Faculty Bibliography

The results from the majority of the reviewed studies support the hypothesis that abdominal surgery, performed via either a large incision or CO2 pneumoperitoneum, systemically encourages tumor growth in the postoperative period. A full laparotomy incision appears to have a significantly greater effect than CO2 pneumoperitoneum on postoperative tumor growth. Whether the large tumor observed in the surgical groups are the result of increased tumor cell proliferation or diminished tumor cell death remains unclear. There is some evidence pointing to both mechanisms. The loss of the postoperative tumor growth differences between the open and pneumo animals in the athymic mouse experiment suggests that cell-mediated immune function plays a role in tumor containment. The proliferation study results, however, suggest that other stimulatory influence(s) are also at work. Clearly, much research needs to be done regarding the etiology of these tumor growth differences. Other tumor cell lines need to be studied, and investigations regarding tumor growth in an intra-abdominal location need be performed as well. This body of research suggests that the manner in which the surgeon gains access to the abdominal cavity may have an impact on the propensity of tumor cells to implant, survive, and grow in the period immediately after surgery. If true, this may be the most compelling justification for the use of minimally invasive techniques for the curative resection of malignancies. However, it remains to be proven that human tumors will demonstrate differences in tumor growth similar to those noted in some of these animals models. Furthermore, it is not all clear that slight differences in tumor growth postoperatively will translate into significant differences in long-term survival or recurrence rates. At first glance, the existence of port-site tumors would appear to contradict totally the conclusions of many studies discussed in this synopsis. If laparoscopic methods are associated with decreased rates of tumor growth and establishment, then why do port-site tumors form? This is a complex issue calling for discussion that goes far beyond the scope of this article. However, several brief comment on this topic follow. The etiology of port tumors is unknown, although traumatization of the tumor during mobilization, resection, or removal is likely to play a significant role in the liberation of tumor cells from the primary. A relatively small protective benefit, in terms of slower tumor growth rates in laparoscopic patients, will likely not be sufficient to prevent a large inoculum of viable tumor cells in an abdominal wound from establishing a metastasis. Furthermore, as suggested earlier, the systemic effects on tumor growth may be different from the local (i.e., intra-abdominal or abdominal wound) effects. Finally, the true incidence of port tumors remains unknown. It has not been definitively established that the laparoscopic wound tumor incidence is significantly higher than the open rate, although this is the assumption of most surgeons. Several relatively large recently published laparoscopic series have reported port tumor incidences of 0 to 1.2%, which is in the same "ballpark" as the 0.6 1.0% abdominal wound tumor incidences mentioned in several open colectomy series. Clearly, much more research in this area is needed to understand port tumors better and to reconcile the port tumor results with the systemic tumor growth benefits that may be associated with minimally invasive methods.

BACKGROUND:Surgery can suppress immune function and facilitate tumor growth. Several studies have demonstrated better preservation of immune function following laparoscopic procedures. Our laboratory has also shown that tumors are more easily established and grow larger after sham laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum in mice. The purpose of this study was to determine if the previously reported differences in tumor establishment and growth would persist in the setting of an intraabdominal manipulation. METHODS:Syngeneic mice received intradermal injections of tumor cells and underwent either an open or laparoscopic cecal resection. In study 1, the incidence of tumor development was observed after a low dose inoculum; whereas in study 2, tumor mass was compared on postoperative day 12 after a high-dose inoculum. RESULTS:In study 1, tumors were established in 5% of control mice, 30% of laparoscopy mice, and 83% of open surgery mice (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). In study 2, open surgery group tumors were 1.5 times as large as laparoscopy group tumors (p < 0.01), which were 1.5 times as large as control group tumors (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We conclude that tumors are more easily established and grow larger after open laparoscopic bowel resection in mice.

