Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study is to determine if a standardized protocol for radial nerve handling during humeral shaft repair reduces the incidence of iatrogenic nerve palsy post operatively. METHODS:Seventy-three patients were identified who underwent acute or reconstructive humeral shaft repair with radial nerve exploration as part of the primary procedure for either humeral shaft fracture or nonunion. All patients exhibited intact radial nerve function pre-operatively. A retrospective chart review and analysis identified patients who developed a secondary radial nerve palsy post-operatively. In each case, the radial nerve was identified and mobilized for protection, regardless of whether the implant necessitated the extensile exposure. RESULTS:Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA guidelines and included 23 Type 12A, 11 Type 12B, and 3 Type 12C. Eight patients had periprosthetic fractures and 28 fractures could not be classified. All patients in the cohort were fixed with locking plates. Surgery was indicated for 36 patients with humeral nonunions and 37 patients with acute humeral shaft fractures. Of the 73 patients, 2 (2.7%) developed radial nerve palsy following surgery, one from the posterior approach and one from the anterolateral approach. Both patients exhibited complete recovery of radial nerve function by 6-month follow-up. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in any demographic or surgical details between those with and without radial nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS:Nerve exploration identification and protection leads to a low incidence of transient radial nerve palsy compared to the rate reported in the current literature (2.7% compared to 6-24%). Thus, radial nerve exploration and mobilization should be considered when approaching the humeral shaft for acute fracture and nonunion repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of obesity on the outcome of operatively treated proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:tests for categorical variables. Regression analysis was performed to determine if BMI was a predictor of fracture pattern severity as determined by the AO/OTA classification. RESULTS:Overall, 223 patients who sustained proximal humerus fractures were analyzed. Patient age at time of injury was 60.5 ± 13.7 years. There were 67 AO/OTA 11A, 79 AO/OTA 11B, and 77 AO/OTA 11C fracture types. Seventy-two patients (32.3%) were obese. No significant differences were seen between groups in regard to demographic variables, Neer classification, or functional and clinical outcomes as determined by DASH scores and shoulder ROM, respectively. Statistical analyses confirmed that obesity is associated with more severe fracture patterns of the proximal humerus as categorized by the AO/OTA classification. An independent t test confirmed that BMI was significantly higher in the complex fracture group based on the AO/OTA classification (p = 0.047). Regression analysis also demonstrated that age (p = 0.005) and CCI (p = 0.021) were predictors of more severe fractures, while BMI approached significance (p = 0.055) based on the AO/OTA classification. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A significantly higher incidence of complex proximal humerus fracture patterns is observed in patients with higher body mass indexes based on the AO/OTA classification. Age and CCI are also associated with more severe fracture patterns of the proximal humerus as determined by the AO/OTA classification. No differences were seen in outcomes or complication rates between obese patients and non-obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Locking plate technology was developed approximately 25-years-ago and has been successfully used since. Newer designs and material properties have been used to modify the original design, but these changes have yet to be correlated to improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of first-generation locking plate (FGLP) and screw systems at our institution over an 18 year period. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Between 2001 to 2018, 76 patients with 82 proximal tibia and distal femur fractures (both acute fracture and nonunions) who were treated with a first-generation titanium, uniaxial locking plate with unicortical screws (FGLP), also known as a LISS plate (Synthes Paoli Pa), were identified and compared to 198 patients with 203 similar fracture patterns treated with 2nd and 3rd generation locking plates, or Later Generation Locking Plates (LGLP). Inclusion criteria was a minimum of 1-year follow-up. At latest follow-up, outcomes were assessed using radiographic analysis, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), VAS pain scores, and knee ROM. All descriptive statistics were calculated using IBM SPSS (Armonk, NY). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 76 patients with 82 fractures had a mean 4-year follow-up available for analysis. There were 76 patients with 82 fractures fixed with a First-generation locking plate. The mean age at time of injury for all patients was 59.2 and 61.0% were female. Mean time to union for fractures about the knee fixed with FGLP was by 5.3 months for acute fractures and 6.1 months for nonunions. At final follow-up, the mean standardized SMFA for all patients was 19.9, mean knee range of motion was 1.6°-111.9°, and mean VAS pain score was 2.7. When compared to a group of similar patients with similar fractures and nonunions treated with LGLPs there were no differences in outcomes assessed. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:.

