Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:loebs01
Perspectives of Residency Applicants and Program Directors on the Role of Social Media in the 2021 Urology Residency Match
Heard, John R; Wyant, W Austin; Loeb, Stacy; Marcovich, Robert; Dubin, Justin M
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To perform a survey assessing the use of, attitudes towards, and perceived utility of social media (SoMe) in the 2021 urology residency match. METHODS:We distributed surveys to urology residency applicants and program directors (PDs) via the Urology Match 2021 Google Spreadsheet and email. The survey collected demographic information as well as SoMe activity, perceived pressure to use SoMe, match results, and attitudes regarding the utility of SoMe in the match process. RESULTS:A total of 108/528 (20%) applicants registered for the 2021 match and 61/142 (43%) PDs completed the survey. More applicants than PDs felt that SoMe helped them gain better insight into residency programs or applicants, respectively. Fewer applicants than PDs felt that SoMe activity provided a benefit to them in the match process. No significant relationship was found between SoMe viewing frequency, posting frequency, or tweetorial use with match outcomes. The majority of PDs believed that SoMe played a more important role in the 2021 match process than previous years while 15% and 12% reported that an applicant's SoMe activity helped or hurt the chances of matching to their program respectively. CONCLUSIONS:SoMe, particularly Twitter, was widely used in the 2021 match by both applicants and PDs. A majority of applicants and PDs believed that SoMe use aided them in some way in the match process, yet there was no relationship between the volume or type of applicant SoMe activity and match outcomes.
PMID: 34606880
ISSN: 1527-9995
CID: 5147102
EDITORIAL COMMENT [Comment]
Malik, Rena; Loeb, Stacy
PMID: 35027183
ISSN: 1527-9995
CID: 5119032
Helix: A Digital Tool to Address Provider Needs for Prostate Cancer Genetic Testing in Clinical Practice
Giri, Veda N; Walker, Alexander; Gross, Laura; Trabulsi, Edouard J; Lallas, Costas D; Kelly, William K; Gomella, Leonard G; Fischer, Corey; Loeb, Stacy
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer (PCA) germline testing (GT) is now standard-of-care for men with advanced PCA. Thousands of men may consider GT due to clinical and family history (FH) features. Identifying and consenting men for GT can be complex. Here we identified barriers and facilitators of GT across a spectrum of providers which informed the development of Helix - an educational and clinical/FH collection tool to facilitate GT in practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A 12-question survey assessing knowledge of genetics PCA risk and FH was administered December 2017 to March 2018 in the Philadelphia area and at the Mid-Atlantic AUA meeting (March 2018). Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and urologists across practice settings from March-October 2020 as part of a larger study based on the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework. Helix was then developed followed by user testing. RESULTS:Fifty-six providers (50% urologists) responded to the survey. Multiple FH and genetic knowledge gaps were identified: only 66% collected maternal FH and 43% correctly identified BRCA2 and association to aggressive PCA. Genetic counseling gaps included low rates of discussing genetic discrimination laws (45%). Provider interviews (n = 14) identified barriers to FH intake including access to details and time needed. In user testing (n = 10), providers found Helix helpful for FH collection. All providers found Helix easy to use, suggesting expanded clinical use. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Helix addressed multiple GT knowledge and practice gaps across a spectrum of providers. This tool will become publicly available soon to facilitate PCA GT in clinical practice.
