Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND AIM/OBJECTIVE:Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare condition associated with hepatic venous outflow obstruction classically treated with portosystemic shunts or liver transplantation. Recent reports indicate promising results with the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the treatment of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We reviewed a 10-year single-institution experience with TIPS in patients diagnosed with BCS. RESULTS:Eleven patients with BCS underwent TIPS procedures, 3 of whom carried a diagnosis of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, a relative contraindication for liver transplantation. One TIPS procedure was unsuccessful for technical reasons. No patient suffered mortality or major morbidity related to the TIPS procedure. The mean reduction of portal venous pressures was 43.7%, with a mean decrease of 73% in the pressure gradient. Of the 7 patients where long-term follow-up was available, 57% had shunts which remained patent but required several nonsurgical revisions for occlusion, with an average assisted patency of 37.5 months. CONCLUSIONS:TIPS is an effective modality in the treatment of patients with BCS, especially for those who are not candidates for liver transplantation. TIPS can be successfully used as a bridge to surgical portosystemic shunting, as well as liver transplantation, but may cause technical difficulties when performing transplantation.

Most successful protocols for renal transplantation across ABO incompatible (ABOi) barriers have utilized splenectomy as part of the pre-conditioning process. We recently described successful ABOi transplantation using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in lieu of splenectomy. In the current study, we hypothesized that plasmapheresis (PP) and low dose CMV hyper-immunoglobulin (CMVIg) alone would be sufficient to achieve successful engraftment of ABOi kidneys. We describe four blood type incompatible patients who received live donor renal transplants from A1 (two patients), A2 (one patient), and B (one patient) donors. All patients started with antihuman globulin (AHG) phase titers of 64 or higher and were pre-conditioned with PP/CMVIg but not splenectomy or anti-CD20. All 4 patients underwent successful transplantation and have a mean current serum creatinine of 1.1 (range: 0.9-1.2). There were no episodes of antibody mediated rejection. Rapid allograft accommodation may limit the need for long-term antibody suppression provided by splenectomy or anti-CD20, thereby eliminating the added infectious risk of these modalities and removing another disincentive to ABOi transplantation.

A national kidney paired donation (KPD) program will substantially increase transplant opportunities for recipients with blood type incompatible or cross-match positive donors. It seems likely that donor-recipient pairs with certain blood types, races or restrictions will wait longer than others for a match, although no data exist to confirm this assumption. We simulated patients and characterized the predicted waiting times for different blood type sub-groups, as well as the effects of patient-imposed restrictions on waiting time. We also compared waiting times of different racial sub-groups. Almost all patients with panel-reactive antibody (PRA) less than 80% match within a few months in a national KPD program, with the longest waiting time seen by O recipients with AB donors. Highly sensitized patients wait considerably longer, especially those unwilling to travel or accept older donors, and those with AB or B donors may not match in a timely manner. Although patients are better served by matching in a combined pool than within their own race, racial inequalities exist and bonus points can offset some of these differences. These data provide the first waiting time predictions that can aid patients with incompatible donors in choosing between KPD and desensitization, and can also facilitate planning for a national KPD program.

Options for utilizing live donor kidneys from those who are blood type incompatible or crossmatch positive with their intended recipients include kidney paired donation (KPD), list paired donation (LPD) and desensitization. KPD provides live donor kidneys for both recipients but requires a match to another incompatible pair, while LPD utilizes the deceased donor pool but is restricted by ethical and logistic concerns. We simulated patients and their potential donors to determine which recipients could receive a kidney through KPD and LPD. With smaller populations (100 pairs or fewer), more kidneys were matched through LPD, although the greatest benefit was derived from a combination of LPD and KPD. With increasing population sizes, more patients were matched through KPD, including almost all patients who would have been eligible for LPD. At population sizes predicted to be achieved by a national paired donation system, the role of LPD became minimal, with only 3.9% of pairs unmatched through KPD eligible for LPD. Considerable overlap was seen between the pairs unmatchable by KPD and those ineligible for LPD, namely less-demanded donors and hard-to-match recipients. For this population, the best option may be desensitization.

CONTEXT: Blood type and crossmatch incompatibility will exclude at least one third of patients in need from receiving a live donor kidney transplant. Kidney paired donation (KPD) offers incompatible donor/recipient pairs the opportunity to match for compatible transplants. Despite its increasing popularity, very few transplants have resulted from KPD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential impact of improved matching schemes on the number and quality of transplants achievable with KPD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: We developed a model that simulates pools of incompatible donor/recipient pairs. We designed a mathematically verifiable optimized matching algorithm and compared it with the scheme currently used in some centers and regions. Simulated patients from the general community with characteristics drawn from distributions describing end-stage renal disease patients eligible for renal transplantation and their willing and eligible live donors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of kidneys matched, HLA mismatch of matched kidneys, and number of grafts surviving 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: A national optimized matching algorithm would result in more transplants (47.7% vs 42.0%, P<.001), better HLA concordance (3.0 vs 4.5 mismatched antigens; P<.001), more grafts surviving at 5 years (34.9% vs 28.7%; P<.001), and a reduction in the number of pairs required to travel (2.9% vs 18.4%; P<.001) when compared with an extension of the currently used first-accept scheme to a national level. Furthermore, highly sensitized patients would benefit 6-fold from a national optimized scheme (2.3% vs 14.1% successfully matched; P<.001). Even if only 7% of patients awaiting kidney transplantation participated in an optimized national KPD program, the health care system could save as much as $750 million. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a national KPD program and a mathematically optimized matching algorithm yields more matches with lower HLA disparity. Optimized matching affords patients the flexibility of customizing their matching priorities and the security of knowing that the greatest number of high-quality matches will be found and distributed equitably.