This study compares outcomes of patients with Lisfranc injuries treated with screw only fixation constructs to those treated with dorsal plate and screw constructs. Seventy patients who underwent surgical treatment for acute Lisfranc injury without arthrodesis and minimum 6-month (mean >1-year) follow-up were identified. Demographics, surgical information, and radiographic imaging were reviewed. Cost data were compared. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) midfoot score. Univariate analysis through independent sample t tests, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-squared compared the populations. Twenty-three (33%) patients were treated with plate constructs and 47 (67%) with screw only fixation. The plate group was older (49 ± 18 vs 40 ± 16 years, p = .029). More screw constructs treated isolated medial column injuries compared to plate constructs (92% vs 65%, p = .006). At latest follow-up (mean 14 ± 13 months), all tarsometatarsal joints were aligned. There was no difference in AOFAS midfoot scores. Plate patients experienced longer operations (131 ± 70 vs 75 ± 31 minutes, p < .001) and tourniquet time (101 ± 41 vs 69 ± 25 minutes, p = .001). Plate constructs were more expensive than screw ($2.3X ± $2.3X vs $X ± $0.4X, p < .001) ($X is the mean cost of screws alone). Plate patients had a higher incidence of wound complications (13% vs 0%, p = .012). Treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocation injuries with screws only demonstrated a higher value procedure as similar outcomes were found amidst lower implant costs. Screw only fixation required a shorter operative and tourniquet time with less frequent wound complications. Screw only fixations proved mechanically sound enough to achieve goals of repair without inferior outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of peripheral nerve blocks in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures is associated with improved outcomes when compared with the use of spinal and general anesthesia. Over a period of 16 years, 132 patients who underwent operative repair for a low-energy tibial plateau fracture and had at least 12 months of follow-up met the inclusion criteria and formed the basis of this study. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on the anesthetic method used during surgery: peripheral nerve block in combination with conscious sedation or general anesthesia (BA), general anesthesia alone (GA), or spinal anesthesia alone (SA). Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Length of stay was greatest in the GA cohort (P<.05), and more patients in the BA cohort were discharged to home (P<.05). Patients in the GA cohort had the highest pain scores at 3 months and 6 months (P<.05). Patients in both the SA and BA cohorts had better Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores at 6 and 12 months when compared with the GA cohort (P<.05). Although knee range of motion did not differ among the three cohorts at 3 months, it did differ at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, with those who had a preoperative nerve blockade (SA and BA) having the greatest knee range of motion (P<.05). Regional anesthesia was safe and was associated with lower pain scores in the early postoperative period and greater knee range of motion and functional outcome scores in the late postoperative period. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):358-364.].

