Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in breast cancer treatment, breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) continues to be a significant problem for many survivors. Some BCRL risk factors may be largely unavoidable, such as mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), or radiation therapy. Potentially avoidable risk factors unrelated to breast cancer treatment include minor upper extremity infections, injury or trauma to the arm, overuse of the limb, and air travel. This study investigates how providing information about BCRL affects the cognitive and symptomatic outcome of breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Data were collected from 136 breast cancer survivors using a Demographic and Medical Information interview instrument, a Lymphedema Education Status interview instrument, a Knowledge Test for cognitive outcome, and the Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire for symptom outcome. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, t tests, chi-square (chi(2)) tests, and regression. RESULTS: BCRL information was given to 57% of subjects during treatment. The mean number of lymphedema-related symptoms was 3 symptoms. Patients who received information reported significantly fewer symptoms and scored significantly higher in the knowledge test. After controlling for confounding factors, patient education remains an additional predictor of BCRL outcome. Significantly fewer women who received information about BCRL reported swelling, heaviness, impaired shoulder mobility, seroma formation, and breast swelling. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors who received information about BCRL had significantly reduced symptoms and increased knowledge about BCRL. In clinical practice, breast cancer survivors should be engaged in supportive dialogues so they can be educated about ways to reduce their risk of developing BCRL.

BACKGROUND: Population-based overall patterns of surgical management of the axilla in women with operable breast cancer during the era of adoption of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) were studied. METHODS: Women with operable breast carcinoma residing in 14 geographic areas of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries (1998-2004, n=239,661) were assessed for axillary surgical patterns of care. RESULTS: Use of SLNB increased from 11 to 59%. Use of no axillary surgery decreased from 14 to 6.6%. In pathologic node-negative women, use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) decreased from 94 to 36%. Independent factors most associated with failure to receive SLNB included diagnosis year (2000: 62%; 2004: 29%), surgery (mastectomy: 64%; breast-conserving surgery: 36%), tumor size (T3: 71%; T2: 56%; T1: 40%), age (>or= 70 years: 50%; <70 years: 45%), grade (high: 42%; low: 38%), urbanity (non-large metropolitan area: 49%; large metropolitan area: 42%), and, by quartile, poverty (highest: 47%; lowest: 35%), and white-collar employment (lowest: 56%; highest: 47%). In pathologic node-positive women who had SLNB, failure to undergo completion ALND increased from 20% in 1998 to 32% in 2004. Patients with smaller, lower-grade tumors, and those with smaller size of nodal metastasis, lack of extracapsular extension, age >or= 70 years, increased linguistic isolation, African-American or Hispanic race/ethnicity, and white-collar employment were less likely to undergo completion ALND. CONCLUSIONS: Management of the axilla changed dramatically during the period of rapid adoption of SLNB. Patterns of care suggest both appropriate and inappropriate selection for SLNB and ALND

BACKGROUND: Papillary breast lesions comprise a spectrum of histopathologic diagnoses ranging from benign papillomas to papillary carcinomas. There is ongoing controversy regarding the management of papillary lesions diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB). Some authors advocate observation of papillary lesions when the CNB is benign, while others recommend surgical excision of all papillary lesions. The current study assessed the adequacy of CNB in evaluating papillary breast lesions. METHODS: A search of the pathology database at our institution identified 122 papillary lesions diagnosed by CNB. The study population consisted of 71 papillary lesions that were subsequently surgically excised. RESULTS: Of the 71 papillary lesions excised, 8 were malignant, 16 were atypical, and 47 were benign at the time of CNB. Of the 47 papillary lesions thought to be benign, 13 (28%) revealed atypia and 4 (9%) revealed malignancy upon surgical excision. Of the 13 atypical papillary lesions on CNB, 7 lesions (54%) were associated with malignancy upon excision. Slightly over half the upgrades were due to finding atypia or malignancy in the tissue surrounding the papillary lesion. The total rate of upgrades from the CNB diagnosis to the excisional diagnosis was 38%. CONCLUSIONS: When a core biopsy of a papillary lesion is encountered, there is a strong likelihood of discovering atypia or malignancy in the index lesion or in close proximity. Therefore, surgical excision should be performed to avoid missing a malignancy and to allow for accurate breast cancer risk assessment that can impact survival and decisions regarding chemoprevention

PURPOSE: To explore the effect of providing lymphedema information on breast cancer survivors' symptoms and practice of risk-reduction behaviors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used to obtain data from 136 breast-cancer survivors in New York City from August 2006 to May 2007. Descriptive statistics, t tests, chi-square tests, and correlations were calculated. METHODS: Data were collected using a demographic and medical information interview tool, two questions regarding status of receiving lymphedema information, the Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire, and Lymphedema Risk-Reduction Behavior Checklist. FINDINGS: Fifty-seven percent of the participants reported that they received lymphedema information. On average, participants had three lymphedema-related symptoms. Only 18% of participants were free of symptoms. Participants who received information reported significantly fewer symptoms (t=3.03; p<0.00) and practicing more risk-reduction behaviors (t=2.42; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Providing lymphedema information has an effect on symptom reduction and more risk-reduction behaviors being practiced among breast cancer survivors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In clinical practice, nurses and other healthcare professionals could consider taking the initiative to provide adequate and accurate information and engage breast-cancer survivors in supportive dialogues concerning lymphedema risk-reduction.