Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:ferzlg01

Total Results:

197


The extraperitoneal approach and its utility

Sayad, P; Ferzli, G
Early after the introduction of the laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, surgeons have realized the many potential applications of this approach. Since then, the access of the preperitoneal space has been used for many other laparoscopic procedures, which include the pelvic lymph node dissection, the bladder neck suspension, the varicoselectomy, and the radical prostatectomy. We discuss the different techniques used to create the preperitoneal space and then we describe our experience in the dissection of this space. The extraperitoneal endoscopic access provides a safe and minimally invasive approach to a variety of procedures and we believe that it is essential to introduce it as an integral part of the surgical training program.
PMID: 10556465
ISSN: 0930-2794
CID: 1748182

Needlescopic extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias

Ferzli, G; Sayad, P; Nabagiez, J
Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy has traditionally been performed using one 5-mm and two 11-mm trocars. In this report, we evaluate the feasibility of the preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias using the needlescopic method (2-mm ports) and describe the technique used in this repair. A total of 11 inguinal hernias were treated with needlescopic extraperitoneal repair. There were five direct and six indirect hernias. One patient had a bilateral hernia. The average operative time was 54 min. One patient was converted to the standard laparoscopic extraperitoneal method. All patients were discharged a few hours after the procedure. They were able to resume activity within a few days and required only minimal analgesic intake. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 months. All patients were followed up by one of the surgeons at 1, 3, and 6 weeks, and then at 6 months. No complications were encountered. There have been no recurrences to date. Overall, needlescopic extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias is a feasible procedure in male patients seeking better cosmetic results than can be achieved with standard laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair. This procedure is technically more demanding. The operative time is longer. The cosmetic aspect is the only advantage of this technique.
PMID: 10430696
ISSN: 0930-2794
CID: 1748192

The feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair under local anesthesia

Ferzli, G; Sayad, P; Vasisht, B
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy has the advantage of being a minimally invasive procedure with a recurrence rate comparable to open preperitoneal repair. However, surgeons have been reluctant to adopt this procedure because it requires general anesthesia. METHODS: In this report, we describe the technique used in the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias under local anesthesia using the preperitoneal approach. We also report our results with 10 inguinal hernias repaired using the same technique. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent their primary inguinal hernia repairs under local anesthesia. None were converted to general anesthesia. Four patients received a small amount of intravenous sedation. Three patients had bilateral hernias. There were five direct and eight indirect hernias. The average operative time was 47 min. The average lidocaine usage was 28 cc. All patients were discharged within a few hours of the surgery. There were no complications. Follow-up has ranged from 1 to 6 months. There has been no recurrences to date. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia is feasible under local anesthesia. This technique adds a new treatment option in the management of bilateral inguinal hernias, particularly in the population where general anesthesia is contraindicated or even for patients who are reluctant to receive general or epidural anesthesia.
PMID: 10347297
ISSN: 0930-2794
CID: 1748202

Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias

Sayad, P; Ferzli, G
Repair of recurrent inguinal hernias using the conventional open technique has been associated with high rates of recurrence and complications. Stoppa has reported a low recurrence rate using the open preperitoneal approach. Evolution of laparoscopic techniques has allowed the reproduction of the open preperitoneal repair via an endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. This study reviewed all the recurrent inguinal hernias repaired laparoscopically and evaluated the complication and recurrence rate. A total of 512 inguinal hernias were treated laparoscopically using the TEP approach. Of these, 75 were recurrent. The ages of the 61 men ranged from 36 to 65 years. There were 41 direct and 34 indirect hernias. Fourteen were bilateral. None of the repairs was converted to an open procedure. The operating time ranged from 20 to 145 min (median 42 min). All patients were discharged home on the same day. There were no deaths. The complications consisted of two instances of urinary retention and one groin collection. Patient follow-up ranged from 6 to 72 (median 40) months, and there have been no recurrences to date. The TEP repair for recurrent inguinal hernias can produce results comparable to the open preperitoneal technique with low morbidity and recurrence rates.
PMID: 10235348
ISSN: 1092-6429
CID: 1748212

Insertion technique and placement site for Greenfield filters: Does it make any difference?

Kopatsis, A; Solis, RL; Cernaianu, AC; Davidson, PG; D'Anna, JJ; Pomper, S; Ferzli, G; Silich, RJ
The clinical outcome and complication rates related to the choice of technique and insertion site in the placement of a Greenfield filter (GFF) is still controversial. Moreover, there is no consensus as to which technique and placement site produces the best outcome. This study evaluated the charts of 364 patients who received GFFs during a 5-year period. Seventy-one filters were placed surgically and 293 were placed percutaneously in the operating room by general and vascular surgeons. Seventy-eight were placed using the femoral approach and 296 were placed using the jugular approach. Demographics were recorded as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. All immediate complications were examined including failure of the GFF to open, suboptimal placement, multiple attempts at placement, abandoned procedures, guidewire related difficulties, hematoma, bleeding, phlegmasia cerulea dolens, pneumothorax, arrhythmia, and death. There was no statistically significant difference between complications derived from surgical placement versus percutaneous placement. There were no statistically significant differences among variables based on jugular versus femoral placement. There was a statistically significant difference in the time required for the percutaneous placement versus the open surgical procedure (33 +/- 28 min, vs 45 +/- 27 min., p<0.05). These findings suggest that the technique and site of the GFF insertion can be left to the discretion of the surgeon based on each patient's profile.
ISI:000078107600003
ISSN: 0042-2835
CID: 1748392