BACKGROUND:Reports of port site tumor recurrences after laparoscopic-assisted resection of colon tumors have raised concerns about the safety of laparoscopic cancer surgery. Tumor cell suspension studies in animals have implicated the CO2 pneumoperitoneum (pneumo) in the etiology of port tumors. Unfortunately, in several ways, the cell suspension model is unrealistic and does not permit assessment of how tumor cells become liberated from the primary tumor. The purpose of this study was to establish a more realistic splenic tumor model and to determine the relative importance of the CO2 pneumo and excessive surgical manipulation in the development of port site and incisional tumor recurrences. METHODS:Splenic tumors were established in female Balb/C mice (n = 134) via a subcapsular injection of 10(5) C-26 colon adenocarcinoma cells (0.1 ml volume) via a left-flank incision at the initial procedure. Ten days later, the animals were reexplored via a 1-cm left subcostal incision. Those with isolated splenic tumors (95%) were randomized into one of four groups: (a) control, (b) CO2 pneumo, (c) crushed tumor, or (d) crushed tumor with pneumo. Ports were placed in the left lower, right lower, and right upper quadrants of each mouse. In groups 1 and 2, the mice underwent a meticulously performed splenectomy; in groups 3 and 4, the tumor capsule was crushed intraabdominally prior to splenectomy. In groups 1 and 3, the subcostal incision was closed and the ports were removed after 15 min of anesthesia. Following splenectomy, group 2 and group 4 mice underwent closure of the subcostal incision and a 15-min CO2 pneumo (4-6 mm Hg) after which the ports were removed. Twelve days later, the mice were killed and examined for abdominal wall tumor implants. RESULTS:Significantly more animals in group 3 (crushed tumor) developed port site and incisional tumors than those in group 1 (control) (p < 0.002 for both comparisons). The same results were found when group 4 (crush plus pneumo) was compared to group 2 (pneumo) (p < 0.002 for both comparisons). Regarding the port wounds, when the ports are considered individually (number of ports with tumors/total number of ports for each group), there were significantly more port tumors in the two crush groups than in the noncrush groups. No significant differences were noted when the port site and incisional tumor rates for group 1 (control) and group 2 (pneumo) were compared or when the results for group 2 (crush) and group 4 (crush pneumo) were compared. CONCLUSIONS:A splenic tumor model was successfully established. When compared to meticulous technique, purposefully traumatic handling of the splenic tumor before resection resulted in significantly more port wound and incisional tumors. In contrast, the addition of a pneumo after splenectomy did not significantly influence the incidence of port tumors in either the "good" or the "poor" technique groups. These results suggest that surgical technique plays a larger role in the development of port site tumors than the CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

BACKGROUND:We investigated the ability of pressurized CO2 gas to aerosolize B16 melanoma (B16) tumor cells in an in vitro model. METHODS:The experimental apparatus consisted of an 18.9-L plastic cylindrical vessel and a compliant latex pouch was attached to the top. Two 5-mm ports penetrated the vessel; insufflation and desufflation were carried out through them. A culture dish containing 20 million B16 cells in liquid culture media was placed at the base within the container. In the first experiment, the vessel was insufflated with CO2 gas to a static pressure of 15 or 30 mm Hg with the outflow port closed. After 10 min, the outflow port was opened and the gas was desufflated through a collecting device containing sterile culture medium. In a second experiment, a continuous flow of CO2 through the vessel was maintained after a pressure of 15 or 30 mm Hg was established. A total of 10 L CO2 was cycled through the vessel. In both experiments, 24 determinations were carried out at each pressure. Each experimental culture dish was microscopically scanned for 2 weeks for the presence of tumor cells. The third and fourth experiments tested for the presence of aerosolized nonviable tumor cells in the expelled gas. Using the model described above, after 10 mins of 30 mm Hg static pressure, the CO2 gas was expelled directly onto a glass slide and cytofixed. Alternately, after 10 mins at 30 mm Hg static pressure, the gas was expelled through a saline-filled Soluset (Abbott Laboratories), centrifuged, and the residue cytofixed onto a glass slide. Each of the five slides per experiment were examined microscopically for the presence of cells. RESULTS:In the first and second experiments, no cells or growth were observed in any of the 96 experimental dishes. In experiments three and four, no cells were detected on any of the slides. CONCLUSIONS:It was not possible with this model to aerosolize tumor cells in a pressurized CO2 environment. Our results suggest that aerosolization of tumor cells is not the mechanism of port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery for malignant disease.