Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:willim33

Total Results:

242


Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

Reardon, Michael J; Van Mieghem, Nicolas M; Popma, Jeffrey J; Kleiman, Neal S; Sondergaard, Lars; Mumtaz, Mubashir; Adams, David H; Deeb, G Michael; Maini, Brijeshwar; Gada, Hemal; Chetcuti, Stanley; Gleason, Thomas; Heiser, John; Lange, Rudiger; Merhi, William; Oh, Jae K; Olsen, Peter S; Piazza, Nicolo; Williams, Mathew; Windecker, Stephan; Yakubov, Steven J; Grube, Eberhard; Makkar, Raj; Lee, Joon S; Conte, John; Vang, Eric; Nguyen, Hang; Chang, Yanping; Mugglin, Andrew S; Serruys, Patrick W J C; Kappetein, Arie P
Background Although transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is an accepted alternative to surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high surgical risk, less is known about comparative outcomes among patients with aortic stenosis who are at intermediate surgical risk. Methods We evaluated the clinical outcomes in intermediate-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis in a randomized trial comparing TAVR (performed with the use of a self-expanding prosthesis) with surgical aortic-valve replacement. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or disabling stroke at 24 months in patients undergoing attempted aortic-valve replacement. We used Bayesian analytical methods (with a margin of 0.07) to evaluate the noninferiority of TAVR as compared with surgical valve replacement. Results A total of 1746 patients underwent randomization at 87 centers. Of these patients, 1660 underwent an attempted TAVR or surgical procedure. The mean (+/-SD) age of the patients was 79.8+/-6.2 years, and all were at intermediate risk for surgery (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality, 4.5+/-1.6%). At 24 months, the estimated incidence of the primary end point was 12.6% in the TAVR group and 14.0% in the surgery group (95% credible interval [Bayesian analysis] for difference, -5.2 to 2.3%; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999). Surgery was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, and transfusion requirements, whereas TAVR had higher rates of residual aortic regurgitation and need for pacemaker implantation. TAVR resulted in lower mean gradients and larger aortic-valve areas than surgery. Structural valve deterioration at 24 months did not occur in either group. Conclusions TAVR was a noninferior alternative to surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, with a different pattern of adverse events associated with each procedure. (Funded by Medtronic; SURTAVI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01586910 .).
PMID: 28304219
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 2490202

Aorto-Right Ventricular Fistula Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Multimodality Imaging of Successful Percutaneous Closure

Vainrib, Alan F; Ibrahim, Homam; Hisamoto, Kazuhiro; Staniloae, Cezar S; Jilaihawi, Hasan; Benenstein, Ricardo J; Latson, Larry; Williams, Mathew R; Saric, Muhamed
PMCID:6034486
PMID: 30062248
ISSN: 2468-6441
CID: 3217032

DIRECT HOME DISCHARGE AND LIKELIHOOD OF 30-DAY HOSPITAL READMISSION AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR): FINDINGS FROM THE STS/ACC TVT REGISTRY [Meeting Abstract]

Dodson, John A; Williams, Mathew; Vemulapalli, Sreekanth; Manandhar, Pratik; Cohen, David; Blaum, Caroline; Zhong, Hua; Rumsfeld, John; Hochman, Judith
ISI:000397342301755
ISSN: 1558-3597
CID: 2528922

SHORT- AND MID-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL INSUFFICIENCY NOT ON HEMODIALYSIS [Meeting Abstract]

Paone, Darien; Shah, Binita; McDonald, Daniel; Thakker, Rahul; Houanche, Pascale; Neuburger, Peter; Saric, Muhamed; Staniloae, Cezar; Jilaihawi, Hasan; Querijero, Michael; Williams, Mathew
ISI:000397342301736
ISSN: 1558-3597
CID: 2528912

Early Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Suboptimal for Surgery: Results of the Evolut R U.S. Study

Popma, Jeffrey J; Reardon, Michael J; Khabbaz, Kamal; Harrison, J Kevin; Hughes, G Chad; Kodali, Susheel; George, Isaac; Deeb, G Michael; Chetcuti, Stan; Kipperman, Robert; Brown, John; Qiao, Hongyan; Slater, James; Williams, Mathew R
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate this transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) bioprosthesis in patients who are poorly suitable for surgical aortic valve (AV) replacement. BACKGROUND: A novel self-expandable TAV bioprosthesis was designed to provide a low-profile delivery system, conformable annular sealing, and the ability to resheath and reposition during deployment. METHODS: The Evolut R U.S. study included 241 patients with severe aortic stenosis who were deemed to be at least high risk for surgery treated at 23 clinical sites in the United States. Clinical outcomes at 30 days were evaluated using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. An independent echocardiography laboratory was used to evaluate hemodynamic outcomes. RESULTS: Patients were elderly (83.3 +/- 7.2 years of age) and had high surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 7.4 +/- 3.4%). The majority of patients (89.5%) were treated by iliofemoral access. Resheathing or recapturing was performed in 22.6% of patients; more than 1 valve was required in 3 patients (1.3%). The 30-day outcomes included all-cause mortality (2.5%), disabling stroke (3.3%), major vascular complications (7.5%), life-threatening or disabling bleeding (7.1%), and new permanent pacemaker (16.4%). AV hemodynamics were markedly improved at 30 days: the mean AV gradient was reduced from 48.2 +/- 13.0 mm Hg to 7.8 +/- 3.1 mm Hg (p < 0.001) and AV area increased from 0.6 +/- 0.2 cm2 to 1.9 +/- 0.5 cm2 (p < 0.001). Moderate residual paravalvular leak was identified in 5.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this novel self-expanding TAV bioprosthesis is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis who are suboptimal for surgery. (Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R U.S. Clinical Study; NCT02207569).
PMID: 28183466
ISSN: 1876-7605
CID: 2437492

