Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:hochmj03
Equipoise, Trust, and the Need for Cardiologists to Randomly Assign Patients Into Anticoagulation Trials in the Time of COVID
Ridker, Paul M; Ortel, Thomas L; Hochman, Judith S
PMCID:7737695
PMID: 33054374
ISSN: 1524-4539
CID: 4734432
Cardiopulmonary Impact of Particulate Air Pollution in High-Risk Populations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review
Newman, Jonathan D; Bhatt, Deepak L; Rajagopalan, Sanjay; Balmes, John R; Brauer, Michael; Breysse, Patrick N; Brown, Alison G M; Carnethon, Mercedes R; Cascio, Wayne E; Collman, Gwen W; Fine, Lawrence J; Hansel, Nadia N; Hernandez, Adrian; Hochman, Judith S; Jerrett, Michael; Joubert, Bonnie R; Kaufman, Joel D; Malik, Ali O; Mensah, George A; Newby, David E; Peel, Jennifer L; Siegel, Jeffrey; Siscovick, David; Thompson, Betsy L; Zhang, Junfeng; Brook, Robert D
Fine particulate air pollution <2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) is a major environmental threat to global public health. Multiple national and international medical and governmental organizations have recognized PM2.5 as a risk factor for cardiopulmonary diseases. A growing body of evidence indicates that several personal-level approaches that reduce exposures to PM2.5 can lead to improvements in health endpoints. Novel and forward-thinking strategies including randomized clinical trials are important to validate key aspects (e.g., feasibility, efficacy, health benefits, risks, burden, costs) of the various protective interventions, in particular among real-world susceptible and vulnerable populations. This paper summarizes the discussions and conclusions from an expert workshop, Reducing the Cardiopulmonary Impact of Particulate Matter Air Pollution in High Risk Populations, held on May 29 to 30, 2019, and convened by the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
PMID: 33303078
ISSN: 1558-3597
CID: 4734992
Enrollment in the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Cohen, Elisabeth J; Jeng, Bennie H; Troxel, Andrea B; Lee, Myeonggyun; Shakarov, Gabriel; Hochman, Judith; Gillespie, Colleen
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To present the results of a survey of the Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) investigators regarding barriers to the enrollment of study participants and approaches to overcome them. METHODS:ZEDS is a multicenter randomized clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute to determine whether prolonged suppressive valacyclovir reduces the complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO), relative to placebo. Enrollment of study participants is currently far below expectations. An institutional review board-approved anonymous internet survey was conducted of ZEDS investigators to study their experiences and opinions regarding barriers to enrollment and various approaches to overcome them. RESULTS:The overall survey response rate was 54% (79/145). Only 29% (23/79) agreed that it is easy to enroll study participants. Regarding patient barriers, 69% (55/79) agreed that HZO patients want to be treated with antiviral medication and 69% (54/78) agreed that HZO patients on antivirals do not want to be randomized. Regarding personal barriers facing investigators, 91% (72/79) agreed that antivirals are effective and 100% that the research questions ZEDS is designed to answer are very important. Fewer than 30% of respondents believed that steps taken to increase enrollment have been very helpful. Over half (54%, 42/78) believed that advertising on social media would be moderately or very effective. CONCLUSIONS:Belief among ZEDS investigators that antivirals are effective, and the preference of patients to be treated with antivirals rather than be randomized in ZEDS, are major barriers to enrollment. New approaches to overcoming barriers are necessary to develop an evidence-based standard of care for treatment of HZO.
