Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The impact of vascular injuries on patient mortality has not been well evaluated in multi-trauma patients. This study seeks to determine (1) whether the presence of vascular trauma negatively affects outcome compared with nonvascular trauma (NVT) and (2) the utility of existing severity scoring systems in predicting mortality among vascular trauma (VT) patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of our trauma database from January 2005 to December 2007 was conducted. Demographics, Injury Severity Scores (ISS), Revised Trauma Scores (RTS), Trauma Score-Injury Severity Scores (TRISS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, and mortality rates were compared. Control patients were selected from a matching cohort based on ISS. Comparisons were made between groups based on the above scoring systems. Statistical analysis used chi(2) analysis and Student t-tests. RESULTS: Fifty VT and 50 NVT patients were identified with no significant differences in age, gender, mechanism of injury, ISS, RTS, or TRISS. The mean APACHE II score was higher in VT compared with NVT (12.3 vs 8.8, P < .05). Overall mortality was higher in VT compared with NVT but did not reach statistical significance (24% vs 11.8%, P = .108). VT patients with RTS score >5 had a higher mortality rate (26% vs 2.2%, P = .007). VT patients with an ISS score >24 had a higher mortality compared with NVT patients (61% vs 28.6%, P = .04). VT patients with an APACHE II score <14 also had a higher mortality rate (18.2% vs 0%, P = .007). Finally, VT patients with a TRISS probability of survival of >80% had a higher mortality rate (13.9% vs 0%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: In multi-trauma patients, the presence of vascular injury was associated with increased mortality in less severely injured patients based on the RTS, TRISS, and APACHE II scores. These scoring systems underestimated mortality in patients with vascular trauma. Level of care and future trauma algorithms should be adjusted in the presence of vascular trauma

In 2001, the use of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) was introduced to the United States to treat superficial venous insufficiency. EVLA has subsequently undergone a rapid rise in popularity and usage with a concomitant decrease in traditional operative saphenectomy. Since its inception, the use of EVLA to treat superficial venous insufficiency has advanced significantly. The efficacy of treatment has been validated using both hemoglobin-specific laser wavelength and water-specific laser wavelength lasers. Currently, laser optimization is focusing on reducing postprocedural sequelae. The clinical parameters that correlate best with improved postoperative recovery use lower power/energy settings, water-specific laser wavelength lasers, and jacket or radial-emitting tips. Future study is still required to assess the durability of treatment at lower power and energy settings coupled with jacket or radial-emitting tip fibers. Long-term follow-up using duplex imaging is recommended to ensure persistent treatment success

INTRODUCTION: Ask a dysphasic patient who has received a carotid artery stent if he or she would instead have rather had a troponin enzyme leak or minor myocardial infarction (MI). Although the answer is clear to most of us, there are many interventionalists and clinicians who have inappropriately interpreted recent data from the CREST trial to conclude that carotid artery stenting (CAS) is equivalent to carotid endarterectomy (CEA)

INTRODUCTION: Extracranial carotid stenoses exhibit significant variance in embolic potential, with restenotic lesions having a particularly low propensity for embolization. This study sought to identify characteristics associated with increased generation of embolic debris during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). METHODS: Captured particulate was available for analysis in 56 consecutive patients. Demographics were mean age, 74 years (range, 60-94 years); mean stenosis, 88% (range, 70%-99%); symptomatic, 27%; prior carotid endarterectomy (CEA), 27%; prior radiotherapy, 7%. Plaque echogenicity, heterogenicity, ulceration, and irregularity were assessed with B-mode duplex ultrasound analysis. Gray scale median (GSM) was calculated from normalized B-mode VHS video recordings. Calcification and degree of stenosis were determined angiographically. Captured particulate debris was evaluated for total number; number >200 microm, >500 microm, >1000 microm; mean and median size. Hematoxylin and eosin, trichrome, and von Kossa stains were used for histologic analysis of captured material. RESULTS: Restenotic carotid stenoses after prior CEA generated minimal embolic debris compared with primary stenoses. Four of 15 patients (27%) with restenotic lesions demonstrated embolic particles; all debris was <500 microm. All 41 patients with primary stenoses had some embolic debris; particulate size was >200 microm in 91%, >500 microm in 72%, and >1000 microm in 43%. In primary lesions, the number and size of captured particulate correlated with GSM and with the combined ultrasound findings of echogenicity, heterogenicity, and luminal irregularity/ulceration (P < .02, 95% confidence interval, 4.5-27.6). None of these ultrasound factors correlated independently with embolic particulate (P = NS). Patients aged >70 years exhibited more total particles (8.1 vs 2.3, P = .008) and increased mean particle size (370 vs 157 mum, P = .02). No significant correlation was observed between the number and size of captured embolic particulate and any other variable (stenosis percentage, prior radiotherapy, preprocedural symptoms, periprocedural symptoms, and calcification). Histologically, the embolic debris consisted of extensive amorphous, acellular proteinaceous material. Calcium debris in the embolic particulate was associated with heavily and moderately calcified lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation exists in the number and size of embolic particles generated during CAS. Embolic potential is positively correlated with lesion GSM and the combination of lesion echogenicity, heterogenicity, and irregularity. Restenosis after prior CEA is associated with minimal embolic particulate generation, suggesting that embolic protection may not be necessary for CAS of restenotic lesions.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains a viable option for treating carotid artery lesions in high surgical risk patients. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in performing CAS in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. The ''coronary technique'' uses an AL1 guiding catheter to engage the origin of the common carotid artery permitting delivery of protection device and stent. In total, 12 patients had complex arch anatomy which precluded access using the standard technique as determined on preoperative imaging. A total of 8 patients with such anatomy underwent femoral artery catheterization with placement of an Amplatz AL1 guide catheter into the common carotid artery. All were able to be successfully treated, with no dissection, neurovascular deficit, or other major complication. Based on this case series, we describe the coronary technique as a safe and viable method for CAS in the setting of complex anatomy which might otherwise preclude CAS