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to assess how quality and volume of common orthopaedic care varies across private, municipal, and federal healthcare delivery systems (HDSs). METHODS:Hip and knee arthroplasty, knee and shoulder arthroscopy, and hip fracture repair were audited over a two-year period. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographics, diagnosis, lengths of stay (LoSs), surgical wait times, inpatient complication, readmission, and revision surgery rates. Multivariate regression controlled for differences in age, sex, diagnosis, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to determine how HDS correlated with surgical wait time, length of stay, complication rates, readmission, and revision surgery. RESULTS:The 5,696 included patients comprise 87.4% private, 8.6% municipal, and 4.0% federal HDSs. Compared with private HDS for arthroplasty, federal surgical wait times were 18 days shorter (95% CI = 9 to 26 days, P < 0.001); federal LoS was 4 days longer (95% CI = 3.6 to 4.3 days, P < 0.001); municipal LoS was 1 day longer (95% CI = 0.8 to 1.4, P < 0.001); municipal 1-year revision surgery odds were increased (odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.3 to 5.4, P = 0.045); and complication odds increased for municipal (OR = 12.2, 95% CI = 5.2 to 27.4, P < 0.001) and federal (OR = 12.0, 95% CI = 4.5 to 30.8, P < 0.001) HDSs. Compared with private HDS for arthroscopy, municipal wait times were 57 days longer (95% CI = 48 to 66 days, P < 0.001) and federal wait times were 34 days longer (95% CI = 21 to 47 days, P < 0.001). Compared with private HDS for fracture repair, municipal wait times were 0.6 days longer (95% CI = 0.2 to 1.0, P = 0.02); federal LoS was 7 days longer (95% CI = 3.6 to 9.4 days, P < 0.001); and municipal LoS was 4 days longer (95% CI = 2.4 to 4.8, P < 0.001). Only private HDS fracture repair patients received bone health consultations. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The private HDS provided care for a markedly larger volume of patients seeking orthopaedic care. In addition, private HDS patients experienced reduced surgical wait times, LoSs, and complication odds for inpatient elective cases, with better referral patterns for nonsurgical orthopaedic care after hip fractures within the private HDS. These results may guide improvements for federal and municipal HDSs.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To (1) determine the ability of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) to identify the probability of contralateral hip fractures within 2 years of index fracture and (2) identify independent risk factors for a subsequent hip fracture. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective. SETTING/METHODS:Urban, academic medical center. PATIENTS/METHODS:This study included a consecutive series of patients treated for unilateral hip fractures between September 2015 and July 2019. RESULTS:Eight hundred thirty-two consecutive patients were included in the analysis with a mean age of 81.2 ± 9.9 years. Thirty-one (3.7%) patients sustained a contralateral hip fracture within 2 years with these patients sustaining the second fracture at a mean 294.1 days ± 197.7 days. The average FRAX score for the entire cohort was 11.9 ± 7.4, and the area under receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for FRAX score was 0.682 (95% CI, 0.596-0.767). Patients in the high-risk FRAX group had a >7% risk of contralateral hip fracture within 2 years. Independent risk factors for contralateral hip fracture risk included patient age 80 years or older and decreasing BMI. CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the strong ability of the FRAX score to triage patients at risk of subsequent contralateral hip fracture within 2 years. In this high-risk FRAX group, patients age older than 80 years and who have decreasing BMI after their index fracture have a 12.5% increased risk of fracture within 2 years which is 4× higher than the current World Health Organization 10-year 3% hip fracture risk standard used to initiate pharmacologic treatment. Therefore, high-risk patients identified using this methodology should be targeted more aggressively with preventative measures including social, medical, and potentially surgical interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:The quality of evidence of the orthopedic literature has been often called into question. The fragility index (FI) has emerged as a means to evaluate the robustness of a significant result. Similarly, reverse fragility index (RFI) can be used for nonsignificant results to evaluate whether one can confidently conclude that there is no difference between groups. The analysis of FI and RFI in proximal humerus fracture (PHF) management is of particular interest, given ongoing controversy regarding optimal management and patient selection. The aim of this study was to report the FI, RFI and quality of the evidence in the proximal humerus fracture literature. METHODS:A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, which utilized EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled clinical trials related to the management of proximal humerus fractures, published from 2000 to 2020 with dichotomous outcome measures and 1:1 allocation. The FI and RFI were calculated by successively changing one nonevent to an event for each outcome measure until