Faculty Bibliography

Lung nodules are detected very commonly on computed tomographic (CT) scans of the chest, and the ability to detect very small nodules improves with each new generation of CT scanner. In reported studies, up to 51% of smokers aged 50 years or older have pulmonary nodules on CT scans. However, the existing guidelines for follow-up and management of noncalcified nodules detected on nonscreening CT scans were developed before widespread use of multi-detector row CT and still indicate that every indeterminate nodule should be followed with serial CT for a minimum of 2 years. This policy, which requires large numbers of studies to be performed at considerable expense and with substantial radiation exposure for the affected population, has not proved to be beneficial or cost-effective. During the past 5 years, new information regarding prevalence, biologic characteristics, and growth rates of small lung cancers has become available; thus, the authors believe that the time-honored requirement to follow every small indeterminate nodule with serial CT should be revised. In this statement, which has been approved by the Fleischner Society, the pertinent data are reviewed, the authors' conclusions are summarized, and new guidelines are proposed for follow-up and management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans

Early detection of lung nodules is an important clinical indication for obtaining routine CT studies of the thorax. To date, research has focused on the sensitivity of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) compared with expert chest radiologists typically using data obtained from single detector CT scanners. The present study focuses on the use of CAD as a second reader supplementing four nonexpert "community level" radiologists using state-of-the-art multidetector high resolution data sets. Evaluations of 18 cases with a total of 87 nodules (average 4.8 per case) were subsequently validated by a panel of two expert dedicated chest radiologists. Only 21% of nodules were identified by all four readers; 17% were identified only by CAD. The mean sensitivity of readers before CAD was 49% while following CAD this improved to 72% (p<0.001). When analyzed by individual lobes, the percentage of these in which nodules could be identified increased from 36% prior to CAD to 44% following CAD (p<0.001). These data support the use of CAD as a second reader specifically for nonexpert radiologists in general clinical practice. (C) 2004 CARS and Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Computed tomography scans are commonly used in imaging lung diseases. As more information accumulates, patterns of rare or new diseases on CT scans are being increasingly reported. Several pulmonary diseases have distinguishing features, which are better delineated on high resolution CT scans than plain chest radiographs. The radiographic features of unusual diffuse lung diseases published in the past two years are described. RECENT FINDINGS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome generally manifests as focal or diffuse bilateral areas of consolidation on chest radiography and reticulation with ground-glass attenuation commonly seen on CT scans. A normal HRCT rules out the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia while a normal chest radiograph does not. Immunocompromised patients without AIDS, who have CMV pneumonia, generally demonstrate a combination of ground-glass attenuation, air-space consolidation, and small nodules on HRCT. Nodules less than 10 mm in size in immunocompromised patients are highly suggestive of viral infections. Bronchial wall thickening on HRCT associated with cavitating nodules is suggestive of Wegner granulomatosis in the appropriate clinical setting. Small cysts may be seen in a minority of patients with subacute hypersensitivity pneumonitis and centrilobular emphysema in chronic farmer's lung. Reversed halo sign has a high specificity for cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. The triad of ground-glass opacities, ill-defined centrilobular nodules and cysts and focal areas of air trapping is highly suggestive of subacute hypersensitivity pneumonitis. SUMMARY: Familiarizing with radiographic and CT scan patterns may help the clinician to exclude certain diagnoses and narrow the differential diagnosis for others

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic performance of a regimen of CT screening for lung cancer. METHODS: Using a common protocol/regimen of screening, 2968 asymptomatic persons at high risk for lung cancer were enrolled in two studies [Early Lung Cancer Action Projects (ELCAP) I and II] for baseline and annual repeat screening. A total of 4538 annual repeat screenings were performed. The regimen's diagnostic performance was characterized in terms of frequency of positive result of the initial CT as well as of screen-diagnosis and Stage I screen-diagnosis among all diagnoses (interim-diagnoses included), all separately for baseline and annual repeat screenings. RESULTS: The proportions with positive result of the initial CT were 12% and 6% in the baseline and repeat screenings, respectively. The proportions of screen-diagnoses among all diagnoses (interim-diagnoses included) were 97% and 99% in the baseline and repeat cycles, respectively. The corresponding proportions of pre-surgical Stage I screen-diagnoses were 95% and 93%. CONCLUSION: The performance of the ELCAP regimen is quite satisfactory in avoiding over many positive results of the initial CT, and it produces highly promising diagnostic results as for the attainment of cure by early intervention