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Self-expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at High Risk for Surgery: One-Year Results from the Evolut R US Pivotal Study [Meeting Abstract]

Popma, Jeffrey J.; Harrison, J. Kevin; Hughes, G. Chad; Kodali, Susheel; George, Isaac; Oh, Jae; Slater, James; Williams, Mathew; Gilbert, Colleen
ISI:000397332900038
ISSN: 0735-1097
CID: 3589362

Sex-Specific Differences After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients: An Analysis from the PARTNER 2 Randomized Trial [Meeting Abstract]

White, Jonathan; Doshi, Darshan; Williams, Mathew; Szerlip, Molly; Squiers, John; Webb, John; Hahn, Rebecca; Kirtane, Ajay; Litherland, Claire; Cohen, David; Tuzcu, E. Murat; Szeto, Wilson; Zajarias, Alan; Malaisrie, S. Chris; Alu, Maria; Smith, Craig; Leon, Martin; Mack, Michael; Kodali, Susheel
ISI:000398590400212
ISSN: 0735-1097
CID: 3589372

Rethinking the gold standard of correction for paravalvular leak: Why correct when you can prevent?

Yaffee, David W; Williams, Mathew R; Grossi, Eugene A
PMID: 27663523
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 2255082

Evaluation of Flow After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis of the PARTNER Randomized Clinical Trial

Anjan, Venkatesh Y; Herrmann, Howard C; Pibarot, Philippe; Stewart, William J; Kapadia, Samir; Tuzcu, E Murat; Babaliaros, Vasilis; Thourani, Vinod H; Szeto, Wilson Y; Bavaria, Joseph E; Kodali, Susheel; Hahn, Rebecca T; Williams, Mathew; Miller, D Craig; Douglas, Pamela S; Leon, Martin B
Importance: Low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis (AS) is an independent predictor of mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). Little is known about improvement in flow after AVR and its effects on survival. Objective: To determine whether higher flow (left-ventricular stroke volume index [LVSVI]) after transcatheter AVR (TAVR) would indicate better clinical outcomes in this at-risk population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A substudy analysis of data from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) randomized clinical trial and continued-access registry was conducted. A total of 984 participants with evaluable echocardiograms and baseline LF AS (LVSVI
PMID: 27437665
ISSN: 2380-6591
CID: 2185412

Early clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable, high-risk and intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis

Kodali, Susheel; Thourani, Vinod H; White, Jonathon; Malaisrie, S Chris; Lim, Scott; Greason, Kevin L; Williams, Mathew; Guerrero, Mayra; Eisenhauer, Andrew C; Kapadia, Samir; Kereiakes, Dean J; Herrmann, Howard C; Babaliaros, Vasilis; Szeto, Wilson Y; Hahn, Rebecca T; Pibarot, Philippe; Weissman, Neil J; Leipsic, Jonathon; Blanke, Philipp; Whisenant, Brian K; Suri, Rakesh M; Makkar, Raj R; Ayele, Girma M; Svensson, Lars G; Webb, John G; Mack, Michael J; Smith, Craig R; Leon, Martin B
AIMS: Based on randomized trials using first-generation devices, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is well established in the treatment of high-risk (HR) patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). To date, there is a paucity of adjudicated, prospective data evaluating outcomes with newer generation devices and in lower risk patients. We report early outcomes of a large, multicentre registry of inoperable, HR, and intermediate-risk (IR) patients undergoing treatment with the next-generation SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (THV). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with severe, symptomatic AS (583 high surgical risk or inoperable and 1078 IR) were enrolled in a multicentre, non-randomized registry at 57 sites in the USA and Canada. All patients received TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 system via transfemoral (n = 1443, 86.9%) and transapical or transaortic (n = 218, 13.1%) access routes. The rate of 30-day all-cause mortality was 2.2% in HR/inoperable patients [mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score 8.7%] and 1.1% in IR patients (mean STS score 5.3%); cardiovascular mortality was 1.4 and 0.9%, respectively. In HR/inoperable patients, the 30-day rate of major/disabling stroke was 0.9%, major bleeding 14.0%, major vascular complications 5.1%, and requirement for permanent pacemaker 13.3%. In IR patients, the 30-day rate of major/disabling stroke was 1.0%, major bleeding 10.6%, major vascular complications 6.1%, and requirement for permanent pacemaker 10.1%. Mean overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score increased from 47.8 to 67.8 (HR/inoperable, P < 0.0001) and 54.7 to 74.0 (IR, P < 0.0001). Overall, paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days was none/trace in 55.9% of patients, mild in 40.7%, moderate in 3.4%, and severe in 0.0%. Mean gradients among patients with paired baseline and 30-day or discharge echocardiograms decreased from 45.8 mmHg at baseline to 11.4 mmHg at 30 days, while aortic valve area increased from 0.69 to 1.67 cm2. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPIEN 3 THV system was associated with low rates of 30-day mortality and major/disabling stroke as well as low rates of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01314313.
PMID: 27190101
ISSN: 1522-9645
CID: 2112172