the result was made nonsignificant or significant, respectively. The fragility quotient, (FQ), calculated by dividing the FI by the total sample size, was calculated as well. RESULTS:There were 25 studies that met our criteria with 48 outcome measures recorded. A total of 21 studies had at least one fragile result, with ten studies including a fragile result in the conclusion of the abstract. A total of 31 outcome measures had nonsignificant results and the median RFI was found to be 4, with 71% greater than number of patients lost to follow up. Seventeen outcomes had significant results, with a median FI of 1, with 65% greater than or equal to the number patients lost to follow up. A total of 18 of 25 studies (72%) included a power analysis. In particular, ten studies reported a statistical analysis of complication rates, 90% of which were fragile. The median FQ was found to be 0.037. CONCLUSIONS:The literature on PHF management is frequently fragile. Outcome measures are often fragile, particularly with regards to comparing complication rates and reoperation rates in treatment arms. Comparing to the studies in other subspecialties PHF RCTs are relatively more fragile and underpowered. Standardized reporting of FI, FQ and RFI can help the reader to reliably draw conclusions based on the fragility of outcome measures.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report surgical outcomes in patients treated with conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) for early failure of cephalomedullary nails (CMNs). METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of CTHA for treatment of failed CMN within 1 year of initial surgery for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. The cohort was matched 1:5 to patients who underwent elective primary THA (PTHA). Patient demographics, mechanism of CMN failure, surgical outcomes, and complication rates were assessed. RESULTS:22 patients met criteria with a mean time to failure of 145 days. Modes of failure included: lag screw cut-out with superior migration (9, 40.9%), or medialization (8, 36.4%), and aseptic nonunion with implant failure (2, 9.0%) and without implant failure (3, 13.6%). Fourteen of the patients (63.6%) had acetabular-sided damage secondary to lag screw penetration, all in the screw cut-out groups. Patient demographics were similar between cohorts. Compared to PTHA, CTHA patients had increased operative time, blood loss, LOS, and readmission rates. After IMN failure, the operative leg was shorter than the contralateral leg in all cases. CTHA restored leg lengths to <  = 10 mm in 15 (68.1%) of patients, with an average leg length discrepancy after CTHA of 6.7 mm. CTHA patients had increased rates of overall surgical complications and medical complications, specifically anemia (all p < 0.01). Tranexamic acid was used less often in the CTHA group (p < 0.01). Rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, and revision were all higher in the CTHA, though did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The majority (77.3%) of CMN implant failure for nonunion within 1 year was due to screw cut-out. CTHA is a salvage option for early failed IT hip fracture repair, but expected surgical outcomes are more similar to revision THA than primary THA, with increased risk of readmission, longer surgery and LOS, increased blood loss, and higher complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III, Retrospective comparative study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a novel technology used to measure improvements in quality and value of care for treatment of hip fracture patients. METHODS:A novel value-based triaging methodology uses a risk prediction (risk M) and inpatient cost prediction (risk C) algorithm and has been demonstrated to accurately predict high-risk:high-cost episodes of care. Two hundred twenty-nine hip fracture patients from 2014 to 2016 were used to establish baseline length of stay (LOS) and total inpatient cost for each (16) risk:cost quadrants. Two hundred sixty-five patients between 2017 and 2019 with hip fractures were input into the algorithm, and historical LOS and cost for each patient were calculated. Historical values were compared with actual values to determine whether the value of the inpatient episode of care differed from the 2014 to 16 cohort. RESULTS:When evaluated without risk or cost stratification, the mean actual LOS and cost of the baseline cohort compared with the 2017 to 2019 cohort were 8.0 vs 7.5 days (P = 0.43) and $25,446 vs $29,849 (P = 0.15), respectively. This analysis demonstrates that there was only a small change in value of care provided to patients based on LOS/cost over the studied period; however, risk:cost analysis using the novel methodology demonstrated that for select risk:cost quadrants, value of care measured by LOS/cost improved, whereas for others it decreased and for others there was no change. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Risk-cost-adjusted analysis of inpatient episodes of care rendered by a value-based triaging methodology provides a robust method of assessing improvements and/or decreases in value-based care when compared with a historical cohort. This methodology provides the tools to both track hospital interventions designed to improve quality and decrease cost as well as determine whether these interventions are effective in improving value.