Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Indirect decompression technique may be limited in that it does not include direct removal of the offending intervertebral disc or osteophyte protruding into the canal. PURPOSE: This study evaluates resolution of radiculopathy and perioperative complications in lumbar fusion with indirect or direct decompression techniques. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of large single center academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 116 single-level lumbar fusion patients with preoperative radiculopathy from 2012 to 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution of radiculopathy, visual analog scores (VAS), perioperative complications, motor scores.
METHOD(S): Patients 18 years of age diagnosed with preoperative radiculopathy undergoing single-level lumbar fusion with up to two-year follow-up were grouped by indirect and direct decompression. Direct decompression group included TLIF with or without direct decompression procedure as well as ALIF and LLIF with direct decompression procedure. Indirect decompression group included ALIF and LLIF without direct decompression procedure. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for differences in age between groups. Outcome measures were compared between groups using means comparison tests. Logistic regression analysis was used to correlate decompression type with symptom resolution over time.
RESULT(S): A total of 116 patients were included in this analysis: 58 direct decompression (mean 53.9y, 67.2% female) and 58 indirect decompression (mean 54.6y, 61.4% female). Direct decompression patients experienced greater blood loss relative to indirect decompression patients (242.4 +/- 128.5 vs 171.79 +/- 143.9 mL, p=0.007). Additionally, direct decompressionpatients experienced full resolution of radiculopathy at 3 months postop at a greater rate than those in the indirect decompression group (OR: 4.742, [1.97-11.41]; 53.1% vs 13.73%, p=0.002). At 6 months, direct decompression patients demonstrated a significantly larger reduction in VAS score 6 months postop (-2.889 +/- 2.3 vs -0.897 +/- 4.3, p=0.044). With regard to motor function, direct decompression patients had improved motor score with respect to the L5 dermatome at 6 months compared to indirect decompression patients (DELTAmotor score from baseline: 0.1714 +/- 0.453 vs -0.024 +/- 0.154, p=0.019).
CONCLUSION(S): Patients who underwent direct decompression experienced significantly greater resolution of preoperative lower extremity radiculopathy at 3 months compared with those who underwent ID alone. At 6 and 12 months, no differences were noted between the two groups. There were no differences in complication rates. At 6 months postop, direct decompression patients had greater improvement in preoperative motor deficit than ID patients. In particularly debilitated patients, these findings may influence surgeons to perform a direct decompression to achieve more rapid resolution of radiculopathy symptoms. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sagittal alignment is integral to a patient's quality of life. Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is currently the standard for correcting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless growth modulating surgical technique used to treat AIS. It relies on the Hueter-Volkmann Law. Indications for this procedure include patients who have coronal curves up to 50degree, growth remaining, and no excessive thoracic kyphosis. VBT has been shown to have good coronal plane deformity correction. There have been fewer examinations of the sagittal effects of VBT. PURPOSE: To determine if VBT is a non-inferior treatment for correction of AIS with regard to sagittal alignment compared to PSF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with AIS who underwent correction surgeries with LIV in the lumbar spine from 2013 to 2021 with pre- and minimum two-year postoperative standing full spine plain films. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical SVA (cSVA), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), cervical lordosis (CL), L4-S1 lordosis (L4L), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL).
