Faculty Bibliography

The SCAI Publications Committee and Emerging Leadership Mentorship (ELM) Fellows concisely summarize and provide context on the most important coronary trials presented at large international meetings in 2015, including the MATRIX, ABSORB, and TOTAL trials. The intent is to allow quick assimilation of trial results into interventional practice, and enable busy interventional cardiologists to stay up to date. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

OPINION STATEMENT: Hyperglycemia in the setting of coronary revascularization is associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events in patients with or without diabetes mellitus. Data suggest that acute peri-procedural hyperglycemia causes an increase in inflammation, platelet activity, and endothelial dysfunction and is associated with plaque instability and infarct size. While peri-procedural blood glucose level is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization, treatment strategies remain uncertain. Randomized clinical trials of glucose-insulin-potassium infusions have consistently shown no benefit, while those comparing insulin therapy versus standard of care have demonstrated mixed results, likely due to the failure to reach euglycemia with these strategies. Although no glucose-lowering agent has been shown to be superior in peri-procedural glycemic control, the continuation of clinically prescribed long-acting glucose-lowering medications in patients with diabetes mellitus prior to coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention may be the simplest and most effective approach to maintain euglycemia and decrease the associated increase in inflammation and platelet activity. However, alternative strategies such as therapies targeted at the underlying mechanism of harm (e.g., more potent anti-platelet therapy, anti-inflammatory therapy) should also be considered and warrant further investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how two different types of iodinated contrast media (CM), low-osmolar ionic dimer ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iso-osmolar non-ionic dimer iodixanol (Visipaque), affect multiple indices of hemostasis. BACKGROUND: In vitro models demonstrate differential effects of ionic and non-ionic CM on markers of hemostasis. METHODS: This blinded endpoint trial randomized 100 patients to ioxaglate or iodixanol. The primary endpoint was change in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) following diagnostic angiography. Secondary endpoints included change in markers of fibrinolysis [tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)] and platelet aggregation following diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bivalirudin. Data are presented as median [interquartile range]. RESULTS: ETP significantly decreased after diagnostic angiography in both ioxaglate (baseline 1810 nM*minute [1540-2089] to post-angiography 649 nM*minute [314-1347], p < 0.001) and iodixanol groups (baseline 1682 nM*minute [1534-2147] to post-angiography 681 nM*minute [229-1237], p < 0.001), but the decrease was not different between CM (p = 0.70). There was a significant increase in ETP during PCI (n = 45), despite the use of bivalirudin, suggesting a prothrombotic effect of PCI (post-angiography 764 nM*minute [286-1283] to post-PCI 1081 nM*minute [668-1552], p = 0.02). There were no significant differential effects on tPA, PAI-1, and markers of platelet activity. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differential effects between ioxaglate and iodixanol. Both CM led to significant reductions in thrombin generation and no significant effects on fibrinolytic activity or platelet activity, thereby contributing to a favorable antithrombotic milieu. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The cardioprotective mechanisms of colchicine in patients with stable ischemic heart disease remain uncertain. We tested varying concentrations of colchicine on platelet activity in vitro and a clinically relevant 1.8-mg oral loading dose administered over 1 h in 10 healthy subjects. Data are shown as median [interquartile range]. Colchicine addition in vitro decreased light transmission platelet aggregation only at supratherapeutic concentrations but decreased monocyte- (MPA) and neutrophil-platelet aggregation (NPA) at therapeutic concentrations. Administration of 1.8 mg colchicine to healthy subjects had no significant effect on light transmission platelet aggregation but decreased the extent of MPA (28 % [22-57] to 22 % [19-31], p = 0.05) and NPA (19 % [16-59] to 15 % [11-30], p = 0.01), platelet surface expression of PAC-1 (370 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) [328-555] to 333 MFI [232-407], p = 0.02) and P-selectin (351 MFI [269-492] to 279 [226-364], p = 0.03), and platelet adhesion to collagen (10.2 % [2.5-32.6] to 2.0 % [0.2-9.5], p = 0.09) 2 h post-administration. Thus, in clinically relevant concentrations, colchicine decreases expression of surface markers of platelet activity and inhibits leukocyte-platelet aggregation but does not inhibit homotypic platelet aggregation.

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), cine imaging, and resting first-pass perfusion (FPP) in the evaluation for ischemic (IC) versus nonischemic (NIC) cardiomyopathy in new-onset heart failure with reduced (