Faculty Bibliography

Background: USD is a preventable disease characterized by significant risk of recurrence. A "cascade of care" shows how many patients are lost to follow-up at diagnosis, referral, and treatment and is a useful tool in delivering HIV care. We can analyze our success, or failure, in the secondary prevention of kidney stones and retention of patients by constructing a cascade of care.
Method(s): We abstracted data from observational studies to identify impediments to care of patients with USD Results: In the US there are about 1.2 million ER visits per year. 37% of patients diagnosed with stones receive a follow-up consultation with a urologist and fewer see a nephrologist. Although 24h urine collection results may decrease stone recurrence rate, only 7.4% do them. 50% of patients experience a recurrent 2nd episode within 5 years. Of these 24% undergo a complete evaluation, 18% are referred to a nephrologist and 13.8% are prescribed medical therapy. 30% remain adherent to this pharmacotherapy. Of patients that are adherent 27% have lower odds of an ER visit than non-adherent patients. The cascade of care demonstrates that a low prevalence of patients receive proper followup. The impediments to the care of patients with kidney stones are (1) the unrecognized comorbidities of stones (2) disconnect between the ER and stone experts and (3) the low prevalence of 24h urine collections and prescribed medical therapy.
Conclusion(s): It is important to identify loci in the cascade of care that could represent opportunities to change practice. Prescription of appropriate fluid therapy and dietary changes and a referral to an expert should 1st be initiated by the ER. The low prevalence of 24h urine collections may reflect that the data are intimidating for some. Empiric therapy for calcium stones with fluids, diet, thiazides and potassium citrate may be a rational therapy to achieve significant supersaturation reductions and could be compared with targeted medical therapy in a randomized controlled trial. A greater effort needs to be devoted to develp a comprehensive flow of participants to retain patients in the cascade of care for USD. (Table Presented)

Each year approximately 13,000 Veterans transition to maintenance dialysis, mostly in the traditional form of thrice-weekly hemodialysis from the start. Among >6000 dialysis units nationwide, there are currently approximately 70 Veterans Affairs (VA) dialysis centers. Given this number of VA dialysis centers and their limited capacity, only 10% of all incident dialysis Veterans initiate treatment in a VA center. Evidence suggests that, among Veterans, the receipt of care within the VA system is associated with favorable outcomes, potentially because of the enhanced access to healthcare resources. Data from the United States Renal Data System Special Study Center "Transition-of-Care-in-CKD" suggest that Veterans who receive dialysis in a VA unit exhibit greater survival compared with the non-VA centers. Substantial financial expenditures arise from the high volume of outsourced care and higher dialysis reimbursement paid by the VA than by Medicare to outsourced providers. Given the exceedingly high mortality and abrupt decline in residual kidney function (RKF) in the first dialysis year, it is possible that incremental transition to dialysis through an initial twice-weekly hemodialysis regimen might preserve RKF, prolong vascular access longevity, improve patients' quality of life, and be a more patient-centered approach, more consistent with "personalized" dialysis. Broad implementation of incremental dialysis might also result in more Veterans receiving care within a VA dialysis unit. Controlled trials are needed to examine the safety and efficacy of incremental hemodialysis in Veterans and other populations; the administrative and health care as well as provider structure within the VA system would facilitate the performance of such trials.

IN BRIEF Dietary guidelines for patients with diabetes extend beyond glycemic management to include recommendations for mitigating chronic disease risk. This review summarizes the literature suggesting that excess dietary phosphorus intake may increase the risk of skeletal and cardiovascular disease in patients who are in the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) despite having normal serum phosphorus concentrations. It explores strategies for limiting dietary phosphorus, emphasizing that food additives, as a major source of highly bioavailable dietary phosphorus, may be a suitable target. Although the evidence for restricting phosphorus-based food additives in early CKD is limited, diabetes clinicians should monitor ongoing research aimed at assessing its efficacy.

PURPOSE: Kidney stone prevention relies on the 24-hour urine collection to diagnose metabolic abnormalities and direct dietary and pharmacologic therapy. While its use is guideline-supported for high risk and interested patients, evidence that the test can accurately predict recurrence or treatment response is limited. We sought to critically reassess the role of the 24-hour urine collection in stone prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In addition to a MEDLINE(R) search to identify controlled studies of dietary and pharmacologic interventions, evidence supporting the AUA and EAU guidelines for metabolic stone prevention were evaluated. Additionally, placebo-arms of these studies were examined to assess the stone clinic effect: the impact of regular office visits without specific treatment on stone recurrence. RESULTS: The 24-hour urine test has several limitations including the complexity of interpretation, need for repeat collections, inability to predict stone recurrence with individual parameters and supersaturation values, unclear rationale of laboratory cutoff values, and difficulty with determining collection adequacy. Only one prospective trial has compared selective dietary recommendations based on 24-hour urine collection results versus general dietary instructions. While the trial supported the intervention arm, significant limitations to the study were found. Placebo arms of intervention trials have noted a 0-61% decrease in stone recurrence rate and a remission rate during the study of 20-86%. CONCLUSIONS: Whether all recurrent stone formers benefit from 24-hour urine collection has not been established. Additional comparative effectiveness trials are needed to determine which stone former benefits from selective therapy, as guided by the 24-hour urine collection.