 1-20 months). Two months after RT2, the patient with PXA developed a trapped temporal horn adjacent to the RT2 treatment volume; pathology from emergent resection revealed necrotic brain tissue. The patient recovered fully and lived another 18 months until dying of disease progression. No other patient developed symptomatic radionecrosis. Median overall survival from RT2 for all patients was 11 months (range, 3-20 months).
CONCLUSION(S): Re-irradiation can be performed with conventionally fractionated schemes. Given the low rate of symptomatic radionecrosis, the dose constraints described here are a starting point for future studies of conventionally fractionated re-irradiation

BACKGROUND: While glioblastoma (GBM) is more prevalent in males, studies show that females with GBM tend to have longer overall survival (OS) than males. Pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has also proven to be prognostic in GBM, with lower NLR having favorable outcomes. This secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial of proton vs. photon intensity modulated radiotherapy aims to explore the interaction of gender and NLR on GBM outcomes.
METHOD(S): Analysis was performed on the full patient population. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated OS with censoring at last follow-up for those who were alive. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA)Cox proportional hazards models assessed predictors of OS.
RESULT(S): Of 90 patients, 77 were included (43 males; 34 females) with median age of 52 years (range: 26-82 years). Median OS was longer for females than males (30.7 vs 18.2 months, p=0.004). On UVA, patients with NLR below median value (NLR= 3.1) tended to have longer OS than those above median, though not meeting statistical significance (23.1 vs. 17.9 months, p=0.051). Difference in OS was statistically significant in females (OS 36.4 months NLR >median vs. 16.7 months NLR< median, p=0.002), but not in males (OS 17.8 months NLR >median vs. 19.1 NLR< median, p=0.95). MVA analysis was consistent, with female gender predicting reduced hazard ratio (HR) (0.28, p=0.034) and females with below median NLR showing a reduced HR over those with above median (0.28, p=0.005). Again, males did not benefit (HR 0.90, p=0.77).
CONCLUSION(S): Consistent with prior publications, females and all patients with lower pre-treatment NLR with newly diagnosed GBM had longer OS. However, combining these two factors revealed that the benefits from lower pre-treatment NLR were conferred only in females with no impact on males. This different impact of NLR between genders may suggest innate immune differences in gender during response to malignancy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:microRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that play important roles in cancer regulation. In this study, we investigated the expression, functional effects and mechanisms of action of microRNA-29a (miR-29a) in glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS:miR-29a expression levels in GBM cells, stem cells (GSCs) and human tumors as well as normal astrocytes and normal brain were measured by quantitative PCR. miR-29a targets were uncovered by target prediction algorithms, and verified by immunoblotting and 3' UTR reporter assays. The effects of miR-29a on cell proliferation, death, migration and invasion were assessed with cell counting, Annexin V-PE/7AAD flow cytometry, scratch assay and transwell assay, respectively. Orthotopic xenografts were used to determine the effects of miR-29a on tumor growth. RESULTS:Mir-29a was downregulated in human GBM specimens, GSCs and GBM cell lines. Exogenous expression of miR-29a inhibited GSC and GBM cell growth and induced apoptosis. miR-29a also inhibited GBM cell migration and invasion. PDGFC and PDGFA were uncovered and validated as direct targets of miR-29a in GBM. miR-29a downregulated PDGFC and PDGFA expressions at the transcriptional and translational levels. PDGFC and PDGFA expressions in GBM tumors, GSCs, and GBM established cell lines were higher than in normal brain and human astrocytes. Mir-29a expression inhibited orthotopic GBM xenograft growth. CONCLUSIONS:miR-29a is a tumor suppressor miRNA in GBM, where it inhibits cancer stem cells and tumor growth by regulating the PDGF pathway.