OBJECTIVES: Inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during attempted central venous access is a well-known complication. Historically, these patients are managed with an open operative approach and repair under direct vision via an infraclavicular and/or supraclavicular incision. We describe our experience and technique for endovascular management of these injuries. METHODS: Twenty patients were identified with inadvertent iatrogenic subclavian artery cannulation. All cases were managed via an endovascular technique under local anesthesia. After correcting any coagulopathy, a 4-French glide catheter was percutaneously inserted into the ipsilateral brachial artery and placed in the proximal subclavian artery. Following an arteriogram and localization of the subclavian arterial insertion site, the subclavian catheter was removed and bimanual compression was performed on both sides of the clavicle around the puncture site for 20min. A second angiogram was performed, and if there was any extravasation, pressure was held for an additional 20min. If hemostasis was still not obtained, a stent graft was placed via the brachial access site to repair the arterial defect and control the bleeding. RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients required a stent graft for continued bleeding after compression. Both patients were well excluded after endovascular graft placement. Hemostasis was successfully obtained with bimanual compression over the puncture site in the remaining 18 patients. There were no resultant complications at either the subclavian or the brachial puncture site. DISCUSSION: This minimally invasive endovascular approach to iatrogenic subclavian artery injury is a safe alternative to blind removal with manual compression or direct open repair

Endovascular repair is becoming the mainstay of treatment for aneurysmal disease of the abdominal and thoracic aorta. Access related issues comprise a major reason for failure or conversion to open repair and can contribute to a significant amount of morbidity and mortality. This article will discuss a multitude of access related complications and their treatment. Preoperative imaging is paramount to the success of endovascular procedures. Intraoperative adjuncts, such as iliac artery angioplasty/stenting, the 'pull-down' technique, and aorto mono iliac/femoral systems will be discussed. Occasionally, challenging iliac or femoral anatomy may preclude access through these vessels and the endovascular specialist may need to gain direct access through the aorta or via the carotid artery. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of an entirely percutaneous technique will be discussed. Finally, peri-operative complications such as rupture, dissection, pseudoaneurysm and infection will be discussed and various treatment modalities reviewed. As stent graft technology and our own skill sets and experience continue to improve, fewer patients will be refused an endovascular repair based on access issues alone

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms historically have high mortality rates. Despite improvements in many open surgical techniques and perioperative care, these mortality rates have not significantly changed. Some of the reasons for the high mortality rates include the excessive blood loss and hypothermia that occur during open operative repair. The blood loss and hypothermia, combined with resuscitative dilutional coagulopathy, can lead to an irreversible spiraling coagulopathy that ultimately ends in the patient's demise. The availability of endovascular approaches to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms in the early 1990s offered an opportunity to substantially alter the treatment outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Endovascular repair offers many advantages, including rapid aortic control under local anesthesia, as well as an opportunity to limit the hypothermia and blood loss that occur with an open abdomen. This article will review the endovascular management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and describe the endovascular techniques for safe and effective treatment. Mt Sinai J Med 77:250-255, 2010. (c) 2010 Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Background: There is a paucity of literature regarding thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) in women. We report our institutional experience with TEVAR. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed from 2004 to 2008. TEVAR was performed in 59 patients; 29 (49%) were female. Results: Mean age was 73.5 years. Mean thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) diameter was larger for women (5.9 cm vs 4.7 cm). A trend toward an increase in paraplegia was noted in women, 10.3% vs 4.8%. This may be related to increase in length of aortic coverage in women, 18.2 cm vs 15.2 cm (P < .05). Conclusion: TEVAR in women is safe and effective. The length of aortic coverage is greater in women, which may be related to larger aneurysms and more diffuse disease. This may be associated with a concerning increase in postoperative paraplegia. Women undergoing TEVAR should be considered for prophylactic maneuvers to prevent spinal cord ischemia (SCI), including minimizing length of coverage