CONTEXT: First proposed 2 decades ago, live kidney paired donation (KPD) was considered a promising new approach to addressing the shortage of organs for transplantation. Ethical, administrative, and logistical barriers initially proved formidable and prevented the implementation of KPD programs in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of KPD for the management of patients with incompatible donors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective series of paired donations matched and transplanted from a pool of blood type or crossmatch incompatible donors and recipients with end-stage renal disease (6 conventional and 4 unconventional KPD transplants) at a US tertiary referral center (between June 2001 and November 2004) with expertise in performing transplants in patients with high immunologic risk. INTERVENTION: Kidney paired donation and live donor renal transplantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient survival, graft survival, serum creatinine levels, rejection episodes. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients received transplants through 10 paired donations including 2 triple exchanges at Johns Hopkins Hospital. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-42 months), the patient survival rate was 100% and the graft survival rate was 95.5%. Twenty-one of the 22 patients have functioning grafts with a median 6-month serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL (range, 0.8-1.8 mg/dL) (106.1 micromol/L [range, 70.7-159.1 micromol/L]). There were no instances of antibody-mediated rejection despite the inclusion of 5 patients who were highly sensitized to HLA antigens due to previous exposure to foreign tissue. Four patients developed acute cellular rejection (18%). CONCLUSIONS: This series of patients who received transplants from a single-center KPD pool provides evidence that recipients with incompatible live donors, even those with rare blood type combinations or high degrees of HLA antigen sensitization, can receive transplants through KPD with graft survival rates that appear to be equivalent to directed, compatible live donor transplants. If these results can be generalized, broader availability of KPD to the estimated 6000 patients with incompatible donors could result in a large expansion of the donor pool

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to determine if focused appendiceal computed tomography with colon contrast (FACT-CC) increases the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. METHODS:A 5-year retrospective review was conducted of a university hospital database of 283 patients (age 0.8 to 19.3 years; mean, 11.3 years) treated with appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. RESULTS:Of the 283 patients in whom appendectomies were performed, 268 were confirmed by pathologic analysis of the specimen to have acute appendicitis for a diagnostic accuracy in our institution of 94.7%. Ninety-six patients (34%) underwent FACT-CC scans as part of their preoperative evaluation. The sensitivity of the computed tomography (CT) scan was 94.6%, and the positive predictive value was 95.6%. In girls older than 10 years, CT imaging was not significantly more accurate in predicting appendicitis than examination alone (93.9% v. 87.5%; P =.46). CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative FACT-CC did not increase the accuracy in diagnosing appendicitis when compared with patients diagnosed by history, physical examination and laboratory studies. If there was a strong suspicion of appendicitis, a negative CT scan did not exclude the diagnosis of appendicitis. However, focused appendiceal CT scan is a sensitive test with a high positive predictive value and may be useful in a patient with an atypical history or examination.

A number of molecular abnormalities have been described in association with the progression from normal thyroid tissue to benign adenomas to well-differentiated and finally anaplastic epithelial thyroid cancer. These include upregulation of proliferative factors, such as growth hormones and oncogenes, downregulation of apoptotic and cell-cycle inhibitory factors, such as tumor suppressors, disruption of normal cell-to-cell interactions, and cellular immortalization. The progression model for thyroid carcinoma has not been proven, but evidence suggests that an evolutionary molecular process is involved, especially in the development of follicular thyroid cancers for which there are distinct intermediate phenotypes. We present a comprehensive evaluation of factors involved in thyroid tumorigenesis and attempt to describe preliminary attributes of a progression model. The organization of this model should also provide a template for the incorporation of new information as it is derived from large-scale genomic studies.

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is currently the best diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules. However, the cytologic category of indeterminate or suspicious lesion, which is found in 10-15% of cases, remains a challenge. Since neither clinical presentation nor intraoperative frozen section is often helpful in differentiating these lesions and since surgical procedures for benign and malignant lesions differ, there is a clear need to develop ancillary tests. In this review we identify 12 potential markers of thyroid malignancy that have been examined in thyroid cytologic samples. Although many of these markers hold promise as adjuncts to FNA cytology, multicenter studies have often shown limitations in the predictive value of these assays due to lack of specificity, sensitivity or both. The recent development, however, of tissue microarray techniques to validate promising new markers suggests that improvements in the approach to indeterminate thyroid FNA samples may soon be at hand. This review presents a summary of the issues facing the development of a clinically useful diagnostic test in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

The MIS type II receptor is expressed at high levels in the Mullerian duct and in Sertoli cells and granulosa cells of the embryonic and adult gonads. The presence of MIS type II and type I receptors in tissues and cell lines derived from breast and prostate suggests that the prostate and mammary glands may be additional targets for MIS action. In both breast and prostate cancer cells, MIS activated NFkB DNA binding activity and induced IEX-1, an immediate early gene which regulates cell growth and apoptosis. Exposure of cells to MIS inhibited growth by increasing the fraction of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and by inducing apoptosis. These results suggest that MIS may be a putative mediator of growth regulatory signals in the breast and prostate.