Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We report contemporary outcomes of salvage cryoablation at a large number of centers which have participated in the COLD (Cryo On-Line Data) Registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A secure online database was developed to collect data for patients undergoing prostate cryoablation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with biochemical failure defined using the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, and the Phoenix definitions. RESULTS:Data from 279 patients who had undergone salvage cryoablation were entered. Average patient age was 70.0 +/- 7.1 years. Pretreatment prostate specific antigen was 7.6 +/- 8.2 ng/ml and Gleason score was 7.5 +/- 1.1 (median 7). Patients were followed for 21.6 +/- 24.9 months and 47 were followed longer than 5 years. The 5-year actuarial biochemical disease-free rates were 58.9% +/- 5.7% (American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) and 54.5% +/- 4.9% (Phoenix). As predicted based on the preservation of some prostatic tissue, 83% +/- 3.5% of patients had a detectable prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater at 5 years. Positive biopsies were observed in 15 of the 46 patients (32.6%) who underwent prostate biopsy after salvage cryotherapy. The incontinence rate (requiring pad use) was 4.4%. The rectal fistula rate was 1.2% and 3.2% of patients underwent transurethral prostate resection to remove sloughed tissue. CONCLUSIONS:Biochemical and local control rates support the use of salvage cryoablation for localized recurrence following failed radiation therapy. Efforts to continue to minimize these complications and to improve disease control in patients with persistent cancer following definitive radiotherapy should continue.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the relationship between the presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in retropubic radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens and cancer-specific outcomes, including pathological variables and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), as HGPIN shares many histopathological characteristics with prostate carcinoma and has been considered a precursor lesion to prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:The Columbia University Urologic Oncology Database was reviewed; 3460 patients were identified who underwent RP between 1988-2006, and 2133 with or without HGPIN and >12 months of follow-up were included in the analysis. Analysis of variance methods were used to evaluate the relationship between HGPIN and pathological stage, Gleason sum, perineural invasion, multifocality, extraprostatic extension, margin and nodal status. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model fitted for preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason sum and pathological stage were used to assess differences in bDFS. RESULTS:In all, 1885 (88.4%) patients had HGPIN in the RRP specimen and 248 (11.6%) had no HGPIN. There was no significant difference in the distribution of PSA level (P = 0.27), pathological stage (P = 0.18) or Gleason sum (P = 0.84) between patients with and with no HGPIN. The HGPIN-positive group had higher rates of perineural invasion (69.9 vs 57.5%; P = 0.003) and multifocality (63.0 vs 38.4%; P < 0.001). Patients with no HGPIN had a better bDFS, at 87.3% vs 81.0% at a median follow-up of 50 months, and 73.6% vs 67.0% at 9 years (P = 0.045). The risk of biochemical failure was 1.9 times greater in the HGPIN-positive group than the negative group (P = 0.006) when controlling for PSA level, pathological stage and Gleason sum. CONCLUSIONS:In addition to traditional pathological prognostic variables, the absence of HGPIN in RRP specimens, although found in a minority of patients, denotes a significantly lower rate of tumour multifocality, perineural invasion and ultimately biochemical recurrence.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Owing to the ability to better detect small-volume tumors, we have seen an increasing population of men with low-risk unifocal prostate cancer. We report our safety and efficacy experience of focal cryoablation of the prostate to maintain potency and preserve genitourinary function in men with localized, unifocal disease. METHODS:From June 2002 to December 2005, 25 patients with primary unifocal prostate cancer were treated with focal cryoablation of the prostate. The patients were followed up with physical examinations, morbidity questionnaires, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations every 3 months for the first year and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. Patients with a PSA nadir greater than 1.0 ng/mL or a nadir plus 2 ng/mL underwent repeat biopsy to assess for cancer recurrence. RESULTS:The median age was 68 years (range 48 to 78). The median preoperative PSA level was 6.0 ng/mL, and the postoperative PSA nadir was 2.4 ng/mL. The median follow-up was 28 months. Seventeen patients remained potent. No patients reported worsened lower urinary tract symptoms, incontinence, rectal pain, perineal discomfort, or fistula formation. The median PSA nadir was 2.4 ng/mL, and 40% of patients had a PSA nadir of less than 1.0 ng/mL. Of the 25 patients, 21 (84%) had not experienced biochemical failure, defined as a greater than 50% PSA nadir reduction. Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy, and prostate cancer was detected in the contralateral gland in 2 patients and in the area of previous cryosurgery in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS:Focal cryoablation of the prostate has exhibited minimal morbidity and promising efficacy in our 3-year observation. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine its role in the treatment of patients with low-risk unifocal prostate cancer.

Correlation between dietary intake and occurrence of prostate cancer has gained significant support in recent years. Although a direct correlation has yet to be proven between inflammation and prostate cancer, chronic or recurrent inflammation has been hypothesized to be the major predisposing factor for this disease. The authors have been studying Zyflamend, a novel herbal anti-inflammatory mixture, as a potential chemopreventive agent in a phase 1 trial for patients diagnosed with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. They report the results of the first patient who has completed the 18-month study in which 24 patients were assigned to a cohort and placed on successive herbal supplement regimen starting with Zyflamend alone.