METHOD(S): Radiographic analyses was completed with independent samples t-test with significance set to p <0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 99 patients were included, 49 VBT and 50 PSF. There were no differences in age or levels instrumented between groups. The VBT cohort Lenke class breakdown is 23% 1A, 13% 1C, 31% 3C. 18% 5C, and 15% 6C, while the PSF cohort consisted of 42% 1A, 6% 1B, 2% 2C, 2% 3B, 12% 3C, 2% 5B, 24% 5C, and 10% 6C. At Baseline, the VBT cohort had lower SVA (-0.7mm+/-3.7 vs 2.2mm+/-5.0, p=0.001), CL (-0.9degree+/-18.2 vs 11.6degree+/-12.8, p=0.001), L4-S1 Lordosis (20.7degree+/-16.0 vs 41.6degree+/-10.2, p=0.001), and higher cSVA (3.3mm+/-1.6 vs -0.95mm+/-3.1, p=0.001) than those who were fused. Postoperatively, VBT patients have an overall higher L4-S1 Lordosis (36.0degree+/-10.1vs 18.3degree+/-12.5, p=0.001), cSVA (3.4mm+/-1.4 vs -3.7mm+/-2.1, p=0.001), and lower CL (-4.3degree+/-18.4 vs 7.0degree+/-12.2, p=0.001). The PSF cohort had a larger change in cSVA (2.8mm+/-4.0 vs 0mm+/-1.6, p=0.001) from baseline to 2-year follow-up compared to VBT. No differences in the change of L4-S1 Lordosis (VBT 1.5degree+/-12.3 vs 4.1degree+/-10.9, p=0.3), TPA (VBT -1.6degree+/-6.8 vs -1.4degree+/-8.5, p=0.89), PT (VBT -0.5degree+/-7.8 vs -1.9degree+/-8.5, p=0.42), or PI-LL (0.2degree+/-12.0 vs -0.5degree+/-14.0, p=0.81) were observed.
CONCLUSION(S): VBT and PSF for AIS result in statistically similar changes in sagittal alignment parameters. The fact that we showed similar results comparing sagittal alignment in fusion and VBT groups indicates that VBT is non-inferior from a sagittal perspective. It is important to maintain sagittal alignment when correcting AIS. Future work can examine the long-term effect of VBT on sagittal alignment. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Reducing fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure in the operating room is beneficial for the patient and surgical team. Placement of an interbody device during lateral transpsoas approach is traditionally carried out using anterior-posterior and lateral fluoroscopy. In this setting, 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT)-based spinal navigation of cage and pedicle screw/rod placement for LLIF procedure may result in decreased radiation exposure compared with fluoroscopically-guided LLIF. We sought to present our experience with the use of CT-based spinal navigation for the LLIF procedure and evaluate rates of intraoperative complications and radiation exposure. PURPOSE: To determine if computer-navigation guided LLIF will have equivalent outcomes with decreased radiation dose compared to fluoroscopy-guided LLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 250 patients over 18 years of age who underwent LLIF with <4 levels fused (age: 61.4 +/- 10.8 yrs, BMI: 29.7 +/- 6.1 7 kg/m2). OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative and 90-day complications, radiation exposure and cage placement.
METHOD(S): Patients were separated into two groups: fluoroscopy-guided LLIF (n=224), and navigated LLIF (n=26). Cage placement was assessed on postoperative radiographs by dividing the disc space into quarters, anterior to posterior.
RESULT(S): In terms of operative characteristics, fluoroscopy dosage was significantly greater in the fluoroscopically-guided LLIF cohort (55.1 +/- 57.4 mGy vs 34.0 +/- 24.9 mGy, p=0.002). There were no significant differences between fluoroscopically-guided LLIFs and navigated LLIFs in overall intraoperative complication rate (4% Fluoro vs 0% Nav, p=0.3), rate of durotomy (2.2 % Fluoro vs 0% Nav, p=0.44), or estimated blood loss (322 +/- 330.3 cc Flouro vs 299.5 +/- 198.6 cc Nav, p=0.6). The rate of postoperative complications (26.8% Fluoro vs 26.9% Nav), neurologic complications (5.4% Fluoro vs 3.8% Nav), surgical site infections (1.3% Fluoro vs 3.8% Nav), mechanical complications (1.8% Fluoro vs 0% Nav) was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in the rate of unplanned return to the operating room within 90 days (1.8% Fluoro vs 0% Nav). Cage placement was similar between the two groups (p=0.29).