PMID: 32558726
ISSN: 1536-4798
CID: 4683702
From Stigma to Validation: A Qualitative Assessment of a Novel National Program to Improve Retention of Physician-Scientists with Caregiving Responsibilities
Jones, Rochelle D; Miller, Jacquelyn; Vitous, C Ann; Krenz, Chris; Brady, Kathleen T; Brown, Ann J; Daumit, Gail L; Drake, Amelia F; Fraser, Victoria J; Hartmann, Katherine E; Hochman, Judith S; Girdler, Susan; Kalet, Adina L; Libby, Anne M; Mangurian, Christina; Regensteiner, Judith G; Yonkers, Kimberly; Jagsi, Reshma
PMID: 32286931
ISSN: 1931-843x
CID: 4383322
Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients with Viral Respiratory Infections versus COVID-19 [Letter]
Smilowitz, Nathaniel R; Subashchandran, Varun; Yuriditsky, Eugene; Horowitz, James M; Reynolds, Harmony R; Hochman, Judith S; Berger, Jeffrey S
BACKGROUND:Thrombosis is a prominent feature of the novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The incidence of thrombosis during hospitalization for non-COVID-19 viral respiratory infections is uncertain. We evaluated the incidence of thrombosis in patients hospitalized with non-COVID-19 acute viral respiratory illnesses compared to COVID-19. METHODS:Adults age >18 years hospitalized with a non-COVID-19 viral respiratory illness between 2002-2014 were identified. The primary study outcome was a composite of venous and arterial thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction (MI), acute ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism, as defined by ICD-9 codes. The incidence of thrombosis in non-COVID-19 viral respiratory illnesses was compared to the recently published incidence of thrombosis in COVID-19 from 3,334 patients hospitalized in New York in 2020. RESULTS:Among 954,521 hospitalizations with viral pneumonia from 2002 to 2014 (mean age 62.3 years, 57.1% female), the combined incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis was 5.0%. Acute MI occurred in 2.8% of hospitalizations, VTE in 1.6%, ischemic stroke in 0.7%, and other systemic embolism in 0.1%. Patients with thrombosis had higher in-hospital mortality (14.9% vs. 3.3%, p<0.001) than those without thrombosis. The proportion of hospitalizations complicated by thrombosis was lower in patients with viral respiratory illness in 2002-2014 than in COVID-19 (median age 64; 39.6% female) in 2020 (5% vs. 16%; p<0.001) CONCLUSION: In a nationwide analysis of hospitalizations for viral pneumonias, thrombosis risk was lower than that observed in patients with COVID-19. Investigations into mechanisms of thrombosis and risk reduction strategies in COVID-19 and other viral respiratory infections are necessary. SHORT ABSTRACT/UNASSIGNED:We evaluated the incidence of thrombosis in patients hospitalized with non-COVID-19 acute viral respiratory illnesses nationwide from 2012 to 2014 and compared this to the incidence among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at a large health system in New York. Non-COVID-19 viral respiratory illness was complicated by acute MI in 2.8% of hospitalizations, VTE in 1.6%, ischemic stroke in 0.7%, and other systemic embolism in 0.1%. The proportion of hospitalizations complicated by thrombosis was lower in patients with viral respiratory illness in 2002-2014 than in COVID-19 (5% vs. 16%; p<0.001).
PMCID:7654304
PMID: 33181067
ISSN: 1097-6744
CID: 4665432
Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With a History of Heart Failure or Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial
Lopes, Renato D; Alexander, Karen P; Stevens, Susanna R; Reynolds, Harmony R; Stone, Gregg W; Piña, Ileana L; Rockhold, Frank W; Elghamaz, Ahmed; Lopez-Sendon, Jose Luis; Farsky, Pedro S; Chernyavskiy, Alexander M; Diaz, Ariel; Phaneuf, Denis; De Belder, Mark A; Ma, Yi-Tong; Guzman, Luis A; Khouri, Michel; Sionis, Alessandro; Hausenloy, Derek J; Doerr, Rolf; Selvanayagam, Joseph B; Maggioni, Aldo Pietro; Hochman, Judith S; Maron, David J
BACKGROUND:Whether an initial invasive strategy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia improves outcomes in the setting of a history of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) when ejection fraction is ≥35% but <45% is unknown. METHODS:Among 5179 participants randomized into ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), all of whom had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥35%, we compared cardiovascular outcomes by treatment strategy in participants with a history of HF/LVD at baseline versus those without HF/LVD. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS:interaction = 0.055). A similar differential effect was seen for the primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality when invasive versus conservative strategy-associated outcomes were analyzed with LVEF as a continuous variable for patients with and without previous HF. CONCLUSIONS:ISCHEMIA participants with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia with a history of HF or LVD were at increased risk for the primary outcome. In the small, high-risk subgroup with HF and LVEF 35% to 45%, an initial invasive approach was associated with better event-free survival. This result should be considered hypothesis-generating. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.
PMID: 32862662
ISSN: 1524-4539
CID: 4683762
Biomarkers of Platelet Activity and Vascular Health Associate with Thrombosis and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 [Letter]
Barrett, Tessa J; Lee, Angela; Xia, Yuhe; Lin, Lawrence H; Black, Margaret; Cotzia, Paolo; Hochman, Judith S; Berger, Jeffrey S
PMID: 32757722
ISSN: 1524-4571
CID: 4554162
Platelet and Vascular Biomarkers Associate with Thrombosis and Death in Coronavirus Disease [Letter]
Barrett, T J; Lee, A H; Xia, Y; Lin, L H; Black, M; Cotzia, P; Hochman, J; Berger, J S
EMBASE:632891988
ISSN: 0009-7330
CID: 4674432
Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease. Reply [Comment]
Bangalore, Sripal; Maron, David J; Hochman, Judith S
PMID: 32905690
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 4589242
Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. Reply [Comment]
Maron, David J; Hochman, Judith S
PMID: 32877596
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 4614612