Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To describe our clinical experience in wavefront-guided LASIK enhancements using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO system (WaveLight Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany) for symptomatic eyes previously treated with standard LASIK. METHODS: Twenty-six eyes of 20 patients with residual myopia, hyperopia, or mixed astigmatism and/or night vision symptoms after primary standard LASIK were considered for wavefront-guided customized retreatment using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE 200 Hz excimer laser system (model 106). Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity, topography with the ALLEGRETTO Topolyzer, wavefront analysis using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE Tscherning Analyzer, and contrast sensitivity were compared to postoperative (enhancement) measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the original 26 eyes underwent wavefront-guided enhancement, 4 were excluded because they did not meet wavefront-guided treatment inclusion guidelines of this study. Mean follow-up was 8 months (range: 6 to 13 months, standard deviation [SD] 2). All patients were within +/- 0.50 diopters (manifest refraction) of intended postoperative refraction. The mean preoperative BSCVA improved from 20/25 (SD +/- 0.12) to 20/18 (SD +/- 0.1) postoperatively. All patients gained at least one line of BSCVA, and a maximum of three lines. There was no loss of BSCVA in any patient. The total amount of high order aberrations (RMSH) decreased from an average of 1.04 (SD +/- 0.22) to 0.46 (SD +/- 0.14) microm. Patients also had a mean improvement in low contrast sensitivity of 59%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this small series, customized wavefront-guided enhancements using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO system in patients who underwent previous LASIK appear to be safe and effective in correcting residual refractive error, reducing high order aberrations, and improving visual symptoms when reliable and reproducible measurements are achieved

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser system (WaveLight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany) in LASIK for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. METHODS: One hundred twenty consecutive LASIK cases for hyperopia with or without astigmatism treated with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser were prospectively evaluated up to 12 months postoperatively. Patients were allocated into three groups according to their refractive sphere and cylinder: a low hyperopia group, with up to +3.00 diopters (D) sphere and astigmatism < or = +1.00 D (n = 52); a moderate hyperopia group with +3.25 to +5.00 D sphere and astigmatism of < or = +1.00 D (n = 45); and a high hyperopia/toric group with sphere > or = +5.25 D or cylinder > or = +1.25.D (n = 23). Flaps were created with the Moria M2 microkeratome (Moria, Antony, France). Parameters evaluated were pre- and postoperative refractive error, uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), higher order aberration change, and contrast sensitivity. RESULTS: One hundred twelve eyes (93%) were available for follow-up at 12 months. Of the eyes in the low hyperopia group, 92% were within +/- 0.50 D of the refractive goal. For the moderate sphere group and the high hyperopia/toric group, 79% and 71% of eyes, respectively, were within +/- 0.50 D of the refractive goal. No eye lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA. An increase in higher order aberrations was noted in the high hyperopia/toric group from 0.47 microm (+/- 0.096) to 0.94 microm (+/- 0.167) (P < .001). No significant changes in higher order aberrations were noted in the low and moderate hyperopia groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopic LASIK using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser appears to be safe and effective in the correction of low, moderate, and high hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of modified intracorneal ring segment implantation (INTACS) in the management of moderate and advanced keratoconus (KCN). METHODS: A modified procedure of intracorneal ring segment (INTACS) implantation was performed in eyes with moderate to advanced keratoconus that were intolerant to contact lens or spectacle correction. The main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, and keratometry. The preoperative values were compared with the values 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Implantation was performed on 20 eyes of 15 patients; 9 were female and 6 were male. The mean age was 30.2 years (SD +/- 5.44; range, 23-40). At the 6-month follow-up, UCVA improved from 20/154 (SD +/- 0.11) preoperatively to 20/28 (SD +/- 0.21) postoperatively (P < 0.05); BCSVA improved from 20/37 (SD +/- 0.21) preoperatively to 20/22 (SD +/- 0.13) postoperatively (P < 0.05). Spherical refractive error improved from -3.38 D (SD +/- 3.12) to -1.15 D (SD +/- 1.84); cylindrical refractive error improved from -3.75 (SD +/- 2.04) preoperatively to -1.21 (SD +/- 0.84) postoperatively (P < 0.05); average keratometry decreased from 49.50 D (SD +/- 1.64) preoperatively to 46.35 D (SD +/- 1.50) postoperatively. The changes remained stable to the 12-month follow-up. There was 1 case of anterior chamber perforation. There were 6 eyes that had ring exposure secondary to corneal thinning over the implants 3-6 months postoperatively, and a dense corneal infiltrate developed in 1 patient at 7 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure appears to be effective in improving UCVA and BSCVA of patients with clinical keratoconus. In our small study group, however, there were significant (6/20) postoperative problems with regards to thinning and ring exposure