Breast Biopsies with ABBI(R): Experience with 183 Attempted Biopsies

Ferzli, George S.; Puza, Tracy; Vanvorst-Bilotti, Susan; Waters, Rebecca
When first introduced, the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI(R)) system seemed to have many advantages as a diagnostic procedure. Problems have arisen, however, both in terms of patient unsuitability and mechanical failure. In addition, there has been uncertainty as to whether the complete lesion removal it afforded could be considered definitive treatment in malignant cases. Incision margins were looked at to investigate that possibility. Of the 183 patients we saw in our first year of experience with ABBI, 48 (26%) were rejected for being poor candidates for it. In the remaining 132 biopsies there were 31 (23%) technical difficulties. All told, 14 malignancies were discovered, all of which appeared to have pathology-free incision margins radiologically. However, 13 of these 14 (93%) proved on pathologic examination to have residual malignancy.
PMID: 11348252
ISSN: 1524-4741
CID: 1739532

Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in a laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Ferzli, G S; Frezza, E E; Pecoraro, A M Jr; Ahern, K D
BACKGROUND: In 1975, researchers introduced the use of a large unsutured polyester mesh prosthesis placed in the preperitoneal space for inguinal hernia repair. Different stapling devices have been used to secure this mesh, and the most common complication of the procedure is nerve damage secondary to the staples. The necessity of stapling has never been demonstrated. We designed a prospective randomized study of the need for stapling in laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias with 1-year and 3-year followup. STUDY DESIGN: Inclusion criteria of the study were men older than 18 years and first-time inguinal hernia repair. Patients with recurrence and previous abdominal operations were excluded to avoid confounding variables. Each patient's hernia was assigned a consecutive random number chosen by computer, with each number corresponding to an assigned group. The first group had stapled mesh and the second had unstapled mesh. RESULTS: Data were collected over a 15-month period, with each procedure having a mean followup time of 8 months. A total of 100 procedures was performed in 92 patients. The two groups of patients were well matched for age and the type of hernia repaired. There were no recurrences in either group and no complications or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The initial 12-month followup showed no significant differences in recurrence or complication rates between the stapled and unstapled groups. Both groups returned to work within an average of 4 days. A net savings of $120 was realized for each hernia repair performed without stapled mesh. In addition, stapling presents an inherent risk of nerve damage.
PMID: 10235572
ISSN: 1072-7515
CID: 1739702

Cost effectiveness of routine type and screen testing before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Usal, H; Nabagiez, J; Sayad, P; Ferzli, G S
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of routine preoperative blood type and screen testing before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: All 2,589 laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 603 open cholecystectomies performed at our institution between January 1990 and December 1996 were retrospectively reviewed to identify the incidence and causes of blood transfusions. With the use of ICD-9-CM coding, a computerized retrospective research was done to match the corresponding codes for the aforementioned operations and blood transfusion. Individual charts were reviewed to identify the indications for blood transfusion. RESULTS: Of the 2,589 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed, 12 patients required blood transfusion, and of the 603 open cholecystectomies, 33 patients required blood transfusion. The incidence of blood transfusions was 0.46% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 5.47% for open cholecystectomy. Two of the blood transfusions given intraoperatively were due to major vascular injury in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The remaining blood transfusions were found to be the result of preexisting medical conditions including sickle-cell anemia, end-stage renal disease, and chronic iron deficiency anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a widely used therapeutic modality in general surgery. The procedure is safe, effective, and well tolerated by the patient. In the era of managed healthcare, the cost effectiveness of commonly ordered tests is frequently questioned. In the absence of preoperative indications, routine preoperative blood type and screen testing should be eliminated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The elimination of routine preoperative blood type and screen testing could have saved our institution $79,800 during a 6-year period.
PMID: 9918617
ISSN: 0930-2794
CID: 1739712

Non stapled mesh in a preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Chapter by: Frezza, EE; Pecoraro, A; Ahern, KD; Ferzli, G
in: 6TH WORLD CONGRESS OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, PTS 1 AND 2 by Montori, A; Lirici, MM; Montori, J [Eds]
pp. A939-A945
ISBN: 88-323-0603-0
CID: 2488922

Management of non palpable breast lesion

Chapter by: Frezza, EE; Ferzli, G
in: 6TH WORLD CONGRESS OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, PTS 1 AND 2 by Montori, A; Lirici, MM; Montori, J [Eds]
pp. A737-A741
ISBN: 88-323-0603-0
CID: 2488912