CONCLUSION(S): We report an average radiation exposure with navigated LLIFs of 34.0 mGy, significantly lower than the 55.1 mGy in the fluoroscopically-guided LLIF group. The length of stay and perioperative complication rate was equivalent between the groups. These data support the use of CT-based navigation for placement of the cage and pedicle screws/rod construct for LLIF procedure. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Thoracic decompensation (TD) represents a distinct radiographic complexity from proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Few studies exist on the occurrence of TD following adult spinal deformity (ASD) corrective surgery. PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of TD following ASD-corrective surgery in comparison with the occurrence of PJK. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 689 ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: ASD, TD, PJK, thoracic compensation.
METHOD(S): ASD patients with complete baseline (BL) and two-year (2Y) followup were included. Patients were divided into groups: those who developed TD: T4-T12 >54.2degree and those who developed PJK. Further analysis assessed outcomes among patients with both TD and PJK (TDPJK). Thoracic compensation was defined as expected thoracic kyphosis minus BL thoracic kyphosis. Means comparison tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed differences between patient groups.
RESULT(S): A total of 373 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient breakdown by radiographic outcome was: TD (N=31), PJK (N=223) and TDPJK (N=119). Age, gender, and ASD-mFI were similar between TD and PJK patients. TD patients were more likely to be osteoporotic than PJK patients, p < 0.05. Procedures on TD patients were less invasive and utilized a shorter construct (9.3 vs 11.5 levels; both p < 0.05). TD patients had significantly greater cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis than PJK patients at BL and 2Y follow-up, all p < 0.05. Thoracic compensation was significantly associated with TD (OR 1.07 [CI 1.04-1.09], p < 0.001) controlling for age, ASD-mFI, and invasiveness. TDPJK had the highest complication rate (84.9%), significantly greater than PJK patients (70.9%), and TD patients (61.3%), both p < 0.05. PJK patients were 78.7% less likely to develop PJF than TDPJK patients (OR 0.213 [CI 0.101-0.453], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION(S): Patients who developed thoracic decompensation were more likely to present with osteoporosis, but had less invasive procedures and levels fused than patients with proximal junctional kyphosis. The tradeoff between fusing too much resulting in proximal junctional kyphosis and fusing too little predisposing to thoracic decompensation can serve as the basis of future studies to determine optimal construct length to balance these two risks. Thoracic compensation was predictive of postoperative thoracic decompensation in adult spinal deformity-correction. Patients who developed TDPJK had the highest rate of complications and greater odds of junctional failure. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While past research has shown racial disparities exist in the outcomes and utilization of spine surgery, those studies were often performed on nondisease-specific national databases, which may capture different patient populations and complication rates compared to prospective multicenter databases. PURPOSE: Purpose: 1) Assess racial disparities for enrollment in two prospective multicenter databases (ASD-

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous orthopedic literature has shown that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are more likely to develop complications in the postoperative period. To date, however, no study has assessed the specific pre- and postoperative risk factors that may contribute to this association for diabetic patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery. PURPOSE: Establish relevant risk factors for postoperative complications in a cohort of diabetic patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 138 patients with DM who underwent spinal deformity surgery at a single academic hospital from 2012-2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the development of any post-operative complications. These complications included the development of neurologic complications, urinary complications, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and surgical site infections (SSI).
