Faculty Bibliography

SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:We present the surgical technique for arthrodesis of the subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints of a Sanders type IV calcaneal fracture nonunion via a distraction bone block arthrodesis technique with tricortical iliac crest allograft combined with reamer/irrigator/aspirator autograft from the patient's femur. A lateral extensile approach to the calcaneus was used for the exposure, which allowed the surgeon to follow the stepwise complex surgical plan outlined here. Calcaneal nonunions are difficult to treat, but good outcomes can be achieved if proper technique with bone grafting is used.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of fracture nonunion repair with autogenous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) under regional anesthesia alone or in combination with other techniques compared to other anesthesia techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Overall, 137 patients were identified who underwent ICBG as part of a repair of a long bone fracture nonunion between January 1, 2013 and October 1, 2020. Surgical and anesthetic records were reviewed to classify patients by anesthesia type. General, spinal, and regional anesthetics were used as either the primary anesthetic or as a combination of regional nerve block with general or spinal anesthesia. RESULTS:Administration of regional anesthesia alone or in combination with general or spinal anesthesia (RA) and general or spinal anesthesia only (GS) groups differed in nonunion site distribution (p < 0.001). RA patients were discharged the same day more often than GS patients (30.9% vs 10.0%, p = 0.009) and experienced fewer postoperative complications (p = 0.021). The RA group achieved union sooner than the GS group (by 5.3 ± 3.2 months vs. by 6.8 ± 3.2 months, p = 0.006). Mean morphine equivalent dose was similar between groups (p = 0.23). Regional anesthesia use increased from 2013 to 2020, and same day discharge surgeries simultaneously increased over the same time period. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Regional anesthesia use increased in nonunion repair surgery with ICBG from 2013 to 2020. This was associated with an increase in same day discharge, sooner time to union, and decreased postoperative complications. There was not a need for increased opioid prescription in patients that underwent regional anesthesia.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess longer-term (> 5 years) function and outcome in patients treated with anatomic locking plates for proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:This retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban, academic level 1 trauma center and an orthopedic specialty hospital. Patients treated operatively for proximal humerus fractures with an anatomic locking plate by three orthopedic trauma surgeons and two shoulder surgeons from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics and injury characteristics, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores, complications, secondary surgeries, and shoulder range of motion were compared at 1 year and at latest follow-up. RESULTS:Seventy-five of 173 fractures were eligible for analysis. At a minimum 5 years and a mean of 10.0 ± 3.2 years following surgery, DASH scores did not differ from one-year compared to long-term follow-up (16.3 ± 17.4 vs. 15.1 ± 18.2, p = 0.555). Shoulder motion including: active forward flexion (145.5 vs. 151.5 degrees, p = 0.186), internal rotation (T10 vs. T9, p = 0.204), and external rotation measurements (48.4 vs. 57.9, p = 0.074) also did not differ from one year compared to long-term follow-up. By one year, all fractures had healed. After 1-year post-operatively, four patients underwent reoperation, but none for AVN or screw penetration. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-reported functional outcome scores and shoulder range of motion are stable after one year following proximal humerus fracture fixation, and outcomes do not deteriorate thereafter. After one-year, long-term follow-up of fixed proximal humerus fractures may be unnecessary for those without symptoms.

Although surgical procedures have been occurring as early at 6500 BC, the modern sense of the operating room (OR) did not exist until more recently. As aseptic techniques and surgical procedures began to evolve, so too did the OR table. The OR table began to transition from a static, wooden table to a dynamic table with the ability to position patients for a variety of procedures. With the advent of intraoperative imaging for orthopaedic procedures, OR tables have adapted and allow for imaging of bony anatomy by using radiolucent materials. These changes have led to the development of numerous OR tables, each with their own sets of advantages and disadvantages. There is currently no summary of the development, indications, benefits, and disadvantages of the various OR tables available to orthopaedic surgeons in the literature. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive review of orthopaedic operating tables for both the junior orthopaedic resident and experienced attending surgeon.

BACKGROUND:The ability to predict long-term outcomes following surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures would help identify patients at risk of poor functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple score based on preoperative data that can accurately predict functional outcomes for patients following operative management of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:Over a 12-year period, all proximal humerus fractures surgically treated with a locked proximal humerus plate at a single institution were enrolled in a prospective database. Inclusion criteria in this analysis were any patient with a minimum of a one-year functional outcome score. Patients were assigned to the poor outcome cohort if their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at that time point was greater than 10 points above the mean DASH score. Logistic regression was used to build a predictive formula for cohort membership using p < 0.15 and an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) value was calculated to define the overall predictive capacity. RESULTS:A total of 165 patients with an average age of 60.91±13.5 years met the inclusion criteria, with 47 (28.5%) patients assigned to the poor outcome group and 118 (71.5%) patients assigned to the good outcome group. Older age (p = 0.088), BMI (p = 0.019), age-adjusted CCI (p = 0.001), non-Caucasian race (p = 0.017), no college degree (p < 0.0005), unemployed (p < 0.0005), and worker's compensation case (p = 0.002) were found to be significant predictors of poorer outcome and were used to create a final formula through logistic regression which predicted the probability of a poor outcome (Nagelkerke R Square = 0.403; Hosmer and Lemeshow = 0.902; AUROC = 0.839 [CI: 0.762-0.917]). Once each patient was assigned a score, cutoff values were defined that divided the cohort into three groups. High-risk patients had a score above 50%, and 19 (73.1%) of these patients had a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS:The POSY score is a tool that can predict the functional outcome at one year or greater following surgical intervention for a proximal humerus fracture. Patients who score above 50% are considered at high risk for a poor functional outcome. In the era of value-based care, the POSY score may be used to direct resource utilization while improving outcomes.

