Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:A jumped facet joint is defined by when the inferior articular process of the superior vertebra becomes locked anterior to the superior articular process of the inferior vertebra. These typically traumatic lesions are exceedingly rare in the thoracic spine. Here, we present a patient with a unilateral jumped facet joint in the upper thoracic spine treated with open reduction and an instrumented fusion. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS:A 45-year-old male presented after a significant motor vehicle accident. In the emergency room, he had a Glasgow Coma Score of 13 without any neurologic deficit. The thoracic computed tomography (CT) showed a significant jumped left facet at the T2-T3 level. Two days later, utilizing intraoperative CT-guided navigation and neuromonitoring, he underwent open reduction of the T2-T3 jumped facet plus an instrumented T1-T5 fusion. X-rays taken 3-month postoperatively showed a stable construct. Six months postoperatively, he remained neurologically intact. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A unilateral jumped thoracic facet may be present in patients with fractured ribs. The mechanism of injury is most likely axial rotation. Both CT and magnetic resonance imaging studies allow for early detection of these very rare lesions and warrant open reduction and instrumented fusion.

BACKGROUND:Identifying the histopathological diagnosis of a spinal tumor is the necessary step prior to pursuing subsequent treatment. Both minimally invasive and open spinal procedures have been described as useful methods of obtaining tumor tissue for diagnosis but differ by their limitations. Minimally invasive techniques, such as computed tomography-guided biopsies, can expose the patient to radiation, and the tissue obtained may be nondiagnostic. Tubular and open procedures require collateral soft-tissue damage and may require bony removal leading to iatrogenic injury. Endoscopic approaches to the spine can be employed to avoid treatment delay in diagnosis, decrease length of stay, and provide adequate tissue for diagnosis. METHODS:We describe the surgical planning, tumor localization, and transforaminal endoscopic approach for tissue diagnosis of a lumbar spinal mass in a patient with a known history of Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma after a nondiagnostic computed tomography- guided biopsy. Final histopathological diagnosis of the lumbar spinal mass was consistent with large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS:We demonstrate the application of an endoscopic transforaminal approach in spine oncology. We also describe our technique on how we use a beveled working channel to obtain a large tissue core sample for definitive diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:International consensus paper on a unified nomenclature for full-endoscopic spine surgery. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Minimally invasive endoscopic spinal procedures have undergone rapid development during the past decade. Evolution of working-channel endoscopes and surgical instruments as well as innovation in surgical techniques have expanded the types of spinal pathology that can be addressed. However, there is in the literature a heterogeneous nomenclature defining approach corridors and procedures, and this lack of common language has hampered communication between endoscopic spine surgeons, patients, hospitals, and insurance providers. METHODS:The current report summarizes the nomenclature reported for working-channel endoscopic procedures that address cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal pathology. RESULTS:We propose a uniform system that defines the working-channel endoscope (full-endoscopic), approach corridor (anterior, posterior, interlaminar, transforaminal), spinal segment (cervical, thoracic, lumbar), and procedure performed (eg, discectomy, foraminotomy). We suggest the following nomenclature for the most common full-endoscopic procedures: posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF), transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy (TETD), transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD), transforaminal lumbar foraminotomy (TELF), interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD), interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression (IE-LRD), and lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD). CONCLUSIONS:We believe that it is critical to delineate a consensus nomenclature to facilitate uniformity of working-channel endoscopic procedures within academic scholarship. This will hopefully facilitate development, standardization of procedures, teaching, and widespread acceptance of full-endoscopic spinal procedures.

BACKGROUND:To evaluate the feasibility of awake transforaminal endoscopic surgery in the management of symptomatic spinal metastases. METHODS:Transforaminal endoscopic spine procedures were performed by 1 surgeon in 325 patients over a period of 4 years from 2014 to 2018. Four of these patients suffered from radicular pain secondary to nerve compression from metastatic spine disease and are the basis of our analysis. Data was evaluated retrospectively in these patients with a minimum follow up of 1 year. RESULTS:All 4 patients treated with transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery for decompression of their metastatic spine disease had successful resolution of their symptoms without any perioperative complications and only brief recovery periods required. CONCLUSIONS:Awake endoscopic surgery for the treatment of symptomatic metastatic spine disease is an effective outpatient surgical option for the treatment of patients suffering from radicular pain due to nerve compression from metastatic spine disease.

BACKGROUND:The authors present 4 techniques for fully-endoscopic cervical spine surgery with accompanying case series: (I) posterior cervical unilateral laminectomy and bilateral decompression, (II) posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF), (III) anterior cervical discectomy, and (IV) anterior transcorporeal discectomy. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery cases at one high-volume endoscopic center in the United States and present clinical data extracted from endoscopic spine surgery performed over a 6-year period with a minimum clinical follow up of 1 year. RESULTS:A series of 114 patients who underwent fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery between 2012 and 2018 is presented. Clinical results and technical data are presented. CONCLUSIONS:Fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery is an emerging surgical technique for addressing cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy through a minimally invasive approach.

BACKGROUND:Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a widely performed lumbar fusion procedure especially suited for treating lower lumbar degenerative disk disease, discogenic disease, and revision of failed posterior fusion. Advantages of the technique include maximizing implant size and correction of lordosis, and disadvantages include approach-related complications such as retrograde ejaculation, visceral injury, and vascular injury. METHODS:Transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery is an effective minimally invasive surgical approach that can be utilized to treat many complications of complex spine procedures. RESULTS:Reported here are 2 cases illustrating the success of treating recurrent lumbar radiculopathy with transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery as a minimally invasive solution to an ALIF complication. CONCLUSIONS:Transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery is suggested here as a possible treatment approach for lumbar radiculopathy after ALIF.