PMID: 35012874
ISSN: 1938-0682
CID: 5118512
Genetic Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment
Jiang, Yu; Meyers, Travis J; Emeka, Adaeze A; Cooley, Lauren Folgosa; Cooper, Phillip R; Lancki, Nicola; Helenowski, Irene; Kachuri, Linda; Lin, Daniel W; Stanford, Janet L; Newcomb, Lisa F; Kolb, Suzanne; Finelli, Antonio; Fleshner, Neil E; Komisarenko, Maria; Eastham, James A; Ehdaie, Behfar; Benfante, Nicole; Logothetis, Christopher J; Gregg, Justin R; Perez, Cherie A; Garza, Sergio; Kim, Jeri; Marks, Leonard S; Delfin, Merdie; Barsa, Danielle; Vesprini, Danny; Klotz, Laurence H; Loblaw, Andrew; Mamedov, Alexandre; Goldenberg, S Larry; Higano, Celestia S; Spillane, Maria; Wu, Eugenia; Carter, H Ballentine; Pavlovich, Christian P; Mamawala, Mufaddal; Landis, Tricia; Carroll, Peter R; Chan, June M; Cooperberg, Matthew R; Cowan, Janet E; Morgan, Todd M; Siddiqui, Javed; Martin, Rabia; Klein, Eric A; Brittain, Karen; Gotwald, Paige; Barocas, Daniel A; Dallmer, Jeremiah R; Gordetsky, Jennifer B; Steele, Pam; Kundu, Shilajit D; Stockdale, Jazmine; Roobol, Monique J; Venderbos, Lionne D F; Sanda, Martin G; Arnold, Rebecca; Patil, Dattatraya; Evans, Christopher P; Dall'Era, Marc A; Vij, Anjali; Costello, Anthony J; Chow, Ken; Corcoran, Niall M; Rais-Bahrami, Soroush; Phares, Courtney; Scherr, Douglas S; Flynn, Thomas; Karnes, R Jeffrey; Koch, Michael; Dhondt, Courtney Rose; Nelson, Joel B; McBride, Dawn; Cookson, Michael S; Stratton, Kelly L; Farriester, Stephen; Hemken, Erin; Stadler, Walter M; Pera, Tuula; Banionyte, Deimante; Bianco, Fernando J; Lopez, Isabel H; Loeb, Stacy; Taneja, Samir S; Byrne, Nataliya; Amling, Christopher L; Martinez, Ann; Boileau, Luc; Gaylis, Franklin D; Petkewicz, Jacqueline; Kirwen, Nicholas; Helfand, Brian T; Xu, Jianfeng; Scholtens, Denise M; Catalona, William J; Witte, John S
Men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) are increasingly electing active surveillance (AS) as their initial management strategy. While this may reduce the side effects of treatment for prostate cancer, many men on AS eventually convert to active treatment. PC is one of the most heritable cancers, and genetic factors that predispose to aggressive tumors may help distinguish men who are more likely to discontinue AS. To investigate this, we undertook a multi-institutional genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 5,222 PC patients and 1,139 other patients from replication cohorts, all of whom initially elected AS and were followed over time for the potential outcome of conversion from AS to active treatment. In the GWAS we detected 18 variants associated with conversion, 15 of which were not previously associated with PC risk. With a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), we found two genes associated with conversion (MAST3, p = 6.9×10-7 and GAB2, p = 2.0×10-6). Moreover, increasing values of a previously validated 269-variant genetic risk score (GRS) for PC was positively associated with conversion (e.g., comparing the highest to the two middle deciles gave a hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]= 0.94-1.36); whereas, decreasing values of a 36-variant GRS for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were positively associated with conversion (e.g., comparing the lowest to the two middle deciles gave a HR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.50). These results suggest that germline genetics may help inform and individualize the decision of AS-or the intensity of monitoring on AS-versus treatment for the initial management of patients with low-risk PC.
PMCID:8725988
PMID: 34993496
ISSN: 2666-2477
CID: 5107432
Instagram and prostate cancer: using validated instruments to assess the quality of information on social media
Xu, Alex J; Myrie, Akya; Taylor, Jacob I; Matulewicz, Richard; Gao, Tian; Pérez-Rosas, Verónica; Mihalcea, Rada; Loeb, Stacy
BACKGROUND:The quality of prostate cancer (PCa) content on Instagram is unknown. METHODS:We examined 62 still-images and 64 video Instagram posts using #prostatecancer on 5/18/20. Results were assessed with validated tools. RESULTS:Most content focused on raising awareness or sharing patient stories (46%); only 9% was created by physicians. 90% of content was low-to-moderate quality and most was understandable, but actionability was 0%. Of the 30% of content including objective information, 40% contained significant misinformation. Most posts had comments offering social support. CONCLUSIONS:Instagram is a source of understandable PCa content and social support; however, information was poorly actionable and had some misinformation.
PMID: 34853412
ISSN: 1476-5608
CID: 5085402
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bass, E J; Pantovic, A; Connor, M J; Loeb, S; Rastinehad, A R; Winkler, M; Gabe, Rhian; Ahmed, H U
BACKGROUND:Multiparametric MRI localizes cancer in the prostate, allowing for MRI guided biopsy (MRI-GB) 43 alongside transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-GB). Three MRI-GB approaches exist; visual estimation (COG-TB); fusion software-assisted (FUS-TB) and MRI 'in-bore' biopsy (IB-TB). It is unknown whether any of these are superior. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to address three questions. First, whether MRI-GB is superior to TRUS-GB at detecting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Second, whether MRI-GB is superior to TRUS-GB at avoiding detection of insignificant PCa. Third, whether any MRI-GB strategy is superior at detecting csPCa. METHODS:A systematic literature review from 2015 to 2019 was performed in accordance with the START recommendations. Studies reporting PCa detection rates, employing MRI-GB and TRUS-GB were included and evaluated using the QUADAS-2 checklist. 1553 studies were found, of which 43 were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS:For csPCa, MRI-GB was superior in detection to TRUS-GB (0.83 vs. 0.63 [p = 0.02]). MRI-GB was superior in detection to TRUS-GB at avoiding detection of insignificant PCa. No MRI-GB technique was superior at detecting csPCa (IB-TB 0.87; COG TB 0.81; FUS-TB 0.81, [p = 0.55]). There was significant heterogeneity observed between the included studies. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with suspected PCa on MRI, MRI-GB offers superior rates of csPCa detection and reduces detection of insignificant PCa compared to TRUS-GB. No individual MRI-GB technique was found to be better in csPCa detection. Prospective adequately powered randomized controlled trials are required.
PMID: 34548624
ISSN: 1476-5608
CID: 5026852
Plant-Based Milk Alternatives and Risk Factors for Kidney Stones and Chronic Kidney Disease
Borin, James F; Knight, John; Holmes, Ross P; Joshi, Shivam; Goldfarb, David S; Loeb, Stacy
OBJECTIVE:Patients with kidney stones are counseled to eat a diet low in animal protein, sodium, and oxalate and rich in fruits and vegetables, with a modest amount of calcium, usually from dairy products. Restriction of sodium, potassium, and oxalate may also be recommended in patients with chronic kidney disease. Recently, plant-based diets have gained popularity owing to health, environmental, and animal welfare considerations. Our objective was to compare concentrations of ingredients important for kidney stones and chronic kidney disease in popular brands of milk alternatives. DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:Sodium, calcium, and potassium contents were obtained from nutrition labels. The oxalate content was measured by ion chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS:The calcium content is highest in macadamia followed by soy, almond, rice, and dairy milk; it is lowest in cashew, hazelnut, and coconut milk. Almond milk has the highest oxalate concentration, followed by cashew, hazelnut, and soy. Coconut and flax milk have undetectable oxalate levels; coconut milk also has comparatively low sodium, calcium, and potassium, while flax milk has the most sodium. Overall, oat milk has the most similar parameters to dairy milk (moderate calcium, potassium and sodium with low oxalate). Rice, macadamia, and soy milk also have similar parameters to dairy milk. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:As consumption of plant-based dairy substitutes increases, it is important for healthcare providers and patients with renal conditions to be aware of their nutritional composition. Oat, macadamia, rice, and soy milk compare favorably in terms of kidney stone risk factors with dairy milk, whereas almond and cashew milk have more potential stone risk factors. Coconut milk may be a favorable dairy substitute for patients with chronic kidney disease based on low potassium, sodium, and oxalate. Further study is warranted to determine the effect of plant-based milk alternatives on urine chemistry.
PMID: 34045136
ISSN: 1532-8503
CID: 4888282
Climate Change Impact of Virtual Urology Meetings [Letter]
Patel, Sunil H; Gallo, Kelsey; Becker, Russell; Borin, James; Loeb, Stacy
PMID: 33985798
ISSN: 1873-7560
CID: 5210712
A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Bhatt, Nikita R; Czarniecki, Stefan W; Borgmann, Hendrick; van Oort, Inge M; Esperto, Francesco; Pradere, Benjamin; van Gurp, Mark; Bloemberg, Jarka; Darraugh, J; Rouprêt, Morgan; Loeb, Stacy; N'Dow, James; Ribal, Maria J; Giannarini, Gianluca
CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Clinical practice guideline (CPG) uptake does not occur spontaneously and requires active implementation, especially for long-term implementation. Social media (SoMe) with its power of rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field can open up unprecedented opportunities for CPG dissemination. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this review was to assess the current use of SoMe in CPG dissemination across different medical specialties. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION/METHODS:A systematic review (SR) of the literature was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the general platform Google were searched for all relevant publications (no limitation for publication time and no language restrictions). The search revealed 1881 citations; following title and abstract review, 22 studies were identified; and five studies were finally included after full-text review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:All included studies were published in the past 5 yr; there was a significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior toward CPGs with the use of SoMe dissemination compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process of CPG dissemination, and expressed an intent to engage in this method in the future. The studies included in the SR reported variable methods of SoMe use and similarly variable methods of analyzing the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Owing to the recent application of SoMe in the context of CPG dissemination, there is no standardized format for its use, and the data available are variable and limited. However, encouraging preliminary results have been reported using SoMe for CPG dissemination in multiple fields, and we have provided a pragmatic method of SoMe usage in CPG dissemination based on the review. It is vital to ensure a uniform method of application and assessment of SoMe use in CPG dissemination and implementation going forward. PATIENT SUMMARY/RESULTS:Social media (SoMe) plays an important role in rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field, and its power can be harnessed in the dissemination of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that guide clinicians in practice. Our review reveals that SoMe use for CPG dissemination is a relatively new concept published approximately 5 yr ago, and it has led to significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior with respect to the CPGs compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process. We have produced a pragmatic method of using SoMe in CPG dissemination. Considering the importance of CPGs in practice and the ever increasing role of SoMe in the medical profession, a new role for SoMe in CPG dissemination could be established.
PMID: 33172773
ISSN: 2405-4569
CID: 5209492
Androgen deprivation therapy and excess mortality in men with prostate cancer during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic
Gedeborg, Rolf; Styrke, Johan; Loeb, Stacy; Garmo, Hans; Stattin, Pär
BACKGROUND:Men have a higher risk of death from COVID-19 than women and androgens facilitate entrance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into respiratory epithelial cells. Thus, androgen deprivation therapy may reduce infection rates and improve outcomes for COVID-19. In the spring of 2020, Sweden was highly affected by COVID-19. The aim was to estimate the impact of androgen deprivation therapy on mortality from COVID-19 in men with prevalent prostate cancer by comparing all-cause mortality in the spring of 2020 to that in previous years. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Using the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden all men with prostate cancer on March 1 each year in 2015-2020 were followed until June 30 the same year. Exposure to androgen deprivation therapy was ascertained from filled prescriptions for bicalutamide monotherapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH), or bilateral orchidectomy. RESULTS:A total of 9,822 men died in March-June in the years 2015-2020, of whom 5,034 men were on androgen deprivation therapy. There was an excess mortality in 2020 vs previous years in all men. The crude relative mortality rate ratio for 2020 vs 2015-2019 was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.04) in men on GnRH, and 0.90 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.05) in men on bicalutamide monotherapy. After multivariable adjustment these ratios were attenuated to 1.00 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.12), respectively. When restricting the analysis to the regions with the highest incidence of COVID-19 or to the time period between 2 April to 10 June when mortality in 2020 was increased >30% compared to previous years, the results were similar to the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS:In this large national population-based cohort of men with prevalent prostate cancer, there was no clear evidence in support for an effect of androgen deprivation therapy on COVID-19 mortality.
PMCID:8496782
PMID: 34618806
ISSN: 1932-6203
CID: 5125312