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Mouse mammary carcinoma tumors are established more easily and grow larger after sham laparotomy and open bowel resection than after CO2 pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether similar differences in tumor growth would be found when sham laparotomy and pneumoperitoneum were compared for the colon-26 mouse adenocarcinoma and B-16 mouse melanoma tumor lines. METHODS:In all three studies, a high-dose injection of tumor cells was used, which resulted in tumors in almost all control mice. In Study 1, female BALB/C mice (n = 127) were injected intradermally in the dorsal skin with 10(6) colon-26 cells in a 0.1-ml volume before interventions. In Study 2, female C57 BL/6 mice (n = 140) were inoculated similarly with 10(6) B-16 melanoma cells. Study 2 consisted of three separate trials conducted on different days. Study 3 was performed because considerable differences in mean tumor size were observed in each of these trials. In Study 3, the B16 experiment was repeated with a larger n (n = 82) on a single day. In each study, after tumor cell injections, mice were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) anesthesia control (no procedure); 2) full laparotomy (4-cm midline incision x 20 minutes, staple closure); or 3) CO2 pneumoperitoneum (4-6 mmHg X 20 minutes). Tumors were excised and weighed on postoperative day 12. RESULTS:In Studies 1 and 3, mean tumor sizes of the laparotomy groups were significantly larger than both the control group and pneumoperitoneum group lesions (P values by Student's t-test). In Study 2, laparotomy group tumors, although significantly larger than control group lesions, were not significantly larger than pneumoperitoneum group tumors. For all three studies, there was no significant difference between mean tumor sizes of the pneumoperitoneum and control groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Both colon-26 adenocarcinoma and B-16 melanoma tumors grow larger after laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum in a murine model. The mechanism of these postoperative tumor growth differences remains to be elucidated.

BACKGROUND:Previous work has demonstrated that cell-mediated immune function is better preserved in rodents after laparoscopic than open surgery. The cause of this laparotomy-related immunosuppression is unclear. Some investigators have attributed it to the length of the incision; others, to peritoneal air exposure. It has also been shown that tumors in mice are more easily established and grow larger after sham laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum. Lastly, the differences in tumor growth have been shown to be, at least in part, attributable to the immunosuppression that occurs after laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to determine if air pneumoperitoneum, presumably via immunosuppression related to peritoneal air exposure, is associated with increased tumor growth in the postoperative period. METHOD/METHODS:A total of 150 immunocompetent syngeneic mice received high-dose intradermal injections of mouse mammary carcinoma tumor cells. They were then randomized to undergo one of the following procedures: (a) anesthesia alone, (b) air insufflation (44 mm Hg), (c) CO2 insufflation, or (d) full laparotomy. No intraabdominal procedure was carried out. All procedures were 20 min long. After 12 days, the animals were killed and the mean tumor mass determined for each group. RESULTS:All animals grew tumors. There was no significant difference in the mean tumor size of the anesthesia control, CO2 insufflation, and air insufflation groups (p > 0.85 by ANOVA). However, the laparotomy group tumors were 1.5 times as large as those of the other three groups (p < 0.05 by ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS:In this model, air insufflation did not significantly affect postoperative tumor growth, nor did CO2 pneumoperitoneum. However, full laparotomy was associated with increased tumor growth.