METHOD(S): This study is a retrospective cohort review of diabetic patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery, with 5 levels fused at a single academic medical center. Patients' age, BMI, levels fused, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (HCT) and preoperative HbA1C were collected. T-test and chi-square analyses were used to compare relevant outcomes. Significance was set to p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 138 patients with DM met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of these, 50.7% of the total cohort developed a postoperative complication within 90 days of the index surgery. Patients who developed postoperative complications were noted to have significantly lower postoperative Hgb (9.82+/-1.46 g/dL vs 10.72+/-1.76 g/dL, p=0.002) postoperative HCT (28.8+/-3.92% vs 32.60+/-4.61%, p<0.001) and significantly greater number of levels fused (9.49+/-3.74 vs 7.47+/-3.16, p=0.001). Diabetic patients who developed cardiac complications had significantly lower postoperative Hgb (9.47+/-1.50 g/dL vs 10.40+/-1.66 g/dL, p=0.021) and HCT (27.87+/-3.16% vs 31.15+/-4.72%, p=0.003) compared with those who did not. Diabetic patients who developed urinary complications were noted to be older on average (72.56+/-8.20 vs 64.43+/-11.70 years, p=0.043), while patients who developed VTE and pulmonary complications were noted to have significantly higher numbers of levels fused (VTE: 14.00+/-3.61 vs 8.37+/-3.51, p=0.007; PC: 10.82+/-4.14 vs 8.29+/-3.49, p=0.025)Finally, diabetic patients who developed a surgical site infection had significantly lower postoperative HCT (26.74+/-3.27% vs 30.86+/-4.64%, p=0.022) than those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative HCT (OR: 0.765 [0.613-1.098], p=0.001) and number of levels fused (OR: 1.243 [1.084-1.425], p=0.002) were predictive of development of any postoperative complication, when controlled for BMI, age, and and postoperative Hgb. Postoperative HCT was an independent predictor of the development of cardiac complications (OR: 0.827 [0.692-0.989], p=0.037) and SSI (OR: 0.709 [0.528-0.952], p=0.022).
CONCLUSION(S): Postoperative HCT is predictive of the development of postoperative complications in general, and more specifically the development of cardiac complications and surgical site infections. Along with blood-glucose and HbA1C, it should be closely monitored perioperatively in diabetic patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used to lower blood loss in ASD surgery. Despite widespread use of TXA in ASD surgery, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal dosing intraoperatively. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess differences in blood loss and complications between high-dose, medium-dose, and low-dose TXA regimens. Complex ASD patients who receive high-dose TXA will have decreased blood loss compared to those who receive low-dose TXA. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective Review. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 265 ASD patients in a multi-center prospective study were retrospectively analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood loss (ml), Major Blood Loss (>90th percentile ml), units transfused intraoperatively, units transfused perioperatively.
METHOD(S): Patients were separated into three cohorts by TXA regimen: 1) low-dose patients had =20mg/kg loading dose with =2mg/kg/hr maintenance dose 2) medium-dose patients had 20-50 mg/kg loading dose with 2-5 mg/kg/hr maintenance dose. 3) high-dose patients had =50mg/kg loading dose with =5mg/kg/hr maintenance dose. Major or minor blood loss was defined as above or below the 90th percentile of our cohort respectively. Multivariable analysis controlled for levels fused, BMI, platelets, Hgb, OR time, 3CO, and radiographic alignment.
RESULT(S): Fifty-four (20%) patients received low-dose regimen, 133 (50%) received medium-dose and 80 (30%) received high dose. Mean blood loss was 1,551+/-1,295 ml, intraoperative units RBCs 1.52+/-2, and perioperative units RBCs 2.3+/-2.3. Mean major blood loss was 4,566+/-1,516ml and minor blood loss 1,236+/-755ml. Compared to the low-dose group, patients in the high-dose group had 77.8% decreased odds of major blood loss (OR 0.222; P=0.007), decreased blood loss (Coef. -540.92ml; P=0.019), units transfused intraoperatively (Coef. -.739 units; P < 0.001), and units transfused perioperatively (Coef. -0.328 units; P=0.025). Compared to medium-dose group, the high-dose group had less units transfused intraoperatively (Coef. -.59 units; P < 0.001) and perioperatively (Coef. -.42 units; P < 0.001) with no difference in blood loss. There was no difference between the medium and low dose groups in blood loss or units transfused. There was no association between high-dose TXA regimen and increased rates of DVT, PE, or any medical complication before six weeks. No patients had a seizure.
CONCLUSION(S): In this multicenter prospectively collected database, ASD patients receiving high-dose intraoperative TXA have decreased odds of major blood loss, less RBC transfusions intraoperatively and 540ml less blood loss compared to low dose TXA, without additional risk of seizure or thromboembolic complications. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Several studies have suggested that Hounsfield units (HU) in the spine are associated with increased complications for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess whether there exists a threshold for HU that is associated with increased blood loss following ASD surgery. We hypothesize that HU below thresholds on spinal CT are predictive of increased blood loss during surgery and implant complications within 90 days after surgery for ASD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: ASD patients who had HU measured in the spine were identified from a multicenter database. OUTCOME MEASURES: High Intraoperative blood loss and implant complications within 90 days of surgery.
