Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To correlate the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) score with preexisting validated outcomes scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and Constant score (CS) in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis (AC). METHODS:Patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic AC ("freezing" or "frozen" phases) who agreed to complete the ASES, CS, and PROMIS UE scores during their office visit were included in this study. Trained researchers performed the objective clinical assessments on the included patients. Responses to the 3 outcomes scores were statistically analyzed and compared utilizing Pearson correlation coefficients. Floor and ceiling effects were calculated. RESULTS:The final cohort included 100 patients with AC of which there were 72% female and 87% right hand dominant, with a mean age of 55 years. The PROMIS UE required fewer question responses (5.02 ±1.84) compared to the fixed questions burden with ASES (12) and CS (9). The mean outcome scores were 34.6 ± 2.5 (PROMIS UE), 55 ± 22 (ASES), and 51 ± 16 (CS). The PROMIS UE displayed excellent correlation with both the ASES (r = 0.80, 95% [CI: 0.72, 0.86], p < 0.001) and CS (r = 0.76, 95% CI [0.67, 0.83], p < 0.001). Neither ceiling nor floor effects were present. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The PROMIS UE displayed comparable efficacy to commonly used legacy outcome scores (ASES and CS) in adhesive capsulitis. A lower question burden with the PROMIS UE carries a potential for wider acceptibility with the researchers and patients with shoulder pathology.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:It is important to understand the current characteristics of orthopaedic surgery program leadership, especially in the current climate of modern medicine. The purpose of this report was to describe the demographic, academic, and geographic characteristics of current orthopaedic chairs and program directors (PDs). METHODS:Orthopaedic surgery residency programs were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website and cross-referenced with the Electronic Residency Application Service, identifying 161 residency programs for the 2018 to 2019 cycle. All data were collected in January 2020 to best control for changes in leadership. Demographic and academic information were collected from public websites. For geographic analysis, the United States was divided into five regions, and training locations were categorized as appropriate. RESULTS:A total of 153 chairs and 161 PDs were identified. 98.0% of chairs were men versus 88.8% of PDs (P = 0.001). Chairs had been in practice and in their current position for longer than PDs (26.4 vs 16.8 years [P < 0.005] and 9.1 vs 7.1 years [P = 0.014], respectively). Chairs had more publications and were more likely to be professors than PDs. PDs were more likely to remain at both the same region and institution that they trained in residency. The most common subspecialty was sports among chairs and trauma among PDs, although when compared with national averages orthopaedic trauma and orthopaedic oncology were the most overrepresented subspecialties. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Orthopaedic chairs are more likely to be men, have had longer careers, and have more academic accomplishments than their PD counterparts. Geography appears to have an association with where our leaders end up, especially for PDs. Subspecialization does not notably influence leadership positions, although orthopaedic trauma and orthopaedic oncology surgeons are more commonly represented than expected. This report serves to identify the current state of orthopaedic leadership and may provide guidance for those who seek these leadership positions.

Background: Glenoid wear is a common challenge in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Augmented baseplates have recently been designed to address this. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes, complications, and revision rates of patients undergoing rTSA with an augmented baseplate compared to those that received a standard, non-augmented baseplate. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative data were analyzed for 414 patients with glenoid bone loss who underwent primary rTSA with either an 8° posterior augmented glenoid baseplate, a 10° superior augmented baseplate (SAB), or an 8° posterior/10° superior augmented baseplate (P/SAB). These patients were compared to 1547 primary rTSA patients who received a standard baseplate. Clinical outcomes were scored using the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), UCLA, ASES, Constant and SPADI clinical outcome scoring metrics. Range of motion for active abduction, forward flexion, internal rotation and external rotation were used to quantify function. Complication and revision rates were also documented, and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for scapular notching. A two-tailed, unpaired t-test was used to identify differences between continuous parameters and a Chi Square test was used for categorical parameters, with P < .05 denoting a significant difference. Results: At an average follow-up of 47.1 ± 23.1 months, the augmented baseplates performed as well, or better, than standard baseplates, with a similar complication rate, revision rate, aseptic glenoid loosening rate, and scapular notching rate. Discussion: Augmented baseplates are a safe and effective option for patients with glenoid bone loss in the setting of rTSA at mid-term follow-up. For each baseplate type, the outcomes were similar, and the complication/revision and scapular notching rates were low and comparable to that of the standard baseplate cohort. Level of evidence: Level III