BACKGROUND:In order to better investigate the effects of laparoscopic surgery, it is necessary to establish reliable, reproducible, and economical animal models of laparoscopic intervention. Here we describe a mouse model of laparoscopic-assisted colon resection. METHODS:After successful induction of anesthesia the mouse is placed in Trendelenburg position and the peritoneal cavity is insufflated with carbon dioxide gas through an angiocatheter placed in the right upper quadrant. A 4-mm rigid scope with camera attachment is then inserted through a midline port created just caudal to the xiphoid. A second port is then created in the right lower quadrant to allow introduction of laparoscopic forceps into the peritoneal cavity. The cecum, which extends 1.5 cm beyond the ileocecal valve, is grasped with forceps and exteriorized through the operative port. Extracorporeally, the cecum is ligated and resected before the cecal stump is returned to the peritoneal cavity. The abdominal wall defects are then stapled closed. RESULTS:This simple model can be mastered by individuals with very limited surgical experience. This laparoscopic model has been used successfully in our laboratory in a number of experiments with an intraoperative complication rate of 3. 2% (3/94), which was similar to the open surgery group rate of 2.1% (2/95, p = 0.99 by chi square). We observed no postoperative leaks in either group. The only postoperative death occurred in the open resection group due to dehiscence of the laparotomy wound. CONCLUSIONS:We propose that this model may be useful for comparing the effects of open to laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND:Major surgery through a laparotomy incision is associated with a postoperative reduction in immune function. Studies in rats involving sham procedures suggest that immune function may be preserved after laparoscopy. This study investigates the effects of incision length and exposure method for bowel resection with respect to postoperative immune function as assessed by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions. METHODS:Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 175) were challenged preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and on postoperative day 2 with an intradermal injection of 0.2 mg phytohemagglutinin (PHA), a nonspecific T-cell mitogen. The averages of two measures of perpendicular diameters were used to calculate the area of induration. Anesthesia control rats underwent no procedure. Minilaparotomy rats underwent a 3.5-cm midline incision. Sham full laparotomy rats underwent a 7-cm midline incision. The open bowel-resection group underwent a cecal ligation and resection through a 7-cm midline incision. In the laparoscopic-assisted resection group a CO2 pneumoperitoneum and four-port technique was utilized to deliver the cecum through a 4-mm port where the cecum was extracorporeally ligated and resected. RESULTS:Preoperative responses were similar in all five groups. Incision length: Full laparotomy group responses were 20% smaller than anesthesia control responses on postoperative day (POD)1 through POD4 (p < 0.02). At no time point were the responses in the minilaparotomy group significantly different from either anesthesia control or full laparotomy group responses. Exposure method: The laparoscopic-assisted resection group responses were 20% larger than open group responses at the time of two of the four postoperative measurements (p < 0.05, both comparisons). At all postoperative time points, open resection group responses were significantly smaller than control responses (p < 0.05, all comparisons), whereas at no time point were laparoscopic group responses significantly different from control responses. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We conclude that postoperative cell-mediated immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma. Results from the minilaparotomy and laparoscopy groups suggest that procedures done through small incisions may result in preservation of postoperative immune function.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Reports in the literature indicate that low energy laser irradiation has a biostimulatory effect on wound healing; however, no mechanism of this effect has been elucidated. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We attempted to establish a model from which to study the mechanism of biostimulation. The effects of low energy helium-neon irradiation on wound healing were observed in two rat models. In the first model, 1.5 cm diameter full thickness excisional skin defects were created in the dorsal midline of rats (n = 32). All animals were anesthetized and all eschars were debrided daily. Wound area was determined by caliper measurements for 2 weeks postoperatively. Rats that received a treatment of 1 J/cm2 had two defects in the dorsal skin. One wound was treated and the second was used as its own control. These measurements were not blinded. Rats that received 2 J/cm2, 4 J/cm2, or anesthesia alone had one defect on the dorsal skin. Caliper measurements of these wounds were blinded. We were unable to demonstrate any difference in the rate of wound contracture in rats that received a daily dose of 1 J/cm2, 2 J/cm2, 4 J/cm2, or anesthesia alone (P > 0.8 by student's t-test). In the second model, a single 2 cm longitudinal full thickness skin incision was created in the dorsal midline of each rat (n = 24). No difference was found between rats that received anesthesia alone and those treated daily with 2 J/cm2 as assessed by tensile strength measurements on postoperative days 7 and 14 (P > 0.8 by student's t-test between groups at both time points). These determinations were blinded. RESULTS:Despite our intentions of studying the mechanism of low energy HeNe biostimulation, we were unable to demonstrate a beneficial effect. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this study, helium-neon laser irradiation produced no measurable benefit on wound healing.