Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: Previous tracheostomy has been considered a relative contraindication for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients with a history of previous tracheostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center case series of all consecutive patients requiring repeat tracheostomy for continued mechanical ventilatory support. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a tertiary-care referral center. SUBJECTS: Fourteen patients (eight female, six male) with a median age of 70 yrs (range, 33-94). All patients had previously undergone tracheostomy. INTERVENTION: Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects' previous tracheostomies dated back between 10 days and 8 yrs. Present intubation time before percutaneous dilational tracheostomy varied between 4 and 30 days. Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy was performed successfully in all 14 patients by trained pulmonologists and surgeons. Eleven patients received an 8-mm and three received a 7-mm tracheostomy tube. There were no significant periprocedural complications, and no patient required surgical revision. The only postprocedural complication was accidental decannulation in one patient, which was managed with repeat percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Trained physicians can safely perform bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy after previous tracheostomy. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy offers an alternative to surgical tracheostomy in this particular patient population and should not be considered contraindicated.

OBJECTIVES: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) can be a significant cause of morbidity in lung transplant (LT) recipients. Risk factors include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, particularly primary infection, and immunosuppression. This article updates the incidence and presentation of PTLD at our lung transplant program. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the immunosuppression, EBV serology, and cases of PTLD among 129 lung transplant recipients at risk who survived > 1 month. RESULTS: There were two cases of PTLD among 129 LT patients, 2/129 (1.6%). One of these patients was among the 6 EBV seroconverters, 1/6 (16.7%), and had a typical presentation of PTLD in the allograft resulting in dissemination and death. The second case of PTLD developed in an EBV seropositive recipient who presented 33 months following LT with isolated colonic involvement. He subsequently died from chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PTLD in a LT program with a large EBV seropositive population is low, 1.6%. The presentation of PTLD in LT recipients is variable and may present typically with allograft involvement in the first year following transplantation, or late with isolated, extrapulmonic involvement.