Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) disproportionally affects racial groups in the United States. Few studies have analyzed the rates of PAD in the American Indian (AI)/ Alaskan Native (AN) population. In this paper we compare the prevalence of PAD in the AI/AN as compared to white and non-white Americans. METHODS: The study data were provided by Life Line Screening (Independence, Ohio). The cohort consists of self-referred individuals who paid for vascular screening tests. Mild to moderate and severe PAD were defined as having an ankle brachial index (ABI) in at least one extremity of < .9 and <.5 respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to compare the rates of PAD between AI/AN, Caucasians, and non-whites. RESULTS: The original sample for which this study was obtained included 3,444,272 people. Of this group there was a predominance of females 64.5% (2,221,555) compared to 35.5% (1,222,716) males. The Native American/ Alaskan Native population was 2.8% of the sample (96,440). In our univariate analysis AI/AN had the highest rates of mild-moderate and severe PAD when compared to whites (OR 1.78 and 2.14 respectively) and non-whites (OR 1.52 and 1.82 respectively). We then controlled for atherosclerotic risk factors in our multivariate analysis and the AI/NA cohort had persistently higher rates of both moderate and severe PAD compared to whites (OR 1.32 and 1.40) but not compared to non-whites (OR .95 and .92). CONCLUSIONS: Here we present the largest epidemiology study of PAD in AI/NA to date. AI/NA people have disproportionately high rates of both mild-to moderate and severe PAD when compared to whites and non-white Americans. After controlling for atherosclerotic risk factors the rates of PAD remain high for AI/NA when compared to whites but not when compared to non-whites. While it is possible that a combination of diet and lifestyle choices are responsible for the high rates of PAD in this population, genetic factors may be involved as well, and deserve further investigation. Optimal medical management may help to prevent the complications of PAD in this patient population.

Background: Patients who present acutely with a femoral vein deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by ultrasound are often treated with anticoagulation and instructed to follow up electively. This study sought to assess whether obtaining central imaging in this cohort of patients results in an increased diagnosis of iliocaval DVT and consequently an increased consideration for interventional treatments to effect thrombus removal. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained RedCap database from November 2014 through August 2016, which is coordinated by the Venous Thromboembolic Center at our institution. Consecutive patients who were diagnosed by ultrasound with a femoral vein DVT were evaluated. The patients who underwent confirmatory central venous imaging (computed tomography venography, magnetic resonance venography; group A) were compared with the patients who did not undergo central venous imaging (group B). Demographic variables were collected. The outcomes evaluated were (1) the presence of iliocaval DVT, (2) candidacy for lytic-based therapies, (3) performance of lytic-based therapy, and (4) performance of any invasive treatment (lytic therapy, mechanical thrombectomy, inferior vena cava filter placement, or venous stenting). Additional outcomes included technical success of invasive treatment and complications associated with invasive treatment. Results:A total of 63 patients were identified who presented with a diagnosis of femoral vein DVT. Group A comprised 20 of 63 (31%) patients. Group B comprised the remainder, 43 of 63 (69%). The baseline demographics did not differ significantly, except for gender (Table). The number of patients who were diagnosed with an iliocaval DVT differed significantly (group A, nine [45%]; group B, nine [20%]; P <.0001). The number of patients who underwent lytic therapy differed significantly (group A, eight [40%] - seven at the index admission and one at 1 month; group B, 0 [0%]; P <.0001). The number of patients without relative contraindications to lytic therapy did not differ significantly (group A, 13 [65%]; group B, 34 [79%]; P =.35). The number of patients who underwent any invasive treatment differed significantly between the two cohorts (group A, 12/20 [60%]; group B, 4/43 [9%]; P =.0001). The majority of interventions were technically successful in both groups (group A, 11/12 [91.7%]; group B, 4/4 [100%]; P = 1.00). Conclusions: This study suggests that a significant percentage of patients diagnosed by ultrasound with femoral vein DVTs have a concomitant iliocaval DVT. The data suggest that in patients with a femoral vein DVT, central venous imaging may be indicated to identify potentially treatable iliocaval thrombosis. Long-term data will be required to see if this results in a decrease in post-thrombotic syndrome on a population basis. (table present)