Background Smoking, obesity, and being below a healthy body weight are known to increase all-cause mortality rates and are considered modifiable risk factors. The purpose of this study is to assess whether adding these risk factors to a validated geriatric inpatient mortality risk tool will improve the predictive capacity for hip fracture patients. We hypothesize that the predictive capacity of the Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) tool will improve. Methodology Between October 2014 and August 2021, 2,421 patients >55-years-old treated for hip fractures caused by low-energy mechanisms were analyzed for demographics, injury details, hospital quality measures, and mortality. Smoking status was recorded as a current every-day smoker, former smoker, or never smoker. Smokers (current and former) were compared to non-smokers (never smokers). Body mass index (BMI) was defined as underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), healthy weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25.0-24.9 kg/m²), or obese (>30 kg/m²). The baseline STTGMA tool for hip fractures (STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE) was modified to include patients' BMI and smoking status (STTGMA_MODIFIABLE), and new mortality risk scores were calculated. Each model's predictive ability was compared using DeLong's test by analyzing the area under the receiver operating curves (AUROCs). Comparative analyses were conducted on each risk quartile. Results A comparison of smokers versus non-smokers demonstrated that smokers experienced higher rates of inpatient (p = 0.025) and 30-day (p = 0.048) mortality, myocardial infarction (p < 0.01), acute respiratory failure (p < 0.01), and a longer length of stay (p = 0.014). Comparison among BMI cohorts demonstrated that underweight patients experienced higher rates of pneumonia (p = 0.033), decubitus ulcers (p = 0.046), and the need for an intensive care unit (ICU) (p < 0.01). AUROC comparison demonstrated that STTGMA_MODIFIABLE significantly improved the predictive capacity for inpatient mortality compared to STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE (0.792 vs. 0.672, p = 0.0445). Quartile stratification demonstrated the highest risk cohort had a longer length of stay (p < 0.01), higher rates of inpatient (p < 0.01) and 30-day mortality (p < 0.01), and need for an ICU (p < 0.01) compared to the minimal risk cohort. Patients in the lowest risk quartile were most likely to be discharged home (p < 0.01). Conclusions Smoking, obesity, and being below a healthy body weight increase the risk of perioperative complications and poor outcomes. Including smoking and BMI improves the STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE tool to predict mortality and risk stratify patient outcomes. Because smoking, obesity, and being below a healthy body weight are modifiable patient factors, providers can counsel patients and implement lifestyle changes to potentially decrease their risk of longer-term poor outcomes, especially in the setting of another fracture. For patients who are former smokers, providers can use this information to encourage continued restraint and healthy choices.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Nonunions about the hip occur as a result of femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and certain subtrochanteric fractures. Treatment of a hip fracture nonunion allows for the choice between hip preservation or arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to examine outcomes of hip-preservation nonunion surgery METHODS: Patients who underwent hip preservation for a fracture nonunion of the femoral neck, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric region to 1 cm below the lesser trochanter over a 10-year period were identified in our nonunion registry. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Functional outcomes were recorded at follow-up visits. For comparison regarding surgical and hospital outcomes, a group of 23 patients who underwent conversion total hip arthroplasties (cTHA) at the same academic medical center was reviewed. Quality measures such as length of stay, reoperation, and complications were collected. All statistics analysis utilized IBM SPSS 25 (Armonk, NY) RESULTS: Thirty patients who underwent 30 hip-preserving nonunion surgeries were analyzed and compared with 23 cTHA patients. Twenty-nine nonunions went on to heal (average time to union 6.3 months). There was improvement in functional outcome scores for the hip preservation group between baseline and latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Reoperation was required in five patients (17%), including four failed to heal and required a second repair to gain union and one failure that was converted to THA rather than attempt a second nonunion repair. Hip preservation failures were older than those that healed with the index treatment (p = 0.11). There was no significant difference in hospital length of stay, complication rate, or need for reoperation when compared to cTHA group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hip-preserving surgery is an option that should be considered for patients with nonunion of fractures about the hip. The rates of complications (20.3 vs 17.3%) and reoperation (16.7 vs 17.3%) were equivalent to conversion THA. Excellent outcomes can be achieved in terms of radiographic union and function with hip preservation.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study compares demographics, outcomes, and costs of patients with similar multifragmentary pertrochanteric (MP) fracture patterns treated with either a short or long cephalomedullary nail (CMN) to determine treatment efficacy and value during hospital admission. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS/METHODS:384 patients who presented with a MP fracture [AO/OTA 31A2.2 and 31A2.3] at 1 of 3 hospitals within a single academic medical center. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Surgical treatment with either short or long CMN Main outcome measurements: Operative time, in-hospital complications, discharge disposition, procedural and total costs of admission. RESULTS:Sixty-nine (18.0%) patients were treated with long CMNs compared to 315 patients treated with short CMNs. Patients treated with long CMNs had increased rates of transfusions of allogenic packed red blood cells (52.2% vs 34.0%, p = 0.005), discharge to rehabilitation facilities (91.3% vs 80.3%, p = 0.030), and had costlier hospital stays ($28,632.50 vs $23,024.86, p = 0.014) with longer (74.9 vs 52.3 min, p <0.001), costlier procedures and implants ($12,090.31 vs $9,647.41, p = 0.014) compared to patients treated with short CMNs. There were no differences in timing of radiographic healing, rates of readmission, nonunion, screw cut out, fixation failure, or peri‑implant fracture. CONCLUSIONS:Short and long CMNs are equally suitable implants for the most unstable intertrochanteric fracture patterns. Short CMNs correlate with reduced operative time and costs with non-inferior in-hospital complication rates, hospital quality measures, and less frequent rehabilitation facility discharges. Given the similar long-term outcomes demonstrated here and in the literature, this data suggests nail length selection should be driven more by cost and discharge considerations for MP fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:level III.

