Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary node staging in patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 10% to 15% will develop local relapse requiring reoperation. Although previous breast or axillary surgery is often considered a contraindication to SLN biopsy, few data support this position. We report our experience with SLN biopsy in the reoperative setting. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:We examined the 3,490 consecutive SLN biopsy procedures for breast cancer performed at our institution between September 1996 and July 2001; 32 (1%) of these followed previous axillary surgery: 22 (69%) for breast recurrence after SLN biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND); 7 (22%) after a recent, failed SLN biopsy or inadequate ALND; and 3 (9%) after earlier axillary surgery for an unrelated condition. RESULTS:SLNs were identified in 24 of 32 (75%) cases and were positive in 3 of 24 (13%). Reoperative SLN biopsy was more successful when less than 10 versus 10 or more nodes had been removed previously (87% versus 44%). Both blue dye and isotope identified the SLN in 16 of 24 successful procedures (67%). Additional, nonsentinel nodes (mean, eight nodes) were removed in 17 of 24 patients (71%) and were negative in all cases. At a median followup of 13 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred. CONCLUSIONS:Reoperative SLN biopsy after earlier SLN biopsy or ALND is feasible in selected breast cancer patients and is more likely to succeed when fewer than 10 nodes were removed during the earlier procedure. Further study is required to better define the subset of patients in whom reoperative SLN biopsy can replace ALND.

UNLABELLED:In the United States, identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) requires the use of (99m)Tc-labeled colloid, 1% isosulfan blue dye, or both to trace the lymphatic drainage of a given neoplasm. We report our experience with adverse reactions to isosulfan blue dye during SLN mapping in breast cancer. A chart review of the breast cancer SLN database was performed; it included 2392 sequential patients who underwent SLN biopsy involving isosulfan blue dye at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from September 12, 1996, to August 17, 2000. Thirty-nine of 2392 patients (1.6%) had a documented allergic reaction during the mapping procedure. Most reactions (69%) produced urticaria, blue hives, a generalized rash, or pruritus. The incidence of hypotensive reactions was 0.5%. Although anaphylaxis after the injection of isosulfan blue dye is rare, this article highlights the need to suspect anaphylaxis when hemodynamic instability occurs after the injection of this compound. Our experience indicates that bronchospasm and respiratory compromise are unusual and that most patients do not require emergent intubation and can be managed with short-term pressor support. In addition, our data indicate that patients with a sulfa allergy do not display a cross-sensitivity to isosulfan blue dye. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:We report the largest single-institution review of adverse reactions to injection of isosulfan blue dye during sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Bronchospasm and respiratory compromise are unusual, and most patients can be treated with short-term pressor support. Patients with a sulfa allergy do not display a cross-sensitivity to isosulfan blue dye.

Surgery is the most effective therapeutic intervention available for the treatment of breast cancer. It has been responsible for obtaining local control and long-term disease-free intervals in more patients over the past century than any other treatment modality. Trends toward earlier stage at diagnosis are likely to increase the importance of surgery and to secure its central role in the treatment of this disease. Unfortunately, during the 1990s the value of excellent local control of breast cancer has been minimized as the disease has come to be considered systemic from inception and as the results of adjuvant-therapy trials in patients with early-stage breast cancer have revealed survival advantages in patients receiving systemic therapy. Only rarely is it acknowledged that surgery alone achieves long-term disease-free states in 70% to 80% of all patients. At the core of this paradigmatic controversy is management of the axilla. The status of the axilla remains the most powerful predictor of outcome in patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast, and it is likely that a small but identifiable subset of patients obtains a survival benefit from the removal of disease-containing nodes. It is believed that no benefit is derived from the removal of negative nodes, and indeed there are even patients in whom complete elimination of the exploration of the axilla may be considered-all of which underscores the need to investigate the axilla selectively. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy represents the most exciting development to date toward this end. The challenge today, as we move closer to a selective approach to the axilla, is to ensure that patients with positive nodes have those nodes identified and removed and patients with negative nodes experience minimal disturbance of their axilla.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with fallopian tube carcinoma treated with paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy following primary cytoreductive surgery. METHODS:Twenty-four patients with the diagnosis of primary tubal adenocarcinoma treated between 1993 and 1998 were identified through the gynecology service database and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center tumor registry. Medical records were reviewed for information on age, stage, chemotherapy regimen, surgical intervention, relapse, and survival. All patients had their histologic material initially read or reviewed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prior to treatment. The original slides were reviewed again by one of the authors (P.E.S.) to confirm the diagnosis of primary fallopian tube cancer. RESULTS:The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 44-76). Distribution by stage was as follows: four patients (17%) were Stage I, three patients (12%) were Stage II, 16 patients (67%) were Stage III, one patient (4%) was Stage IV. Four patients had grade 2 tumors, 20 had grade 3. Sixteen patients (67%) had optimal cytoreduction at the time of initial surgery with residual disease less than 1 cm. Eight patients (33%) had suboptimal cytoreduction. Following initial surgery, all patients were treated with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for a median of five cycles. Twenty-three patients received paclitaxel at the dose of 135-175 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin or cisplatin; the majority, 17 of 23 (74%), received carboplatin. One patient received paclitaxel alone. Median follow-up from time of initial surgery was 24 months (range, 1-73 months). Two patients are dead of disease. Overall survival for the entire group was 96% at 12 months by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and 90% at 3 years. The overall median progression-free survival was 27 months (range, 5-57 months) for the entire group. The median disease progression-free survival at 3 years was 67% (95% CI, 45-100) in the optimally debulked group as compared with 45% in the suboptimally debulked group (95% CI, 27-57). Twelve patients (50%) had evidence of recurrence or persistent disease. There were fewer recurrences in the optimally debulked group: 5 of the 16 patients (31%) versus 7 of the 8 patients (88%) with suboptimal cytoreduction. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Optimally cytoreduced patients with primary fallopian tube carcinoma treated with a paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimen have an excellent possibility of survival.

BACKGROUND:The introduction of SLNB has allowed accurate staging in early-stage breast carcinomas and has minimized the number of unnecessary ALNDs. Intraoperative frozen-section analysis is a fundamental component of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure. Some patients have positive nodes on frozen-section analysis and thus undergo a conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the time of the SLNB. A few patients have negative nodes on frozen-section analysis but have subsequent evidence of metastases on final pathologic examination. The purpose of our study was 2-fold: to compare the hospital-related charges of patients undergoing staging by SLNB with those of patients undergoing conventional ALND and to assess whether the different outcomes associated with SLNB adversely affect the charges incurred with this procedure. METHODS:Our study group consisted of 100 patients with T1 breast cancer and breast conservation therapy who underwent either SLNB or ALND from July 1, 1997, to June 30, 1998. We identified the first 50 consecutive patients to undergo SLNB during this period. We chose a similar cohort of 50 patients for ALND. Mean hospital-related charges for the SLNB patients were categorized and compared with those for the ALND patients. RESULTS:Results for the two groups were analyzed using a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Charges for the OR and hospital stay were less for the SLNB group (P < .05). Frozen-section analysis in the SLNB group contributed to the significant difference in charges for pathologic evaluation. Overall, the two groups showed no significant difference in total hospital-related charges. CONCLUSIONS:When SLNB is used for T1 tumors, a small percentage of patients (10% in our study) will return to the operating room for an ALND. This small percentage does not increase the charges related to SLNB, however, as the reduced stay for most patients offsets this subgroup's contribution to the total hospital-related charges. Thus, in patients with clinical stage I breast cancer, SLNB does not cause significantly higher hospital-related charges compared with conventional ALND.

The management of breast cancer associated with pregnancy encompasses many diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. The various modalities used for screening, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer are not always applicable during pregnancy. The risk to the unborn child plays a major role in the decision process. Overall, the prognosis of patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer is worse because a large proportion of patients are first seen with more advanced disease. However, stage for stage, the prognosis is similar.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer has an overall worse prognosis than nonpregnancy-associated breast cancers because a large proportion present with more advanced disease. Stage for stage, however, the prognosis is similar. The various modalities used for screening, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer are not always applicable during pregnancy. Often, a delay in diagnosis may contribute to a more advanced stage at presentation. The management of pregnant women with breast cancer is also different because it involves assessing the possible risks to the fetus versus the maternal benefits.