PURPOSE: To describe an alternative surgical technique in stabilizing peripheral corneal thinning in keratoglobus corneas with severe ectasia. METHODS: A 27-year-old man with keratoglobus and severe corneal ectasia in his remaining functional eye was managed by surgically placing an allograft corneoscleral ring around the limbus to support the mid-peripheral thinned cornea. Nylon 10-0 interrupted sutures were used only at the limbus. The allograft corneoscleral ring had an outer diameter of 14.5 mm and an inner opening of 7.0 mm. Conjunctiva was draped over and sutured to the donor corneoscleral ring graft. RESULTS: Cornea and vision are stable at 18 months' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The peripheral suturing of a corneoscleral ring graft over the periphery of the cornea maybe an acceptable technique for providing tectonic tissue support and stabilizing eyes with keratoglobus

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Moria M2 single use 130 microkeratome head in consecutive LASIK procedures for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: One hundred eyes of 55 patients underwent LASIK in which the flaps were created with the Moria M2 microkeratome using the single use 130 head and excimer laser ablation was done with the Allegretto Wave-light laser. Flap parameters measured were: thickness, diameter, hinge length, and overall quality. Preoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, wavefront aberrations, and low contrast sensitivity were compared to postoperative values at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mean flap thickness was 145 +/- 17.5 microm, mean flap diameter was 8.5 +/- 0.40 mm, and mean hinge cord length was 4.05 +/- 0.35 mm. At 6-month follow-up, UCVA improved from 20/200 (+/-0.24) to 20/18.5 (+/-0.12) and BSCVA improved from 20/20.5 (+/-0.18) to 20/17.5 (+/-0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The Moria M2 single use 130 microkeratome head appears to be safe and effective in performing LASIK procedures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of topography-guided ablations for refractive irregularities induced by previous surgery. METHODS: This prospective, non-comparative trial comprised 27 symptomatic eyes with a history of LASIK for myopia that underwent topography-guided treatment with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE system. Pre- and postoperative refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal asphericity (Q value), low contrast sensitivity, and patient's subjective assessment of improvement were measured. RESULTS: Preoperative data were sphere -0.84 +/- 1.37 diopters (D), cylinder -1.55 +/- 0.78 D, UCVA 20/49 +/- 0.22, BSCVA 20/32 +/- 0.15, and Q value 1.46 +/- 0.79. Postoperative data at mean 6-month follow-up were: sphere -0.61 +/- 0.81 D, cylinder -0.53 +/- 0.58 D, UCVA 20/25 +/- 0.21 (P < .01), BSCVA 20/21 +/- 0.14 (P < .001), and Q value 1.07 +/- 0.89. Contrast sensitivity scores improved by 70%. No loss of BSCVA occurred in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided treatments may be effective in correcting the quality of vision. It should be viewed as a possible two-step procedure due to spherical adjustment that may change refraction unpredictably

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of aphakic bullous keratopathy (ABK) management with combined PK, anterior vitrectomy, angle synechiolysis, and Artisan intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Fourteen eyes of 11 patients underwent the procedure. Mean follow-up was 12-36 months (mean 24) for visual acuity (Va), refractive error (RE), intraocular pressure (IOP), tonography, graft clarity, intraocular lens centration, and any complications. RESULTS: The postoperative mean values were: Va improved from 20/400 to 20/50, spherical RE was -2.65 diopters, IOP was 17.5 mmHg, tonography improved by 55%, all grafts were clear; no IOL decentrations or serious complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This iris-fixated intraocular lens appears to offer simplicity in implantation and may be combined with PK, anterior vitrectomy, and angle synechiolysis. It may be a safe and effective alternative with PK in the management of ABK.