Background The incidence of geriatric hip fractures, respiratory infections (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), influenza), and mortality is higher during the fall and winter. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the addition of seasonality to a validated geriatric inpatient mortality risk tool will improve the predictive capacity and risk stratification for geriatric hip fracture patients. We hypothesize that seasonality will improve the predictive capacity. Methodology Between October 2014 and August 2021, 2,421 patients >55-year-old treated for hip fracture were analyzed for demographics, date of presentation, COVID-19 status (for patients after February 2020), and mortality. Patients were grouped by season based on their admission dates into the following four cohorts: fall (September-November), winter (December-February), spring (March-May), and summer (June-August). Patients presenting during the fall/winter and spring/summer were compared. The baseline Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) tool for hip fractures (STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE) and the seasonality iteration (STTGMA_SEASON) were also compared. Sub-analysis was conducted on 687 patients between February 2020 and August 2021 amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The baseline score (STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE) and the COVID-19 iteration (STTGMACOVID_ORIGINAL_2020) were modified to include seasonality (STTGMA_COVID/SEASON). Patients were stratified by risk score and compared. The predictive ability of the models was compared using DeLong's test. Results For the overall cohort, patients who presented during the fall/winter had a higher rate of inpatient mortality (2.87% vs. 1.25%, p < 0.01). STTGMA_SEASON improved the predictive capacity for inpatient mortality compared to STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE but not significantly (0.773 vs. 0.672, p = 0.105) On sub-analysis, regression weighting showed a coefficient of 0.643, with fall and winter having a greater absolute effect size (fall = 2.572, winter = 1.929, spring = 1.286, summer = 0.643). STTGMA_COVID/SEASON improved the predictive capacity for inpatient mortality compared to STTGMAHIP_FX_SCORE (0.882 vs. 0.581, p < 0.01) and STTGMACOVID_ORIGINAL_2020 (0.882 vs. 0.805, p = 0.04). The highest risk quartile contained 89.5% of patients who expired during their index inpatient hospitalization (p < 0.01) and 68.2% of patients who died within 30 days of discharge (p < 0.01). Conclusions Seasonality may play a role in both the incidence and impact of COVID-19 and additional respiratory infections. Including seasonality improves the predictive capacity and risk stratification of the STTGMA tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. This allows for effective triage and closer surveillance of high-risk geriatric hip fracture patients by better accounting for the increased respiratory infection incidence and the associated mortality risk seen during fall and winter.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to investigate if early postoperative ambulation metrics affect hospital quality measures and 1-year outcomes in operative hip fracture patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A consecutive series of hip fracture patients [OTA/AO 31A, 31B, 32A-C] who underwent operative treatment were reviewed for demographic and clinical data. Chart review was performed to determine participation with physical therapy [PT] and ambulation distance on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, and 5. POD1 ambulators and non-ambulators were statistically compared. Outcome correlates of postoperative ambulation distance were investigated by univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.0353). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Failure to ambulate on POD1 following hip fracture surgery in >55 years is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital complications and mortality. Every effort should be made address this modifiable risk factor and mobilise patients on POD1 to improve patient outcomes.