Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:receptor availability in MDD. METHODS:C]-(+)-PHNO, before and after oral dextroamphetamine. MDD participants then received pramipexole treatment for 6 weeks. RESULTS:were not significantly associated with blood oxygen level-dependent response to reward prediction error in the ventral striatum, severity of depression and anhedonia, or antidepressant response to pramipexole (response rate = 72.7%). CONCLUSIONS:availability were not associated with ventral striatal activation to reward prediction error or clinical features, in this study powered to detect large effects. While a preponderance of indirect evidence implicates dopaminergic dysfunction in MDD, these findings suggest that presynaptic dopamine dysregulation may not be a feature of MDD or a prerequisite for treatment response to dopamine agonists.

OBJECTIVE:Immunological theories, particularly the sickness syndrome theory, may explain psychopathology in mood disorders. However, no clinical trials have investigated the association between overall immune system markers with a wide range of specific symptoms including potential gender differences. METHODS:We included two similar clinical trials, the lithium treatment moderate-dose use study and clinical and health outcomes initiatives in comparative effectiveness for bipolar disorder study, enrolling 765 participants with bipolar disorder. At study entry, white blood cell (WBC) count was measured and psychopathology assessed with the Montgomery and Aasberg depression rating scale (MADRS). We performed analysis of variance and linear regression analyses to investigate the relationship between the deviation from the median WBC, and multinomial regression analysis between different WBC levels. All analyses were performed gender-specific and adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, race, and somatic diseases. RESULTS:The overall MADRS score increased significantly for each 1.0×109/l deviation from the median WBC among 322 men (coefficient=1.10; 95% CI=0.32-1.89; p=0.006), but not among 443 women (coefficient=0.56; 95% CI=-0.19-1.31; p=0.14). Among men, WBC deviations were associated with increased severity of sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, inability to feel, and suicidal thoughts. Among women, WBC deviations were associated with increased severity of reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts. Both higher and lower WBC levels were associated with increased severity of several specific symptoms. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Immune system alterations were associated with increased severity of specific mood symptoms, particularly among men. Our results support the sickness syndrome theory, but furthermore emphasise the relevance to study immune suppression in bipolar disorder. Due to the explorative nature and cross-sectional design, future studies need to confirm these findings.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:Psychostimulant augmentation is considered a potential treatment strategy for individuals with major depressive disorder who do not adequately respond to antidepressant monotherapy. The primary objective of this 12-month open-label extension study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) as augmentation therapy to an antidepressant in adults with major depressive disorder. METHODS/PROCEDURES/UNASSIGNED:Eligible adults who completed 1 of 3 short-term antecedent LDX augmentation of antidepressant monotherapy studies were treated with dose-optimized LDX (20-70 mg) for up to 52 weeks while continuing on the index antidepressant (escitalopram, sertraline, venlafaxine extended-release, or duloxetine) assigned during the antecedent short-term studies. Safety and tolerability assessments included the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events and vital sign changes. FINDINGS/RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:All 3 antecedent studies failed to meet the prespecified primary efficacy endpoint, so this open-label study was terminated early. Headache (15.5% [241/1559]), dry mouth (13.6% [212/1559]), insomnia (13.1% [204/1559]), and decreased appetite (12.1% [189/1559]) were the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events. The greatest mean ± SD increases observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure and for pulse were 2.6 ± 10.85 and 1.7 ± 7.94 mm Hg and 6.9 ± 10.27 bpm, respectively. Monitoring determined that less than 1% of participants experienced potentially clinically important changes in systolic blood pressure (10 [0.6%]), diastolic blood pressure (8 [0.5%]), or pulse (6 [0.4%]). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The overall safety and tolerability of long-term LDX augmentation of antidepressant monotherapy was consistent with the profiles of the short-term antecedent studies, with no evidence of new safety signals.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:For a drug to acquire Food and Drug Administration approval, it must significantly outperform placebo treatment. In recent years, the placebo effect seems to be increasing in neuropsychiatric conditions. Here, we examine placebo effects across self-reported, clinically rated, and performance-based data from a trial using a corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor type 1 (CRHR1) antagonist for treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS/PROCEDURES/UNASSIGNED:Women with chronic PTSD were randomized to treatment with either GSK561679, a CRHR1 antagonist, or placebo. Before randomization, participants completed self-report scales, clinician-rated measures of PTSD and depression symptoms, and objective tests of cognition and functioning. Differences in change scores on measures were compared between GSK561679 and placebo-treated participants. FINDINGS/RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:GSK561679 failed to produce any significant improvement in the participants. A substantial placebo effect was observed in both self-report and clinical rating scales, with effect sizes up to 1.5 SD. No single variable predicted placebo-related changes. Notably, there was an improvement on objective performance measures of cognition that exceeded previous standards for practice effects. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Participants in this trial manifested retest effects on performance-based measures of cognition. Notably, they had minimal prior experience with performance-based assessments. Experiencing the structure and support of a clinical trial may have contributed to significant reductions in subject-reported and clinician-rated PTSD symptom levels. The improvement seen across all assessment domains was consistent with that seen in previous studies where the active treatments separated from placebo. Investigators conducting clinical trials treating PTSD patients should expect placebo effects and design studies accordingly.

BACKGROUND:The antibiotic minocycline appears to promote neuroprotection through antioxidant and other mechanisms that may be relevant to the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. The present study assessed the efficacy of minocycline in bipolar depression and examined the association between minocycline treatment and brain glutathione (GSH), an essential regulator of oxidative stress. METHOD/METHODS:H MRS) measures of cortical GSH within a voxel prescribed in the precuneus and aspects of the occipital cortex were obtained from a subset of patients (n=12) before and after treatment. RESULTS:The daily dose of minocycline at study end was 256mg (SD: 71mg). Treatment was associated with improvements in depression severity [MADRS score change: -14.6 (95% CI: -7.8 to -21.3)]. Ten patients (50%) were classified as responders based on a ≥50% reduction in MADRS score and 8 patients (40%) were classified as remitters (MADRS score ≤ 9). Higher baseline GSH levels were associated with greater improvement in MADRS score following treatment (ρ=0.51, p=0.05). Increases in GSH levels at study end were higher in non-responders than in responders (p=0.04). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Small sample size, lack of a placebo group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Minocycline may be an effective adjuvant treatment for bipolar depression, particularly in patients with high baseline GSH levels. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential of minocycline in this population.

Background: Anxiety and trauma-related disorders are among the most prevalent and disabling medical conditions in the U.S., and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in particular exacts a tremendous public health toll. We examined the tolerability and anxiolytic efficacy of neuropeptide Y (NPY) administered via an intranasal route in patients with PTSD. Methods: Twenty-six individuals were randomized in a cross-over, single ascending dose study into one of five cohorts: 1.4mg (n=3), 2.8mg (n=6), 4.6mg (n=5), 6.8mg (n=6), and 9.6mg (n=6). Each individual was dosed with NPY or placebo on separate treatment days one week apart in random order under double-blind conditions. Assessments were conducted at baseline and following a trauma script symptom provocation procedure subsequent to dosing. Occurrence of adverse events represented the primary tolerability outcome. The difference between treatment conditions on anxiety as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) immediately following the trauma script represented the principal efficacy outcomes. Results: Twenty-four individuals completed both treatment days. NPY was well tolerated up to and including the highest dose. There was a significant interaction between treatment and dose; higher doses of NPY were associated with a greater treatment effect, favoring NPY over placebo on BAI score (F1,20=4.95, p=0.038). There was no significant interaction for STAI score. Conclusions: Our study suggests that a single dose of NPY is well tolerated up to 9.6 mg, and may be associated with anxiolytic effects. Future studies exploring the safety and efficacy of NPY in stress-related disorders are warranted. The reported study is registered at: http://clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT01533519).

BACKGROUND:Low-Field Magnetic Stimulation (LFMS) is a novel, non-invasive, sub-threshold neuromodulation technique, shown in preliminary studies to have immediate mood elevating effects in both unipolar and bipolar depressed patients. OBJECTIVE:We aimed to assess the antidepressant augmentation effects at 48 h of LFMS administered on two consecutive days compared to sham treatment in treatment resistant depression (TRD) subjects, using the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design (SPCD). METHODS:Eighty-four eligible subjects with TRD were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with LFMS 20 min/day for four days, sham treatment 20 min/day for four days, or sham treatment 20 min/day for 2 days followed by LFMS treatment 20 min/day for two days, using the pre-randomization version of the SPCD (randomization 1:1:1). The SPCD analyses used a repeated measures linear modeling approach with maximum likelihood estimation to use all available data, and using a 60-40 weighting of Stage 1 vs. 2 responses, with the primary outcome being measured after 2 and 4 days. RESULTS:Both primary and secondary outcome measures consistently showed no differences between LFMS-treated patients and those treated with sham, with the exception of a slight, non-significantly greater improvement than sham in the visual analogue scale (VAS) sad mood on LFMS-treated patients. LFMS treatment was relatively well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:We did not observe a significantly greater, rapid efficacy of LFMS compared to sham therapy. Future studies need to examine the possible therapeutic effects of more intensive forms of LFMS, as other forms of neurostimulation typically require longer duration of exposure.