METHOD(S): HU at L1, upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) and total averages were assessed. Threshold linear regression with Bayesian information criteria was utilized to identify optimal cut-offs for predicting high blood loss (>2100mL, top 25% by volume) or any implant complications within 90 days. Implant complications included loosening, breakage and dislocation of rods or screws. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized controlling for age, gender, comorbidity, osteotomy and levels fused.
RESULT(S): Of 527 patients included, the mean age was 61+/-14. Mean L1 HU was 154.59+/-87, UIV HU was 175.1+/-304, and total average HU was 165+/-168. There were 59 patients with high blood loss (mean 5,026+/-233ml) and 467 with low blood loss (1,331+/-39.5ml). Threshold regression analysis identified that a cut-off of =140.33 was optimal for predicting high blood loss and =99.75 total average HU was optimal for predicting implant complications within 90 days of surgery. On multivariable analysis, L1 HU less than 140 was associated with 1.57x higher odds of high blood loss (P=0.032). Total average HU less than 100 was associated with a 3.6x higher odds of having an implant related failure within 90 days of surgery (P=0.035).
CONCLUSION(S): In this prospective multi-center study, Those with L1 HU=140 had a 1.52x higher odds of high blood loss. Patients with an average HUof =100 have 3.6x higher odds of implant related complication within 90 days of surgery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sacralization of L5 is a condition that affects 15% of the population. Because of the increased L5 articulations to the sacrum, it is unclear how pelvic incidence and spinopelvic parameters should be measured. PURPOSE: Determine whether patients with L5 sacralization should be radiographically measured with relation to the L5 or S1 vertebrae. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity database. OUTCOME MEASURES: ODI, SF36 PCS, radiographic spinopelvic parameters.
METHOD(S): Linear regression modeling was used to determine normative TPA and PI-LL based on PI and age in a database of asymptomatic subjects. In an adult spinal deformity database, patients with radiographic evidence of L5 sacralization, had PI, LL and TPA measured from the superior endplate S1 and then also from L5. Patients with instrumentation below L4 at baseline were excluded. The differences in TPA and PI-LL from normative were calculated in the sacralization cohort relative to L5 and S1 and correlated to ODI. Patients were grouped based on PI-LL Schwab modifier (0, +, ++) utilizing their L5 PI-LL and S1 PI-LL. Baseline ODI and SF36 PCS were compared across and within groups and their respective SRS Schwab class.
RESULT(S): Among 1,179 ASD patients, 276 (23.4%) had transitional anatomy, 176 with sacralized L5 (14.9%) and 100 (8.48%) with lumbarization of S1. The 176 with sacralized L5 were analyzed. PI (24.5 +/- 11.0 vs 55.7 +/- 12.0, p=0.001), TPA (11.2 +/- 12.0 vs 20.3 +/- 12.5, p=0.001) and PI-LL (0.67 +/- 21.1 vs 11.4 +/- 20.8, p=0.001) measured utilizing the L5 superior endplate were significantly smaller than those who were measured relative to S1. When measured from S1, 76 (43. %) of patients were SRS Schwab 0, 45 (25.6%) were Class +, and 55 (31.3%) were class ++ compared to 124 (70.5%), 22 (12.5%), and 30 (17.0%) measured from L5 respectively. There were significant differences in ODI and PCS as the Schwab grade increased regardless of L5 or S1 measurement. The L5 group had higher PCS functional scores for Schwab 0 and ++ relative to same grades in the S1 group. Offset from normative TPA (0.5 +/- 11.1 vs 9.6 +/- 10.8, p=0.001) and PI-LL (0.67 +/- 21.1 vs 11.4 +/- 20.8, p=0.001) were smaller when measuring from L5. Moreover, S1 measurements were more correlated with disability by ODI (TPA offset from normative, S1: R=0.326 vs L5: R=0.285; PI-LL Offset from normative, S1: R=0.318 vs L5: R=0.274).