BACKGROUND:A severe grade I and grade II spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 creates an anatomic distortion that can compress the traversing S1 nerve with a retropulsed S1 vertebral body endplate and (sometimes) herniated disc. OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the feasibility for awake, endoscopic treatment of symptomatic radiculopathy secondary to the deformity that results from the retropulsed superior endplate of S1 in grade I/II L5-S1 spondylolisthesis in patients with and without previous fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective chart review. SETTING:This study took place in a single-center, academic hospital. METHODS:In 325 patients over 4 years there were 19 patients (8 with previous L5-S1 fusions and 11 without) treated with transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery for decompression of the neural foramen at L5-S1 in the setting of spondylolisthesis (at least 5 mm) and a retropulsed superior vertebral endplate of S1. RESULTS:The average preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg scores were 6.1 and 6.7, and the average preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was 50.4. The average 1-year VAS back and leg scores were 2.2 and 2.2, and the average 1-year postoperative ODI score was 20.5. There was no statistically significant difference between the fusion and nonfusion groups. Patients treated were patients who presented with an S1 or L5 and S1 radiculopathy as their primary complaint and a L5-S1 spondylolisthesis of 5 mm or greater. Patients treated had no instability on flexion-extension x-rays. Eleven patients had not had fusions at L5-S1, and 8 patients had previous fusions at L5-S1 but still had a spondylolisthesis of at least 5 mm. The average slip for nonfusion patients was 8.4 mm, and the average slip for fusion patients was 8.8 mm. At 1-year follow-up the improvement in VAS back scores was 44% in the nonfusion group and 49% in the fusion group, and the improvement in VAS leg scores was 84% in the nonfusion group and 58% in the fusion group. At 1-year follow-up the improvement in ODI scores was 63% in the nonfusion group and 54% in the fusion group. LIMITATIONS:Retrospective case series. CONCLUSIONS:Awake, endoscopic surgery for the treatment of radiculopathy in the setting of a grade I/II L5-S1 spondylolisthesis is a viable minimally invasive treatment option for patients with radiculopathy in the setting of a stable L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with foraminal narrowing caused by a retropulsed superior endplate of the S1 vertebral body.

BACKGROUND:Surgical options for treating thoracic spinal cord compression that results from circumferential stenosis typically involve instrumented fusion procedures. The authors present here an outpatient, awake, endoscopic surgical option for treating thoracic stenosis that avoids fusion. OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the outcome and safety of combining fully endoscopic transforaminal and posterior approaches for ventral and dorsal decompression of thoracic spinal stenosis. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective case review. SETTING:Single-center acute-care hospital. METHODS:Eight patients with single-level, significant stenosis of the thoracic spinal canal were treated with fully endoscopic transforaminal and posterior approaches to achieve 360° ventral and dorsal decompression. Patients were followed up to 30 months postoperatively. Axial back pain was measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and paired Student t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS:Successful decompression was achieved in all 8 patients. All surgeries were performed as outpatient procedures under local anesthesia with intravenous (IV) sedation. There were no intraoperative dura tears, spinal cord or nerve root injury, postoperative infections, or cases of iatrogenic-induced segmental instability. All patients had significant improvement with VAS scores significantly lower postoperatively. LIMITATIONS:Small case series evaluated retrospectively with 15-month average follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:Combining fully endoscopic transforaminal and posterior approaches for both ventral and dorsal decompression under local anesthesia with IV sedation is an effective and safe minimally invasive surgical treatment for thoracic spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND:The lateral fusion procedure is a newer minimally invasive approach to indirectly decompressing and fusing a lumbar motion segment. As with many new procedures, new thoughtful approaches to recognizing and treating the complications of these procedures need to be developed. OBJECTIVES:Here we describe our experience with transforaminal endoscopic decompression for complications of lateral and oblique lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective case review. SETTING:This was a multicenter study that took place in an academic hospital, community hospital, and ambulatory surgery center. METHODS:An endoscopic treatment technique for 4 types of complications associated with lateral and oblique fusion is presented. We retrospectively reviewed cases at 3 centers in 2 countries of patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of lateral fusion complications in a 4-year period with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS:A preliminary series of 4 patients with an average age of 74.8 years (range, 69-82 years) who underwent transforaminal endoscopic procedures at the level of their lateral and oblique lumbar fusions between 2014 and 2018 is presented. Disc herniations, heterotopic bone formation, endplate fracture, and nerve root impingement by the interbody device were all treated endoscopically. LIMITATIONS:Small case series evaluated retrospectively with 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:Transforaminal endoscopic surgery is a useful minimally invasive surgical technique to treat several complications associated with lateral and oblique lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

BACKGROUND:Monostotic fibrous dysplasia rarely involves the lumbar spine. Although its optimal surgical management is unknown, some recommend complete resection to decrease the likelihood of future recurrence. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS:resection, the patient remained asymptomatic without evidence of recurrence 8 months later. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Image-guided excision of monostotic fibrous dysplasia involving the right L4 lamina and spinous process was successfully performed without clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence within 8 postoperative months.