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency with which a particular, possibly optimal work-up of noncalcified nodules less than 5.0 mm in diameter identified on initial computed tomographic (CT) images at baseline screening leads to a diagnosis of malignancy prior to first annual repeat screening, compared with a possibly optimal work-up of larger nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two series of baseline CT screenings in high-risk people were retrospectively reviewed. The first series (n = 1,000) was performed in 1993-1998; the second (n = 1,897), in 1999-2002. In each series, cases in which the largest noncalcified nodule detected was less than 5.0 mm in diameter and those in which it was 5.0-9 mm were reviewed to determine whether diagnostic work-up prior to first annual repeat screening showed or would have shown nodule growth and led or would have led to a diagnosis based on biopsy or surgical specimens. RESULTS: The frequency with which malignancy was or could have been diagnosed when the largest noncalcified nodule was less than 5.0 mm in diameter was 0 of 378, whereas when the largest noncalcified nodule was 5.0-9 mm in diameter, the frequency was 13 or 14 of 238. If persons with only nodules smaller than 5.0 mm had merely been referred for first annual repeat screening without immediate further work-up, the referrals for such work-up would have been reduced by 54% (from 817 [28%] to 385 [13%] of 2,897). CONCLUSION: In modern CT screening for lung cancer at baseline, detected noncalcified nodules smaller than 5.0 mm in diameter do not justify immediate work-up but only annual repeat screening to determine whether interim growth has occurred

Air trapping is a prominent finding in small airway disease (SAD) of the lungs. To investigate the feasibility of accurate, automated assessment of air-trapping from low-dose CT, we compare visual scoring by expert radiologists to a conventional method of automated assessment as well as two novel methods. The conventional method, the "density mask" method, has been reported to correlate weakly but significantly with visual scoring on normal-dose CT. While we were unable to reproduce these results on our low-dose scans, our two novel methods showed some promise. More study on larger data sets is required to determine the optimal analysis method.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of using a lossy Joint Photographic Experts Group standard for wavelet image compression, JPEG2000, on pulmonary nodule detection at low-dose computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sets of lung CT data ('cases') were compressed to 30:1, 20:1, and 10:1 levels by using a wavelet-based JPEG2000 method, resulting in 400 test cases. Each case consisted of nine 1.25-mm sections that had been obtained with 20-40 mAs. Four thoracic radiologists independently interpreted the test case images. Performance was measured by using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Az) and conventional sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: There were 51 cases with and 49 without lung nodules. Az values were 0.984, 0.988, 0.972, 0.921, respectively, for original and 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 compressed images. Az values decreased significantly at 30:1 (P =.014) but not at 10:1 compression, with a trend toward significant decrease at 20:1 (P =.051). Specificity values were unaffected by compression (>98.0% at all compression levels). Sensitivity values were 86.3% (176 of 204 test cases with nodules), 77.9% (159 of 204 cases), 76.5% (156 of 204 cases), and 70.1% (143 of 204 cases), respectively, for original and 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 compressed images. Results of logistic regression model analysis confirmed the significant effects of compression rate and nodule attenuation, size, and location on sensitivity (P <.05). CONCLUSION: While no reduction in nodule detection at 10:1 compression levels was demonstrated by using ROC analysis, a significant decrease in sensitivity was identified. Further investigation is needed before widespread use of image compression technology in low-dose chest CT can be recommended

The ability to identify and characterize pulmonary nodules has been dramatically increased by the introduction of multislice CT (MSCT) technology. Using high-resolution sections, MSCT allows considerable improvement in assessing nodule morphology, enhancement patterns, and growth. MSCT also has facilitated the development and potential of clinical application of computer-assisted diagnosis

Air trapping is a prominent finding in small airway disease (SAD)of the lungs. To investigate the feasibility of accurate, automated assessment of air-trapping from low-dose CT, we compare visual scoring by expert radiologists to a conventional method of automated assessment as well as two novel methods. The conventional method,the markdensity maskmark method, has been reported to correlateweakly but significantly with visual scoring on normal-dose CT.While we were unable to reproduce these results on our low-dose scans, our two novel methods showed some promise. More study on larger data sets is required to determine the optimal analysis method.