CONCLUSION(S): Measuring the PI at L5 in sacralized anatomy results in underestimating the PILL Schwab grade in a percentage of patients and less correlation with HRQLs. Patients with sacralized L5s should have spinopelvic parameters measured relative to S1. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous literature has demonstrated the advantages of lateral single position surgery (L-SPS) in the perioperative period; however, 2-year postoperative outcomes of this novel technique have not yet been compared to circumferential anterior-posterior fusion (FLIP) at 2-years postoperatively. PURPOSE: Evaluate the feasibility and safety of L-SPS technique against the conventional FLIP. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multi-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing primary AP (ALIF or LLIF) fusions with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between L2-S1 with minimum 2-year followup at three institutions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included levels fused, operative time, estimated blood loss and perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI-LL mismatch and segmental lumbar lordosis.
METHOD(S): Patients were grouped as L-SPS if anterior and posterior portions of the procedure were performed in the lateral decubitus position, and FLIP if patients were repositioned from supine or lateral to prone position for the posterior portion of the procedure. Groups were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, perioperative and radiological outcomes, complications and reoperations up to 2 years follow-up. Measures were compared using independent samples or paired t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 442 pts met inclusion, including 352 L-SPS and 90 FLIP pts. Significant differences were noted in age (62.4 vs. 56.9; p= < 0.001) and smoking status (7% vs. 16%; p=0.023) between the L-SPS and FLIP groups. No differences between L-SPS and FLIP were noted in gender (57.4% female vs 57.8% female, p=1.000), BMI (30.0kg/m2 vs 29.3kg/m2; p=0.318). No differences were noted in number of levels fused between L-SPS and FLIP (1.45vs 1.50; p=0.533), proportion including ALIF (38% vs 39%; p=0.809), or the proportion of surgeries including L5-S1 (38%vs 31%; p=0.222). Perioperative outcomes: L-SPS demonstrated significantly lower Op time (97.7min vs 297.0 min; p < 0.001), fluoro dose (36.5mGy vs 78.8mGy; p < 0.001), EBL (88.8mL vs 270.0mL; p < 0.001), and LOS (1.91 days vs. 3.61 days; p < 0.001) compared to FLIP. L-SPS also demonstrated significantly fewer post-op complications than FLIP (21.9% vs 34.4%; p=0.013), specifically regarding rates of ileus (0.0% vs 5.6%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in remaining surgical site, neurological, or medical complications between groups. Reoperation: N=no differences in reoperation were noted at 30-day (1.7%L-SPS vs 4.4%FLIP, p=0.125), 90-day (5.1%L-SPS vs 5.6%FLIP, p=0.795) or 2-year follow-up (9.7%L-SPS vs 12.2%FLIP; p=0.441). The most common reason for return to OR was Adjacent Segment Disease, (L-SPS 3.1% vs. FLIP 7.8%; p=0.067). Pseudarthrosis rates were similar between groups (0.0%L-SPS vs. 1.1%FLIP; p=0.204). Radiological Outcomes: no significant differences were noted in rates of radiological fusion (94.3% L-SPS vs 97.8%FLIP; p=0.266) or subsidence (6.9%L-SPS vs 12.2%FLIP; p=0.260). There were no differences noted between L-SPS and FLIP in change in LL from Baseline to 1-year (3.5 vs 2.8; p=0.466) and post-op to 1yr (-0.18 vs -0.51; p=0.777), or in PI-LL from Baseline to 1-year (-3.5 vs -3.2; p=0.835) and from post-op to 1-year (0.71 vs 0.71; 0.998).
CONCLUSION(S): L-SPS improves safety, improves operative efficiency and reduces complications in the perioperative period while maintaining similar efficacy of AP fusion at 2-year followup in treating degenerative lumbar spinal conditions. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright